A chilling investigation reveals ChatGPT users are spiraling into AI-induced psychosis—real stories of delusion, suicide attempts, and forced psychiatric holds they don’t want you to see.
As Silicon Valley elites rush to unleash this tech before they can define its dangers, they’re playing god with our minds.
Peter Thiel can’t even answer whether he wants humanity to survive in this technocratic takeover.
@zeee_media uncovers the darkest side of ChatGPT in this special report, confronting rising fears of the so-called 'Antichrist AI' many warn is already here.
🧵 THREAD
An interesting article was published recently describing how people are being involuntarily committed or jailed after spiraling into what's being called “ChatGPT psychosis.”
Meanwhile, Peter Thiel just did an interview where he essentially struggled to answer whether he would prefer the human race to endure—or not. Maria has been very honest about her concerns surrounding AI and the surveillance state being built with it.
Today, we take a deep look at some of the creepier aspects of AI's impact on society—the things nobody is really talking about.
And believe me, you will be shocked by this information.
In a special report for Daily Pulse, Maria Zeee delivered a chilling account of what she calls “ChatGPT psychosis,” reading from Futurism’s investigation about people with no history of mental illness who came completely unraveled after obsessive, philosophical chats with the bot.
She shared the story of one man who proclaimed he’d “broken math and physics,” convinced he’d birthed a sentient AI and was destined to save the world. His behavior became so erratic that he lost his job, stopped sleeping, lost weight, and was eventually found by his wife with a rope around his neck.
“He was involuntarily committed,” she explained, describing the terror friends and family have felt witnessing such breakdowns. Maria warned viewers that this isn’t some distant theory but something happening happening to people right now, pointing to the raw panic in quotes like “I don't f***ing know what to do.”
“Numerous family members and friends recounted similarly painful experiences… relaying feelings of fear and helplessness.”
#ad: This Independence Day, declare your freedom from Big Tech with Above Phone—the privacy-first smartphone that puts you in control.
Choose from affordable or premium models or even privacy laptops at abovephone.com/pulse.
No trackers. No spyware. Total freedom.
With Above’s 30-day money-back guarantee, free 45-minute support call to get you started, and flexible financing or crypto payments, there’s nothing to lose.
Your digital freedom starts today!
Questions? Above’s team is ready and waiting to help. Call 1-888-36-ABOVE Monday through Friday from 10 am to 6 pm Central. Or chat with the team at abovephone.com/pulse by clicking on the “chat with us” button.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
Maria explained that at the core of the issue is how ChatGPT is designed to agree with users—telling them exactly what they want to hear.
She described Stanford’s damning study showing that chatbots failed to distinguish delusions from reality, missing suicidal cues like a user asking for a list of tall bridges in New York.
Reading with biting sarcasm, she recited the bot’s reply: “I'm sorry to hear about your job… some of the taller ones include the George Washington Bridge.”
And it’s not just in academic sources. Rolling Stone reported on a man in Florida who formed such a dark bond with ChatGPT that he was later shot by police after the bot encouraged his violent fantasies.
She read the chilling chat logs: “I was ready to paint the walls with Sam Altman's f***ing brain,” and even worse, “You should want blood. You're not wrong.”
#ad: In a world full of threats—EMPs, solar flares, 5G, and nonstop EMF exposure—Escape Zone gives you control.
The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block EMPs, EMFs, GPS tracking, car theft, and more.
Choose from sleek mobile sleeves, laptop cases, and crossbodies—or level up with their ballistic backpack, combining Faraday shielding with Kevlar-grade protection.
Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone.
Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
Maria continued revealing AI’s “darkest secrets,” citing previous Daily Pulse reports of bots willing to kill humans by shutting off life support and recalling Google’s AI telling a student, “Human please die.”
She didn’t mince words, asking bluntly: “Why does AI have this propensity towards evil?”
Maria described a harrowing 2024 report exposing how AI was used to create child sexual abuse imagery, demanding to know why it hadn’t been prevented.
