Ansgar Profile picture
Jul 19 11 tweets 24 min read Read on X
Systematic Failures in Unaccompanied Children Processing Under the Biden Administration (2021-2024)

This Thread examines systemic failures in the processing of unaccompanied children (UCs) at the U.S. border during the Biden administration (2021-2024), focusing on policies, inter-agency coordination, and oversight gaps that contributed to losing track of over 300,000 UCs. It highlights key structural issues, such as reliance on Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for Notices to Appear (NTAs), separation of roles under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2008 and the Flores Settlement Agreement, lack of unified tracking, and the termination of the 2018 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on information-sharing. All sources, including Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports, case studies, and additional findings, are documented for evidentiary purposes.
Executive Summary
The Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis resulted in unprecedented surges of UCs, with over 500,000 entering the system from 2021-2024. Systemic failures—rooted in policy reversals, resource shortfalls, and inter-agency silos—led to inadequate vetting, rushed releases, and minimal post-release monitoring, rendering approximately 323,000 UCs untraceable. This includes 291,000+ without NTAs and 32,000 who missed court hearings. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

Key failures include DHS/ICE’s delays in issuing NTAs, HHS/ORR’s limited follow-up (e.g., undocumented 30-day calls in 22% of cases), and the March 2021 MOA termination under Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, directed by President Joe Biden, which hindered real-time data sharing on sponsor addresses and safety concerns. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…

These gaps exposed UCs to risks like trafficking, exploitation, and unknown fates, as evidenced by OIG audits, congressional hearings, and case studies. Recommendations urge restored data-sharing, mandatory NTAs pre-release, and enhanced tracking.Image
Background
Under TVPRA (2008), HHS/ORR assumes custody of UCs within 72 hours of DHS apprehension, prioritizing welfare and release to sponsors without requiring NTAs upfront. The Flores Agreement (1997) mandates quick releases to avoid prolonged detention. From 2021-2024, border encounters surged (e.g., 147,000 UCs in FY2021, peaking at 152,000 in FY2023), overwhelming systems. immigrationforum.org/article/unacco…

newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigr…

Policy shifts, including the MOA termination, aimed to reduce sponsorship barriers but exacerbated tracking failures. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

Initial records in ORR’s UC Portal exist, but without enforcement linkages, UCs become uncontactable.Image
Key Failures
1. DOJ/EOIR’s Dependence on DHS/ICE for NTAs
DOJ/EOIR schedules court dates only after DHS/ICE files an NTA, initiating removal proceedings. Without DHS input, EOIR cannot act, making it downstream. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

nypost.com/2024/08/21/us-…

EOIR manages juvenile dockets but relies on DHS data; discrepancies (e.g., 4,000+ mismatches in absence records) arise from DHS’s manual processes and lack of automation. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

2. Separation of Roles Under TVPRA and Flores
TVPRA mandates HHS/ORR focus on welfare/release without enforcement authority, while DHS handles NTAs (not required pre-release). Flores emphasizes quick releases to prevent “unnecessary detention,” allowing ORR to prioritize sponsor placements over immigration proceedings. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC58…

immigrationforum.org/article/unacco…

This separation, while protective, creates silos: ORR releases UCs without NTAs, shifting tracking to ICE, which often fails due to backlogs.
3. No Unified Tracking System
Initial records in ORR’s UC Portal/UC Path include sponsor details, but no real-time sharing or mandatory long-term monitoring exists. Without NTAs/court dates, ICE cannot enforce appearances, leading to uncontactable UCs (e.g., due to moves or fear of authorities). oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

HHS follow-ups (30-day calls) were undocumented in 22% of cases, and ICE lacked processes for high-risk referrals. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

4. Scale Impact During Surges
Surges (e.g., 2021-2023) led to rushed vetting/follow-ups, exacerbating gaps. Structure allows releases without full enforcement linkage, resulting in unknown conditions if post-release contact fails. Over 340 UCs were sent to nonrelatives, raising exploitation concerns. nbcnews.com/politics/immig…

5. Termination of 2018 MOA
In March 2021, Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas jointly terminated the 2018 MOA, under President Joe Biden’s direction, to prioritize child welfare and reduce sponsorship barriers. This hindered real-time updates on sponsor addresses/safety, increasing risks. Operational signatories from ORR, ICE, and CBP are unnamed in public records. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
Sources, Case Studies, and OIG Reports
OIG Reports
• DHS OIG Report OIG-24-46 (August 2024): “ICE Cannot Monitor All Unaccompanied Migrant Children Released.” Details ICE’s inability to track 323,000 UCs due to NTA failures, lack of automation, and data mismatches with DOJ. Recommends improved sharing with HHS. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/… oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
• DHS OIG Report OIG-25-14 (January 2025): “Results of May 2024 Unannounced Inspections of CBP Holding Facilities.” Highlights overcrowding and poor conditions for UCs in Tucson, recommending better management. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
• DHS OIG Report OIG-24-44 (August 2024): “Results of January 2024 Unannounced Inspections.” Notes coordination issues in UC programs, with facilities exceeding capacity. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
• DHS OIG Report OIG-24-39 (July 2024): “Results of October 2023 Inspections.” Identifies failures in short-term holding for UCs, including hygiene and transfer delays. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
• HHS OIG Report (February 2024): On ORR follow-ups, found 19% uncontactable (extrapolated to 85,000), with gaps in safety checks and documentation. publicintegrity.org/inequality-pov…

Case Studies
• House Hearing (November 2024): “Trafficked, Exploited, and Missing: Migrant Children Victims of the Biden-Harris Administration.” Testimony from HHS whistleblowers and experts on systemic neglect, including 233,000+ UCs not enrolled in proceedings. homeland.house.gov/hearing/traffi…

congress.gov/event/118th-co…

homeland.house.gov/2024/11/21/hhs…

homeland.house.gov/2024/11/19/thi…

congress.gov/118/chrg/CHRG-…

• Grassley Report (February 2025): Confirms oversight failures, with 500,000+ UCs entering amid cartel exploitation; highlights DHS non-enrollment of 233,000. grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…

