Reminder that the wealthy are, at least in principle, not entitled to any more say in govt than anyone else. Mamdani meeting with these clowns is probably smart politics but “business leaders” are Just Some Guys with zero constituency and it’s bad journalism to act otherwise
The idea that “business leaders” need to approve of a mayor is a Fake Thing They Just Make Up. They are not a democratic body, no one elected them, they are Just Some Guys. To the extent they are influential it’s, by definition, the result of a corruption in democracy.
12 random teachers or sanitation workers or homeless people have as much right to vet Mandani as 12 “business leaders,” who, again, are Just Some Guys. This ring kissing routine is a distortion of democracy backed by an implied threat of campaign spending and media manipulation
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m baffled as to what conspiracy they’re going for anymore. MAGA media is playing catch up trying to square the circle of whatever an increasingly senile Trump vomited out that day and I need a whiteboard to keep track of what the Deep State is supposedly doing now
feel like if Trump just said “there’s nothing left in the Epstein case, it’s closed, of course Dems are going to imply what they want but what about Bill Gates and Clinton etc” it’d be done by now. But then he started breathlessly defending himself against allegations no one made
This is where superficial generational discourse gets you: An AOC and Bernie-endorsed candidate wins and it’s somehow an indictment on Mamdani—who didnt endorse anyone and has nothing to do with the race. The similarities, like Weisman and Healy’s analysis, are purely superficial
To paraphase a @BrandyLJensen classic: @jackhealyNYT has the comprehension of a dog, he can parse tone but not content.
The NYT wants so bad Mamdani’s win to be Young Hip Gen Z Guy Does Vertical Camera Thing and nothing else. This is an ideological axiom they will just assert over and over again because if it’s not true they are forced to acknowledge a much deeper rot in the liberal establishment
There’s been 90000 of these billionaire funded “we just want to win” “drop liberal orthodoxy” “big tent” front projects launched in the last six months. More consulting grifts designed to push the party right under the auspices of Savvy Pragmatism
Definitely need to do a break down. So much Silicon Valley and billionaire money funneling into the same consult class losers to “energize” “hard nose” “youthful” democrats who can “win in Trump country” who will courageously defend crypto and Israel
1) relies on ex-Biden official sources reinforcing myth of Helpless Biden desperately seeking a ceasefire without addressing the fact that, according to Israeli officials, he NEVER demanded one. this key dynamic is hand-waved away 🧵
2) the idea that Netanyahu dragged on the war “for political gain” is partly true but misleading. Polls showing 50%+ Israelis prefer a ceasefire to more war ignore the common assumption they’d get captives back then RESTART the genocide. This is & was the Israeli “left” position
One April 2024 poll during the relevant timetable of this article shows only 19% of Israelis (and 4% of Israeli Jewish citizen) thought Netanyahu had “gone too far” in Gaza. The basic premise of the genocide, unfortunately, was and remains VERY popular.
important to understand what pro-Israel lobbying org ADL is doing here: they are issuing a mob threat to continue demagoguing this issue and exploiting the public’s ignorance and racism until Mamdani “comes to them” e.g. toes the line on Israel. This is extortion plain and simple
It has nothing to do with him “condemning” anything. If he condemns “globalize the intifada” they will demand he condemn “intifada,” if he condemns this they’ll find some other expression for him to “condemn”. The point is for him to accept the minimum axioms of liberal zionism
The ADL is a libel-spewing shakedown racket that lets white nationalist antisemites like Elon Musk off the hook because he does the IDF press tour and censors to their liking. They explicitly believe any meaningful opposition to Israel is per se “antisemitism” and act accordingly
Are any “fact checking” groups or reporters going to note Mamdani never said “intifada” anything but simply said, when asked about it, it wasn’t a call for violence against anyone, much less Jewish people (the thing he’s also being accused of saying that he never said)
Just so everyone’s clear here’s how these ginned up meta-scandals work:
Media hack: DO YOU CONDEMN X (thing politician A never said)
Politician A: No, [nuanced, thoughtful answer]
Other media hack: politician A said X