Jeremiah 49:11
Leave thy fatherless children, I will preserve them alive; and let thy widows trust in me.
Jul 19 • 11 tweets • 24 min read
Systematic Failures in Unaccompanied Children Processing Under the Biden Administration (2021-2024)
This Thread examines systemic failures in the processing of unaccompanied children (UCs) at the U.S. border during the Biden administration (2021-2024), focusing on policies, inter-agency coordination, and oversight gaps that contributed to losing track of over 300,000 UCs. It highlights key structural issues, such as reliance on Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for Notices to Appear (NTAs), separation of roles under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2008 and the Flores Settlement Agreement, lack of unified tracking, and the termination of the 2018 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on information-sharing. All sources, including Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports, case studies, and additional findings, are documented for evidentiary purposes.
Executive Summary
The Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis resulted in unprecedented surges of UCs, with over 500,000 entering the system from 2021-2024. Systemic failures—rooted in policy reversals, resource shortfalls, and inter-agency silos—led to inadequate vetting, rushed releases, and minimal post-release monitoring, rendering approximately 323,000 UCs untraceable. This includes 291,000+ without NTAs and 32,000 who missed court hearings. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
Key failures include DHS/ICE’s delays in issuing NTAs, HHS/ORR’s limited follow-up (e.g., undocumented 30-day calls in 22% of cases), and the March 2021 MOA termination under Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, directed by President Joe Biden, which hindered real-time data sharing on sponsor addresses and safety concerns. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…
These gaps exposed UCs to risks like trafficking, exploitation, and unknown fates, as evidenced by OIG audits, congressional hearings, and case studies. Recommendations urge restored data-sharing, mandatory NTAs pre-release, and enhanced tracking.
Jul 17 • 11 tweets • 9 min read
🧵Stop Doing the Bidding for the Deep State and Pay Attention to the Actual Crime: NGOs and Intel Agencies Are Weaponizing Psychological Ops to Sow Division Against the America First Agenda
🚨 Yesterday during the DHS Oversight Hearing, Democrat Rep. Mr. Goodman and others strongly implied that President Trump is personally blocking the release of Epstein files… because he’s in them.
👀 Watch the attach video that shows just how everyone screaming for the release of the Epstein Files allowed for the weaponization to derail actual investigations into crimes against Children!
@GenFlynn @MaryFlynnONeil1 @taraleerodas @SunTzusWar @boonecutler @briangamble_v1 @Crux41507251 @LizCrokin @LynzPiperLoomis
Follow: x.com/amerifuture?s=…
Let me be clear:
There is NO evidence that President Trump is named in any unreleased Epstein files.
This isn’t oversight — this is optical warfare. This is a political op—an old playbook being used again to confuse Trump’s base and fracture America First unity.
This is why @POTUS made this statement and if you had been paying attention during his first administration you should be aware of the tactics and ashamed of yourselves. I’d go as far as to say some of you are aware and pushing the deep state agenda, but I digress!
Jul 10 • 22 tweets • 39 min read
🚨 MEGA THREAD: You’ve been lied to — by the very people who claimed to expose the truth.🚨
This is the REAL story behind Epstein, Maxwell, QAnon, and the intelligence web that weaponized it all against the American people — and against President Trump.
Two explosive reports drop below. They will change the way you see the past 10 years.
👇🧵
For years, QAnon lured patriots with promises of sealed indictments, child rescue ops, and elite takedowns.
But what if I told you:
👉 QAnon was not an organic awakening — it was an intelligence distraction
👉 Epstein & Maxwell were never just perverts — they were espionage assets
👉 And the same names linked to CIA/Mossad ops were also whispering in Trump’s ear — only to undermine him from within
We connected the dots between:
🔹 Steve Bannon
🔹 Pompeo & Priebus
🔹 Frank Gaffney & CSP
🔹 Generals Vallely & McInerney
🔹 John Brennan, James Clapper
🔹 QAnon psy-ops & psychological warfare
🔹 Epstein’s blackmail operation & compromised elites
🔹 The bizarre “Hammer & Scorecard” disinfo campaign
🔹 And how Flynn’s ouster was an inside job by these very operatives
This isn’t speculation. This is documented intel, sourced, mapped, and presented so YOU can see the bigger operation at play.
