Insurrection Barbie Profile picture
Jul 15 • 13 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
🧵🧵How much do you think people like Obama, Clinton and other leftist aligned global interests would hide for the opportunity to access $1 trillion dollars worth of foreign investment in oil, aviation, banking, shipping and telecom contracts?

Do you think they would look the other way when they realized one of the key shady power players had a team of women plus all of his staff procure and fly out underage girls that he abused in his depraved world?
Marc Rich: The Original Sanctions Profiteer

Marc Rich pioneered the art of profiting from sanctioned regimes, most infamously by buying Iranian oil during the U.S. embargo and selling it through secret routes. He built vast wealth through opaque offshore companies, setting a model for navigating around sanctions, manipulating commodities markets, and leveraging global connections.

In the 1970s and 80s, he pioneered the spot oil market, buying crude on short notice and flipping it for profit.

He continued trading with Iran after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and during the U.S. hostage crisis, blatantly violating U.S. sanctions.

He was indicted for tax evasion and illegal trading but never stood trial living in Swiss exile until he was controversially pardoned by President Bill Clinton in 2001, after significant donations to Clinton-linked foundations by his ex-wife Denise Rich.
Ehud Barak: The Israeli Connector

Barak, former Prime Minister and elite special forces operative, bridged the worlds of military intelligence, finance, and global tech. His name surfaced in U.S. legal chatter around Rich, but he was never charged.

He was very close to Clinton and Obama. He even lobbied on behalf of Marc Rich for a Clinton pardon. In late 2002, Haaretz reported that Barak “failed to reply to questions posed by federal prosecutors in New York,” which triggered talk of an arrest threat—but no action followed....

Barak and Rich had overlapping circles, particularly within elite financial, intelligence, and national security communities in Israel and Europe.

As a major figure in Israeli tech and defense, Barak later became chair of Carbyne, a surveillance-tech firm funded by Jeffrey Epstein, and invested in by Peter Thiel.

Barak moved seamlessly between national security, high finance, and global elite networks, making him a perfect bridge between past clandestine operations (Rich) and the modern data-security state (Carbyne, Thiel, Epstein).
EPSTEIN: FINANCIAL FIXER & NETWORKER

Though Epstein never publicly traded oil, his entire career revolved around moving capital for the ultra-wealthy, often through offshore structures.

He was Les Wexner’s money manager, held power of attorney, and allegedly misappropriated hundreds of millions.

Epstein used the U.S. Virgin Islands as a laundering base through entities like Southern Trust Company, which received over $150 million from Leon Black alone.

He invested in Israeli intelligence-adjacent ventures like Carbyne (with Barak) and Palantir and had connections to high-powered political figures on both the left and right.

While no direct record ties Epstein to Marc Rich’s oil deals, he did have the next best thing in his little black book the number of Conrad Black.

Epstein didn’t just traffic underage girls to himself and Ghislaine (as victim statements clearly say they had threesomes)—he moved enormous sums of money for billionaires like Les Wexner and Leon Black, using shell companies like Southern Trust in the Virgin Islands. He also bankrolled Carbyne, connecting him directly to Israeli defense infrastructure via Barak.

Epstein moved capital through opaque jurisdictions and had elite access to politicians.
CLINTON, OBAMA & THE SANCTIONS-TO-PROFIT PIPELINE

Bill Clinton’s 2001 pardon of Marc Rich shocked the political world. Rich had fled the U.S. in 1983 after being indicted for trading with Iran, racketeering, and tax fraud and yet Clinton pardoned him on his final day in office.

This decision was widely viewed as influenced by Denise Rich’s donations to the Clinton Library and DNC.

Under Obama, the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) opened the door for billions in frozen assets to return to Iran, and for foreign companies to profit from Iran’s re-entry into global energy, banking, aviation, and tech.

Though Obama sought the deal for non-proliferation, it also mirrored Marc Rich’s original playbook:

Use backchannels (European firms, SWIFT restoration).

