This is a sad Parsha in many ways. In this Torah portion, God instructs Moses and Aaron regarding the red heifer. Miriam, who is the sister of Moses and Aaron, dies. 1)
Moses hits a rock to bring forth water rather than speaking to it. At the end of the parsha, Aaron dies.
Of course, there is more to it.
After years of wandering through the desert, the people arrive in the wilderness of Zin.
2)
Miriam dies, and the people thirst for water. G‑d tells Moses to speak to a rock and command it to give water. Moses gets angry at the complaining people and strikes the stone. Water flows, but Moses is told by G‑d that neither he nor Aaron will enter the Promised Land.
3)
Aaron dies soon after and is followed in the high priesthood by his son Elazar who he trained.
Moses leads the people in battles against the Emorite kings Sichon and Og (who seek to prevent Israel’s passage through their territory) and
4)
conquers their lands, which lie east of the Jordan River and comprise parts of modern Jordan.
So, what lessons can we learn from this Parsha?
As I see it, there is one big lesson.
5)
When faced with a real problem, whining about it is a waste of energy. Getting angry and responding irrationally to those that are whining, is counterproductive. And, finally, responsible action to solve problems is the only thing that works.
6)
Our Sages said that Moshe was banned from entering the land because he disobeyed when he struck the rock in anger at the people. Though Moshe made a mistake to act out in anger, I think his not being allowed to enter the land had a more serious and more important reason.
7)
For 40 years, Moshe was sort of the father figure of the nation, the judge of last resort, the one to provide solutions to all problems, almost like an absolute monarch with final authority on everything and
8)
there is a dangerous tendency to start thinking of such important figures almost like gods that one cannot do without.
9)
But a people who have now been told not to have any other gods, not to be dependent on one hero, one leader, one person seen as closer to HaShem than others, the loss of such a leader with no preparation and alternatives appointed,
10)
before entering the land, could have led to tragedy. Consider what a tragedy it might have been had Moshe entered the land with the people and then died while they were going through the stressful process of getting their land and organizing their lives.
11)
The whole enterprise might have been seriously damaged.
Interestingly, Torah is so insistent on not making a man a hero or an idol to follow that it never mentions any special status for Moshe’s children. Power would not be handed down based on blood.
12)
Before they entered the land, the new lines of authority had to be established, and they had to be established without expecting Moshe to be the final authority on everything or even as a figurehead or person making decisions as the last result.
13)
What we are seeing is the wisdom of the Creator, understanding the creation, and doing what was needed.
One more interesting observation. At a time when wandering was nearing an end, we see Moshe reacting to a situation,
14)
in fact losing his temper and striking a rock to bring forth water. The top guy, the infallible leader, the man closest to HaShem, acting in an irresponsible manner, showing a flaw in character.
15)
The lesson? Don’t worship leaders, do not make them into idols or pictured them as infallible. No leader is to be followed unquestionably."
16)
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "RATIONAL OPTIONS THAT CAN WORK AND THOSE THAT CANNOT —- THE “PALESTINIAN” PROBLEM.
(İn contrast to solutions that will never work)
FIRST, LET’S LOOK AT WHAT NEVER CAN WORK.
1)
Suggestions over the last 80 years have been made that just maybe a bi-national state could be a solution, and in more recent years, a so-called two-state solution.
I challenge anyone to show me are and how a bi-national state has ever been successful.
2)
It’s easy for me to make that challenge because the answer is simply. It has never worked. Sure, some of you will say “Belgium” but that arrangement has been contentious at best, with two languages being the only significant difference between the two competing groups.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "THIS WEEK — THE 250 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE USA.
I SERIOUSLY THINK PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS, 1)
That the American Revolution and what motivated it is unique, and not unique at the same time.
Those that signed on to declare independence, who dedicated their own lives, those of their family members, their property, their wealth,
2)
all of which could be lost if their goal was not met, were making two statements then in 1775, one that has only been made twice in history, and the other than is being made again worldwide today.
2)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "I AM SO TIRED OF LIES FROM THE LEFT
ONE DEMOCRAT PARTY SPOKESMAN THIS AFTERNOON CLAIMED THE TRUMP BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL NEEDS TO BE REJECTED BECAUSE:
“MILLIONS WILL LOSE THEIR HEALTHCARE
A lie.
1)
Who is losing Medicaid —— Illegal Migrants. Healthy people between ages 20-55 who refuse to work at least 20 hours a week. N0 ONE ELSE LOSES HEALTHCARE.
2)
THE CLAIM THAT SNAP WILL DENY MASSES OF PEOPLE FOOD.
Another lie. SNAP will change to ban using Federal Money for unnutricious foods, i.e.: soft drinks, power drinks, and many packaged sweets.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "IF THE UNITED NATIONS RECOGNIZES A PALESTINE STATE
Under International law such recognition would initiate a tragedy for the Palestinians.
1)
It would gain them nothing - unless the State of Israel ignores the law to facilitate what the United Nations Organization has done.
2)
1. If Palestine is a recognized state, it must have a recognized territory, and under all pre-existing agreements going back more than 100 years, it does not other than through negotiations.
3)