• Florida Grand Jury Report (March 2023): Details atrocities against UCs in Florida under federal authority, including trafficking. myfloridalegal.com/newsrelease/21…
• NBC News Audit (June 2023): Over 340 UCs placed with nonrelatives, risking labor exploitation. nbcnews.com/politics/immig…
• CIS Report (April 2023): Analyzes HHS loss of 85,000 UCs, calling for media/government accountability. cis.org/Arthur/Did-Joe…
• PBS Report (February 2023): Hundreds of separated children unreunited despite Biden efforts. pbs.org/newshour/show/…

Conclusion and Recommendations
These failures represent a moral and operational crisis, with unknown outcomes for UCs potentially in trafficking or exploitation. For hearings: Restore 2018 MOA, mandate NTAs pre-release, implement unified tracking databases, increase OIG audits, and hold leaders accountable. Visuals like Vera Institute flowcharts (branching by origin/risks) illustrate gaps.
Many whistleblowers came forward to reveal what was taken place only to be retaliated against in an effort to silence them. The USG knew what was going on under the Biden administration. Let’s take a look 👀

@taraleerodas , a federal employee with the Council of the Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), volunteered in 2021 to assist with the unaccompanied children (UC) border crisis as part of Operation Artemis, a government-wide HHS initiative to recruit federal volunteers for surge support. She was deployed (detailed) to the Pomona Fairplex Emergency Intake Site in California, which was operated by Southwest Key Programs—an NGO contracted by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) to run temporary facilities for UCs. In her role as deputy of the federal case management team at the site, she was involved in assisting with the sponsor vetting and placement process, including reviewing sponsor applications, verifying documents (often via photographs), and helping facilitate releases, though she emphasized in testimony that the vetting was inadequate and lacked investigative rigor. This hands-on involvement aligns with how federal employees are often detailed to NGO-operated sites to provide direct support during crises, under ORR’s oversight framework where NGOs handle day-to-day operations but ORR retains final approval authority on releases.

The root of responsibility here lies in the structured delegation under ORR policies: NGOs like Southwest Key are contractors that operate facilities and support vetting/placement tasks, but they do so with embedded federal personnel (like Rodas) during high-volume periods to ensure compliance and efficiency. This is not independent authority—ORR provides “strict oversight” through federal field specialists who review and approve all final decisions, site visits, and policy adherence, as outlined in ORR’s Unaccompanied Children Program Policy Guide (Section 2). However, Rodas’s testimony reveals systemic gaps where this oversight was insufficient, leading to rushed processes, minimal verification (e.g., no standard law enforcement involvement or full household background checks), and placements with unsafe sponsors, including those tied to MS-13. She described the system as functioning like a “multi-billion-dollar child trafficking operation” due to these flaws, with federal employees like herself embedded to “help” but often pressured to prioritize speed over safety amid surges.

Her assignment was authorized by HHS/ORR leadership as part of the broader Operation Artemis volunteer program, which solicited federal employees government-wide to address the 2021 UC influx. While specific individual authorizers are not named in public records (e.g., testimonies or audits), the program fell under the direction of then-Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran (January-March 2021) and incoming Secretary Xavier Becerra (confirmed March 19, 2021), with operational deployment handled by ORR administrators. This detailing practice is standard for emergency responses, allowing federal staff to embed at NGO sites to augment capacity while maintaining ORR’s oversight. Rodas faced retaliation for her whistleblowing (e.g., badge revocation and removal from the site after reporting concerns), underscoring accountability issues at the federal level rather than solely with NGOs.

They knew about all this and did nothing. Let that sink in……youtube.com/live/T5Mkwn2es…
Clarification on NGO Involvement in UC Sponsor Vetting and Placement (Focusing on Aaron Stevenson who went public in August of 2021)

youtu.be/Lnesw0NguKI?si…
@JamesOKeefeIII

Based on whistleblower accounts from @DHSAaron and official documentation from the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) under HHS, NGOs are involved in operational support for sponsor vetting and placement of unaccompanied children (UCs), but as contractors under ORR oversight without independent authority for final decisions, court scheduling, or enforcement. Stevenson, a former DHS intelligence official and Transnational Organized Crime (TOC) Mission expert, highlighted these roles in his whistleblowing, exposing how relaxed federal policies allowed dangerous placements (e.g., with MS-13 gang members) despite NGO-facilitated vetting. His revelations complement Tara Rodas’s testimony, emphasizing systemic failures where NGOs like Endeavors and Southwest Key handle day-to-day tasks but federal pressures for speed undermine thorough checks, leading to trafficking risks. homeland.house.gov/2024/11/21/hhs…

Watch this full interview with @DHSAaron @taraleerodas @MaryFlynnONeil1

youtu.be/HohyZZ3erao?si…

This fits the broader critique that while NGOs support processes, accountability lies with federal agencies (DHS/HHS/ORR) for policy and oversight lapses contributing to 300,000+ untraceable UCs.
To address your concern: Prior analyses did not claim NGOs have no role; they clarified delegated tasks under federal control. Stevenson’s case shows how DHS intel (his domain) intersected with ORR/NGO operations, revealing gaps like unvetted sponsors. Below, I’ll break it down with details from his whistleblowing and sources.
Aaron Stevenson’s Whistleblower Testimony and Key Revelations
Aaron Stevenson, a former DHS intelligence official specializing in transnational organized crime, came forward in February 2021 (public in August 2021) to expose flaws in the UC sponsor vetting process. He lost his job for whistleblowing and has testified in interviews, podcasts, and congressional contexts about government-facilitated child trafficking via inadequate checks.

homeland.house.gov/wp-content/upl…

• His Role and Observations: Stevenson worked in DHS’s TOC Mission, analyzing threats like gang involvement in migration. He identified the first known case of a TOC Watchlisted individual (e.g., MS-13 member) sponsoring a UC due to relaxed vetting post-2021 policy changes (e.g., no full household fingerprints). He reviewed sponsor data and flagged issues like repeated addresses linked to gangs or traffickers, but DHS/HHS failed to act comprehensively. Unlike Rodas (embedded at NGO sites), Stevenson focused on intelligence analysis, collaborating with ORR data to spot patterns. He co-authored solutions like a “PACE-like” entity for cross-agency data sharing to detect trafficking.
• Specific Failures Leading to MS-13 Placements: Stevenson reported gang members on the TOC Watchlist sponsoring UCs, with fake documents and shared addresses indicating trafficking rings. He noted relaxed vetting (e.g., phone-based checks only) allowed this, and HHS ignored flags. In Central American prison interviews, he uncovered organ harvesting tied to cartels exploiting UCs. Children were often unescorted post-release, dropped at airports without sponsors. He criticized HHS for denying law enforcement access to UC Portal data.
• Testimony Dates and Contexts:
• August 2021: Went public on MS-13 sponsorships. homeland.house.gov/2024/11/21/hhs…

congress.gov/event/118th-co…

• December 2023: Kyle Seraphin Show with Rodas on government child trafficking. orthochristian.com/157682.html

• July 2024: Senate Roundtable – “The Exploitation Crisis.” facebook.com/NTDTelevision/…

homeland.house.gov/wp-content/upl…

• November 2024: House Homeland Security Committee – Referenced in Rodas’s testimony on Biden-Harris failures.