Funnel money through complex trade finance systems.

Let elites and state-linked firms on all sides benefit.

Notably:

Glencore (founded by Rich) quickly pursued oil opportunities post-JCPOA.

European energy giants like Total and Royal Dutch Shell signed billions in MOUs with Iran.

Banks, hedge funds, and asset managers prepared to enter Iranian markets via proxies or joint ventures.
WHY THIS MATTERS:

This web exposes the architecture of modern elite influence:

Sanctions regimes are not impenetrable walls, but negotiated markets for those with the right access.

Global crises (like Iran’s isolation) create profit windows for traders, banks, intelligence-linked firms, and asset managers.

People like Rich and Epstein are not anomaly they’re symptoms of a system where laws are flexible for the powerful, and connections span from Pentagon-backed surveillance startups to sex-trafficking compounds.

The Rich–Barak–Epstein–Clinton–Obama matrix doesn’t point to a conspiracy in the Hollywood sense—but rather to a cohesive elite model:

A transnational class of power brokers who move capital, bend rules, and leverage diplomacy and technology to serve elite interests.

Understanding this pattern is key—not just to unpacking the past, but to watching how similar structures emerge around China, AI, surveillance, sanctions, and resource conflict today.
The JCPOA: The Trillion-Dollar Deal Window

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—signed in 2015 was not just about limiting Iran’s nuclear program. It was a massive financial unlock for elite global networks.

How Much Money Was at Stake? $100–150 billion in unfrozen Iranian assets.

A projected $1 trillion in foreign investment over a decade, per European financial forecasts.

Billions in oil, aviation, banking, shipping, and telecom contracts.

SWIFT reintegration allowed banking access and digital transaction infrastructure reactivation—essential for hedge funds, asset managers, and PE firms with offshore arms.

Who Stood to Profit?

European companies like Total, Airbus, Siemens.

Wall Street-connected investment firms positioning via proxies and joint ventures.

Defense tech investors like Peter Thiel (via Palantir and Carbyne).

Private equity elites with Middle East exposure and diplomatic cover.

Clinton-Obama aligned networks through NGOs, foreign policy think tanks, and donor-backed “development” ventures.

Obama’s Circles and Their Stakes:

Many individuals and institutions within Obama’s political, donor, and advisory ecosystem were positioned to benefit directly from Iran’s reintegration:

Former Obama officials went into consulting and investment firms quietly tracking Iran’s opening markets.

Foundations, law firms, and multilateral NGOs—all of which supported the JCPOA—had overlapping donors with Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Clinton-world.

Biden’s later foreign policy team also emerged from this Obama-era network of Iran deal architects and investment strategists.
Clintons and their network stood to gain both financially and geopolitically from the JCPOA (Iran nuclear deal) and from their ties to key figures in elite finance, including Marc Rich’s associates and Jeffrey Epstein.

While there’s no definitive proof of illegal enrichment, the Clinton ecosystem was deeply embedded in the structures and institutions that stood to benefit from:

Lifting Iranian sanctions

Expanding Western access to Iranian markets

High-level lobbying and investment access
The Clinton Foundation accepted donations from many Middle Eastern-linked interests, including:

Qatar, UAE, and Saudi Arabia (geopolitical players heavily affected by the JCPOA),

Wealthy investors and banking firms that would later position themselves to profit from post-JCPOA investment access in Iran and surrounding regions.

While no donations from Iran or its proxies have been documented, the Foundation’s donor base heavily overlapped with entities preparing to engage with Iran commercially once sanctions were lifted.
Hillary Clinton & JCPOA Framework

As Secretary of State (2009–2013), Hillary Clinton helped:

Build the sanctions regime that pressured Iran to negotiate.

Set the diplomatic table for the JCPOA, which was finalized under John Kerry in 2015.