⚠️ While you were distracted by crumbs from anonymous LARPs, real evidence of trafficking, blackmail, and CIA compromise was buried.
The Epstein case? Covered up.
The client list? Buried.
The QAnon crowd? Used as pawns.
And who benefited? Not Trump.
Not We The People.
But the same intel networks that have been running regime change ops overseas… now turned inward.
These reports lay it all out.
You won’t find this on cable news.
You won’t hear this from your favorite influencers.
But if you’re ready to unplug from the weaponized illusion, read on.
👇 Here are the receipts:
📎 Report 1: Epstein-Maxwell: Intelligence Links & Blackmail Ops
📎 Report 2: Bannon, Flynn’s Ouster, QAnon, and The Counter-Trump Network
RT this thread.
Awaken the ones who thought they already were.
‼️REPORT #1‼️
Epstein-Maxwell Network: Intelligence Links, Blackmail Operations, and the QAnon Distraction
Overview
This report examines evidence that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ran a blackmail-based sex trafficking network potentially linked to intelligence agencies, and how investigations into their crimes were impeded by suppression of evidence. It also analyzes how the QAnon phenomenon functioned as a psychological operation to distract and discredit serious inquiry into elite abuse networks. A comprehensive timeline (2005–2025) is provided, detailing key developments in the Epstein case – from initial investigations and plea deals to evidence suppression, major arrests, trials, and recent Department of Justice (DOJ)/FBI actions. Finally, we discuss how Virginia Giuffre’s recruitment at Mar-a-Lago was used to “frame” President Trump by association (despite lack of evidence of his involvement), and assess the significance of the July 2025 DOJ memo denying any “client list” and the coincident FBI investigations of former officials James Comey and John Brennan. The evidence suggests these events are not coincidental but rather part of a deeper campaign to expose long-hidden networks of corruption.
Epstein-Maxwell Network as an Intelligence-Linked Blackmail Operation
Longstanding allegations hold that Epstein’s sex trafficking ring was not merely for personal gratification or profit, but designed to compromise powerful individuals – a classic “honey trap” operation potentially run with intelligence backing. Multiple pieces of evidence and testimony support this theory:
•Witness and Insider Testimony: Former Israeli military intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe alleges in his 2019 book that Epstein and Maxwell ran a “honey-trap” blackmail operation on behalf of Israeli intelligence . According to Ben-Menashe – who claimed to have been a handler for Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell (an alleged Mossad agent) – the duo would procure underage girls, induce powerful figures to engage in illegal sex acts, and secretly record the encounters for leverage . As he bluntly put it: “[Epstein] was taking photos of politicians f**king 14-year-old girls – they would just blackmail people like that.” Such testimony, while anecdotal, aligns with reports that Epstein wired his properties with hidden cameras and kept archives of recordings.
•Concealed Cameras and Secret Recordings: Evidence gathered by law enforcement corroborates that Epstein’s residences were extensively wired for video surveillance. During a 2005 Palm Beach police raid, two hidden cameras were discovered in his mansion . Epstein’s close associate Ghislaine Maxwell told a friend that his private island was “completely wired for video” to record everyone “as an insurance policy” . One Epstein employee, Maria Farmer, recounted being shown a “media room” in Epstein’s New York mansion with monitors for pinhole cameras covering bathrooms and bedrooms – clearly set up to capture compromising footage . Epstein hinted at his own blackmail materials in a 2018 off-record interview, bragging that he had “dirt” on powerful people’s sexual proclivities . Indeed, when the FBI raided Epstein’s NYC townhouse in 2019, agents found a locked safe of CDs labeled with names, including titles like “young [Name] + [Name]” – apparent evidence of illicit encounters .
