In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce an American lawyer and politician, Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee). He’s best-known for opposing the aid to Ukraine, undermining NATO by calling the US to withdraw from the alliance, and for fighting with a bunch of braindead dogs online.
1/21
Like many of the most vile vatniks out there, “Based Mike” is a lawyer by profession. He hails from the holy land of Mormons, Utah, where he faces little political competition, allowing him to make the most outrageous claims online without risking his Senate seat.
2/21
Before becoming a senator, Mike fought to let a nuclear waste company dump Italian radioactive waste in Utah, arguing it was fine if they just diluted it. The state said no, the public revolted, and the courts told poor Mikey to sit down.
3/21
Politically, Mike Lee isn’t just conservative — he’s the most ideologically extreme senator of the 113th Congress, according to a BYU study. NYT, GovTrack, and FiveThirtyEight all rank him on the far-right fringe. His voting aligned with Trump 81% of the time.
4/21
In 2019, Mike flew solo to Russia after the rest of his delegation were denied visas. While others backed out, he insisted on holding private talks with Russian officials — because nothing says “America First” like going to Russia to “do politics”.
5/21
In a 2022 debate, Mikey was grilled over his ties to Russia. Along with Rand Paul, he’s the only US senator not blacklisted by Moscow. Both voted against a major Russia sanctions bill in 2017, earning Lee the nickname “Putin’s most reliable yes man in the Senate.”
6/21
After the Jan 6 Capitol attack, “Based Mike” compared Trump to a Book of Mormon war hero and spent 14 hours a day helping Trump try to overturn the 2020 election. He texted Mark Meadows about alternate electors and pushed various conspiracy theories about the election.
7/21
According to Mikey, Trump deserved a “mulligan.” He voted against a commission to investigate the attack, then pushed disinformation claiming the FBI was behind it. All while over 100 emails showed his deep involvement in trying to overturn the election.
8/21
Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Mikey has become one of the most fervent opponents of U.S. aid to the defending country. There was a brief moment in the spring of 2022 when he voted for military aid and even joined a video call with Zelenskyy.
9/21
But by mid-2022, that changed, and Mikey began opposing every aid package to Ukraine. We can only guess what shifted during that time, but my bet is he got a call from the Trump/MAGA camp or the Heritage Foundation, telling him to fall in line.
10/21
In 2024, he had become one of the biggest opponents of Ukraine aid. He introduced bills, spread pro-Kremlin disinformation, and even spoke for nearly four hours on the Senate floor, arguing against a bill that would send more aid to Ukraine.
11/21
Interestingly, “Based Mike” fully supports military aid to Israel. He even tried to separate Biden’s aid package to Ukraine, Taiwan, and Israel so that only Israel would receive funding. The whole “let’s fund Israel but not Ukraine or Taiwan” shtick is wildly…
12/21
…inconsistent bordering on schizophrenic foreign policy - and ironically, it goes against any true “America First” principle. But it all starts to make sense when you realize AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group, has paid him $368,778, while Ukraine and Taiwan paid zero.
13/21
Naturally, all the Kremlin bootlickers are happy to hand Mikey a microphone. He’s appeared on Tucker Carlson and Jordan Peterson’s shows, plus a lineup of smaller grifters and podcasters eager to let him spew unfiltered bullshit to their audiences.
14/21
Mike’s anti-Ukraine rhetoric parrots typical MAGA BS talking points: “unaccountable aid,” “mission creep,” “money laundering” and so on. But with a tiny fraction of US aid, Ukraine is doing America’s job - bleeding out an evil empire without a single US boot on the ground.
15/21
Like his MAGA ally Elbridge “Cheese” Colby, “Based Mike” also has a tendency to get into online fights with braindead NAFO dogs. And like so many clowns before him, he actually thinks NAFO is a government-funded op or run by the CIA. And this dude’s a US Senator!
16/21
These days, Mikey’s focused on getting the US to leave NATO. He says it only benefits other countries—not America—despite the fact that only one NATO member has ever invoked Article 5: the US, after the Sep 11, 2001 WTC terrorist attacks.
17/21
For claiming to be a “devout Christian,” Mikey’s social media posts are absolutely vile. After a Trump-supporting gunman murdered two Minnesota lawmakers and targeted others, he posted: “This is what happens when Marxists don’t get their way.”
18/21
He also mocked Governor Tim Walz with “Nightmare on Waltz [sic] Street.” After being confronted by two senators and facing nationwide backlash over his verbal diarrhea, “Based Mike” quietly deleted the posts.
19/21
Mikey’s unhinged “Based Mike” persona isn’t just a stain on the Senate, it’s also a growing headache for his church. According to Politico, leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are now debating whether his reckless posts are a liability to the faith.
20/21
To conclude: As @billybinion wrote, “Mike Lee’s transformation from a principled, policy-driven lawmaker into a desperate shitposter should be studied. Not the first time a middle-aged, nerdy guy morphed into a teenager online after getting a taste of internet fame.”
21/21
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5