1/ I've just accomplished something no economist has done in 80 years.
For the first time ever, I've created the complete accounting model of Keynes' revolutionary "Bankor" proposal the international monetary system that could have prevented decades of financial crises.
2/ Most economists still think money is just "fancy barter" between two parties. This primitive thinking dominates every economics textbook worldwide.
But here's the reality they're missing: every transaction involves THREE parties, not two.
3/ This is what Italian economist Augusto Graziani called the "triangular approach" to money.
Every purchase involves a buyer, a seller, and a BANK. The bank is the crucial third agent that enables the transfer to occur.
4/ Keynes understood this 80 years ago when he proposed Bancor for international trade.
His elegant system would have used domestic currencies internally, bank reserves between institutions, and Bancor for international transactions.
5/ Instead, we got Harry Dexter White's imperial vision where the US dollar serves BOTH domestic AND international functions.
This distorted system has given us 80 years of currency wars, trade imbalances, and recurring financial crises.
6/ My new accounting model reveals exactly how Bankor would have worked:
Countries with persistent deficits would hit limits and devalue. Countries with surpluses would pay interest to developing nations.
7/ What we lost was a system designed to minimize imbalances and encourage global growth.
What we gained was a rigged system benefiting one nation at everyone else's expense.
8/ The beauty of using double-entry bookkeeping for economic modeling is that it prohibits logical errors.
Most economic models ignore banks, debt, and money itself, like studying flight while pretending wings don't exist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I've documented how 30+ years of privatization promises have turned into economic disasters. The evidence is overwhelming that "competition fixes everything" is a dangerous myth.
4/ Telecommunications "success"? Original monopolists still dominate 40 years later. Telstra in Australia, BT in the UK. Most supposed "competitors" failed spectacularly.
5/ The hidden costs mainstream economists ignore: massive marketing budgets, CEO salary inflation, reduced long-term investment, and system fragmentation.
1/ After 40+ years in economics, here's my verdict: the discipline is fundamentally broken and needs complete reconstruction.
Here's what real economics should look like.
3/ Real economics must embrace complexity, not equilibrium. My Minsky software shows how to model dynamic, evolving systems rather than static mathematical fantasies.
4/ Financial instability is inherent to capitalism—not an external shock. My work on Minsky's hypothesis predicted 2008 when mainstream models saw stability.
1/8 Trade deficits: Buffett warns they bleed national wealth. Mosler claims they boost real prosperity. Who’s right? My analysis settles this economic cage fight.
2/8 Buffett’s view: A trade deficit = "selling the farm." You exchange assets (bonds, land) for imports today. Over time, foreigners own your capital. Squanderville parable shows how complacency leads to colonization-by-purchase.
3/8 Mosler (MMT) counters: Wealth = your "pile of stuff." Imports grow that pile; exports shrink it. Trade deficits = free goods! Just offset money outflow with government deficits. Simple?
(1/9) Finance YouTubers are screaming Japan will crash the global economy because a municipal bond auction failed. Japan's debt is 250% of GDP, and they think this proves that a collapse is coming.
(2/9) They're confusing city budgets with national budgets—it's like panicking that Samsung will shut down because your local electronics store ran out of Galaxy phones.
(3/9) When your city spends $1000, it takes existing money from someone else's bank account. Money just moves around the neighborhood. No new money gets created.