Jul 10 • 9 tweets • 17 min read
‼️REPORT #2‼️
Intelligence Links Behind Bannon, QAnon, and the Epstein-Maxwell Network
Introduction: Recent revelations and historical patterns suggest a disturbing convergence of political operatives, retired military officers, and intelligence-linked networks all working in concert. From the ouster of Gen. Michael Flynn early in the Trump administration to the rise of the QAnon conspiracy movement and even the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, a common thread emerges. Seemingly disparate events – Steve Bannon maneuvering in the White House, generals like Paul Vallely and Thomas McInerney pushing wild theories, and an international blackmail ring involving Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell – all bear the fingerprints of sophisticated intelligence operations. Below, we piece together these elements to reveal a possible “one big operation” orchestrated by an intelligence-connected ecosystem that transcends traditional political boundaries.
Steve Bannon, Flynn’s Ouster, and Pompeo’s Rise
Steve Bannon’s tenure as White House Chief Strategist was marked by power struggles and behind-the-scenes influence. One key episode was the abrupt ouster of National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn in February 2017. While Flynn officially resigned over misleading the Vice President, reports at the time hinted that White House rivals – Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and Steve Bannon – had lost confidence in Flynn and facilitated his removal. The move cleared the way for a more establishment figure, Gen. H.R. McMaster, to assume the role. It also tightened Bannon’s and Priebus’s grip over the early national security agenda. Notably, Bannon championed Mike Pompeo for CIA Director, seeing Pompeo as an ideologically aligned ally. Pompeo, a former congressman, shared Bannon’s hardline views on issues like Islamist extremism and Iran, thanks in part to Pompeo’s close association with Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy (CSP) . (Pompeo had been interviewed on Gaffney’s radio program over twenty times and even headlined CSP’s 2015 “Defeat Jihad Summit” .) By advocating Pompeo, Bannon helped install at the CIA a figure sympathetic to their worldview.
This maneuvering underscores how Bannon leveraged ideological networks to place key figures in power. Pompeo’s alignment with CSP – a think tank notorious for its anti-Muslim, Cold War-style alarmism – was a signal that the Trump intelligence apparatus would pursue a confrontational, “deep state”–skeptical agenda. Indeed, Bannon himself has longstanding ties to Gaffney’s circle; he and Gaffney later collaborated on initiatives like the Committee on the Present Danger: China, blending anti-communist and nationalist rhetoric. The through-line is that Bannon, Pompeo, and their allies were enmeshed in a tight network of hawkish defense ideologues that predated the Trump era. This network laid the groundwork for the information campaigns and psy-ops that would soon follow.
Gaffney’s CSP Network: The Generals and the Ideological Nexus
The Center for Security Policy, founded by former Reagan official Frank Gaffney, emerges as a crucial hub connecting many of these players. Gaffney’s CSP has for decades propagated conspiracy-laden narratives about enemies “within” (from Muslims to leftists), advocating aggressive countermeasures. Retired military officers like Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely and Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney have been integral to Gaffney’s network, lending it an air of military legitimacy. Both men served on CSP’s “Military Committee” alongside other hardline generals . In fact, Vallely headed that committee at one point and McInerney was also a member . Their alliance with Gaffney meant adopting CSP’s core themes: the belief that the U.S. government had been deeply infiltrated by Islamist or leftist traitors, and that extraordinary measures were needed to purge these “enemies within.” This mirrors the “deep state” narrative that later became central to QAnon.
Frank Gaffney’s influence on these retired officers is evident. Vallely and McInerney, after careers in military intelligence, embraced Gaffney’s brand of hyper-nationalist, anti-Islam, anti-Iran ideology. Both even signed on to hawkish campaigns like opposition to the Iran nuclear deal in 2015, coordinated by Gaffney’s group. As one analysis noted, “CSP’s fingerprints” were all over a letter by ex-military officers lobbying against the Iran deal – Vallely and McInerney, among others, were signatories and key organizers . These same men simultaneously engaged with domestic conspiracy theories: for example, Adm. James “Ace” Lyons (another CSP ally) openly claimed the Obama administration was infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, even smearing CIA Director John Brennan as a secret Muslim double agent . Such wild allegations prefigured the QAnon narrative of a “cabal” infiltrating government.
