Post

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 15

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today

#10 - Medical doctor reveals COVID boosters AGE lung capacity in athletes by “five to ten YEARS in just ONE WEEK.”

This is devastating.

For Dr. Robert Sullivan, the damage was much worse. He says his lung capacity has been slashed by HALF after taking the COVID shots the government recommended.

After a period of being unsure if the damage was in his head or not, Dr. Sullivan was diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension, a dangerous condition that elevates blood pressure and forces the heart to work much harder to pump blood to the lungs.

“On the outside, I look fine... I’ve lost half my lung capacity. If I can look this normal while carrying that much damage, how many others are out there suffering silently?” he asked.

The peer-reviewed study he referenced was conducted in 2022 and found that 19% of athletes with a mean age of 37 experienced an 8.6% drop in VO₂max just one week after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA booster.

That’s equivalent to aging about ten years in terms of aerobic capacity.

It’s time to PULL THE SHOTS NOW!

*SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW*

🧵 THREAD

#9 - Trump repeats that the Epstein files are a "made-up" Democrat hoax.

Credit: @disclosetv

#8 – Joe Rogan ambushes Gavin Newsom via text with a pointed COVID question, asking if he feels any remorse for his draconian decisions to force jabs on kids and enrich Big Pharma.

“Who will be held accountable for mandating COVID-19 vaccines for children, which were unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases in myocarditis and cancer cases among them?” Rogan asked.

“Second to that,” he added, “do you feel any remorse for that draconian decision that was obviously heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical companies’ desire for maximum profit?”

Watch Newsom’s desperate attempt to avoid accountability as he defends lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and the damage those policies caused.

Read 18 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 15

Joe Rogan just AMBUSHED Gavin Newsom with a single text that forced him to answer for California’s draconian COVID policies.

This conversation was a real test.

Newsom tried to recycle old COVID talking points.

But Shawn Ryan pushed back hard, telling Newsom to his face that he REGRETTED taking the vaccine.

Then Rogan’s question landed like a bomb: Who will be held accountable for mandating “unnecessary and ineffective” COVID vaccines for young children?

Watch Newsom squirm as he tries to defend lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and the damage those policies caused.

🧵 THREAD

Governor Gavin Newsom didn’t get the friendly interview he might have expected when he joined The Shawn Ryan Show.

Instead, he found himself pressed on the very issues that have defined...and haunted...his political career.

Even before Covid came up, the conversation turned to one of the country’s most divisive topics: guns.

Ryan opened the exchange with a direct question:

“Do you think that everyday citizens carrying a gun reduces crime or increases crime?”

Newsom didn’t hesitate, delivering the argument he’s repeated for years.

“I think the evidence, the evidence suggests the opposite. It increases the likelihood of a gun death,” he said, insisting that states with stricter gun laws see fewer gun deaths.

“And you look at all the states with the most comprehensive gun safety reforms, they have lower gun death rates than states with weaker gun laws. And there's a correlation there.”

“California is one of the lowest gun death rates in America. The highest murder rates in the county tend to be red states.”

Ryan wasn’t convinced. He brought up Chicago—a city with strict gun laws but among the nation’s leaders in shootings and homicides.

“Well, I thought Chicago was the number one?”

Newsom faltered.

“No.....well.....as cities you'll have different experiences, but at state levels, gun safety from our perspective, saves lives,” he tried.

He insisted the data proved his point.

“We have the data to bear that out.”

But there’s a reason that argument often feels hollow.

California’s overall gun death rate might look better than the national average on paper, but its largest cities have become with violent crime rates that defy easy talking points.

For anyone paying attention to the crime waves in Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco, it was hard not to see the disconnect.

But things really unraveled when the topic turned to Covid.

Newsom fell back on the lines he’d used for years, praising the vaccine rollout and claiming it kept hospitals from being overrun.

“I think it prevented the acuity of the symptoms and disease, and kept people out of the emergency rooms,” he said. “And I think that's universally accepted by 90% of objective, of....uh....experts.”

But Ryan wasn’t some media anchor nodding along. He fired back with his own experience—blunt and undeniable.

“Man, I don't know—I wound up getting the vaccine. It's one of the only f*cking things I regret,” he said.

“And then I got f*cking Covid like a couple weeks later.”

The exchange was devastating for Newsom.

He had no comeback, just the same stale claim that "experts agree."

The governor looked and sounded exactly like the politician who forced mandates on millions while ignoring anyone who pushed back....even when their own experience told them the promises didn’t hold up.

It was the moment Newsom’s polished veneer cracked.

Watching him try to explain why people should trust the same messaging that had failed so many times was downright painful.

Read 10 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 15

SSRIs don’t “treat” depression. They hijack your brain.

Sure, you might not feel sad anymore—but you might not feel anything AT ALL.

Up to 60% of SSRI users describe their lives as colorless or even “zombie-like.”

The worst part? Many former SSRI users say that their personality never came back, even after quitting.

And that’s only the opening chapter of this SSRI horror story. You’ll be furious when you learn what these drugs do to unborn babies.

🧵 THREAD

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full 5000-word report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-anti…

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors—or SSRIs—are one of the most harmful medicines prescribed today.

And that’s saying a lot because the market is FULL of harmful medicines.

What’s so bad about these antidepressants?

First of all, their use is widespread and frequently unjustifiable.

They promise to be a magical solution to depression and anxiety, but it’s quite the opposite.

In fact, they can cause side effects far worse than what they claim to treat.

Read 11 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 15

It was a TOTAL indictment.

Victor Davis Hanson just obliterated former CIA Director John Brennan, as fresh investigations into his actions take a dark turn.

Hanson laid out THREE DAMNING examples of lies and hoaxes that expose the real Brennan.

