Ed Miliband is extending CfD contracts to 20 years, offering contracts to projects without planning permission & offering CfDs to support "repowering" onshore wind projects. He's making his CP2030 plan irreversible even if he loses his job. Short thread 🧵(1/n)
Nothing says "cheap renewables" quite like extending contracts to 20 years. The impact assessment suggests that extending the contracts will reduce strike prices & reduce short term subsidies, but concedes that consumers will likely pay more subsidies overall (2/n)
Miliband is scraping the barrel of projects by allowing projects without planning permission to bid for CfD contracts (3/n)
Projects to "repower" old onshore wind sites will now be eligible for new CfD support. Guess which prominent Labour donor might benefit from this policy? (4/n)
Overall, Miliband is so desperate to secure the maximum renewable capacity in AR7, he is willing to sacrifice consumer bills by lining the pockets of renewables developers with gold (5/n)
He's trying to get as much capacity as possible under contract in AR7 to make his Clean Power 2030 plan irreversible, even if he loses his job. This will set in stone crippling energy bills for decades to come (6/n)
We radical solutions from opposition Conservative and Reform parties if we are to avoid even more rapid deindustrialisation and economic collapse. Perhaps they should announce they will repudiate the contracts if they get into office? (7/n)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article on the link below (8/8) open.substack.com/pub/davidturve…
Hi @threadreaderapp unroll please.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The hidden costs of renewables from grid balancing and backup are set to rise to 2X the cost of gas used to generate electricity. It's not gas driving our electricity bills higher. A thread 🧵(1/n)
Many have by now heard that renewables subsidies cost us a fortune, about £12bn per year made up of ROCs (£7.6bn), CfDs (£2.4bn) and FiTs (£1.9bn) (2/n)
Many do not realise that there are extra costs of renewables in the form of grid balancing and backup to make sure the lights stay on when the weather changes (3/n)
Yesterday, the OBR released its Financial Risks Report that old us about the dire state of the public finances. The OBR also told us that Net Zero would cost the public purse £803bn out to 2050. But part of their analysis relies on fake numbers from the CCC. A thread🧵 (1/n)
The public cost of Net Zero is made up of lost tax revenue and increased spending and the overall cost at 21% of GDP is down from 29% the OBR's last report (2/n)
Public expenditure is at 6% of GDP is some 5 points down on their prior estimates driven by “the CCC’s downward revisions to the whole-economy costs of transition.” (3/n)
How did Dale Vince become a green energy tycoon? Is it because wind is cheap as he claims? Or is it through subsidies? Declining performance and expiring subsidy support could spell trouble ahead. Let’s dive in! (1/16)
Dale Vince’s empire, Green Britain Group, includes Ecotricity and Forest Green Rovers. At the heart is Ecotricity Generation Limited, with wind and solar farms harvesting subsidies from Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROCs). (2/16)
Ecotricity’s wind farms, like Fen Farm (£29.7M), Bambers Farm (£17.3M), and Bristol Port (£10.3M), have earned £115M in ROCs since 2002. But ROC income dropped from £9.15M (2023/24) to £7.87M (2024/25). (3/16)
UK’s energy policy is failing: high costs, low reliability & environmental harm. A physics-first approach - focusing on EROEI, reliability, environmental footprint, security & cost—can save us. Why we need to ditch renewables ideology & embrace nuclear, gas, and hydro. (1/17)
Ed Miliband’s Clean Power 2030 plan relies on wind and solar, cutting gas to 5% and virtually ignoring nuclear. Result? UK has the highest industrial electricity prices in the developed world. Net Zero’s low-energy future risks economic stagnation. (2/17)
A physics-first energy policy prioritizes:
- High Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROEI)
- Reliability and flexibility
- Small environmental footprint
- Energy security
- Low total system cost
Net Zero is a far-left tyrannical Death Star, cloaking state control as climate action. It crushes free markets with subsidies & bans. Time to fight for freedom! #NetZeroTyranny (1/11)
On the Political Compass, Net Zero is far-left: massive subsidies for renewables, bans on oil/gas, & Soviet-style plans like Miliband’s Clean Power 2030. No free market here! #NetZero (2/11)
Net Zero is peak authoritarianism. The Climate Change Committee (CCC) overrides Parliament, mandating how we heat homes, drive, & eat. Tyranny, not progress! #FreedomVsNetZero (3/11)