In short, the CSP network provided an ideological template: it identified internal enemies, demonized them, and even floated the idea of extra-constitutional action to save the Republic. Gaffney and his cohort urged a kind of McCarthyite cleansing of government . This template would soon be repurposed for a broader audience via digital propaganda.
Jul 8 • 28 tweets • 30 min read
🚨 WAKE UP. You’ve been lied to.
The Epstein case was REAL — the crimes, the victims, the corruption. But QAnon hijacked it. They turned a legit scandal into a disinfo psyop to keep you chasing shadows, talking tunnels, satanic temples & “client lists” that never existed. Sound familiar?
This wasn’t a movement for truth. It was a psychological trap — using truth as bait to flood your mind with bullshit.
While you focused on conspiracy theories, you ignored actual crimes against children happening right here in America — from domestic trafficking rings to immigrant children who disappeared under the Biden administration. It’s time to stop with the bullshit and start defending and protecting our kids.
It’s time to stop defending a psyop and start looking at facts. You want to know how the Epstein case was weaponized against you?
Read this. Then ask yourself who really benefited from Q.
👇 FULL REPORT:
How QAnon Weaponized the Jeffrey Epstein Case as a PsyOp
Background: Epstein’s Crimes Were Public Knowledge Before QAnon
Jeffrey Epstein’s abusive history was well-documented years before QAnon ever mentioned him. Law enforcement began investigating Epstein in 2005 after reports he molested a 14-year-old girl in Palm Beach . This led to Epstein’s 2006 indictment and controversial 2008 plea deal on sex-crime charges, which sparked public outrage and media scrutiny at the time . By 2009, multiple victims (such as Virginia Giuffre) were filing lawsuits seeking justice, openly naming powerful associates like Prince Andrew as participants or witnesses in Epstein’s activities . In fact, years before “Q” appeared online, Epstein’s private Caribbean domain – Little St. James, infamously dubbed “Epstein Island” – had already entered court records and mainstream news. For example, a 2015 federal filing by Giuffre alleged she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on Epstein’s Virgin Islands property, a claim widely reported in the press (prompting strong denials from Buckingham Palace) . Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, the so-called “Lolita Express” flight logs of his private jet, and rumors of depraved events on his island were all publicly known well before QAnon – through investigative journalism, lawsuits, and even local gossip. In short, the raw material of the Epstein saga was not a secret; it was in the public domain long before Q first seized on it.
Jun 23 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
THREAD:
You’re not helping Trump. You’re setting him up.
The truth about “patriots” pushing anti-Israel psyops and how it’s endangering President Trump, his second term, and YOU. 👇
A few months into Trump’s 2nd term, after dismantling Biden’s domestic censorship state, he just took bold action:
🚨 Ordered targeted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Why? To prevent war later. But the backlash didn’t come from the Left.
It came from “our side.”
Suddenly, anonymous “conservative” influencers, Q hangers-on, and fake anti-war accounts flood the timeline with:
•“Trump is a Zionist puppet”
•“Israel tricked him into WW3”
•“This is all for the Jews”
Let’s be clear: That narrative is NOT organic.
It’s a PSYOP.
These narratives:
•Echo Iranian regime propaganda
•Are amplified by Russian and Chinese networks
•Mirror talking points from the SAME military psyop circles that invented QAnon
Yes, the same people who confused, paralyzed, and turned patriots against each other in 2020–2022.
Some of you forgot:
QAnon wasn’t an awakening — it was a weapon.
It was designed to:
•Distract from real evidence
•Divide Flynn from Trump
•Hijack the Digital Soldiers movement
Now the same black-hat psyop structure is re-deploying — with a new goal:
TURN THE MAGA BASE AGAINST TRUMP
Not with indictments.
Not with CNN.
But by hijacking our own movement and seeding emotional narratives like:
•“He’s a war criminal now”
•“He betrayed America First”
•“Flynn warned us — Trump is compromised”
This is INFORMATION WARFARE.
