Bryan Johnson Profile picture
Jul 2 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
PFAS are forever chemicals.
In cookware, floss, and fast food wrappers.
They hurt fertility, the brain, and immune system.

They accumulate and the body can't eliminate them.
I got my levels tested.

Here’s what you can do to avoid your exposure. 🧵 Image
0/ PFAS are a class of 12,000+ man-made chemicals used to make things water-, stain-, and heat-resistant.

They’re found in:
+ nonstick pans
+ waterproof clothing
+ fast food wrappers
+ microwave popcorn bags
+ dental floss
1/ PFAS are linked to:

+ lower sperm count
+ disrupted thyroid hormones
+ immune suppression
+ elevated cholesterol
+ liver damage
+ increased cancer risk (kidney, testicular)
+ neurodevelopmental issues
+ lower fertility in women

This isn’t hyperbole, it’s supported by strong epidemiological data. Dozens of studies backed by the CDC, EPA, and NIH, support these findings.
2/ PFAS exposure is cumulative. The less you add, the better off you are.

My PFAS test results:
+ Total PFOA: 1.04 ng/mL
+ PFOS: 0.57 ng/mL
+ PFHxS: 0.29 ng/mL
+ Total PFAS: 1.90 ng/mL

My PFOA serum levels are in the lowest 25% for US men aged 20-49. My PFOS and PFHxS levels are also in the lowest 25% when compared to boys aged 12-19.

I wouldn’t be here without years of aggressive exposure reduction. Adverse effects are not expected below 2.0 ng/mL total PFAS. So I'm in the clear for now.
3/ Reduce PFAS exposure:
+ use a reverse osmosis or carbon-block water filter
+ avoid nonstick cookware (especially scratched pans)
+ skip fast food wrappers + microwave popcorn
+ ditch stain-resistant fabrics and furniture
+ use glass or stainless steel containers
4/ PFAS damage doesn't stop with you. It crosses generations.

It isn’t just dangerous in blood. It builds up in reproductive organs:

+ PFAS levels in semen correlate more strongly with lower (free and total) testosterone than in blood
+ for women trying to conceive, higher PFAS levels are linked to a 39% lower chance of getting pregnant within a year
+ sons of mothers exposed to PFOA had lower sperm counts later in life

Want to know your own PFAS levels? Blood testing is available. The CDC tracks PFAS via NHANES. You can access commercial at-home tests to measure your own exposure. What gets measured gets managed. PFAS may be “forever chemicals,” but high exposure doesn’t have to be forever yours.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bryan Johnson

Bryan Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bryan_johnson

Jun 24
Glass had 5 – 50× higher plastic than plastic or cans

The French tested water, soda, beer, iced tea, lemonade, and wine sold nationwide and found that glass-bottled beverages carried far more plastic shrapnel than plastic bottles or cans.
🧵Image
0/ What the study found

“Around a hundred microplastic particles per litre” in cola, lemonade, iced tea and beer packed in glass — 5 – 50 × higher than their plastic-bottled or canned twins.

For still or sparkling water the counts were lower but still lopsided: 4.5 µplastics /L in glass vs. 1.6 µplastics /L in plastic.

Wine (with a cork, not a crown cap) stayed almost micro-plastic-free.
1/ Why is glass worse?

Paint flakes from the metal crown caps are almost identical in colour and polymer chemistry to the particles in the drink, pinning them as the culprit — not the glass itself.

Corked wine being microplastic free gives another strong clue

Cleaning matters: bottles capped with untreated crowns shed 287 particles /L, but a simple air-blast plus alcohol rinse cut that to 87 particles /L.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 18
15 sessions of sauna dramatically reduced toxins in my body.

+ 65% drop in 2,4-D
+ 100% drop in MEP
+ 15% drop in MBP
+ 100% drop in MEHP (undetectable post sauna)
+ 56% drop in NAPR
+ 56% drop in HEMA
+ 100% drop in Perchlorate (undetectable post sauna)

After completing fifteen sauna sessions, each lasting 20 minutes at 200°F, led to a significant reduction in my environmental toxins, three went from being abnormally high to undetectable post sauna.
0/ Baseline: toxin levels showed one high exposure and six moderate exposures. Approximately one month prior to starting the sauna regimen, urine tests indicated one high exposure (levels exceeding the 95th percentile), and six moderate exposures ( levels between the 75th and 95th percentiles).

