🚨 BREAKING: NPR’s GOVERNMENT-FUNDED DEI policies EXPOSED!
The Senate just voted to cut funding for NPR. Why should you care?
Among other things:
NPR admits to tracking the race of its employees and, incredibly, its SOURCES used to give you the ‘news.’
Your tax dollars are hard at work pushing an agenda, not reporting the news. 🧵
/2 Focused on “inclusive storytelling” (instead of “accurate reporting”), NPR tracks the demographics of its news sources in order to achieve its “newsroom mission” “to look and sound like America.”
THEY ARE RACIALLY BALANCING THEIR NEWS SOURCES!
/3 Translation: NPR is basing which stories it covers, runs, and airs on the basis of skin color and sex of the sources of their stories. But don’t just take our word for it. They openly admit it.
This News Source Tracking initiative appears to have resulted in a 16% drop in the number of white news sources since 2013 while black sources have been the primary beneficiary.
/4 Is tracking the race of sources affecting NPR’s reporting on critical issues? NPR states that people of color make up 3 out of every 4 sources in stories about race.
/5 NPR is committed to matching the demographics of its news sources to the United States adult population — not the real world availabilty of diverse or on-point sources.
/6 While available NPR news source demographic data is only available until 2021, NPR’s website suggests that it continues today.
/7 In addition to implementing race-based quotas for its news sources, NPR also has injected DEI into all of its operations:
At NPR, “diversity is not a special project — it is our core work.”
/8 What does “Diversity” mean to NPR? It means considering “race and ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity . . .”
/9 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion — including race considerations — are “Core Values” that NPR allows to influence its HIRING, AUDIENCE, and WORPLACE.
/10 To further its DEI priorities, NPR also states that it tracks the promotion rates of racial groups within its workforce.
/11 These diversity-focused policies appear to have achieved their intended effect:
A rise in the representation of people of color corresponding with a decrease in the representation of white employees.
/12 Why is publicly-funded NPR using race to affect its workforce and news sources — and how is this affecting NPR’s reporting?
/13 So what?
- NPR is using YOUR taxpayer dollars to discriminate against Americans on a number of factors, including race.
- Facts don't matter to NPR if they come from a source with the "wrong" skin color.
- NPR appears to engage in blatant racial classifications and discrimination in its own hiring.
Are there things that you would rather spend YOUR money on?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL just filed a new lawsuit against HHS and CMS to expose the architects behind a Biden-era organ transplant policy that financially rewards higher transplant volume and prioritizes race in transplant decisions.
/2 Last week, AFL filed a lawsuit to determine who within the Biden Administration was behind its race-based organ transplant policy.
This new lawsuit seeks to uncover the outside influencers who shaped the program, and why.
/3 The lawsuit targets the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for failing to produce records tied to a federal transplant program that rewards hospitals for increasing kidney transplant volume and embeds race into the process.
/1🚨VICTORY — AFL DEFEATED Maricopa County’s attempt to hijack County Recorder Justin Heap’s election integrity lawsuit and block us from representing him.
An Arizona court fully rejected the blatant power grab.
Our lawsuit against Maricopa County will now proceed.
/2 After Recorder Heap chose AFL to represent him in a lawsuit against the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell filed another lawsuit against him, claiming that she had the right to select his attorney, and she did not want AFL to represent him.
/3 In its ruling, the Maricopa County Superior Court held that Arizona law does not give the county attorney authority to control a county officer’s legal representation.
/1🚨VICTORY — AFL has BROKEN Nashville’s years-long stonewalling over the Covenant School shooter’s “manifesto.”
A Tennessee appeals court REJECTED Nashville’s attempt to withhold records related to the shooting and keep the public in the dark.
/2 The ruling from the Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville reverses most of a lower court decision that allowed the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Metro) to withhold the shooter’s “manifesto” in full.
/3 The court’s ruling made clear that government agencies cannot rely on sweeping legal theories to justify total secrecy, and must instead conduct a record-by-record review, redacting only what is lawfully protected and releasing the rest under Tennessee’s Public Records Act.
AFL has uncovered that MULTIPLE states lack evidence to support their claims of harm in their lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s federal wind regulation review.
/2 Last year, 17 states and D.C. sued the Trump Administration and several federal agencies, challenging the implementation of the Wind Memo, claiming it would cause irreparable harm to each state’s environment, climate, and economic, transportation, and security interests.
/3 The plaintiff states include New York, Massachusetts, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
AFL filed a brief on behalf of @tedcruz, @Jim_Jordan, and 26 members of Congress urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship and restore the Fourteenth Amendment’s original meaning.
/2 AFL’s brief, filed in partnership with Boyden Gray PLLC, supports President Trump’s Executive Order 14160, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.”
/3 Executive Order 14160 restores the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which the lower courts wrongly blocked by expanding birthright citizenship beyond what the U.S. Constitution allows.
AFL filed a new amicus brief after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Noem v. Al Otro Lado, a major case on whether courts can rewrite federal immigration law and block critical border security tools.
SCOTUS must reverse the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
/2 AFL’s brief, filed with Boyden Gray PLLC, on behalf of U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa and U.S. Senators Ted Cruz, Ted Budd, Mike Lee, Kevin Cramer, and Josh Hawley, urges SCOTUS to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s ruling on the merits and stop a decision that would cripple border security.
/3 The Supreme Court’s decision to take the case puts this dispute on the main stage.