#5GW
Jun 22 • 12 tweets • 13 min read
The history of Iran prior to 1945 is deep, complex, and spans several millennia. Here’s a structured overview of the key eras and events leading up to the modern period:
⸻
I. Ancient Iran (Before Islam)
1. Elamite Civilization (c. 2700–539 BCE)
•Located in the southwest (modern Khuzestan).
•One of the earliest urban civilizations in the region.
•Frequently interacted and warred with Mesopotamian empires like Sumer, Akkad, and Babylon.
2. Median Empire (c. 678–550 BCE)
•First Iranian empire formed by Indo-Iranian tribes (the Medes).
•Defeated the Assyrians with the help of the Babylonians.
•United much of the Iranian plateau.
3. Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BCE)
•Founded by Cyrus the Great, who conquered Lydia, Babylon, and established a vast empire.
•Noted for human rights (Cyrus Cylinder), administration, road systems (Royal Road), and religious tolerance.
•Reached its height under Darius I and Xerxes I.
•Fell to Alexander the Great in 330 BCE.
4. Seleucid Empire (330–150 BCE)
•Hellenistic state formed after Alexander’s death.
•Struggled to control Iranian lands due to local resistance.
5. Parthian Empire (247 BCE – 224 CE)
•Founded by the Parni tribe.
•Known for effective cavalry and decentralized governance.
•Constantly in conflict with Rome.
6. Sasanian Empire (224–651 CE)
•Last pre-Islamic Persian empire.
•Zoroastrian state religion; promoted Persian culture and arts.
•Engaged in long wars with the Byzantine Empire.
•Eventually fell to Muslim Arab invasions.
II. Islamic & Post-Islamic Iran (651–1501)
7. Early Islamic Period (651–1055)
•Iran becomes part of the Umayyad and later Abbasid Caliphates.
•Non-Arab Iranians (mawali) faced social discrimination.
•However, Persians gradually regained influence, especially under Abbasids.
•Persian literature and science flourished (e.g., Rumi, Avicenna, Ferdowsi).
8. Persian Renaissance & Local Dynasties
•Tahirids, Samanids, Buyids, and Ziyarids reassert Persian autonomy under Islamic rule.
•Revival of Persian language and culture.
•Development of Persian Islamic art, science, and poetry.
9. Seljuk Empire (1037–1194)
•Turkic rulers who embraced Persian culture.
•Patronized Persian scholars like Omar Khayyam and Al-Ghazali.
•Ruled a Sunni Muslim state with Persian bureaucracy.
10. Mongol & Timurid Invasions (13th–15th Century)
•Genghis Khan and later Hulagu Khan (Mongols) devastated Iran (~1220s).
•Formation of the Ilkhanate in Iran (Mongol successor state).
•Later, Timur (Tamerlane) sacked major cities in Iran again (~late 1300s).
•Despite destruction, Persian art, architecture, and literature persisted.
⸻
III. Safavid to Qajar Era (1501–1925)
11. Safavid Empire (1501–1736)
•Founded by Shah Ismail I.
•Made Twelver Shi’a Islam the state religion, defining Iran’s religious identity.
•Capital moved to Isfahan under Shah Abbas I, who made it a cultural and architectural center.
•Constant wars with Ottoman Empire.
12. Afsharid & Zand Dynasties (1736–1794)
•After Safavid collapse, Nader Shah (Afsharid) took power—briefly invaded India and looted Delhi.
•Zand dynasty under Karim Khan Zand ruled part of Iran and was known for internal peace.
13. Qajar Dynasty (1794–1925)
•Founded by Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar.
•Faced increasing foreign interference, especially from Britain and Russia.
•Lost large territories in the Russo-Persian Wars (1804–13, 1826–28).
•Tobacco Protest (1891) and Constitutional Revolution (1905–1911) showed growing civil resistance and demand for modern governance.
⸻
IV. Pahlavi Period Begins (1925–1941)
14. Reza Shah Pahlavi (r. 1925–1941)
•Former military officer, seized power and founded the Pahlavi Dynasty.