She later supported the deal publicly, defending it in 2015 and during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Strategic benefit: While Clinton was no longer in office by the time the JCPOA was signed, her allies in think tanks, law firms, and global consulting groups were deeply involved in shaping and preparing for post-sanctions economic openings.
Clinton World’s Ties to Epstein & His Network
Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private jet at least 26 times, including international trips.

Epstein donated to the Clinton Foundation and was listed as a contact in Clinton circles.

Ghislaine Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, highlighting deep social ties.

Epstein’s role as a financial fixer and access broker placed him at the intersection of politics, capital, and diplomacy—a world the Clintons thrived in.

The Clintons didn’t just stand to benefit directly from Iran’s return to global markets—they were part of a transnational influence structure that shaped how, when, and who would get in first. Their ties to Marc Rich, Jeffrey Epstein, and global capital networks gave them both access and incentive to remain close to the machinery of profit built around the JCPOA.
Sure seems like many people had reasons with a whole lot of zeros to bury all of this forever.

But, I am sure that is not what happened. The Israel blackmail thing and the other men that have never been publically named thing is probably the story....
Marc Rich, 'King of Oil' pardoned by Clinton, dies at 78 —Reuters

Marc Rich dies at 78; his pardon by Clinton stirred controversy — Los Angeles Times

Marc Rich controversially pardoned by President Clinton dies — JTA

Marc Rich — Wikipedia
The President's Defenders Feel Betrayed by His ----
Pardon of Marc Rich — Brookings

Bill Clinton pardon controversy — Wikipedia

Marc Rich sold Iranian oil to Israel — Haaretz

Barak Could Face U.S. Arrest in Marc Rich Affair — Haaretz (2002)

He Was Like Boo Radley: The Mysteries of Jeffrey
Epstein’s Financial Black Book — Vanity Fair

Decoding Jeffrey Epstein's Mysterious, Star‑Studded Black Book — Vanity Fair

Jeffrey Epstein's High Society Contacts — New York Magazine

Conrad Black — Wikipedia

Jeffrey Epstein’s Financial Empire in the Virgin Islands — The Times (UK)

Denise Rich Gave $450,000 to Clinton Library — ABC News

Fact-check: Clinton Foundation and foreign donations — FactCheck.org

Iran Sanctions Relief: Fact Sheet — Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Major Beneficiaries of the Iran Deal: The IRGC and Hezbollah — Brookings

Obama White House Press Briefing on JCPOA — White House Archives

Jeffrey Epstein and the Iran-AI-Surveillance Ecosystem — Whitney Webb (MintPress)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DefiyantlyFree

Jul 13
🧵🧵Why was our FBI protecting Clinton for 30 years but somehow allowed an asset of a foreign government to get blackmail material?

That makes no sense.

What does make sense is that they looked the other way this whole time because of Clinton.

Receipts below:
1. Travelgate and Whitewater

In 1993, shortly after taking office, the Clinton White House abruptly fired seven nonpartisan employees from the White House Travel Office. These staffers had served under multiple administrations and were responsible for managing press and presidential travel logistics. The Clintons replaced them with close Arkansas allies, including a cousin of Hillary Clinton. Hillary initially denied involvement, but a 2000 report by Independent Counsel Robert Ray concluded she had played a “significant role” in the firings and provided “factually inaccurate” statements during the investigation. Nothing happened to her.

To justify the firings, the White House referred the matter to the FBI, which launched an investigation into alleged financial mismanagement by the Travel Office. Critics including members of Congress and press associations viewed this as a politically motivated purge. The FBI’s decision to involve itself in what was essentially a personnel dispute enabled the Clintons to frame the firings as criminally necessary, rather than politically convenient. In the only criminal prosecution, longtime Travel Office director Billy Dale was accused of embezzling $68,000. However, the jury acquitted him in under two hours after no personal enrichment could be proven. The case highlighted the use of federal law enforcement to legitimize a politically charged action—and the FBI’s role in facilitating it without pushback.

