1/14 DELIGHT IN THE ABSURD
What are TRUMP’s tariffs about?
Trade deficits being felt in the U.S. credit structure—it's as simple as that.
2/14 When a Nixon-Volcker prohibition on G7 countries prevented the sale of excess USD acquired in trade into commodities within the G7, you ended up with a currency that was constantly overvalued in trade—an imbalance characterized by massive overconsumption versus production.
3/14 When Bessent and TRUMP impose very high tariffs, they are essentially cutting the purchasing power of Americans on foreign goods and services—cutting consumption, which also reduces income for exporters. But why?
4/14 So basically, the message is simple: the current administration recognizes it can’t continue because the deficits have strained the credit structure of the U.S pushing the curve much higher than it should in a “normal” slow economy. Kenneth Rogoff has tried to explain why.
5/14 And as Jacques Rueff predicted, this game of double-counting FX as reserves would continue only for as long as the credit structure could tolerate it.
6/14 So how do you make the deficit felt in the credit structure of the U.S.?
You perform an external drain.
Juglar discussed the mechanics of that:
China is performing an external drain by not recycling its excess USD into USTs...
7/14 ... but instead into the BRI, gold and silver in yuan, commodities in yuan at Qianhai—what have you.
8/14 That affects the credit structure of the U.S. by pushing the USD down versus commodities and the yield curve up, and Bessent and TRUMP respond by cutting U.S. citizen spending via tariffs.
9/14 Now, what is interesting is that at the start of the 1980s Bretton Woods II era, you could find consumer finance companies for a pittance.
10/ But now that it’s ending, consumer lending, unsecured consumer lending, and securitization businesses like $CVNA, $AFRM, $UPST, and $SOFI trading at stratospheric levels—while single-B junk credit spreads have just bounced off lows not seen since the 2006 "crazy town" days.
12/14 On the other hand, you have e-retailers in China—very slick operations—trading at single-digit earnings with double-digit growth, a fiscal stimulus unseen since the GFC, and an external drain and settlement in local currency that naturally continues to boost the purchasing…
13/14 …power of the Chinese people.
And some believe (due to PLTR-sponsored propaganda) that the purchasing power of Chinese people over the last 30 years has fallen in absolute terms. Those people, we can agree, are living in a propaganda inspired absurdistan.
14/14 It seems that investing is finding delight in the absurd.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/9 Large deficit IS NOT fiscal dominance
Large PRIMARY deficit is fiscal dominance.
So.
The previous central banker of Brazil might have been a traitor indeed.
He was "attending crypto conferences", ... "right".
explanation
2/9 If the deficit is large but the primary deficit is small, if you lower rates the private sector expands but your primary deficit (the non-interest part) might turn into a surplus because more taxes enter.
3/9 So maybe a bit of inflation on the monetary side, but primary surplus are DEFLATIONARY by nature (a bit of compensation)
It’s pretty clear that the US will hit 3% inflation by year-end, especially with oil adding 0.4% for every 10 USD, he says the view from the Fed is that tariffs push prices higher.
COMMENT:
Sure, tariffs are not monetary inflation, but higher prices are higher prices. If Walmart and Amazon tell you that they will raise price, it’s fair to assume they will. Could the tariffs be a one-time hit? Most likely, but it hits nonetheless.
According to Gundlach, the Fed will have to choose between inflation and unemployment—and will throw away the inflation target.
COMMENT:
That’s short-term expediency. In the long term, they will have neither. The fiscal condition will cripple the US.
2% INFLATION TARGET GONE
In an old post from our previously hacked account, we mentioned that the US would eventually move its inflation target and shift toward inflationary financing:
2/7 Back to Gundlach’s unpacking:
If unemployment rises, they give up on inflation.That’s his view
He also mentions the de-inversion of the 2–10 year spread, which is moving above its moving average. He says that when the spread moves above the moving average it means recession historically.
COMMENT:
That’s an interesting point. But under monetary dominance, de-inversion usually occurs with the entire curve falling, not rising. De-inverting with a rising curve signals fiscal dominance—disanchoring the long end and dragging the whole curve up.
Back to Gundlach:
U3 is at 4.2%,
It is above the 36-month moving average, which is typically a trend of deceleration.
But it's not accelerating.
COMMENT:
Gundlach says he's puzzled by the lack of acceleration. The puzzle might be simpler than it seems. When deceleration happens with little government stimulus (primary deficit = gov stimulus), there’s quick contagion and no artificial booster to stop the decline. That booster is uncovered spending (permanent Keynes now in operation).
BUT even with a large government deficit spending, the economy remains tepid. This was visible in our recent Q1 2025 review of Wells Fargo. x.com/GraphCall/stat…
It should be a bit alarming—massive Keynesian boosting under both Biden and now Trump, and yet very little to show for it, coupled with reduced output. (Classic fiscal dominance.)