•Implemented modernization and secular reforms: railways, schools, new civil codes, reduced clerical power.
•Centralized authority; changed Persia’s name to Iran (1935).
•Tried to reduce British and Soviet influence, but maintained ties with Germany.
⸻
V. World War II Prelude (1941–1945)
•Reza Shah’s neutral stance and ties to Nazi Germany raised Allied suspicions.
•In 1941, British and Soviet forces invaded Iran (Operation Countenance) to secure oil fields and supply lines to the USSR.
•Reza Shah was forced to abdicate; his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, took the throne.
•Iran became a vital Allied supply route (the “Persian Corridor”) during the war.
⸻
Jun 12 • 9 tweets • 4 min read
🚨🚨So, Qanon is set up to fight against military industrial complex correct ? 🚨🚨
This seems like a compelling question, and the real answer is:
Wait for it………..🫣
not exactly…..at least, not in the way it might appear on the surface. Here’s a breakdown based on historical and forensic analysis:
🔹 QAnon’s Surface Narrative
QAnon presented itself as a populist, pro-Trump movement exposing:
•The “deep state”
•Global child trafficking rings
•Corruption in intelligence agencies and military leadership
•Endless wars and the military-industrial complex (MIC)
So yes, on the surface, Q appeared to rally patriots to resist globalism, war profiteering, and elite cabals — the kinds of issues traditionally associated with MIC corruption.
Jun 9 • 11 tweets • 8 min read
Thread Start
🚨🚨Partners of @NoKingsOrg—Full Breakdown
Here are all partners sorted as NGOs vs Unions/Other Non‑NGO Nonprofits, with brief descriptions and Key NGOs highlighted 🌍:
🚨🚨
Don’t take my word for it just type “noKing” or “mayday” in your search on X or any other platform!
🟢 NGOs (Advocacy & Public‑Good)
(non‑governmental, mission‑driven independent nonprofits)
1.ACLU – Civil liberties legal defense (founded 1920)
2.Greenpeace USA – Environmental activism 3.Center for Biological Diversity – Wildlife & habitat protection 4.Black Voters Matter – Voter mobilization, racial justice
5.Sunrise Movement – Youth climate activism
6.Common Cause – Government transparency advocacy
7.Move to Amend – Campaign finance reform
8.Reproductive Freedom for All – Reproductive rights advocacy
9.Physicians for Social Responsibility – Peace & public health
10.Climate Hawks Vote – Environmental electoral support11. 350.org – Global climate campaign 12. 5 Calls – Civic engagement reminders 13. Activate America – Progressive campaign org 14. Americans for Tax Fairness – Tax justice advocacy 15. Bend the Arc – Jewish social justice 16. Color of Change – Racial justice policy 17. Food & Water Watch – Public health & environment 18. Free Press Action – Media democracy 19. Human Rights Campaign – LGBTQ rights 20. Sierra Club – Environmental protection
…
(up to ~120 NGOs)
🔵 Unions & Other Non‑NGO Nonprofits
(member-focused, collective bargaining/professional groups)
1.American Federation of Teachers (AFT) – Educators & public sector union (1.7M members)
2.Albuquerque Teachers Federation – Local union 3.New Haven Federation of Teachers – Local union
4.Communications Workers of America – Telecom/public service union
5.National Nurses United – Nurses’ union
6.American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) – Federal workers union
7.National Treasury Employees Union – Treasury dept workers
8.UE – Electrical & machine workers union
9.UUP – SUNY university staff union
10.CFT – California Federation of Teachers
…
(~70+ more local unions)
Jun 8 • 23 tweets • 24 min read
🚨 INVESTIGATION THREAD: How Fiscal Sponsorship Enables Secret Funding: Could This Framework Be How Dark Money Is Funding Violent Protests, And Swatting Events?🚨
Watch @annvandersteel video Below, I will break down the documents Ann found using the framework below.
