Both struck by the same ideology.
Both in need of reform.
And for the same reason.
Behind the curated stats, behind PISA scores & GDP, more & more people are being left behind.
Something is wired into both systems.
Inequality.
🧵
The UK economy is said to be the world's 6th largest, yet there's 15m people living in poverty.
English schools claim improved PISA scores in maths, reading, science, yet have rising exclusions, suspensions, absences & school dissatisfaction.
How is this all possible?
⬇️
This isn't a bug of the system.
It's a feature.
In the UK economy, the tax burden on high-earners has steadily reduced, billionaire wealth has soared, while public services & welfare state have been slashed by austerity.
These aren't separate actions, but part of one thing.
⬇️
Education reforms have seen a similar outcome.
Overall exam results mask a growing unhappiness with school, soaring absences, and rising crises for the most vulnerable pupils.
This is worsened by rigid punitive school cultures and a curriculum which overwhelms too many kids.
⬇️
Both the economy and the education system are affected by the same ideology.
It's a political belief which favours a small benign govt, market freedom, deregulation & privatisation.
In society, it values strength & power over community & compassion.
Neoliberalism.
⬇️
How does neoliberalism affect the population?
The most powerful & advantaged increase their power & advantage.
Others might find success *if* they can prevail & comply within a rigid & gruelling system.
And the weakest, most vulnerable? This system isn't really for them.
⬇️
Neoliberalism's approach to the vulnerable is well-known.
Support structures have been eroded, leaving ever more people isolated.
But rather than recognise the effects, the system encourages us to find ways to accommodate this cheaper, harsher reality.
In a neoliberal economy, the state steps ever further away from its responsibilities for people, leaving public services to be run by under-regulated corporations.
In an education system, the same thing happens.
Here, the corporations are called Multi-Academy Trusts.
⬇️
The largest MATs each control dozens of schools.
They're also known for soaring exec pay levels.
Harris Federation paid its CEO over £500k pa, whilst cutting dozens of jobs, attracting complaints from hundreds of teachers, and sitting on £21m in reserves.
How very corporate.
⬇️
MATs attract similar headlines & complaints to the corporations that run Britain's water, energy, rail.
Exec pay, working conditions, inequalities.
Perhaps it's time to use the language we apply to other corporate behemoths.
What we're looking at is Big MAT.
⬇️
The message under neoliberalism is sink or swim.
It encourages one-size-fits-all approaches to everything from taxation to education.
It exploits quack theories to undermine hard-won rights.
And it deploys the language of euphemism to justify divisions & demonise victims.
⬇️
Ultimately neoliberalism fails society, because it widens inequality.
Its stated aim is to reduce costs, but in the long run these policies always cost more.
That doesn’t bother its fans. The point is to preserve privilege.
And there it succeeds very well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the red flags in the defence of hyper-controlled schools is the straw-man of order vs chaos.
The idea that there can only be utter control or utter chaos.
That kids are either controlled or unsafe.
But in reality there are many, many types of control.
A short 🧵
Some rules in schools aren't necessary for education or even to keep order. The rigid enforcement of them won't achieve dignity for children or make them safer.
It just extends the control of the adult over kids, to include clothing, eye movement, body posture, even downtime.
2/6
What's most cruel is when kids are then punished: for forgetting a pen, wearing wrong shade of socks, not standing in a precise line, whispering in the corridor, looking at their hands, fidgeting, being unable to complete homework, or even being poor. 3/6
Reading this blog, I was struck at how there's always a straw man close to any use of the neoconservative phrase 'soft bigotry of low expectations'.
And in this piece it comes right at the start.
There are three critical points to be made in favour of adjustments in the English schools curriculum.
None of them are about refusing to challenge working-class kids.
What's needed, what's been demanded so consistently across England for years, is something else.
⬇️
First, it's a fact that SEND kids suffer nationally from a deficit of reasonable adjustments & support in schools. In some cases some of that should be curriculum-based.
Mono-focusing on 'standards' won't alter the fact that these kids need bridges built, not ladders pulled.
⬇️
A shockingly misleading & dangerous piece from @matthewhood on @SchoolsWeek, lobbying for an end to EHCPs.
With Matt Hood's Oak Academy enjoying influence over @educationgovuk thinking, this should worry all parents & teachers.
And worst of all, the piece is just plain wrong.
🧵
The misdirection begins at once, describing "the EHCP approach" as "the primary cause of the SEND crisis".
But as every parent & school knows, the crisis isn't caused by a child's individual needs, or the attempts to support them.
It's caused by lack of resources & commitment.
⬇️
The SEND crisis, like most public-sector crises, is about under-delivery caused by under-funding & under-planning.
SEND is a system born & raised by Austerity, and has never been given wings.
Yes, kids have been let down relentlessly, but not by EHCPs.
⬇️
The answer may surprise you.
The reality will certainly be a shock for Reform, now holding 10 English councils.
And it might also offer a lifebelt to Labour... if it can actually grab it...
🧵
The key influence over councils isn't councillors, but central govt.
First, funding.
From 2010-20, real-terms funding of councils by govt was cut by 55%. This led councils to cut staff & services by around £25bn in just 12 years.
Less money coming in = less services going out.
⬇️
The funding collapse meant that almost all councils used tax increases to plug some of the gap.
Since the 2% adult social care precept was launched in 2016, councils have been able to increase CT by 4.99% every year.
More CT revenue = more spending.
⬇️
The claim is based on this finding in the parent feedback (see link & chart).
Ofsted says this shows that 76% of parents wanted separate grades for each inspection area.
But... does it really?
Um, nope.
⬇️ assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66d06d7f…
Firstly, the question tested attitudes to a limited range of alternatives to single-word judgements for schools.
Every alternative is more popular than single-word judgements.
But all this shows is a preference for ANY alternative over the dysfunctional status quo.
⬇️
March 20th is exactly 5 years since I picked my son up from school ahead of UK lockdown.
It would be his last day there for 6 months.
What happened next was a betrayal of all our children.
No, I'm not debating Covid, or protesting lockdown.
I'm talking about what came after.
🧵
To understand what I mean, you have to see that time through the eyes of a young child.
Imagine a Yr6 girl looking ahead nervously to secondary school.
Or a Yr1 boy like my son was, still near the start of primary.
Or a toddler, adapting to preschool.
And now...
⬇️
In the blink of an eye, every child's life was transformed.
School: gone.
Peer contact: gone.
Social learning: gone.
Family & friend visits: gone.
Even the playparks were closed.
But the loss of socialisation was just the start...
⬇️