Just Human Profile picture
Jul 18, 2025 15 tweets 3 min read Read on X
One year ago, thanks to legislation passed in FL, over 150 pages of grand jury transcripts and videos of witness interviews regarding the 2008 state investigation of Jeffrey Epstein were made public.
You can read them here.
mypalmbeachclerk.com/home/showpubli…
In June of that same year, Epstein pleaded guilty to the state charges: one count of soliciting prostitution and one count of soliciting prostitution from someone under the age of 18. He is sentenced to register as a sex offender, pay restitution, and serve 18 months in jail... but was allowed to go to his office during the day.
Around the same time that the state grand jury indicted Epstein, a federal grand jury in Florida had been impaneled and heard testimony.

There was a proposed indictment against him for conspiracy and sex trafficking.
That indictment was dropped when the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida inked a secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein that resolved those possible charges against him and gave immunity to four female co-conspirators.
Image
Maxwell was NOT one of those four female co-conspirators, but she is currently attempting to get her conviction overturned at SCOTUS by arguing that the NPA does in fact apply to her.

realghislaine.com/_files/ugd/ba2…
So... questions:

What grand jury transcripts is Trump referring to?

A) Transcripts from the federal case in Florida in 2008 that was resolved thanks to the NPA?

B) Transcripts from the federal case in 2019?

C) Transcripts from the 2020 federal case against Maxwell?
More questions:

How is releasing these transcripts a response to the Epstein Hoax and attack on the Trump Admin?

Is it to show that Trump was never mentioned by any witness/victim?

Or is it to show the involvement of someone other than Trump?
I will go ahead and tell y'all what I am thinking.

There is someone who was close to Epstein, close to him post-2008 guilty plea and NPA.

Even post-2019 charges.

Someone who advised him. Spent HOURS with him.

Someone who was making a documentary about him.
And this someone has been a constant thorn in Trump's side, as have his associates.

This person has duped MAGA, fleeced them, and pied piper'd them for years.

And recently, he and his influencer pals have turned on Trump hard.
He is also someone who is WAAAAAAAY too close to a certain CCP agent.
Image
So I'm just wondering, just wondering, if this counterpunch from Trump makes contact with him. 👆

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Jan 8
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

It appears that defendant Brian J. Cole Jr. will be RELEASED FROM CUSTODY due to DOJ's failure to file a valid federal indictment by Dec 30, 2025.

Charges are not dismissed.
Arraignment on the new indictment is set for tomorrow. Image
It seems Judge Amir H. Ali accepted the defense's argument, summarized here👇 Image
The charges are not dismissed.

Cole will be arraigned tomorrow (and probably put back in custody). Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 6
🧵United States v. Carvajal-Barrios
(Maduro Narco-Terrorism Conspiracy Case)

Thread on case background and related cases. Image
Nicolás Maduro Moros. Image
The case against Maduro, titled U.S. v. Carvajal-Barrios, is not a new one.

It was first brought in March of 2011.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 2
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

Prosecutors will seek a superseding indictment against Cole, this time from a federal grand jury, next week. Image
At the detention hearing on Dec 30, we learned that prosecutors had a 2-count indictment against Cole from a "local grand jury," meaning one empaneled by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia—not one empaneled by the federal court.

This method of getting an indictment is currently under review at the Court of Appeals.

Read 5 tweets
Jan 2
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

Defendant Brian J. Cole, Jr. to remain in custody pending trial. Image
"According to the government’s proffer in support of detention, its investigation pointed to Mr. Cole for at least the following reasons:" Image
More reasons for continued detention Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
🧵Richman v. United States
(Arctic Haze search warrant material case)

ORDER: DOJ must get a search warrant for Arctic Haze/Richman materials seized from Richman in 2017, 2019, and 2020.

And that includes materials under seal in the EDVA and within DOJ "component" offices. Image
Backstory:

Just days after United States v. Comey was dismissed for Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan being unlawfully appointed, Daniel Richman, who is Person 3 from the indictment in the Comey case, filed a civil case against the DOJ.
Richman wants the property he volunteered to DOJ in 2017 and the materials that were seized from him pursuant to the four Arctic Haze search warrants in 2019 and 2020 to be returned to him.
Read 30 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
🧵United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)

Minute Entry:
Following today's detention hearing, Cole remains held without bond as the judge considers each side's motions.

1/5 Image
MINUTE ORDER:

A D.C. Superior Court grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Cole for the same two counts charged in the criminal complaint—18 U.S.C. 844(d) and 844(i).

This indictment has not been filed publicly but was presented to the judge yesterday.

2/5 Image
Federal prosecutors using a local grand jury in this way is a new thing in DC. It came about thanks to the Trump Admin's push to neutralize criminal activity in the capital.

But the issue is currently before the Court of Appeals.

3/5

archive.is/14vO2Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(