I cannot state how important it is to understand this, and not just as regards neoliberalism.
Most activists make the mistake of thinking, if they campaign, that they can change something in the system. Not realizing that the system it rigged.
1/🧵
In other words, people can have anything they like, but only if it is within what the powerful few who control our society will allow. If it isn't, the controlling clique will block it, regardless of public opinion, and election results.
2/
This controlling clique of powerful and wealthy people, have created the illusion of freedom and democracy, but actually they carefully control, what choices are allowed, and what choices are not allowed by the people.
3/
This isn't your fictional conspiracy theory, where they have some sort of secret committee and cabal. In fact, this is a distraction, to make it seem as if a powerful clique, needs such a mechanism, to control our societies. They do not.
4/
In actuality, it is what I call, a conspiracy of common purpose, in which many layers of power clique have in common. So for instance, oligarchs, the most powerful cliques, have common interests, even if they differ over some things.
5/
So for instance, with oligarchs, they have the common interest of being able to accumulate unlimited wealth, and for this to be treated, as their private property. All of them have that common interest. Therefore, nothing is allowed to change that parameter.
6/
In other words, if that parameter, the right to hold unlimited wealth, to accumulate it, and for it to be considered their private property is challenged, the oligarch clique, with act and cooperate as one, to prevent any change to the status quo.
7/
Blocking changes, rather than implementing changes, is far harder to see. Governments, politicians, can give the illusion of considering changes, even vaguely agreeing to it, but then in fact blocking it, and never allowing it.
8/
For instance, at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, world leaders apparently agreed to address the causes of climate change i.e. fossil fuels, and appeared to agree to creating a sustainable system and stopping further biodiversity loss.
This was apparently enshrined in various agreements and treaties, like the UNFCCC, apparently set up to phase out fossil fuels driving climate change, and setting up the COP talks to agree on this, whilst eternally procrastinating.
This is how this illusion of freedom control works. Powerful people, whether they be politicians, or the oligarchs who control them with their purse strings, have the final say so on decisions, and can block decisions, eternally.
11/
The COP talks are a great example of how this control of powerful cliques, works. The diplomats, scientists, the UN, the @IPCC_CH appear to discuss what is necessary to address the climate crisis, then the key people at the top, just refuse to agree to it.
12/
Of course, they don't say, we are going to ensure the burning of fossil fuels without constraint continues, because that is how the wealth accumulation of the oligarchs, is primarily facilitated it. They give specious reasons for not agreeing at that point in time.
13/
There is a sort of informal hierarchy of power cliques, their vested and common interests. The interests of the powerful come first, and these are strongest, when they all agree on them. The interests of power cliques lower in the pecking order are secondary.
14/
The whole corrupt system, is propped up by carrot and stick control method, the carrot being financial, which includes the careers of those in controlling positions.
15/
People at the top of all organizations, are usually paid ridiculously high salaries and bonuses, that are dependent on pleasing the most powerful people in these power cliques. Displease them, and they face the stick, a loss of their privileges.
16/
Of course, it is much more complex than this. There is a careful filtering system, to ensure that those who get into politics, and climb the political ladder, are pliable and deferent to oligarchs and those at the top of power cliques.
17/
People, the public, falsely appear to have agency, to how they vote in elections, whether they will cooperate. But this is illusory, as the oligarchs own and control the media, and therefore effectively what people think, believe and know.
18/
This is not a perfect system of control, like in fiction, or in very authoritarian regimes (which is not actually as perfect as it seems). You see, they don't need complete control, only to succeed most of the time. This creates a one way current.
19/
Some people, some movements, appear to resist the current, and succeed to an extent. But that flow of power, in this rigged system, is always too strong, and they will eventually tire and be swept away by the power those at the top have.
20/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is part 3 of my thread, in which I want to return to my original theme of taxing rich, the very rich, not slightly better off. This both illustrates the obstacle, and the solution.
1/🧵
As I initially explained, despite over 75% of the UK public, wanting a wealth tax, this Labour government and all previous governments, will refuse to agree to it, because of neoliberal doctrine, which is essentially the credo of oligarchs.
2/
This is the reason for these threads. There is the illusory vision of freedom and democracy, which fools people to believe, that because it is a majority view, if we campaign hard enough, that the government will do it, because it is sensible.
3/
When powerful individuals started taking over our societies 5-6,000 years (it wasn't like this for >95% of the existence Homo sapiens), they have learned how to perpetuate their control of our societies, in an evolutionary way.
2/
I don't mean natural evolution here, I simply mean often quite crude trial and error, where the unsuccessful means of control, fall by the wayside, and the successful means of control are perpetuated and copied by other powerful individuals.
3/
I am very supportive of @garyseconomics call for a wealth tax.
However, I am also very puzzled about how he shows no understanding of why the UK government will not implement a wealth tax, and that is neoliberal doctrine.
I left a comment explaining this on his YouTube video, and it seems to have been hidden, as there's not been a single interaction with it.
So I did various Google searches, to find out Gary's position on neoliberalism, and was surprised to find he has never mentioned it.
2/
Anyone who advocates for a wealth tax, needs to understand why all UK governments, and indeed most governments of the rich countries, refuse to implement a wealth tax, it's not random.
The reason all the policy of governments, looks so weirdly similar, is neoliberal doctrine.
3/
There is no point to Keir Starmer. People didn't so much vote for his Labour as no one could work out what he stood for. They were voting against the Conservatives, but they ended up with the Tories 2.0
1/🧵
Most of the public feel this way, because Keir Starmer's approval ratings are at an all time low, and so is support for the Labour Party. They are so dreadful, they have pushed the even more dreadful Reform Party into the lead.
Flamingoes are filter feeders, which feed on aquatic invertebrates. Self-evidently, there are plenty of aquatic inverts in the newly flooded paddy fields, or the Flamingoes wouldn't be there.
2/
There is a simple solution, to reduce the numbers of aquatic invertebrates in the paddy fields, to encourage the Flamingoes to feed elsewhere, fish! Stock the paddy fields with the fry of fast growing fish, when they are first flooded.
3/
If anyone has any doubts about this, look at the extraordinary attacks on the sick and disabled, by not only Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves etc, but the leaders of the Conservative and Reform Parties, and especially, the Tory Press. They are literally frothing at the mouth.
2/
Yet, public opinion is very clear. There's strong public support, for taxing the very rich. Like 3/4 of the public. So why are the senior politicians of all 3 parties, likely to form the next government, and oligarch owned Tory Press, going on the warpath against the disabled?
3/