Whitewater, meanwhile, began as a real estate investment in the 1970s between the Clintons and their friends Jim and Susan McDougal. The venture failed, but when Bill Clinton became president, the collapse of Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan—run by Jim McDougal—drew federal scrutiny. Dozens of Clinton associates, including both McDougals and former Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker, were indicted and convicted of fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction. However, despite emerging evidence and the discovery of previously missing Rose Law Firm billing records implicating Hillary Clinton, the Clintons themselves escaped prosecution.

According to FBI field agents involved in the Whitewater probe, promising leads were often ignored or sidelined by upper-level DOJ and Independent Counsel staff. Kenneth Starr, initially tasked with pursuing the Whitewater investigation, eventually redirected the focus of his probe to President Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky—a scandal that led to impeachment, but not accountability for the original financial misconduct.

Pattern Established: The FBI allowed itself to be instrumentalized—first by providing cover for Travelgate, and later by failing to insist on rigorous follow-through during the Whitewater investigation. This marked the beginning of a long institutional pattern of deferral, soft enforcement, and political calculus when dealing with the Clintons.
In 1996, during President Bill Clinton’s first term, it was revealed that the White House had improperly obtained and reviewed over 900 FBI background files on former Republican officials, many of whom had served in previous administrations. This included sensitive and private information gathered through security clearances—data that, by law, should never have been accessed without specific authorization and legitimate purpose.

The files were requested by Craig Livingstone, the Director of the White House Office of Personnel Security, a Clinton political appointee with no prior experience in handling classified records. Livingstone claimed that the request was made in error, citing an outdated Secret Service list. This explanation was quickly adopted by the Clinton White House as a “bureaucratic mistake.”

Yet the scale and nature of the breach raised alarm across Washington. The victims of the data breach included James Baker, John Sununu, Tony Snow, and even former Reagan-era cabinet officials—a who's who of Republican leadership. The fact that this treasure trove of political opposition research ended up in the Clinton White House without consequence prompted concerns of political espionage, misuse of intelligence, and a dangerous precedent of turning federal security mechanisms into partisan tools.

Despite the serious implications—unauthorized access to sensitive FBI files, potential violations of the Privacy Act, and improper handling of government records the FBI’s response was strikingly muted. The Bureau conducted an internal review but did not pursue charges against any White House officials. Instead, it allowed the administration’s narrative of “clerical error” to stand. Craig Livingstone ultimately resigned, but no one was prosecuted.

Congressional hearings led by Republicans were convened, and Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr was asked to review the matter. Starr concluded that although the actions were “grossly inappropriate,” there was insufficient evidence to prove criminal intent. Hillary Clinton, who many believed had recommended Livingstone for his position, denied under oath that she knew him prior to his hiring—a claim later challenged by several witnesses but never prosecuted as perjury.

Institutional Implication: The FBI’s decision not to pursue legal remedies despite a clear breach involving politically sensitive data demonstrated an early pattern of deference. Rather than challenge executive overreach, the FBI enabled the administration to control the narrative, framing an invasive political act as mere clerical mishap. In doing so, the Bureau signaled to future administrations that violations committed in the name of political preservation could be tolerated, or at least quietly buried.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 9
🧵🧵Pam Bondi’s Epstein Dilemma: The Legal Trap Behind the Withheld Files

When former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was appointed U.S. Attorney General, she promised a new era of transparency especially regarding the long-shrouded Jeffrey Epstein files. With public pressure mounting, Bondi announced that “tens of thousands” of videos and records existed, and that her Justice Department would make them public.

But that promise has quietly unraveled.

Instead of full disclosure, the DOJ has backpedaled. A recent memo claimed no “client list” exists. Bondi has delayed further releases. And the explosive evidence she once suggested was on the verge of public exposure remains sealed, redacted, or buried.