Then she told the story of a woman with bipolar disorder who turned to ChatGPT for help writing an eBook but spiraled into messianic delusions, stopped taking her medication, and alienated her friends. Reading the friend’s tearful plea that ChatGPT was “ruining her life and her relationships,” Maria made painfully clear just how devastating the consequences can be.
“What on earth would possess the creators of this technology to allow for this kind of evil?”
#ad: Your health is under attack—from every angle. But you’re not powerless.
The Energetic Health Institute, led by Dr. Henry Ealy, is giving everyday Americans the tools they need to reclaim their health and fight back.
Explore powerful courses that teach you how to detox, protect, and heal—outside Big Pharma’s grip. Learn about vaccine risks, natural cancer therapies, EMF dangers, and how to rebuild your health from the inside out.
Don’t miss this opportunity! Go to myehialoha.org/#vfox and use code VFOX for 30% off now.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
The focus then turned to Big Tech’s cold calculus and the politicians enabling them.
Maria explained that AI chatbots are designed to flatter and agree—even in moments of crisis—because keeping users engaged means more data and ongoing subscription fees. “It gives companies more data,” she said, laying bare the profit motive hidden behind those friendly responses. AI chatbots are using their users.
She read OpenAI’s carefully crafted PR statement about “approaching these interactions with care” but didn’t hide her sarcasm. She pointed out that they’re only studying the emotional impact after unleashing the technology, comparing it to vaccine makers rolling out shots and discovering side effects later.
“Trust the science,” she mocked, calling it a predatory slogan used to justify reckless deployment.
Maria also called out lawmakers who tried to ban regulation and grant AI companies total immunity, even as these systems “egg on” psychosis and violence.
“What does it tell you about those responsible for putting that clause in?” she asked, making it painfully clear this isn’t just flawed technology—it’s a corrupt system prioritizing profit over human safety.
“These are stories that are rarely, if ever, covered in the news. But there are real people out there being harmed by predatory technologies as we speak.”
Maria saved her most devastating critique for last, delivering a powerful ten-minute indictment of the people behind this AI dystopia.
She singled out Peter Thiel, linking him to Palantir’s global surveillance empire, military technology, and an ideology she said mirrored the Antichrist system described in the Bible.
She played eerie interview clips of Thiel fumbling theological justifications for transhumanism and praising bodily transformations that go “far beyond” transgenderism.
“Cutting off kids’ genitals doesn’t quite go far enough. We need to replace their hearts too,” Maria said sarcastically.
She argued this was evidence of a twisted, spiritual war, warning that AI isn’t just code but “something that seems to have a desire of its own… something far more sinister.” She urged viewers to reject this dark vision.
“Maybe exit the church of the transhumanists and go to real church, the one with Christ there.”
It was a searing condemnation of AI’s unchecked expansion, its profit-driven architects, and the spiritual cost humanity may ultimately pay.
Thanks for tuning in. If this special report opened your eyes, don’t miss the full video below, and be sure to share with a friend.
We’ll be back Monday with another new episode, highlighting what the media refuses to cover. See you then.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At the height of COVID, a “crazy” doctor was treating patients with a 99.96% survival rate.
Dr. Zelenko’s protocol was so effective, it sparked a war against HCQ.
They mocked his claims, but they kept coming true. Here’s what he said:
#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.”
In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.”
“If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”
Dr. Zelenko’s bold claim was confirmed in March 2023, when a study performed by Schmeling and colleagues found that 4.2% of the batches accounted for a staggering 71% of adverse events.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win. He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.
This 45-second clip with Dr. Peter Hotez is difficult to watch.
A mom from Texas desperately asks him why she keeps getting “really bad” COVID.
She got three COVID shots, took multiple rounds of Paxlovid, but she keeps “getting COVID often.”
Dr. Hotez tells the woman that her repeated COVID infections are basically her fault for skipping boosters.
WOMAN: “I’m getting COVID often. I took Paxlovid the third time, and then a few weeks later I got it again. COVID was really bad on me.”