Then I will dive deep into how this is structured to fund these operations! Buckle up……
A leaked document exposes structured protest funding with staged payments, covert contacts, and financial opacity. But how does this system work? Let’s break down the fiscal sponsorship loophole that keeps it hidden. 🧵👇
Reposting from my suspended account @Jeremibullfrog2
H/t @PaulaCBlades17 for archiving my threads 🙏❤️
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1903103…
Fiscal Sponsorship 101
Instead of funding an unregistered group (like an Antifa cell), large donors give to 501(c)(3) fiscal sponsors like Tides Center, AFGJ, or New Venture Fund. These groups act as a legal front, shielding donors from scrutiny.
The sponsor handles financials, allowing activists to operate without direct IRS oversight.
Example: Tides Center
Tides has sponsored hundreds of activist groups, giving them tax-exempt status without requiring their own 990 filings. This creates a black box of funding that enables anonymous cash to flow into organized protests.(as well as many other forms of operations)
Leaked Document Highlights
•“D.A. Donnelly” as a secret contact (Does D.A. = Democracy Alliance?)
•“328BG” – A coded reference? Transaction ID?
•Multiple-stage funding before & after protests.
•“DO NOT REPORT THIS AS INCOME” – Avoiding tax trails?
Is This a One-Off? No.
•Arab Resource & Organizing Center (AROC) is a Tides-sponsored project.
•Refuse Fascism has ties to AFGJ, another fiscal sponsor.
•Soros-backed OSF funds Democracy Alliance, which channels $$ into progressive activism.
Bottom Line
🚨 Fiscal sponsorship legally launders political money into activist networks.
🚨 No need for direct grants—funds trickle down through shell nonprofits.
🚨 This shields donors, activists, & groups from accountability.
Jun 8 • 6 tweets • 8 min read
Kamala/Biden administration Knew what was taking place and I’m about to prove it!
Why did congress fight President Trump so hard on the border wall and his policies?
They all are involved!
🚨The Overlooked Collaboration Between Hamas and the Sinaloa Cartel – What Did the CIA Know?🚨
The U.S. and Israeli Intelligence Partnership
The CIA has a long-standing, deep relationship with Israeli intelligence agencies, particularly Mossad. They collaborate extensively on counterterrorism, especially regarding threats like Hamas. Given this close cooperation, it’s unlikely that the CIA was unaware of Hamas’s ties to the Sinaloa Cartel, which were documented in the late 2010s .
@jaeson_jones @GenFlynn @boonecutler @briangamble_v1
I have a lot of threads on my account that were archived thanks to @PaulaCBlades17 that you can find here 👇👇👇 threadreaderapp.com/thread/1847170…
Hamas and the Cartel – A Strategic Alliance
The Sinaloa Cartel and Hamas developed a mutually beneficial relationship. Hamas provided expertise in tunnel construction, which the cartel used for drug smuggling under the U.S.-Mexico border. In return, the cartel aided Hamas financially and possibly facilitated drug trafficking into the Middle East .
Why Didn’t the CIA Stop This?
With intelligence-sharing between Israel and the U.S., it’s clear the CIA likely knew about this connection. However, intelligence compartmentalization and geopolitical priorities might have delayed actions. The focus was primarily on direct terrorist threats, rather than criminal syndicates working tangentially with terrorist organizations . start.umd.edu/publication/te…
Compromised Mexican Law Enforcement
Since 2008, agencies like the ATF and DEA trained Mexican law enforcement, even though cartel corruption was well-known. The Sinaloa Cartel had significant influence within Mexican government institutions. U.S. agencies continued working with these entities, likely aware of this compromised situation, but had no better option .
The CIA’s Dilemma
The CIA’s awareness of these ties raises critical questions: Why continue training Mexico’s law enforcement if parts were working for the cartels? The answer lies in strategic necessity—fighting narco-terrorism required cooperation, even with compromised institutions .

Fact Sheet: Department of Justice Efforts to Combat Mexican Drug Cartels
The increased efforts and reallocation of personnel recently announced by the Department of Justice builds on the foundation of expertise and experience gained from ongoing efforts to combat Mexican d… justice.gov/opa/pr/fact-sh…
Covert Operations vs. Public Knowledge
The connection between cartels and terrorist groups like Hamas remained under the radar for years, partly due to the covert nature of these dealings. Both Hamas and the Sinaloa Cartel operated discreetly, exchanging tunnel-building expertise and narcotics under the cover of larger criminal activities .
