I am very supportive of @garyseconomics call for a wealth tax.
However, I am also very puzzled about how he shows no understanding of why the UK government will not implement a wealth tax, and that is neoliberal doctrine.
I left a comment explaining this on his YouTube video, and it seems to have been hidden, as there's not been a single interaction with it.
So I did various Google searches, to find out Gary's position on neoliberalism, and was surprised to find he has never mentioned it.
2/
Anyone who advocates for a wealth tax, needs to understand why all UK governments, and indeed most governments of the rich countries, refuse to implement a wealth tax, it's not random.
The reason all the policy of governments, looks so weirdly similar, is neoliberal doctrine.
3/
Ever since Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, introduce neoliberalism (they never called it that - it was Reaganomics in the US and Monetarism in the UK), every major country has fallen in lockstep, with neoliberal doctrine.
4/
I don't intend to have a big discussion about neoliberalism here, and I suggest people read George Monbiot and Peter Hutchinson's book, The Invisible Doctrine, if people want to know more about it.
However, the important point, is that the economic, and indeed the social policy implemented, by every UK government, whether Conservative or Labour in the last 45 years, is neoliberal doctrine. That's why their policy looks so similar.
6/
The public is profoundly misled. They mistakenly think, they can have whatever policy they want or vote for. Then are baffled, that no matter who they vote for, the policy is almost identical. That's because you can have any policy you like, as long as it's neoliberal.
7/
This is, for instance, why both the Conservatives and Labour, refuse to renationalize the water industry, no matter how much of a mess they make of things, and how much of a financial mess they get themselves in. Neoliberal doctrine, won't allow it.
8/
Neoliberalism is largely hidden, hence George Monbiot's book title, The Invisible Doctrine. It is hidden, because it would be very publicly unpopular, especially if the public found out that the system is rigged.
Much is made of the fact, that over 75% of the public, want a wealth tax, including the majority of Conservative voters. However, hardly anyone talks about why it doesn't happen i.e. neoliberal doctrine.
My point of writing this thread is not to attack or criticise @garyseconomics, but to say, that if he wants the wealth tax he campaigns for, he must first address the elephant in the room, neoliberal doctrine, as to why it will be an uphill struggle getting one.
11/
A wealth tax will only be possible, if we call out and identify why leading politicians, refuse to even consider it, and refuse to discuss it. There is almost no public discussion, in the mainstream, as to why our economic and political policy is fixed, neoliberal doctrine.
12/
A wealth tax is certainly a good idea, and very sensible. So why doesn't it happen? For the same reason, there's the opposition to nationalizing the utilities and so much else, neoliberal doctrine.
13/
Essentially, the neoliberal doctrine, all the major parties follow, although they never mention it, says, the public can have whatever they want, but only if it is consistent with neoliberal doctrine.
14/
I will leave this open to all commenting for discussion. But if there's any attempt to troll me i.e. making aggressive assertions as fact, and refusing to support those assertions, I will restrict commenting.
15/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is part 3 of my thread, in which I want to return to my original theme of taxing rich, the very rich, not slightly better off. This both illustrates the obstacle, and the solution.
1/🧵
As I initially explained, despite over 75% of the UK public, wanting a wealth tax, this Labour government and all previous governments, will refuse to agree to it, because of neoliberal doctrine, which is essentially the credo of oligarchs.
2/
This is the reason for these threads. There is the illusory vision of freedom and democracy, which fools people to believe, that because it is a majority view, if we campaign hard enough, that the government will do it, because it is sensible.
3/
When powerful individuals started taking over our societies 5-6,000 years (it wasn't like this for >95% of the existence Homo sapiens), they have learned how to perpetuate their control of our societies, in an evolutionary way.
2/
I don't mean natural evolution here, I simply mean often quite crude trial and error, where the unsuccessful means of control, fall by the wayside, and the successful means of control are perpetuated and copied by other powerful individuals.
3/
I cannot state how important it is to understand this, and not just as regards neoliberalism.
Most activists make the mistake of thinking, if they campaign, that they can change something in the system. Not realizing that the system it rigged.
1/🧵
In other words, people can have anything they like, but only if it is within what the powerful few who control our society will allow. If it isn't, the controlling clique will block it, regardless of public opinion, and election results.
2/
This controlling clique of powerful and wealthy people, have created the illusion of freedom and democracy, but actually they carefully control, what choices are allowed, and what choices are not allowed by the people.
3/
There is no point to Keir Starmer. People didn't so much vote for his Labour as no one could work out what he stood for. They were voting against the Conservatives, but they ended up with the Tories 2.0
1/🧵
Most of the public feel this way, because Keir Starmer's approval ratings are at an all time low, and so is support for the Labour Party. They are so dreadful, they have pushed the even more dreadful Reform Party into the lead.
Flamingoes are filter feeders, which feed on aquatic invertebrates. Self-evidently, there are plenty of aquatic inverts in the newly flooded paddy fields, or the Flamingoes wouldn't be there.
2/
There is a simple solution, to reduce the numbers of aquatic invertebrates in the paddy fields, to encourage the Flamingoes to feed elsewhere, fish! Stock the paddy fields with the fry of fast growing fish, when they are first flooded.
3/
If anyone has any doubts about this, look at the extraordinary attacks on the sick and disabled, by not only Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves etc, but the leaders of the Conservative and Reform Parties, and especially, the Tory Press. They are literally frothing at the mouth.
2/
Yet, public opinion is very clear. There's strong public support, for taxing the very rich. Like 3/4 of the public. So why are the senior politicians of all 3 parties, likely to form the next government, and oligarch owned Tory Press, going on the warpath against the disabled?
3/