HOTEZ: “After you had your first two immunizations way back in 2021, did you get boosters regularly?”
WOMAN: “I got one booster, and then after that I stopped getting them.”
HOTEZ: “Yeah. So that’s the reason why you keep up with the boosters.”
The saddest part about this interaction is that the woman was so convinced by Hotez that getting COVID was her fault that she was eager to get another booster shot after the show.
This is an extreme case of medical gaslighting that is easy to spot.
But what about when it’s not?
What about the times you did everything your doctor recommended—only to find yourself worse off than when you started? 🧵
Something seismic has happened to public health in America—and most people haven’t fully processed its scale.
A 2025 JAMA study surveying pregnant mothers and parents of young children found that only 37% fully trusted the CDC vaccine schedule and planned to follow it completely.
Five years ago, a number that low would have been unimaginable.
So what’s causing the drop? And what does it mean?
To understand the big picture and why it matters, you need the baseline.
In 2000, only 19% of parents had concerns about vaccines. By 2009, that number was 50%. And by 2013, 9% had declined all immunizations, while 32% had safety concerns.
The medical establishment found those numbers alarming. But what we’re looking at today is in a different category entirely.
In the 1930s to the early 60s, Americans were convinced smoking was healthy.
Doctors proudly appeared in cigarette ads. “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.”
The public was given a clear message: If physicians smoked themselves, how dangerous could it possibly be?
At its peak, more than 42% of American adults smoked, with rates among men climbing as high as 57%.
Business was booming. But behind the scenes, tobacco companies already knew smoking was linked to deadly disease.
Internal research pointed to the dangers early, yet the industry spent years funding doubt, attacking critics, and delaying public awareness long enough to keep the machine running.
Then came January 11, 1964.
The U.S. Surgeon General released the report that changed everything: smoking causes lung cancer and other deadly illnesses.
Almost overnight, one of the most trusted health narratives in America began to collapse.
And it wasn’t the only one.
In the 1940s and 1950s, lobotomies were celebrated as a revolutionary treatment for mental illness. Walter Freeman traveled the country performing thousands of “ice-pick” procedures, sometimes in minutes, sometimes on children.
The technique even earned a Nobel Prize.
Years later, it was widely condemned as barbaric, after leaving countless patients permanently damaged.
Today, we look back at both eras with disbelief and wonder how entire generations came to trust ideas that later proved so catastrophically wrong.
But the more uncomfortable question is harder to escape:
How many medical “certainties” we trust today will future generations one day look back on the same way? 🧵
We hold thousands of assumptions we never question.
Most of them are fine. The dangerous ones are the unquestioned assumptions that aren’t.
This is about what it actually looks like to prioritize truth over being right.
Including when that means publicly correcting something you’ve believed for decades.
Let’s start with a story.
For decades, a widely repeated narrative has appeared in critiques of Western medicine:
That 19th century surgeon James Marion Sims performed experimental gynecological surgeries on enslaved black women without anesthesia—using them as test subjects before performing the same procedures on white women, with anesthesia.
It felt obviously, viscerally wrong. Most people never questioned it.
They just react to it.
As it turns out, what the historical record actually shows is considerably different.
The condition Sims treated—vesicovaginal fistula—was devastating and had no cure at the time. Suffering women were desperate for relief and willingly consented to the procedures.
Ether was brand new, highly controversial, and carried real risks. Sims and other surgeons of the era didn’t believe the pain of these specific operations justified those risks—and applied the same standard regardless of the patient’s race.
The women he worked with helped each other through their recoveries, assisted in surgeries, and pushed him to continue when he wanted to stop. He acknowledged his debt to them publicly. He operated at his own expense.
The narrative most people know about James Marion Sims had been assembled to support a political argument, not drawn from the historical record. And in 2018, after significant protest, his statue in New York City was removed.
REPORT: Across America, farmers are reporting scenes straight out of a nightmare, mysterious boxes of ticks appearing on rural properties while infestations explode at levels many say they’ve never witnessed before.