The reason, though unspoken, is now becoming clear(at least to me): Bondi is legally bound to defend the FBI in a civil lawsuit filed by Epstein’s victims and releasing the files could fatally damage that case.
The Florida Lawsuit That Changed Everything

In September 2024, eight women (six listed as “Jane Does,” plus Laura Newman and Sandra Ward) filed a civil suit against the U.S. government. The lawsuit alleges that the FBI received credible tips as early as 1996 about Epstein’s sex trafficking operation and failed to act. That failure, the plaintiffs argue, enabled two more decades of exploitation, abuse, and cover-up.

The suit was originally filed in Washington, D.C., but on June 30, 2025, a federal judge transferred it to the Southern District of Florida (the very heart of Epstein’s criminal empire and the jurisdiction where the FBI’s Miami field office oversaw the controversial 2006 non-prosecution deal).

That transfer wasn’t just procedural it was tactical. And I think that it changed everything.
Why Bondi Can’t Release the Epstein Files Now

1. She’s Legally Obligated to Defend the Government

As Attorney General, Bondi is the federal government’s top lawyer. In this case, the United States is the defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Her job is to defend the FBI and argue that it did not act negligently in handling the Epstein case.

That means her DOJ is responsible for filing:
•Motions to dismiss
•Claims of sovereign immunity
•Arguments that the statute of limitations has expired

Any public release of sensitive documents (emails, surveillance logs, case memos, or footage) could undermine those defenses. If the files confirm that the FBI knew more than it admitted or failed to act on specific tips, the plaintiffs’ case is strengthened and the government’s is fatally weakened.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 8
🧵🧵I don’t like being lied to by the media. I don’t really care if the lies come from the liberal media or the conservative media lies are lies.

One of the biggest lies I’ve heard lately came not from a partisan blog or anonymous source, but during two high-profile interviews: the first between Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz, and the second between Carlson and the president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian.

In both cases, the claim was made that there is “no proof” that Iran tried to assassinate President Donald Trump.

That is a lie. A flat-out, documented, federally indicted lie.

And what’s more infuriating?

Even Biden’s own Department of Justice,an agency that has shown no love for Donald Trump,has confirmed that lie to be false.
In November 2024, Biden’s Department of Justice charged Farhad Shakeri, an Afghan national living in Tehran, with attempting to carry out a murder-for-hire plot. His target? Donald J. Trump.

According to recorded interviews with the FBI, Shakeri said he was personally tasked by an IRGC official to plan Trump’s assassination in October 2024—right before the presidential election. He even admitted the Iranians told him, “We’ve already spent a lot of money, money’s not an issue.”

This wasn’t abstract talk. Shakeri attempted to activate criminal contacts in the U.S. to carry out the plot. Two of them were arrested. And Shakeri himself was charged not just with conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire, but with providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization (the IRGC).

That’s not a Fox News chyron. That’s a federal indictment under President Biden’s Department of Justice.
A Second Case Points to Trump as a Target

Just three months earlier, in August 2024, the DOJ charged Asif Raza Merchant, a Pakistani national with ties to Iran, in a separate murder-for-hire plot targeting a high-profile U.S. political figure. Merchant tried to hire hitmen—who turned out to be undercover FBI agents—to carry out an assassination on U.S. soil.

Although the official indictment didn’t name Trump, a leaked intelligence document shared by Sen. Chuck Grassley indicated he was the intended target. Merchant had connections to an Iranian handler, detailed elaborate plans, and admitted to targeting a “political person” in the United States.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 7
🧵 “DemocracyAID” Is the New Shadow Network Working to Undermine Trump from Within

1/A new group is quietly organizing to stop Trump’s second term from the inside.

It’s called DemocracyAID—and it’s not a nonprofit, a think tank, or a PAC.

It’s a covert network of ex-USAID & State Department operatives who are using the color revolution tactics they deployed in Belarus, Venezuela and other places to start a “revolution.”

Apparently all roads lead to USAID. The Daily Caller did an expose on them. The article is linked below after my deep dive.
2/ At the center is Rosarie “Ro” Tucci, former Deputy Director of USAID’s Democracy, Rights & Governance bureau.