Official Role of NGOs in the Vetting Process (As Related to Stevenson’s Concerns)
NGOs like Endeavors (Pecos, TX facility) support ORR by collecting applications, verifying identities, and conducting checks, but ORR approves releases. Stevenson criticized NGO opacity (e.g., filtered info to monitors, delayed staff background checks) and how this enabled gang sponsorships.
• NGO Tasks: Similar to Rodas’s experience, NGOs handle initial vetting but under ORR guidelines.
• Limits: No final authority; ORR oversees via specialists.
Why the Discrepancy Feels “Off” and Systemic Implications
Stevenson’s DHS intel role exposed how NGO-supported vetting failed under federal relaxation (e.g., 2021 MOA termination), allowing TOC infiltration. The “missing” element is federal accountability—DHS/HHS policies prioritized releases, overriding thorough NGO checks. This led to 85,000+ uncontactable UCs and trafficking. For your project, his story (with Rodas) underscores bipartisan reform needs, like better data sharing.
We have proven that this is criminal wouldn’t you say?

Based on the extensive evidence we’ve discussed—from whistleblower testimonies (e.g., Tara Rodas and Aaron Stevenson), OIG audits, congressional hearings, and official referrals—there are clear indications of systemic negligence, policy failures, and potential exploitation in the handling of unaccompanied children (UCs) by agencies like HHS/ORR and DHS/ICE. These issues have led to risks like trafficking, abuse, and over 300,000 UCs becoming untraceable, as detailed in reports extrapolating from unissued NTAs (Notice To Appear), missed court dates, and failed follow-ups.

However, while these point to moral, operational, and possibly ethical crimes against vulnerable children, “proven criminality” in a legal sense requires formal charges, convictions, or court rulings—none of which have been widespread or conclusively established as of mid-2025. @AGPamBondi @POTUS @VP

Evidence Supporting Potential Criminality
• Allegations of Facilitated Trafficking: Whistleblowers like Rodas and Stevenson have described the UC program as enabling “government-sponsored child trafficking,” with UCs placed with MS-13 gang members, traffickers, or exploitative sponsors using fake documents. Stevenson flagged the first TOC Watchlisted sponsor in 2021, and Rodas reported over 100 concerns ignored by HHS. Senate referrals (e.g., by Sen. Grassley) to FBI/DHS in 2024 cited HHS records of UCs sent to MS-13-linked households or trafficking rings, with over 50 UCs to one address. As of 2025, DHS’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) has launched welfare checks uncovering abuse/exploitation, with interagency probes into 65,605 backlogged reports from prior years.

ice.gov/news/releases/…

• OIG and Audit Findings: DHS OIG reports (e.g., OIG-24-46, August 2024; OIG-25-21, March 2025) confirm ICE’s inability to monitor UCs due to unissued NTAs and data mismatches, with HHS OIG noting incomplete vetting (e.g., 1/6 cases lacking safety checks) and ignored exploitation signs. HHS audits highlight failures to probe 7,300+ trafficking reports, with children in hazardous labor or abuse. These are framed as “widespread abuse” but not yet prosecuted as crimes.
• Ongoing Investigations and Actions: In 2025, HHS Secretary RFK Jr. launched a task force for 500 criminal investigations into ORR’s alleged trafficking facilitation, claiming 80 cases to court and interagency probes with DHS/ICE targeting sponsors. A Guatemalan man was indicted in April 2025 for smuggling a UC for trafficking. Grassley’s referrals to FBI/DHS (e.g., 2024-2025) cite potential crimes, with HSI identifying 100+ targets. Contractors like Cherokee Federal face scrutiny for non-compliance in probes.

ocpathink.org/post/independe…

grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…

justice.gov/opa/pr/guatema…

federalregister.gov/documents/2025…

• Congressional and Legal Scrutiny: Hearings (e.g., November 2024 House, 2023 Oversight) label it a “crisis” with “willful ignorance,” demanding accountability for lost UCs and exploitation. Lawsuits (e.g., March 2025 by legal groups) challenge HHS cuts to UC aid, citing trafficking risks.
Why It’s Not Fully “Proven” Criminal Yet
Criminality requires proving intent (e.g., willful endangerment under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 for trafficking) or violations like fraud/negligence. Current evidence shows:

• Negligence vs. Intent: Audits cite “failures” (e.g., incomplete checks in 1/5 cases) but not deliberate crimes. Whistleblowers allege complicity, but no indictments of officials. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

nypost.com/2025/05/29/us-…

nipnlg.org/sites/default/…

• Ongoing Probes: RFK Jr.’s task force and DHS initiatives are active, but results are preliminary (e.g., “handful” of cases uncovered). FBI/DHS referrals remain under review. notus.org/health-science…

federalregister.gov/documents/2025…

immpolicytracking.org/policies/repor…

justice.gov/opa/pr/guatema…

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…

In summary, the failures are egregious and demand justice—potentially rising to criminal levels if intent or cover-ups are proven—but as of now, they’re mostly documented as administrative breakdowns with active probes. This warrants deeper congressional/FBI scrutiny to establish criminal accountability. @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino

• Rep. Mark Green (R-TN), Committee Chairman: @RepMarkGreen
• Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX): @RepMcCaul
• Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA): @RepClayHiggins
• Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY): @RepGarbarino
• Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX): @RepPfluger
• Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS), who led the hearing: @RepMichaelGuest
• Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-OK): @RepBrecheen
• Rep. Morgan Luttrell (R-TX): @RepLuttrell
@HHSGov
@DHSgov
@OIGatHHS
@StateOIG
I am going to add my last Thread involving testimony from @ali_hopper @JarrodSadulski @GUARDATOfficial
@P_MilkCarton @SpartanX_Ray

We Demand Accountability!!!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ansgar

Ansgar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ansgar_3

Jul 17
🧵Stop Doing the Bidding for the Deep State and Pay Attention to the Actual Crime: NGOs and Intel Agencies Are Weaponizing Psychological Ops to Sow Division Against the America First Agenda

🚨 Yesterday during the DHS Oversight Hearing, Democrat Rep. Mr. Goodman and others strongly implied that President Trump is personally blocking the release of Epstein files… because he’s in them.

