So! China released its new renewable power consumption quotas yesterday and added heavy industry into the list of obligated entities. A Big Deal!
I last wrote a thread about China's RPS ~4 years ago, but things have changed since then, so it's time for a commentary refresh. 🧵
But first, the basics. An Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is a mandate for a company to consume a certain minimum % of renewable power in its electricity mix.
Different countries handle this in different ways. In China, it varies on a provincial basis.
In China, the RPS system is divided into "renewable power including hydro (the first column) and "renewable power excluding hydro (the second column)"
So an obligated entity in...Gansu, for example, must consume at least 52.76% renewable power, and 28.84% must be non-hydro.
The percentages are set according to the abundance of renewable resources in the local grid. So a place like Gansu, with it's abundant wind, solar, and decent hydro, has a pretty high RPS.
Sichuan, Yunnan and Qinghai have the highest in the country - 70% including hydro.
70% is the highest the RPS goes. I don't know why it's capped at that exactly. Sichuan's grid is probably higher than 70% annually.
Meanwhile, the non-hydro RPS quota peaks at 30%. Again, dunno why. 4 provinces are there already: Jilin, Heilongjiang, Qinghai, Ningxia.
The provinces with the lowest non-hydro RPS are usually the places with the worst wind and solar assets.
See Shanghai, Chongqing, Sichuan, Fujian, and Guangdong.
Xinjiang also has a remarkably low RPS quota (just 14.84%) in context of its massive solar and wind assets.
Anyway, the RPS quotas have reliably risen a few % points every year since the program was launched, so obligated entities have had to procure a little bit more renewable power each year to maintain compliance.
I like the RPS program a lot. It's stupidly simple, so it works.
The big deal this year is some HEAVY INDUSTRY has been added into the RPS program for the first time.
Preivously RPS only affected entities trading in the wholesale power markets. This was basically just grid companies, power retailers, and a few ultra-large wholesale buyers...
Now the first round of heavy industry has been folded into RPS as well, including steel, cement, polysilicon, and certain kinds of data centers.
This is on top of electrolytic aluminum, which has implemented an RPS scheme since 2024.
Simply put: heavy industry must buy green.
The heavy industry RPS levels are fixed to the provincial benchmark, so a cement producer in Gansu must now also consume 52.76% renewable power starting from 2025.
The only exception is "national hub node data centers" which have a uniform 80% green power quota nationwide!
Pushing heavy industry into RPS is the perfect complement to the end of the feed-in-tariffs for renewable generators.
Now, instead of selling to the grid at a fixed rate, they'll negotiate and sell to heavy industry producers, who are regulatorily mandated to buy green power.
Of course, RPS in China is tied to the Green Energy Certificate (GEC) program, which is only matched and settled on a monthly basis.
So in Gansu, you don't have to be 52% green on a daily basis; you only have to be 52% green on an average *monthly* basis.
The logical next step is to move to a more granular reporting system for RPS, where GECs are generated and time-stamped on an hourly basis, and where you can actually claim ownership of green attributes on a 24/7 basis, and claim to be 24/7 green...
But this is a distant goal.
Some obvious problems include: how do you track green attributes as they move through storage like a battery? How do you meet 24/7 green requirements when you don't even have fully operating spot markets in some provinces? etc.
But market-leading corporates are asking for it.
Within a few years, I expect all heavy industry segments will be pulled into the RPS (by 2030) and the spot markets will be fully operational by that time too, so we can start looking for 24/7 green solutions for corporates.
But for now, I'm quite pleased with this progress.
Here's a link to the pdf of China's RPS levels for 2025. Feel free to ask any questions about RPS, GECs, and compliance standards.
Among all the random stuff I talk about on Twitter, this is one of the things I actually do in my day job.
"Nail Houses" in Shanghai Old City - Interview With a Local
You know Chinese "nail houses" - those local residents whose properties (and their demands for compensation) impede developers' aspirations, sometimes for years. I've tweeted about it before:🧵
The most famous stories are often in rural areas, where standalone nail houses are striking and obvious, requiring highways or trains to make awkward detours.
But anyone could become a holdout, including someone in an apartment in the Shanghai old city.
The "Shanghai old city" refers to a part of modern Huangpu District around what used to to be the city wall.