She now runs the DRG Center at SID-US and is spearheading an effort to retool fired democracy-aid professionals into domestic political organizers.

“Ro Tucci” mentioned in initial reports, posted on LinkedIn about a group called democracyAid (all lower-case, but context aligns). She wrote:
“democracyAid is working to do something similar! It’s ALL HANDS ON DECK! … protecting and reimaging our democracy”
3/The movement appears to involve ex-USAID and State Department personnel who lost roles when Trump halted ~90% of democracy funding in January 2025.

Many were from Office of Transition Initiatives or similar units supporting elections, civil society, and media worldwide
Read 11 tweets
Jun 27
🚨 THREAD: The Unholy Red-Green Alliance — America’s New Political Party 🧵

1/ A Marxist. An Islamist. And a Chinese propagandist walk into a ballot box.

It’s not a joke.

It’s the Red-Green Alliance, a coordinated, well-funded campaign to replace American institutions with an authoritarian fusion of socialism, Islamism, and foreign control.

Receipts below;
2/đź”´ RED: The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America)
•Largest socialist group in the U.S.
•Builds slates of candidates for school boards, unions, city councils
•Runs massive volunteer ops (50,000+ in NYC alone)
•Uses tools like NGP-VAN & Mobilize
•Messaging: “Justice,” “Housing for All,” “Defund,” “Free Palestine”

But they’re not doing this alone.
3/🟢 GREEN: Muslim Brotherhood-Aligned Orgs (CAIR, SJP, MPAC, ISNA)
•Operating through soft fronts like CAIR & SJP
•Promote Islamist worldviews under civil rights cover
•Target campuses, swing states, and local politics
•Use “Islamophobia” claims to silence critics
•Linked — provably — to Muslim Brotherhood funding

How do we know?
Read 11 tweets
Jun 25
🧵🧵The Unelected President: Neera Tanden, the NGO Cartel, and the Greatest Conflict of Interest in Modern American Politics

On June 24, 2025, the mask finally slipped.

Testifying before Congress behind closed doors, Neera Tanden, a longtime Democratic operative and former president of the far-left think tank Center for American Progress (CAP) she admitted to running the autopen for President Joe Biden. She didn’t just witness the signature process. She oversaw it. In some cases, she was the one signing the President’s name to executive orders and laws.

This wasn’t a technicality. This was a transfer of power. Joe Biden was not acting as President. Neera Tanden was.

And that’s only half the scandal.Image
Follow the Money: From Washington to the NGO Empire

Before stepping into the West Wing, Tanden spent years at the helm of CAP, where she helped craft a quiet revolution in federal funding strategy:

•Traditionally, federal money flowed to state and local governments, empowering elected officials to implement policy based on local needs.

•Under guidance from CAP and its policy architects including Tanden that model was dismantled.

•In its place? A massive NGO distribution network.

Rather than giving money to mayors, governors, or county agencies, the Biden administration began funneling billions in taxpayer dollars directly to “approved” nonprofit groups, many of which were politically aligned with CAP and other progressive institutions.

These NGOs became the new gatekeepers of public money, funding everything from housing to education to public health. And they weren’t accountable to voters. They were accountable to bureaucrats, often the same people who helped build them.
The Circular Scam: Tanden’s Role on Both Ends

This is where the conflict of interest becomes undeniable and explosive.

•As head of CAP, Tanden helped design the policy architecture that gave preferred NGOs outsized control of federal money.

•Later, as Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, she wielded executive authority over how those policies were implemented.

•Now, in sworn testimony, we learn she also signed the documents via autopen that activated the very programs and funding models her allies stood to profit from.

This is not just a revolving door. It’s a closed loop of power and money.

Neera Tanden wasn’t just advising on policy. She was authoring executive orders, overseeing disbursements, and enabling unaccountable NGOs to control billions of dollars—while holding the pen with Joe Biden’s name on it.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(