👀 Watch the attach video that shows just how everyone screaming for the release of the Epstein Files allowed for the weaponization to derail actual investigations into crimes against Children!
@GenFlynn @MaryFlynnONeil1 @taraleerodas @SunTzusWar @boonecutler @briangamble_v1 @Crux41507251 @LizCrokin @LynzPiperLoomis

@RepClayHiggins @RepLuttrell
@RepBrecheen @RepMichaelGuest
@RepPfluger @RepGarbarino @RepMcCaul @RepMarkGreen

Thank you for taking action on this issue these NGOs are the Criminal elements to crimes against our great Nation!

Watch the full Hearing: youtube.com/live/BX0mimyt-…

Follow @ali_hopper @JarrodSadulski
Their Organization : x.com/guardatofficia…

Follow: @P_MilkCarton
Big updates coming to the Website soon projectmilkcarton2025.web.app

Follow: x.com/shepherdswatch…

Follow: x.com/amerifuture?s=…
Let me be clear:
There is NO evidence that President Trump is named in any unreleased Epstein files.

This isn’t oversight — this is optical warfare. This is a political op—an old playbook being used again to confuse Trump’s base and fracture America First unity.

This is why @POTUS made this statement and if you had been paying attention during his first administration you should be aware of the tactics and ashamed of yourselves. I’d go as far as to say some of you are aware and pushing the deep state agenda, but I digress!Image
This was NEVER a vote to release the files.
What Democrats brought to the floor was a procedural motion, not a bill for transparency.

They hijacked another bill to jam in an Epstein-related amendment knowing Republicans would block it to protect legislative process.

The motion Democrats introduced would have only allowed a floor vote — not released any files.

Republicans voted 211–210 to block that procedural trick, and Dems instantly turned around and screamed:

“See?! Republicans are hiding Epstein’s client list!!”

That’s an information op.

Even Speaker Mike Johnson, who has publicly supported transparency, blocked the vote — not because he wants to hide anything — but because this was a weaponized procedural ambush, not a good-faith effort.

Ask yourself:
Why didn’t Democrats introduce a clean bill?
Read 11 tweets
Jul 10
🚨 MEGA THREAD: You’ve been lied to — by the very people who claimed to expose the truth.🚨

This is the REAL story behind Epstein, Maxwell, QAnon, and the intelligence web that weaponized it all against the American people — and against President Trump.

Two explosive reports drop below. They will change the way you see the past 10 years.

👇🧵

For years, QAnon lured patriots with promises of sealed indictments, child rescue ops, and elite takedowns.

But what if I told you:
👉 QAnon was not an organic awakening — it was an intelligence distraction
👉 Epstein & Maxwell were never just perverts — they were espionage assets
👉 And the same names linked to CIA/Mossad ops were also whispering in Trump’s ear — only to undermine him from within

We connected the dots between:
🔹 Steve Bannon
🔹 Pompeo & Priebus
🔹 Frank Gaffney & CSP
🔹 Generals Vallely & McInerney
🔹 John Brennan, James Clapper
🔹 QAnon psy-ops & psychological warfare
🔹 Epstein’s blackmail operation & compromised elites
🔹 The bizarre “Hammer & Scorecard” disinfo campaign
🔹 And how Flynn’s ouster was an inside job by these very operatives

This isn’t speculation. This is documented intel, sourced, mapped, and presented so YOU can see the bigger operation at play.

⚠️ While you were distracted by crumbs from anonymous LARPs, real evidence of trafficking, blackmail, and CIA compromise was buried.

The Epstein case? Covered up.
The client list? Buried.
The QAnon crowd? Used as pawns.

And who benefited? Not Trump.
Not We The People.
But the same intel networks that have been running regime change ops overseas… now turned inward.

These reports lay it all out.
You won’t find this on cable news.
You won’t hear this from your favorite influencers.
But if you’re ready to unplug from the weaponized illusion, read on.

👇 Here are the receipts:
📎 Report 1: Epstein-Maxwell: Intelligence Links & Blackmail Ops
📎 Report 2: Bannon, Flynn’s Ouster, QAnon, and The Counter-Trump Network

RT this thread.
Awaken the ones who thought they already were.
‼️REPORT #1‼️

Epstein-Maxwell Network: Intelligence Links, Blackmail Operations, and the QAnon Distraction

Overview

This report examines evidence that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ran a blackmail-based sex trafficking network potentially linked to intelligence agencies, and how investigations into their crimes were impeded by suppression of evidence. It also analyzes how the QAnon phenomenon functioned as a psychological operation to distract and discredit serious inquiry into elite abuse networks. A comprehensive timeline (2005–2025) is provided, detailing key developments in the Epstein case – from initial investigations and plea deals to evidence suppression, major arrests, trials, and recent Department of Justice (DOJ)/FBI actions. Finally, we discuss how Virginia Giuffre’s recruitment at Mar-a-Lago was used to “frame” President Trump by association (despite lack of evidence of his involvement), and assess the significance of the July 2025 DOJ memo denying any “client list” and the coincident FBI investigations of former officials James Comey and John Brennan. The evidence suggests these events are not coincidental but rather part of a deeper campaign to expose long-hidden networks of corruption.