Today, the oval shapes of Zhonghua/Renmin Road follow the walls, and neighborhoods still refer to "gates" torn down 100+ years ago, but little else of the wall remains.
Pretty interesting ride last night...I don't often encounter drivers who are just so ambivalent and unbothered as Mr. Liu.
He picks me up in Pudong. First we drop off my colleague at his hotel, then head to my home. 🧵
Mr. Liu seems a little older than I am. He has short spiky black hair and glasses, with a round face covered in old acne scars. He speaks with an unemotional, low, raspy voice, like he's smoked heavily his whole life. He doesn't seem like he's bothered by anything.
"Hey shifu, does the Didi system charge extra to change a destination? My fare for this ride is surprisingly high..."
"Yeah, after we dropped off your friend and you changed the destination to your home, it added a surcharge. You can also set the destination as your home from the beginning and then add an additional dropoff point along the way, but that will also add a fee."
China Taxicab Chronicles: Mr. Le offers Career Advice
Mr. Le picks us up at the entrance to the Zeng Cuo’an tourist area in Xiamen. We’re going to the ferry and it’s the middle of the day, so we’ve got a bit of a ride ahead of us.
I'm immediately struck by his unique vehicle.
It's a BYD EV, but I’ve never seen one like it before. It’s shaped like a smaller SUV crossover but has sliding doors and a somewhat boxy roof that offers lots of headspace like a minivan.
"Hey shifu, what is this car model? I’ve never seen it before. The BYD what?"
Mr. Le responds enthusiastically.
"We just call it “Little Green” (小绿). BYD designed a car for rideshare drivers, as a partnership with Didi. It sold very well in Xiamen."
He seems to have a lot of energy for a guy who spends all day just sitting. Great, someone to talk to!
In the north of Xiamen's main island in Huli District, just west of the airport, is Dianqian Community, one of Xiamen's last urban villages (and its largest).
Urban villages are called 城中村 (literally: village in a city) or sometimes 村子.
Urban villages can be found in large cities in southern China especially, and are often described as China's "ghettoes" or "slums".
This is not quite correct in my opinion, and the topic deserves a separate thread. But they are indeed generally home to people with lower incomes.
Dianqian has gained fame in recent years on social media as a place of pilgrimage for aviation enthusiasts visiting Xiamen.
It lies immediately beneath the final descent path of airplanes arriving at Xiamen's Gaoqi Airport, offering unique photography opportunities.
Yicai released its influential 2025 China "Rank of City Attractiveness" list last week. This is the source of the "1st Tier, 2nd Tier" etc. labels.
I went through the list and compared to the 2024 rankings, finding interesting items to comment on. 🧵 yicai.com/news/102638963…
But before we get started, if you're unclear what I'm talking about, you'll want to review my thread from last year where I introduce the Yicai city tiers and ranking system, how it's calculated, and what it's good for (and what it isn't!)
Chinese carbon emissions indeed appear to have leveled off. A peak into a plateau, perhaps, but a peak nonetheless.🥳
As highlighted in the thread, this is a *structural* decline. It's NOT caused by power usage decreasing (which naturally allows less coal use) like in the past.
All the major fossil-fuel consuming segments are now consuming less than they did last year, with the exception of the coal-to-chemicals segment.
But for the sake of completeness, what are the counterfactuals we must be aware of? What could cause emissions to grow again?
WHAT IF? 1: Power consumption growth picks up again and new renewables are unable to meet 100% of consumption growth.
This could happen if new renewables capacity additions slow down in the 2H of the year (or any time we have a bad year for hydropower).
This could also happen if the power consumption growth rate picks up again (it's been pretty sluggish through the first 5 months of the year, but I suspect we're heading for a sweltering summer that will drive cooling demand to record highs).
Remember, renewables additions need to meet or exceed 100% of consumption growth EVERY YEAR to keep coal consumption in the power sector from rising. Consumption growth was roughly 650 TWh last year. That needs to be met by new renewables every year. If it doesn't, power sector emissions rise, which means whole-of-economy emissions could rise (powergen is like 60% of China's coal usage)
But the fact that this is being made possible by huge renewables growth, and not declining power usage, is really the key point here. This is nothing like 2013-2015, when emissions were flat because power usage dropped.