Funny how so many of the same influencers who are throwing hissy fits right now re: the DOJ Epstein memo were also distributing black pills to their followers when his co-conspirator/partner Ghislaine Maxwell was successfully convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
There might be something to that...
All singing the same song...
The Doomer’s Refrain:
But nothing is happening.
And if it is happening, it’s too late.
And if it’s not too late, then it’s not good enough.
And if it is good enough, then it’s the last thing that will happen, and we’ll be right back to:
but nothing is happening.
It’s not about Epstein, or his clients, or Kash or Bondi, or Trump, or the victims and it’s definitely not about the truth.
It’s about the grift and how it fits into the strategy of “audience capture.”
That doesn’t apply to everyone, of course.
Some are simply caught up in the memes and punditry of peers, mistaking the retorts of mediocre minds for scholarly logic and well-reasoned arguments.
It’s useful to remember that an idea’s or meme’s virality is one thing.
Its accuracy and merit is something else entirely.
The above can be applied broadly, from the “Epstein Did Not Kill Himself” meme to “Orange Man Bad/TDS” to the current hysterics of “Panican Pundits.”
Don’t mistake the distribution of an idea, especially one that exists almost entirely online, , for genuine popularity among real people, let alone widespread acceptance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit AFFIRMS "the dismissal with prejudice of the claims against the other defendants, both sanctions orders, and the denials of the reconsideration and disqualification motions."
"These four consolidated appeals concern five separate orders. In 2022, between his terms of office, President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against dozens of defendants, alleging several claims, including two under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and three under Florida law."
"The district court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. On the defendants’ motions, the district court also entered sanctions against Trump and his attorneys, under Rule 11 and under its inherent authority."
Another filing from Halligan seeking to clarify the grand jury proceedings that have been the focus of scrutiny over recent days and really, since day one in this case—as the just-filed Transcript of Return of Grand Jury Indictment Proceedings shows.
For reference, here are the "no true bill" 3-count and the "true bill" 2-count indictments.
As you can see, Count Two and, uh, the other Count Two of the 3-count are IDENTICAL to Count One and Count Two of the 2-count.
Both were filed, as both were presented in open court.
The notice accompanying the transcript says
"The official transcript of the September 25, 2025, proceedings before Magistrate Judge Vaala conclusively refutes [the] claim [that there was an issue with the grand jury voting process] and establishes that the grand jury voted on—and true-billed—the two-count indictment."
NEW filing by US Attorney Halligan clarifies that "the foreperson of the grand jury 'reported that 12 or more grand jurors did not concur in finding an indictment' as to proposed 'Count 1 only,'" but did concur on Counts 2 & 3.
The 3-count indictment was edited into a 2-count indictment, numbers adjusted, and the foreperson signed the new one.
"Fed. R. Crim. P. [] Rule 6 simply does not require a successive-voting procedure where there is a mixed return from the grand jury on a multi-count indictment."