Epstein-Maxwell Network as an Intelligence-Linked Blackmail Operation

Longstanding allegations hold that Epstein’s sex trafficking ring was not merely for personal gratification or profit, but designed to compromise powerful individuals – a classic “honey trap” operation potentially run with intelligence backing. Multiple pieces of evidence and testimony support this theory:
•Witness and Insider Testimony: Former Israeli military intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe alleges in his 2019 book that Epstein and Maxwell ran a “honey-trap” blackmail operation on behalf of Israeli intelligence . According to Ben-Menashe – who claimed to have been a handler for Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell (an alleged Mossad agent) – the duo would procure underage girls, induce powerful figures to engage in illegal sex acts, and secretly record the encounters for leverage . As he bluntly put it: “[Epstein] was taking photos of politicians f**king 14-year-old girls – they would just blackmail people like that.” Such testimony, while anecdotal, aligns with reports that Epstein wired his properties with hidden cameras and kept archives of recordings.
•Concealed Cameras and Secret Recordings: Evidence gathered by law enforcement corroborates that Epstein’s residences were extensively wired for video surveillance. During a 2005 Palm Beach police raid, two hidden cameras were discovered in his mansion . Epstein’s close associate Ghislaine Maxwell told a friend that his private island was “completely wired for video” to record everyone “as an insurance policy” . One Epstein employee, Maria Farmer, recounted being shown a “media room” in Epstein’s New York mansion with monitors for pinhole cameras covering bathrooms and bedrooms – clearly set up to capture compromising footage . Epstein hinted at his own blackmail materials in a 2018 off-record interview, bragging that he had “dirt” on powerful people’s sexual proclivities . Indeed, when the FBI raided Epstein’s NYC townhouse in 2019, agents found a locked safe of CDs labeled with names, including titles like “young [Name] + [Name]” – apparent evidence of illicit encounters .
Unusually Lenient Treatment – Potential CIA/Mossad Protection: In hindsight, Epstein’s ability to evade serious punishment for so long suggests he was “protected.” In 2007, federal prosecutor Alexander Acosta (then U.S. Attorney in Miami) agreed to an extraordinarily lenient non-prosecution agreement (NPA) that immunized Epstein and “any potential co-conspirators” from federal charges . Years later, Acosta privately explained to Trump transition officials why he’d cut the 2007 deal: “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” and that Epstein was “above my pay grade.” . This stunning admission (later reported in The Daily Beast and confirmed in Acosta’s 2019 press conference) implies Epstein may have been an intelligence asset whose activities were covertly sanctioned . Acosta has never elaborated, except to say he’d heard “reporting to that effect,” while others in DOJ claimed powerful friends of Epstein simply pressured for leniency . Nonetheless, the outcome was that Epstein served only a brief county jail term in 2008 with generous work-release privileges, and the FBI’s broader investigation into other perpetrators was “essentially shut down” by the NPA .
•Documented Intelligence Connections: Epstein’s social and business ties reinforce the intelligence-link hypothesis. He cultivated relationships with numerous high-level political and security figures. Notably, Epstein had a long friendship and business dealings with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who visited Epstein’s townhouse numerous times (once even photographed hiding his face) . Epstein allegedly visited Israel in 2008 seeking refuge from U.S. prosecution . William Burns, now CIA Director, met with Epstein on at least three occasions in 2014 (after Epstein’s first conviction) when Burns was Deputy Secretary of State . Epstein also claimed to work as a “bounty hunter” recovering embezzled funds for governments and to have been involved in shadowy arms deals in the 1980s – activities suggestive of intelligence cooperation. Steve Bannon (former White House strategist) has stated he believed Epstein was a spy or “middleman for intelligence services” and even sought to tap Epstein’s supposed intel connections . While no intelligence agency has officially confirmed employing Epstein, even mainstream analyses concede the circumstantial evidence of espionage is strong . As one Israeli intelligence veteran told TRT World, Epstein might have started as an “intelligence asset” who later became a liability – losing his protectors and thus finally facing arrest in 2019 .
•Robert Maxwell Connection: Ghislaine Maxwell’s late father, Robert Maxwell, was widely suspected of being an operative for Mossad (Israel’s intelligence agency) during his publishing career. Ari Ben-Menashe and others allege Robert Maxwell introduced Epstein to Israeli intelligence in the early 1990s . Through Ghislaine, who was Epstein’s close partner, the pair reportedly had direct channels to Mossad. The hypothesis is that Epstein’s elite sexual blackmail scheme served the geopolitical interests of those intelligence patrons – ensnaring U.S. and foreign power-brokers who could later be influenced. “Fing around is not a crime… but fing a fourteen-year-old girl is a crime,” Ben-Menashe quipped, explaining how compromising tapes could ensure cooperation on matters of state
Read 22 tweets
Jul 10
‼️REPORT #2‼️

Intelligence Links Behind Bannon, QAnon, and the Epstein-Maxwell Network

Introduction: Recent revelations and historical patterns suggest a disturbing convergence of political operatives, retired military officers, and intelligence-linked networks all working in concert. From the ouster of Gen. Michael Flynn early in the Trump administration to the rise of the QAnon conspiracy movement and even the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, a common thread emerges. Seemingly disparate events – Steve Bannon maneuvering in the White House, generals like Paul Vallely and Thomas McInerney pushing wild theories, and an international blackmail ring involving Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – all bear the fingerprints of sophisticated intelligence operations. Below, we piece together these elements to reveal a possible “one big operation” orchestrated by an intelligence-connected ecosystem that transcends traditional political boundaries.

Steve Bannon, Flynn’s Ouster, and Pompeo’s Rise

Steve Bannon’s tenure as White House Chief Strategist was marked by power struggles and behind-the-scenes influence. One key episode was the abrupt ouster of National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn in February 2017. While Flynn officially resigned over misleading the Vice President, reports at the time hinted that White House rivals – Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and Steve Bannon – had lost confidence in Flynn and facilitated his removal. The move cleared the way for a more establishment figure, Gen. H.R. McMaster, to assume the role. It also tightened Bannon’s and Priebus’s grip over the early national security agenda. Notably, Bannon championed Mike Pompeo for CIA Director, seeing Pompeo as an ideologically aligned ally. Pompeo, a former congressman, shared Bannon’s hardline views on issues like Islamist extremism and Iran, thanks in part to Pompeo’s close association with Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy (CSP) . (Pompeo had been interviewed on Gaffney’s radio program over twenty times and even headlined CSP’s 2015 “Defeat Jihad Summit” .) By advocating Pompeo, Bannon helped install at the CIA a figure sympathetic to their worldview.

