Long COVID can injure the brain - and persistent autoimmunity could be a major driver.
A study links persistent AT1 receptor autoantibodies (AT1-AA) with neuroaxonal injury and cognitive symptoms.
Here’s what it means🧵
The study focused on post-COVID patients with neurological symptoms like brain fog, memory issues, or fatigue.
They found:
Elevated AT1-AA in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
Correlation with neurofilament light chain (NfL), a marker of axonal damage
Signs of a compensatory immune response - often insufficient
What are AT1-AA?
Autoantibodies that act as agonists at the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), which mediates pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic, and vasoconstrictive signals.
Unlike typical antibodies, these lock the receptor in an “always on” state - driving inflammation and oxidative stress.
NfL is a marker of axonal damage - its elevation in serum reflects ongoing or recent neural injury.
In this study, NfL strongly correlated with AT1-AA levels.
Suggesting that immune activation via RAS isn’t just inflammation - it may physically damage the brain.
The body tries to compensate - but often too late!
In CSF, patients showed increased autoantibodies activating anti-inflammatory RAS receptors (AT2-AA, MasR-AA).
This may reflect a feedback response to chronic AT1R stimulation.
But in many patients, this compensatory axis isn’t enough.
Strikingly, patients with the worst cognitive deficits had the highest levels of MasR-AA.
This suggests the compensatory response may scale with injury - but fail to reverse it.
Post-COVID cognitive issues may reflect measurable CNS damage.
These findings echo what we’ve seen in other diseases:
Pre-eclampsia: AT1-AA drive endothelial damage
Parkinson’s: AT1-AA found in serum & CSF
HIV: chronic neuroinflammation, axonal loss
Alzheimer’s: AT1R overactivity linked to hippocampal atrophy
Long COVID may follow similar patterns.
So what are the implications?
AT1-AA and NfL may serve as biomarkers for CNS-involved Long COVID
Could stratify patients and guide care
AT1 receptor blockers (eg telmisartan) could be repurposed - already studied in neurodegeneration
Big picture: Post-COVID is not a diagnostic trashbin.
In some patients, it’s a biologically defined neuroinflammatory syndrome, with
Persistent autoantibodies
Axonal damage
Failed CNS homeostasis
And we can measure it.
Limitations? Yes - and they matter.
Small cross-sectional study (n = 69).
Subgroups (eg severe cognitive impairment) are even smaller.
Causality can’t be established - yet.
But the signal is real. And it’s consistent with prior research.
This doesn’t reinvent the wheel - it reinforces a signal we’ve seen again and again.
AT1-AA, NfL, hippocampal atrophy, BBB disruption - these threads are converging!
Meanwhile, public health hasn’t moved an inch. No screening. No follow-up. No guidelines.
Just silence.
Bottom line:
Some Long COVID patients may suffer persistent autoimmune RAS activation in the brain - a measurable, actionable form of CNS injury.
We now have biomarkers.
We have mechanisms.
What we don’t have is urgency.
Rodriguez-Perez et al. (2025). Serum angiotensin type‑1 receptor autoantibodies and neurofilament light chain as markers of neuroaxonal damage in post‑COVID patients.
Frontiers in Immunology. frontiersin.org/journals/immun…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
SARS-CoV-2 targets mitochondria. That’s not collateral damage - that’s a strategy.
A July 2025 review in Redox Biology brings together striking evidence of viral mitochondriopathy in COVID-19 and Long COVID.🧵
It shows how SARS-CoV-2 reprograms host cells by attacking their energetic and immunologic core: the mitochondria.
Here’s what that means:
What the virus does to mitochondria:
Inhibits oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) = less ATP
Increases ROS and triggers mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release
Disrupts MAVS - the antiviral signaling hub
Switches metabolism to aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect)
Blocks mitophagy = damaged mitochondria accumulate
Triggers pyroptosis, apoptosis & DAMP release
What if the brain doesn’t just suffer from what “leaks in” - but from what no longer gets in?
A 2025 Nature Medicine study reframes brain barriers as dynamic gates - and may help explain post-COVID cognitive symptoms.🧵
Brain barriers are not passive walls.
They’re regulated, selective gates - deciding which proteins from blood enter cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and under what conditions.
This study profiled 2,304 proteins in paired CSF/plasma samples from over 2,000 individuals!
The key output: CSF/plasma ratio per protein - a readout of transport, permeability, and barrier regulation.
Results challenge the default assumption that high CSF/plasma = “leak” = bad.
Some proteins are meant to enter the brain. Their presence can be protective.
SARS-CoV-2 is not just another respiratory virus.
It has evolutionarily selected features that actively manipulate innate immunity - similar to viruses like HIV, EBV, or CMV.
A new study in iScience shows how.🧵
What are formyl peptide receptors (FPRs)?
They’re innate immune sensors on neutrophils and other immune cells.
They detect signs of infection or damage.
Key types
FPR1: strongly pro-inflammatory
FPR2: dual, context-dependent
FPR3: poorly understood, but active in viral immunity
The new study tested 80 synthetic peptides from the Omicron spike protein.
It found:
10 activated FPR1
9 activated FPR2
30 (!) activated FPR3
Several triggered immune responses in primary human neutrophils
New study identifies 3 cognitive phenotypes in Long COVID - and raises a troubling question about insight and impairment.
123 adults
21 months post-COVID
All with some persistent cognitive complaints🧵
A new prospective cohort study (Nature Communications, 2025) followed 74,000 adults in Southern China and found - elevated EBV activity (measured by VCA-IgA) significantly increases the risk of several cancers.
First - limitations.🧵
Conducted in an NPC-endemic region with unique viral and population genetics
VCA-IgA was measured only once - no longitudinal antibody data
Lymphomas and other cancers were grouped, not stratified by subtype
Despite these limitations, this is one of the largest studies of its kind:
73,939 adults
Two independent cohorts
10 years of follow-up
Thousands of incident cancer cases tracked through registries
What actually helps people with ME/CFS and long COVID?
Not theory - but real-world data from 3,925 patients who rated over 150 treatments.
A new peer-reviewed study in PNAS (2025) analyzed what helped - and for which symptoms.
Here’s what patients report, symptom by symptom:🧵
Before we dive in - what do the percentages mean?
Patients reported whether a treatment helped a specific symptom (eg brain fog, fatigue).
So if a treatment shows 77% for brain fog, that means:
77% of patients who had brain fog and tried it said it helped.
It’s all self-reported
Brain fog
Top patient-reported treatments:
ADHD meds (methylphenidate, amphetamines) - 77% improved
Pacing (energy management) - 71%
IVIG (immunoglobulin) - 51%
Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) - 42%
Nattokinase/lumbrokinase - 50%
ADHD meds often worsen POTS - not for everyone