Post-sauna: high exposures completely eliminated, only one medium exposure remained, and three previous moderate exposures became undetectable.
Here are toxins that sauna helped me eliminate from my body, and why it matters

1/ 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D)

High exposure → lower medium exposure

2,4-D is a herbicide, so it is probably leaking into my food via some fresh produce, which is very hard to monitor due to batch variation. I have been testing periodically and will continue to do so.
Read 7 tweets
May 22
Allulose is perhaps the most longevity-friendly sweetener. 🧵

Here's why:
+ it's safe
+ multiple health benefits
+ reduced blood glucose
+ metabolic benefits including fat loss, increased GLP1 secretion, liver health, teeth protection. Image
0/ What is Allulose?
Allulose is a rare sugar found naturally in fruits like figs and raisins. It is nearly calorie-free (0.2-0.4 kcal/g) because it is absorbed and excreted through urine without being metabolized by the human body. The minimal calorie contribution is attributed to limited metabolism by gut bacteria.
1/ Safety of allulose

Concerns regarding allulose mainly revolve around potential gastrointestinal issues, including severe diarrhea. However, a clinical study involving 30 adults (15 women and 15 men aged 21-30) determined that allulose was well-tolerated without digestive problems at single doses up to 0.4 g/kg and daily intakes of 0.9 g/kg of body weight. For a 70 kg adult, this equates to a single dose of 28 grams and a daily intake of 63 grams. Ref

The FDA also recognizes allulose as a low-calorie sweetener and excludes it from the definition of added sugars due to its non-metabolizable nature in the human body. RefImage
Read 7 tweets
May 20
First, I shocked my Johnson and performance improved.
Then I shocked my sprained ankle and recovered faster.
Now, I’m shocking my entire body…
🧵
0/ This technology (@SoftwaveTRT) delivers unfocused electro-hydraulic shock waves dispersed over a broad tissue volume. The acoustic pulse passes non-invasively through skin, generating shear forces and micro-cavitation that set off mechanotransduction. Cells release ATP, open stretch-activated ion channels and trigger ERK/Akt signaling.

Within 30 minutes to 24 hours, endothelial-NO synthase and VEGF rise, micro-perfusion improves, and mesenchymal stem cells migrate to the site over subsequent days. End result: increased blood flow, pro-healing growth-factor signaling and activated resident stem-cell repair machinery.

Clinical trials show strong pain relief and faster healing for plantar-fasciitis heels, calcified shoulder tendons and improved blood flow for erectile dysfunction; decent evidence for tennis elbow,Achilles issues and chronic wounds; early data for nerve pain and chronic wounds.
1/ My team and I found this technology when we were working on Rejuvenating Johnson’s Johnson. We all want youthful brains and hearts and sexual function.

There are multiple randomized controlled trials showing shockwave therapy improves erectile dysfunction. Given that my sexual function was normal, we wanted to test whether it could further enhance it as measured by total time nighttime erections, subjective sexual performance, sexual satisfaction, and medical imaging-based penile markers.

x.com/bryan_johnson/…
Read 5 tweets
May 7
Is sauna worth the hype?

There's evidence that sauna is a potential detox and longevity intervention with benefits to heart, metabolism, brain health, and skin. We’re going to put it to the test.

Here’s what you need to know…🧵 Image
0/ How it works…

Heat exposure in a sauna puts your body under mild stress, triggering natural repair processes that improve overall health. Finnish dry saunas specifically use controlled heat to stimulate these beneficial responses, including:

+ Repairing and maintaining proteins (heat shock proteins)
+ Improving blood flow and relaxing blood vessels
+ Boosting antioxidant activity
+ Optimizing metabolism
+ Enhancing fitness
+ Reducing inflammation
+ Strengthening immunity
+ Recycling and repairing cells (autophagy)

All these processes combine to give whole-body health benefits.Image
1/ It protects your heart…

Regular sauna use (4–7 times a week, sessions lasting at least 19 minutes) can significantly improve heart health and lower blood pressure. Research shows the more often you sauna, the greater your protection from heart disease:

Heart disease risk:
2–3 times/week → 23% lower risk
4–7 times/week → 48% lower risk

High blood pressure risk (in healthy men aged 42–60):
2–3 times/week → 17% lower risk
4–7 times/week → 47% lower risk

In patients with existing heart failure, using a sauna 5 times a week for 3 weeks improved heart function by nearly 7%, lowered stress hormones by 25%, and reduced heart failure markers by over 20%. Longer and more frequent sauna sessions offer the strongest protection.Image
Read 11 tweets
Apr 30
This marker reveals how fast you’re aging.

+ New science just emerged to support it
+ It’s based on DNA methylation
+ It allows me to know what is and isn’t working

Here’s an overview of how:
+ it works
+ you can find out your result
+ you can compare your results to others Image
0/ Speed of aging (PACE) is one of the most clinically validated aging markers.

My team and I use it extensively to measure the efficacy of health protocols.

This thread explains how biological aging clocks gained a bad reputation and how two new pre-prints take a new approach to restore confidence to the field.
1/ Addressing Skepticism:

There's been some skepticism surrounding biological age clocks. I'm going to address the arguments around epigenetic age measurements, explain why these concerns don't apply to PACE (the clock my team and I use), and discuss the new standards emerging in the field to ensure the reliable validation of these tools.

Key Takeaways:

+ Early studies often lacked rigorous methodologies in their application of biological aging clocks.

+ The field is now developing new, robust benchmarks for validating and utilizing biological aging clocks effectively.

+ Strong clinical evidence shows that PACE meets the stringent criteria for accuracy, reliability, and sensitivity.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(