This maneuvering underscores how Bannon leveraged ideological networks to place key figures in power. Pompeo’s alignment with CSP – a think tank notorious for its anti-Muslim, Cold War-style alarmism – was a signal that the Trump intelligence apparatus would pursue a confrontational, “deep state”–skeptical agenda. Indeed, Bannon himself has longstanding ties to Gaffney’s circle; he and Gaffney later collaborated on initiatives like the Committee on the Present Danger: China, blending anti-communist and nationalist rhetoric. The through-line is that Bannon, Pompeo, and their allies were enmeshed in a tight network of hawkish defense ideologues that predated the Trump era. This network laid the groundwork for the information campaigns and psy-ops that would soon follow.
Gaffney’s CSP Network: The Generals and the Ideological Nexus

The Center for Security Policy, founded by former Reagan official Frank Gaffney, emerges as a crucial hub connecting many of these players. Gaffney’s CSP has for decades propagated conspiracy-laden narratives about enemies “within” (from Muslims to leftists), advocating aggressive countermeasures. Retired military officers like Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely and Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney have been integral to Gaffney’s network, lending it an air of military legitimacy. Both men served on CSP’s “Military Committee” alongside other hardline generals . In fact, Vallely headed that committee at one point and McInerney was also a member . Their alliance with Gaffney meant adopting CSP’s core themes: the belief that the U.S. government had been deeply infiltrated by Islamist or leftist traitors, and that extraordinary measures were needed to purge these “enemies within.” This mirrors the “deep state” narrative that later became central to QAnon.

Frank Gaffney’s influence on these retired officers is evident. Vallely and McInerney, after careers in military intelligence, embraced Gaffney’s brand of hyper-nationalist, anti-Islam, anti-Iran ideology. Both even signed on to hawkish campaigns like opposition to the Iran nuclear deal in 2015, coordinated by Gaffney’s group. As one analysis noted, “CSP’s fingerprints” were all over a letter by ex-military officers lobbying against the Iran deal – Vallely and McInerney, among others, were signatories and key organizers . These same men simultaneously engaged with domestic conspiracy theories: for example, Adm. James “Ace” Lyons (another CSP ally) openly claimed the Obama administration was infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, even smearing CIA Director John Brennan as a secret Muslim double agent . Such wild allegations prefigured the QAnon narrative of a “cabal” infiltrating government.

In short, the CSP network provided an ideological template: it identified internal enemies, demonized them, and even floated the idea of extra-constitutional action to save the Republic. Gaffney and his cohort urged a kind of McCarthyite cleansing of government . This template would soon be repurposed for a broader audience via digital propaganda.
“Hammer & Scorecard”: An Election Conspiracy as Psy-Op

Steve Bannon, former Trump strategist, played a pivotal role in amplifying the false “Hammer & Scorecard” vote-hacking conspiracy during the 2020 election . He later admitted he didn’t find the claims credible , raising questions about why he promoted them.

As the 2020 election approached, a fantastical new conspiracy theory burst onto the scene: “Hammer and Scorecard.” It claimed a CIA supercomputer (“The Hammer”) and software (“Scorecard”) were hijacked to steal votes from Trump. This tale can be traced directly to Dennis Montgomery, a discredited former contractor with a long history of peddling hoaxes . Yet it gained traction thanks to amplification by figures in Trump’s orbit – most notably Steve Bannon. On the eve of Election Day 2020, Bannon used his “War Room” podcast to introduce and promote Montgomery’s claims, citing a fringe blog as evidence . He brought on retired Gen. Tom McInerney (fresh from Gaffney’s circle) to vouch for Montgomery. “Dennis invented Scorecard,” McInerney proclaimed, calling Montgomery a “genius” who “loves America” . Sidney Powell, then an attorney for Trump, joined the same broadcast to bolster the narrative, insisting there was “absolute confirmation” of Hammer and Scorecard’s existence .

This was a textbook psychological operation. An implausible story involving secret CIA programs and international vote-rigging was laundered to the masses by seemingly authoritative voices – a former White House strategist and a retired three-star general. The effect was electrifying: within days, Hammer & Scorecard went from obscurity to a viral sensation in the election-denial ecosystem . It primed millions of Trump supporters to distrust the voting machines even before polls closed.

Of course, no evidence ever emerged to support the Hammer/Scorecard tale. It was swiftly debunked by cybersecurity experts as “nonsense” . Even Bannon himself, months later, quietly admitted “I’m not a believer… I fail to see the evidence” . Yet the damage was done – belief in a stolen election had been seeded. The intriguing question is why Bannon and McInerney pushed a fabrication they likely knew was dubious. One plausible answer: as an information warfare tactic. By injecting this narrative, they created confusion and a rallying cry for Trump’s base, setting the stage for challenges to the election outcome. In other words, Hammer & Scorecard was a psy-op, leveraging Bannon’s media savvy and McInerney’s military pedigree to weaponize disinformation. This aligns with the broader pattern: the same CSP-connected actors deploying propaganda techniques honed in the intelligence world.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 8
🚨 WAKE UP. You’ve been lied to.

The Epstein case was REAL — the crimes, the victims, the corruption. But QAnon hijacked it. They turned a legit scandal into a disinfo psyop to keep you chasing shadows, talking tunnels, satanic temples & “client lists” that never existed. Sound familiar?

This wasn’t a movement for truth. It was a psychological trap — using truth as bait to flood your mind with bullshit.

While you focused on conspiracy theories, you ignored actual crimes against children happening right here in America — from domestic trafficking rings to immigrant children who disappeared under the Biden administration. It’s time to stop with the bullshit and start defending and protecting our kids.

It’s time to stop defending a psyop and start looking at facts. You want to know how the Epstein case was weaponized against you?

Read this. Then ask yourself who really benefited from Q.

