🚨 Your 401(k) may soon fund Wall Street’s riskiest bets.
Trump is expected to sign an executive order that would open the door to private equity.
Behind the sales pitch? A ticking time bomb for retirement savers.
(Save this thread)
Let’s start with the basics.
A 401(k) is a retirement savings plan sponsored by your employer.
You contribute a portion of your paycheck, and in return, you (hopefully) build wealth over time typically through public investments like mutual funds and stocks.
Those investments are regulated, priced daily, and you can move in and out fairly easily.
That’s important. Most people expect their retirement savings to be liquid meaning accessible if needed.
Private equity flips that script.
Private equity (PE) refers to investing in companies that aren’t publicly traded meaning they aren’t listed on the stock market.
Instead, PE firms raise capital from investors, buy businesses, try to improve them, and eventually sell them at a profit.
Sounds great? Not so fast.
Private equity funds typically “lock up” your money for years sometimes 5, 7, even 10 years with very limited ability to withdraw. This is called illiquidity.
So if your 401(k) holds these assets and you want to move your money… you might be stuck.
Enter Trump’s executive order (EO). It doesn’t create a new law.
Instead, it tells federal agencies like the Department of Labor (DOL) and SEC to reinterpret the rules around what 401(k) plans can offer.
That might sound harmless but it opens a big door.
Under the law called ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 401(k) managers must act in your best interest. This is known as a fiduciary duty, and it includes rules like:
• Prudence (make smart decisions)
• Loyalty (no conflicts)
• Diversification (don’t put all eggs in one basket)
This EO doesn’t change ERISA. But it nudges regulators to say: “Hey, maybe it’s okay if plans start including private equity as long as fiduciaries check the right boxes.”
That could mean more 401(k) plans start slipping private assets into your portfolio especially inside target-date funds.
Target date funds are default retirement options that adjust risk based on your age
Younger workers get more aggressive investments; older workers get more conservative ones
They’re widely used and that’s the wedge. If they add private equity to TDFs, it reaches millions of savers automatically
So what’s the appeal of private equity? The big pitch is higher returns. Some studies show PE outperforms public stocks over the long term.
But that edge often disappears when you factor in fees and PE fees are steep:
• 1–2% annual management fee
• 20% cut of the profits (called “carry”)
• Extra fund expenses
Compare that to ~0.3% for a public mutual fund.
And transparency? Basically none.
Public stocks report earnings quarterly. Private equity funds? They often rely on mark-to-model valuations meaning fund managers estimate how much their assets are worth, using internal formulas.
That means prices are:
• Updated infrequently
• Prone to stale values in downturns
• Potentially hiding losses
What happens in a recession?
Let’s say the private equity market drops. You won’t see the hit right away. Your 401(k) might still show the same value… until months or years later when the fund finally updates prices or sells assets possibly at a loss.
That’s deferred pain.
And if too many people want to exit? Funds can impose gates temporary limits on withdrawals. You might be told: “Sorry, we’re not processing redemptions right now.”
This isn’t hypothetical. It’s happened with non-traded REITs (real estate funds) in past downturns.
So why is this happening now? Because private equity firms are sitting on over $1.1 trillion in “dry powder” committed money they haven’t deployed.
But exits are frozen. The IPO and M&A markets (where PE firms usually sell investments) are ice-cold.
They need fresh money. Badly.
401(k)s represent a massive pool over $13 trillion in retirement assets. Even a small slice diverted into private equity would inject billions into struggling portfolios.
That’s why industry lobbyists have been pushing for this for years.
The EO is their win.
The result?
A quiet shift of risk from institutions who’ve started pulling back from some private markets to individual retirement savers who may not understand what they’re signing up for.
All under the guise of “choice.”
And let’s be clear: this isn’t a level playing field.
Large pensions and endowments negotiate better terms lower fees, advisory access, sometimes co-investment rights.
Retail 401(k) savers? You’re getting a packaged, high-fee version, with little say and even less visibility.
Younger, lower-income workers may be hit hardest.
They’re more likely to be auto-enrolled in default funds. They have less financial knowledge. And they can’t easily afford illiquid, expensive investments.
Yet under this EO, they could be exposed without even realizing it.
And older workers?
They rely on their 401(k) balance in the near term. Illiquid assets could mean delayed access or being forced to sell other holdings at bad prices while waiting for private funds to pay out.
Time is a luxury they don’t have.
Now imagine the worst-case scenario:
• A market crash hits
• Private equity valuations plummet (but aren’t reported yet)
• 401(k) participants try to withdraw
• Funds gate redemptions
• Savers discover losses years later
• Lawsuits follow—but fiduciaries claim they followed guidance
Who’s left holding the bag? You.
There’s even systemic risk. If private equity gets hooked on 401(k) inflows, what happens when those flows stop?
As Deloitte warns, retail exposure to private capital could explode from ~$80 billion today to trillions by 2030.
Too much money chasing too few deals = trouble.
In short: This executive order won’t immediately force changes but it clears a path.
If fiduciaries follow DOL/SEC guidance, and providers feel competitive pressure, private equity could quietly become part of your retirement even if you never asked for it.
This isn’t about fear. It’s about clarity. Private equity can offer value but it’s not a silver bullet and it’s not designed for daily savers.
If the risks aren’t clearly communicated and the rules aren’t enforced you’re not investing like the 1%.
You’re absorbing their fallout.
If you found these insights valuable: Sign up for my FREE newsletter! thestockmarket.news
Just a heads-up, guys! Trump hasn’t signed the order yet, so details could possibly change. But the goal here is to highlight the potential risks tied to opening 401(k)s to private equity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
But long-term yields are climbing and mortgage rates are spiking.
One reason? Bond vigilantes are back, driving up the government’s borrowing costs and yours.
(Save this thread)
Let’s start with the basics.
When the U.S. government needs money, it borrows by issuing Treasury bonds. These are essentially IOUs to investors: “Lend us money today, and we’ll pay you back with interest later.”
They’re considered some of the safest investments in the world.
The yield on a bond is the interest rate the government pays.
It moves inversely to price: when investors sell bonds, prices fall and yields go up.
So rising yields signal that investors are demanding more interest to keep lending to the government.
But pulling that trigger has MASSIVE consequences.
Here’s why it’s likely illegal and why firing Powell could backfire spectacularly.
(Save this thread)
Let’s start with the law.
The President cannot remove the Fed Chair at will.
Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act says that Fed governors including the Chair may only be removed “for cause.” That means serious misconduct, not policy disagreements.
In legal terms, “cause” refers to specific wrongdoing like gross negligence, corruption, or fraud.
It’s not a catch-all for “we disagree on rates.”
Courts have consistently interpreted this narrowly, and for good reason: the Fed is designed to be independent from political pressure.
🚨 The Buffett Indicator just hit 210%, its highest level in history.
That means U.S. stocks are worth more than twice the size of the U.S. economy.
Higher than 2000. Higher than 2007. Higher than 2021.
(Save this thread)
The Buffett Indicator is a simple way to measure if the stock market is overvalued. It compares the total value of all U.S. stocks to the size of the U.S. economy.
Formula: Stock Market Value ÷ GDP
If that number gets too high, it’s a sign that the market may be in bubble territory.
Warren Buffett, yes, that Buffett once said this is “probably the best single measure of where valuations stand.”
Why? Because it shows when investor enthusiasm is running far ahead of real-world output.