Funny how so many of the same influencers who are throwing hissy fits right now re: the DOJ Epstein memo were also distributing black pills to their followers when his co-conspirator/partner Ghislaine Maxwell was successfully convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
There might be something to that...
All singing the same song...
The Doomer’s Refrain:
But nothing is happening.
And if it is happening, it’s too late.
And if it’s not too late, then it’s not good enough.
And if it is good enough, then it’s the last thing that will happen, and we’ll be right back to:
but nothing is happening.
It’s not about Epstein, or his clients, or Kash or Bondi, or Trump, or the victims and it’s definitely not about the truth.
It’s about the grift and how it fits into the strategy of “audience capture.”
That doesn’t apply to everyone, of course.
Some are simply caught up in the memes and punditry of peers, mistaking the retorts of mediocre minds for scholarly logic and well-reasoned arguments.
It’s useful to remember that an idea’s or meme’s virality is one thing.
Its accuracy and merit is something else entirely.
The above can be applied broadly, from the “Epstein Did Not Kill Himself” meme to “Orange Man Bad/TDS” to the current hysterics of “Panican Pundits.”
Don’t mistake the distribution of an idea, especially one that exists almost entirely online, , for genuine popularity among real people, let alone widespread acceptance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I just finished reviewing updates from today. Good stuff.
Leaving a palm print is great and maybe they got DNA (huge!).
Hitting the grass hard left an identifiable shoe print (Converse), nice!
And we learned earlier they know both the route the shooter took through the neighborhood and back. THAT can lead to finding the transportation the shooter used. From there they can track via traffic cams, plate readers, and of course cameras on homes and businesses.
And they have the weapon used. DNA can be lifted from that plus finger prints, palm prints, arm prints, track purchases of the gun, scope, ammo, etc.
This is not a pro shooter or “hit” as some knuckleheads and disinfo clowns are spreading. This guy left the same way he came in, left foot prints, hand prints, the weapon, his DNA, his face on multiple cameras, etc.
Pros do not leave these behind.
Ignore the disinformation, the dumbasses, and black pillers.
Focus on the positives and on being the light and good in the world.
Pray for the Kirks, Law Enforcement, and our Nation.
BTW: I don't fault anyone for initially wondering if a professional was behind the rifle; that's fair enough. Just like people wondered if it was a trans activist. There was no evidence either way initially.
But the clues that it wasn't a pro have been present since the moment it happened.
You could tell by the sound, number one.
A pro would have used a suppressor.
Second, a pro would NOT have been that close, and the sound bouncing around the buildings gave away that the shooter was very close.
There are many accounts, usual suspects I'd say, who immediately jumped to narratives of it being a professional, it being a false flag, etc etc.
This is all so they can get clicks and views and build a bridge from the event to a conspiracy that blames the Jews or blames the CIA or whatever bogeyman they happen to prefer. The same thing happens every time (Baltimore Bridge, Butler PA, Rudy car accident, etc).
THOSE are the disinfo clowns and knuckleheads I am referring to.
Also, if you want to penalize people burning flags, any flag, just enforce laws and ordinances already on the books against burning anything on public property without a permit.
🧵Update on DOJ's efforts to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material:
Judge Berman has DENIED DOJ's motion to unseal the grand jury materials in the Epstein case.
The reasons for the denial are the same as in Maxwell—no exceptions to Rule 6e and not a "special circumstance" case.
A judge CANNOT unseal grand jury materials UNLESS an exception under Rule 6e is met OR the case can be qualified as a "special circumstance" case.
In my thread on the denial to unseal grand jury materials in Maxwell I broke down the reasons for that denial and they are largely the same in this case.
According to an HPSCI whistleblower 302, and my own sleuthing, the "system" for leaking classified information to media was "established" by Minority Staff Director Michael Bahar.
**That's if I am correct on what's under the redaction block.**