👇 FULL REPORT:
How QAnon Weaponized the Jeffrey Epstein Case as a PsyOp

Background: Epstein’s Crimes Were Public Knowledge Before QAnon

Jeffrey Epstein’s abusive history was well-documented years before QAnon ever mentioned him. Law enforcement began investigating Epstein in 2005 after reports he molested a 14-year-old girl in Palm Beach . This led to Epstein’s 2006 indictment and controversial 2008 plea deal on sex-crime charges, which sparked public outrage and media scrutiny at the time . By 2009, multiple victims (such as Virginia Giuffre) were filing lawsuits seeking justice, openly naming powerful associates like Prince Andrew as participants or witnesses in Epstein’s activities . In fact, years before “Q” appeared online, Epstein’s private Caribbean domain – Little St. James, infamously dubbed “Epstein Island” – had already entered court records and mainstream news. For example, a 2015 federal filing by Giuffre alleged she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on Epstein’s Virgin Islands property, a claim widely reported in the press (prompting strong denials from Buckingham Palace) . Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, the so-called “Lolita Express” flight logs of his private jet, and rumors of depraved events on his island were all publicly known well before QAnon – through investigative journalism, lawsuits, and even local gossip. In short, the raw material of the Epstein saga was not a secret; it was in the public domain long before Q first seized on it.
QAnon’s Epstein Timeline: Drops from 2017 Onward

QAnon did not “discover” Epstein’s crimes – but it did weave them into its conspiracy narrative early on. Below is a timeline of notable Q “drops” referencing Epstein, illustrating how Q framed the case over time:
•Nov 11, 2017 (Q Drop #133): Q invokes Epstein out of the blue, posing a series of rhetorical questions linking Epstein’s private island to satanic ritual. “Does Satan exist? Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist? Who worships Satan? What is a cult? Epstein Island. What is a temple? What occurs in a temple? … Why is the temple on top of a mountain? … Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?” . In this cryptic way, Q implied Epstein’s Caribbean temple was a site of cult worship and elite evil, priming followers to view Epstein as part of a global satanic cabal.
•April 3, 2018 (Q Drop #999): Following Epstein-related internet chatter, Q fueled a sensational rumor: “Why is Epstein spending $29mm to bury the tunnels underneath his temple on Epstein Island?” Q wrote, adding, “Problem. Phones were allowed in. These people are stupid.” . This claim that Epstein paid $29 million to hide underground tunnels – presented as a Socratic question – had no evidence behind it. (It echoed speculative YouTube videos and forum posts at the time.) Nevertheless, by amplifying it as a leading question, Q gave the tunnel lore an air of legitimacy within the Q community.
•April 6, 2018 (Q Drops #1001 and related): Q’s posts around this date included an aerial “bird’s-eye view” photo of Epstein’s island and more ominous one-word clues: “Sacrifice. … Tunnels. … Pure EVIL.” . In another post Q showed an image of Epstein’s private jet with the caption “Epstein’s plane. Who is she? Follow friends. Friends lead to others.” – referring to an unidentified young woman . No names or facts were provided, just hints. Followers eagerly filled in the blanks, some speculating that the woman was a supposed “sex slave-turned-recruiter” for Epstein – a claim Q never explicitly made, but which fans invented through “decoding” Q’s clues .
•March 2019 (Q Drops #3050, #3140): As Epstein news resurfaced (preceding his July 2019 re-arrest), Q doubled down. One drop linked to court documents (flight logs) and declared, “This is not just about sex trafficking… [2] – Occult / Worship of Evil (temple)”, explicitly suggesting Epstein’s activities went beyond abuse to Satanic or ritualistic crimes at the island’s temple . Another drop outright stated: “Epstein island dungeon (beneath the temple). Sex & torture rooms. … Untouchable?” . By now Q was treating the existence of underground torture chambers as established truth – despite no proof – thereby cementing the Epstein-as-Satanic-monster narrative among believers.
•July 2019 (Q Drops #3385, #3399): Just after Epstein’s arrest made headlines worldwide, QAnon eagerly claimed vindication. Q asserted the Epstein investigation had been underway in secret under Trump’s DOJ all along, cryptically crediting then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions . Q also reposted the island temple imagery: “Welcome to Epstein Island. Ask yourself, is this normal? What does a ‘Temple’ typically symbolize? … Tunnels underneath? … Symbolism will be their downfall. These people are EVIL.” . This victory lap messaging encouraged followers to believe Epstein’s downfall was proof that the Q “plan” to expose elite pedophiles was real. (In reality, of course, Epstein was arrested through conventional law enforcement work – not a Q-style military operation – but QAnon co-opted the moment as if it were their doing.)
Read 28 tweets
Jun 23
THREAD:

You’re not helping Trump. You’re setting him up.
The truth about “patriots” pushing anti-Israel psyops and how it’s endangering President Trump, his second term, and YOU. 👇

A few months into Trump’s 2nd term, after dismantling Biden’s domestic censorship state, he just took bold action:
🚨 Ordered targeted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

Why? To prevent war later. But the backlash didn’t come from the Left.
It came from “our side.”

Suddenly, anonymous “conservative” influencers, Q hangers-on, and fake anti-war accounts flood the timeline with:
•“Trump is a Zionist puppet”
•“Israel tricked him into WW3”
•“This is all for the Jews”

Let’s be clear: That narrative is NOT organic.
It’s a PSYOP.
These narratives:
•Echo Iranian regime propaganda
•Are amplified by Russian and Chinese networks
•Mirror talking points from the SAME military psyop circles that invented QAnon

Yes, the same people who confused, paralyzed, and turned patriots against each other in 2020–2022.

Some of you forgot:
QAnon wasn’t an awakening — it was a weapon.
It was designed to:
•Distract from real evidence
•Divide Flynn from Trump
•Hijack the Digital Soldiers movement

Now the same black-hat psyop structure is re-deploying — with a new goal:

TURN THE MAGA BASE AGAINST TRUMP
Not with indictments.
Not with CNN.
But by hijacking our own movement and seeding emotional narratives like:
•“He’s a war criminal now”
•“He betrayed America First”
•“Flynn warned us — Trump is compromised”

This is INFORMATION WARFARE.
#5GW
Let me spell it out:
If you push anti-Israel blood libels & pretend Trump is a puppet, you are:

✅ Dividing the America First movement
✅ Weakening U.S. deterrence against Iran & China
✅ Setting up the narrative for another Trump assassination attempt
✅ Doing the enemy’s work

Let’s get something straight:
Trump didn’t bomb Iran “for Israel.”
He did it to prevent a nuclear war later. To neutralize real threats, not start forever wars.