And he finished with a gut-punch:

“He should be worried. Not about losing his security clearance. But about the very real possibility of being indicted and sent to jail.”

🧵 THREAD

Victor Davis Hanson laid out the case bluntly: John Brennan wasn’t just a bureaucrat who played politics, but someone who built a career on reinvention, spin, and outright lies....and left a trail of wreckage in American politics that’s still being reckoned with.

As Hanson put it, there’s a reason Brennan is back in the spotlight.

“Recently, Pam Bondi and the Trump Department of Justice has said they are running an investigation into James Comey and John Brennan's career as the respective FBI Director and the CIA head during the Obama administration. And in the case of Comey, the first year of the Trump administration,” he said.

“They are very angry about this, but let's just review why there might be some culpability.”

Hanson started with Brennan’s talent for switching sides when it suited him. Under George W. Bush, Brennan was a champion of harsh interrogation and Guantanamo.

“Take John Brennan. He was a big proponent of waterboarding and enhanced interrogation under George W Bush's administration. And the things that went on in Guantanamo,” Hanson said.

But when power changed hands, so did Brennan’s story.

“But he flipped to condition himself to go into the Obama administration. And then he attacked the very president that he had served, George Bush.”

Hanson described how Brennan went further, rebranding his entire approach to counterterrorism to fit Obama’s worldview.

“Then he began sounding, sounding off about Islam, religion of peace, Jihadism is not a violent act, to condition himself further, to be appointed by Obama, which he was eventually as CIA director.”

For Hanson, that wasn’t just another political calculation...it set the stage for Brennan’s most brazen deceptions.

“But then he started lying,” he said.

“I mean, he always probably lied, but I mean flagrantly.”

One of those lies, Hanson argued, was meant to cover for Obama’s drone war.

“So he said before Congress in the media, there wasn't one civilian killed by Obama's targeted assassination program via predators on the Afghan or Pakistan border.”

Hanson didn’t attempt sugarcoat the reality of what happened.

“Actually, there were 50 or 75 innocent people we killed. He was caught in that lie.”

Then came the clash with Congress over spying on Senate investigators.

“Three years later, he went before the Congress and there was information that he had been tapping his CIA, the staffers for the Senate to get into their computer. He not only lied about it, he did so emphatically, ‘oh, we would never do that. That’s horrible.’”

He eventually admitted it.

But Hanson pointed out the consequences were non-existent.

“Then he was forced to say yes, I lied. In both cases, there were no perjury charges, nothing.”

Read 10 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 14

President Trump just announced he’s sending “EVERYTHING” to NATO.

This is part of a big, new effort to “get Putin to the table.”

Secretary General Mark Rutte says this is “only the first wave. There will be more.”

Lindsey Graham predicted this would happen. What comes next is “weapons flowing at a record level to help Ukraine defend themselves.”

Here’s the full scoop on Trump’s announcement today—and what it means for NATO and the war in Ukraine.

🧵 THREAD

On Sunday, Senator Lindsey Graham sat down with Margaret Brennan on CBS’ Face the Nation and made a stunning prediction about Ukraine and the United States’ role in the war.

He said President Trump was about to ramp up military support for Ukraine in a way we hadn’t seen before.

Brennan pressed him on whether it would be a stronger sign if the president simply sent the weapons immediately, noting he had nearly $4 billion in drawdown authority he could use without Congress.

Graham made it clear: “Well the $4 billion is not nearly enough,” he said.

“I expect him to exercise that drawdown authority. But the game regarding Putin’s invasion of Russia [Ukraine] is about to change.”

Graham explained that he expected “weapons flowing at a record level to help Ukraine defend themselves” in the coming days.

He also hinted at new tools for Trump, saying there would be “tariffs and sanctions available to President Trump, he’s never had before.”

According to Graham, Putin had miscalculated badly by trying to outplay Trump.

“For six months, President Trump tried to entice Putin to the table. The attacks have gone up, not down. One of the biggest miscalculations Putin has made, is to play Trump,” he said.

“And you just watch, in the coming days and weeks, there’s going to be a MASSIVE effort to get Putin to the table.”

It turns out Graham’s prediction wasn’t just talk.

Today, it came true.

In the Oval Office, President Trump met with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and laid out a hard line on Russia, starting with tariffs and sanctions.

The president opened the meeting with: “One of the reasons that you’re here today is to hear that we are very unhappy, I am, with Russia. But we’ll discuss that maybe a different day.”

“But we’re very, very unhappy with them and we’re going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don’t have a deal in 50 days.”

He spelled out just how steep those tariffs could be.

“Tariffs at about 100%, you’d call them ‘secondary tariffs’. You know what that means,” he added.

“But today we’re going to talk about something else.”

Read 13 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 13

What if I told you the government hid a safe, cheap cure while people died?

I’m not talking about ivermectin.

This drug from nature has the ability to treat things most doctors call “incurable,” such as paralysis and brain trauma.

What drug am I talking about?

None other than DMSO.

A teenage girl paralyzed in a diving accident walked again after a year on DMSO.

Another woman was found unconscious after a stroke and returned to work teaching in no time—all thanks to DMSO.

Never heard of DMSO? That’s no accident.

Get ready to learn what this powerful treatment can do—and why it worked so well that the FDA had to bury it.

🧵 THREAD

If you knew a cheap, safe treatment could save people from strokes, spinal injuries, and brain bleeds—and it was buried for decades to protect profits and keep people in pain—would you be angry?

You might want to sit down—I’ve got quite the story to tell.

And so far, it doesn’t have a happy ending. But with help from @MidwesternDoc, that’s going to change.

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full 49,000-word report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-could-s…

Read 38 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!