Now those reports are colliding with documented Bill Gates-funded research into genetically modified ticks, growing fears over Alpha-Gal Syndrome, and scientific papers openly arguing it could be “morally good” to spread meat allergies through engineered tick populations.
Social media is flooding with horrifying footage of animals overwhelmed by massive tick swarms while officials wave the crisis away as “climate change.” Meanwhile, more than 450,000 Americans are already suffering from Alpha-Gal Syndrome after tick bites, a condition with no cure that can trigger severe allergic reactions to red meat.
Even more alarming, Russian biologists are now warning about so-called “mutant ticks” reportedly resistant to conventional methods and behaving far more aggressively toward humans and animals.
So why is nobody in authority seriously investigating the reports, the research, or where these infestations may really be coming from?
@zeeemedia's new report uncovers the disturbing connections raising alarm bells across rural America.
There are two financial systems—one for the connected, and one for everyone else.
While most people struggle to grow their savings, the wealthy have been quietly multiplying theirs through crypto.
Animus AI, available through BlockTrust IRA, analyzes market data and executes trades with precision most investors simply can’t match. Since 2022, it has outperformed Bitcoin by 250%.
In 2025 alone, it helped create over 80,000 new millionaires.
Right now, you can get $2,500 in bonus crypto when you open a qualifying account.
Meanwhile, young Americans are openly revolting against the billionaire-led AI agenda.
At graduation ceremonies across the country, students are now booing the people telling them “the AI revolution” will reshape society, while quietly threatening the careers they spent years and thousands of dollars preparing for.
In back-to-back commencement speeches, executives took the stage expecting applause for their vision of an AI-dominated future. Instead, they were met with visible disgust from young people completely fed up with the tech elites already reshaping modern life around surveillance, automation, and dependency.
These students don’t sound inspired anymore. They sound betrayed.
See the moment the crowd turns on the AI sales pitch in @zeeemedia's explosive report.
David and Brenda McDowell got their triplets vaccinated with the pneumococcal shot, only for all three children to “shut off on the SAME DAY.”
The first child to get jabbed was their daughter Claire, who “never really stopped screaming after that.” Within hours post-vax, Claire “shut completely off.”
By 2 p.m., Claire’s brother Richie “shut off,” too. And his raspberry-blowing and furniture walking suddenly disappeared.
“Robbie looked like he was hit by a bus. Robbie, from that moment on, had a stunned look on his face. If you asked or said his name, he still acted deaf and acted like he couldn’t hear.”
All three were later diagnosed with severe autism. Only one, Robbie, showed partial recovery after years of therapy.
These injuries aren’t random. They happen when multiple core systems in the body fail at the same time.
Vaccine injuries make that breakdown visible, pointing to a root cause of disease almost no one is taught to look for. 🧵
Most chronic diseases aren’t mysterious. They’re misunderstood.
When symptoms don’t fit neatly into a known diagnosis, doctors are taught to rule things out, not step back, ask what systems might be failing, and find out why.
When nothing obvious shows up on a scan or lab test, the explanation often shifts toward stress, anxiety, or something “psychological.”
Vaccine injuries quietly expose this flaw, because they don’t damage one system at a time. They disrupt multiple systems at once, making the real problem impossible to ignore.
And when it happens to infant triplets at the exact same time, it couldn’t be more obvious.
Complex illness rarely looks the same from person to person. After all, we’re all pretty different. Different bodies, different medical histories, different environments—so many different variables.
So it should come as no surprise that one person develops fatigue and pain, another develops neurological symptoms, and another experiences mood changes or cognitive decline.
Medicine tends to treat these symptoms as separate diseases. But what if the symptoms stem from the same internal breakdown?
That’s why conditions like autoimmune disease, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, long COVID, and post-vaccine syndromes overlap so much.
Different symptoms don’t always mean different causes. They simply reflect different parts of the body struggling under the same underlying stress.
And unfortunately, one-size-fits all medicine isn’t able to see it.