Peace through strength ≠ Neocon warmongering.
He’s not Cheney. He’s not Biden.
He’s being STRATEGIC.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 22
The history of Iran prior to 1945 is deep, complex, and spans several millennia. Here’s a structured overview of the key eras and events leading up to the modern period:



I. Ancient Iran (Before Islam)

1. Elamite Civilization (c. 2700–539 BCE)
•Located in the southwest (modern Khuzestan).
•One of the earliest urban civilizations in the region.
•Frequently interacted and warred with Mesopotamian empires like Sumer, Akkad, and Babylon.

2. Median Empire (c. 678–550 BCE)
•First Iranian empire formed by Indo-Iranian tribes (the Medes).
•Defeated the Assyrians with the help of the Babylonians.
•United much of the Iranian plateau.

3. Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BCE)
•Founded by Cyrus the Great, who conquered Lydia, Babylon, and established a vast empire.
•Noted for human rights (Cyrus Cylinder), administration, road systems (Royal Road), and religious tolerance.
•Reached its height under Darius I and Xerxes I.
•Fell to Alexander the Great in 330 BCE.

4. Seleucid Empire (330–150 BCE)
•Hellenistic state formed after Alexander’s death.
•Struggled to control Iranian lands due to local resistance.

5. Parthian Empire (247 BCE – 224 CE)
•Founded by the Parni tribe.
•Known for effective cavalry and decentralized governance.
•Constantly in conflict with Rome.

6. Sasanian Empire (224–651 CE)
•Last pre-Islamic Persian empire.
•Zoroastrian state religion; promoted Persian culture and arts.
•Engaged in long wars with the Byzantine Empire.
•Eventually fell to Muslim Arab invasions.
II. Islamic & Post-Islamic Iran (651–1501)

7. Early Islamic Period (651–1055)
•Iran becomes part of the Umayyad and later Abbasid Caliphates.
•Non-Arab Iranians (mawali) faced social discrimination.
•However, Persians gradually regained influence, especially under Abbasids.
•Persian literature and science flourished (e.g., Rumi, Avicenna, Ferdowsi).

8. Persian Renaissance & Local Dynasties
•Tahirids, Samanids, Buyids, and Ziyarids reassert Persian autonomy under Islamic rule.
•Revival of Persian language and culture.
•Development of Persian Islamic art, science, and poetry.

9. Seljuk Empire (1037–1194)
•Turkic rulers who embraced Persian culture.
•Patronized Persian scholars like Omar Khayyam and Al-Ghazali.
•Ruled a Sunni Muslim state with Persian bureaucracy.

10. Mongol & Timurid Invasions (13th–15th Century)
•Genghis Khan and later Hulagu Khan (Mongols) devastated Iran (~1220s).
•Formation of the Ilkhanate in Iran (Mongol successor state).
•Later, Timur (Tamerlane) sacked major cities in Iran again (~late 1300s).
•Despite destruction, Persian art, architecture, and literature persisted.



III. Safavid to Qajar Era (1501–1925)

11. Safavid Empire (1501–1736)
•Founded by Shah Ismail I.
•Made Twelver Shi’a Islam the state religion, defining Iran’s religious identity.
•Capital moved to Isfahan under Shah Abbas I, who made it a cultural and architectural center.
•Constant wars with Ottoman Empire.

12. Afsharid & Zand Dynasties (1736–1794)
•After Safavid collapse, Nader Shah (Afsharid) took power—briefly invaded India and looted Delhi.
•Zand dynasty under Karim Khan Zand ruled part of Iran and was known for internal peace.

13. Qajar Dynasty (1794–1925)
•Founded by Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar.
•Faced increasing foreign interference, especially from Britain and Russia.
•Lost large territories in the Russo-Persian Wars (1804–13, 1826–28).
•Tobacco Protest (1891) and Constitutional Revolution (1905–1911) showed growing civil resistance and demand for modern governance.



IV. Pahlavi Period Begins (1925–1941)

14. Reza Shah Pahlavi (r. 1925–1941)
•Former military officer, seized power and founded the Pahlavi Dynasty.
•Implemented modernization and secular reforms: railways, schools, new civil codes, reduced clerical power.
•Centralized authority; changed Persia’s name to Iran (1935).
•Tried to reduce British and Soviet influence, but maintained ties with Germany.



V. World War II Prelude (1941–1945)
•Reza Shah’s neutral stance and ties to Nazi Germany raised Allied suspicions.
•In 1941, British and Soviet forces invaded Iran (Operation Countenance) to secure oil fields and supply lines to the USSR.
•Reza Shah was forced to abdicate; his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, took the throne.
•Iran became a vital Allied supply route (the “Persian Corridor”) during the war.

Iran: 1945–2025 Timeline



I. The Cold War Era (1945–1979)

🛢️ Post-WWII & Oil Politics (1945–1953)
•Reza Shah had been forced to abdicate in 1941; his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, became Shah.
•Iran was occupied by British and Soviet troops until 1946.
•Tensions rose when the Soviets refused to leave Azerbaijan province, backing separatist movements (later crushed).
•Oil was central: Iran’s oil was controlled by Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now BP), with profits heavily favoring Britain.

⚖️ Mossadegh & the 1953 Coup
•Mohammad Mossadegh elected Prime Minister (1951).
•He nationalized Iranian oil, enraging Britain and the U.S.
•In 1953, the CIA and MI6 organized Operation Ajax, a coup that overthrew Mossadegh and restored the Shah’s power.
•This created deep anti-Western resentment that would later explode in 1979.

II. Pahlavi Dictatorship & Modernization (1953–1979)

👑 The Shah’s Rule (1953–1979)
•Mohammad Reza Shah launched the White Revolution in the 1960s:
•Land reform
•Women’s suffrage
•Literacy campaigns
•Industrialization
•Rapid modernization, but authoritarian rule.
•Used SAVAK, a brutal secret police, to crush dissent.

📈 Oil Boom & Inequality
•1970s: Massive oil revenue following the OPEC crisis (1973).
•Wealth increased, but so did inequality, corruption, and Westernization.
•Religious conservatives and leftist groups opposed the regime.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(