The reason deterioration is slow is due to a crowding-out situation, or “war regime”: lots of means of circulation (T-bills are quasi-money), little output.
The same thing happened between 1913–1919 (see
Kemmerer: High Prices and Deflation), which created abnormally high inflation and interest rates relative to output—if analyzed through a monetary dominance lens.
3/7 Back to Gundlach again:
Bond market vs. PCE:
The curve continues steepening in the context of high inflation.
The Fed's dual mandate is thrown away.
The entire yield curve is up 11 bps since the last meeting.
GUNDLACH ON CREDIT SPREAD REVERSAL:
Spread went from 250 bps to 450 bps in April—and almost completely reversed.
The CCC bank loan market spreads have come in this year...!
425 bps higher than a few years ago, yet the Fed isn’t lowering rates.
Triple-C+ spreads are coming in, thoser companies are paying 10–11%, despite economic deceleration.
Meanwhile, regular high-yield spreads are only slightly wider.
COMMENT:
Absurdity is where you make money. It also indicates a place where something is likely to blow up.
Gundlach is moving up the ladder in credit quality.
COMMENT:
That’s interesting, because that’s where the FDIC is also warning about tight credit (we’ll come back to the FDIC quarterly report).
0/20 After the BLS data on inflation not adding up with inferior goods consumption trends...
Credit bureau data on delinquencies in unsecured debt does not seem to add up either.... let's review the data...
1/20 This is data gathered from different sources, including credit bureaus:
This data seems highly improbable on the side of improving delinquencies in subprime unsecured debt.
1/18 Different data points indicate a Liz-Truss Moment on April 4th.
There was extreme volatility on cash versus futures post- April 4th, with the 30 years going. We have seen the same dislocations and volatility in 2022, during the Liz Truss moment.
2/18 Because pension funds sold what's liquid first, and it can be the futures.
And that's because people went too heavy on swap spreads, ignoring the fiscal dominance risk...
3/18 A veteran explained why people went too heavy on the long end in the swap spreads thread, hoping for large absorption of UST due to deregulation. marketwatch.com/story/heres-ho…
Why under the old AND new regime ONLY trade can stop Gold outflows (stop rising in a floating ccy)
And why "real rates" alone don't work to stop Gold in the old a new regime.
Are rates responsible for a fall in gold?
Forget what you learnt in FX as reserves, only indirectly via trade when FX as reserves is not obeyed!
A provocative view, yet perfectly logical explanation from Clément Juglar.
It becomes clear why there was a prohibition from Nixon/Volcker on G-7 countries from dumping their USD acquired in trade into precious metals.
2/23 Juglar starts by citing an example that seems to support that the higher rates themselves result in lower prices of Gold. (but wait...)
3/23 This echoes the view from Henry Thornton: when purchasing power parity and goods are too expensive, the goods stay , and what is cheap (gold) goes where gold is dearer to the trade surplus / creditor country (spread on gold). link.graphcall.com/Silver-V
1/24 You probably remember the claims from Larry Summers and Jamie Dimon questioning the inflation calculation in the US?
I think that we can conclude that they are correct using a simple curve that most people in economics have learnt.
2/24 That is the demand profile for inferior goods versus normal goods.
So here is the chart that shows that inferior goods consumption increases with a decrease in real income.
3/24 What is going on with private labels (inferior goods)? Booming.
Here are several recent industry and news articles showing that consumers are increasingly shifting toward private-label products:
NielsenIQ (Apr 2025): Nearly half of U.S. shoppers report they’re buying more private-label items than ever, as retailers roll out multi-tiered store brands to meet both value and premium needs. NIQ nielseniq.com/global/en/insi…
Bazaarvoice (May 2025): Their Shopper Preference Report finds an 11 percentage-point jump in store-brand adoption over the past year, driven by quality improvements and tight household budgets. Bazaarvoice bazaarvoice.com/blog/why-priva…
PYMNTS (Mar 3, 2025): Grocery private labels have “surpassed national brands in both sales and consumer preference,” as value-seeking shoppers abandon legacy labels without sacrificing quality. pymnts.com/news/retail/20…
Reuters (Apr 24, 2025): Major CPG firms like Nestlé and Unilever are easing price hikes to compete with lower-priced store brands, noting “private-label goods have been outpacing major brands in growth.” Reuters reuters.com/business/nestl…
The Sun via Reuters (Q1 2025): Dollar General is expanding its private-label Clover Valley line by 100 new products, responding to “shoppers who cannot afford purchasing mistakes.” The US Sun the-sun.com/money/13400341…