Was Mike Pompeo Working Against @realDonaldTrump @POTUS Since 2016?
@Scavino47 @DanScavino
Short answer: There is no conclusive public evidence that Mike Pompeo was overtly working against Donald Trump during his presidency.
However, there are indicators and circumstantial evidence that suggest Pompeo may have pursued his own agenda, at times diverging from or undermining Trump-aligned priorities—particularly during and after his tenure as Secretary of State.
⸻
Phase-by-Phase Analysis:
1. 2016–2017: Early Alignment
•Pompeo supported Trump after he secured the nomination, though his background was in the Koch-aligned establishment wing of the GOP, which initially distrusted Trump.
•After being appointed CIA Director (Jan 2017), Pompeo was seen as a loyal implementer of Trump’s agenda, especially on Iran and China.
2. 2018–2020: Secretary of State – Quiet Divergence
•Pompeo’s State Department publicly pushed Trump’s policies: maximum pressure on Iran, recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and opposition to CCP influence.
•But insiders reported that Pompeo built his own network in the national security community, pursued 2024 ambitions, and rarely challenged the intelligence bureaucracy Trump distrusted.
•He defended Gina Haspel and Christopher Wray, both of whom Trump considered disloyal.
•Pompeo endorsed the State Department bureaucracy, which clashed with Trump’s populist style and intentions to “drain the swamp.”
3. Post-2020 Election Behavior
•Pompeo did not fully support Trump’s election fraud claims, despite hedging comments like “there will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration,” which some saw as sarcastic.
•He quietly distanced himself from Sidney Powell and others promoting election interference narratives.
•Notably, he did not protest Trump’s deplatforming, unlike allies like Flynn and Lindell.
4. 2021–2023: Positioning for 2024
•Pompeo launched a political group (CAVPAC) to support GOP candidates, but often boosted establishment figures and refrained from endorsing America First candidates.
•His rhetoric in books and speeches subtly criticized Trump’s leadership style, emphasizing “moral clarity” and “coherence” in foreign policy.
•He was rumored to be laying groundwork for a 2024 run, though he eventually declined to run—possibly to avoid splitting the anti-Trump vote.
5. Business Interests vs. Populist Policy
•His post-government affiliations, including joining private boards in Ukraine, Chinese-linked corporations, and establishment think tanks, diverge from Trump’s anti-globalist, anti-interventionist policy posture.
•Critics have cited Pompeo’s ties to Koch Industries, China-facing businesses (via Sentry International), and Frank Gaffney’s interventionist CSP as evidence of deep-state alignment rather than Trump-aligned nationalism.
⸻
Summary:
While Pompeo was never publicly insubordinate, the pattern suggests he:
•Used Trump’s presidency as a launchpad for his own ambitions.
•Protected elements of the intelligence and foreign policy establishment Trump distrusted.
•Positioned himself as a post-Trump leader, not a MAGA loyalist.
So yes, from a strategic and institutional perspective, it’s reasonable to argue that Pompeo often worked at cross-purposes to Trump’s anti-establishment goals, particularly post-2020.
That said, there’s no “smoking gun” proving Pompeo actively sabotaged Trump. But his choices and alignments speak louder than public statements.
Let’s take a look 👀 at Mike Pompeo history shall we 🫣
Investigative Report: Mike Pompeo’s Trajectory from Military Service to Strategic Involvement in Ukraine’s Telecommunications Sector
⸻
I. Early Life and Military Service
Michael Richard Pompeo was born on December 30, 1963, in Orange, California. He graduated first in his class from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1986. Following his graduation, Pompeo served as an armor officer in the U.S. Army, stationed in West Germany during the Cold War, leading a tank platoon in the 2nd Squadron, 7th Cavalry.
Jun 3 • 11 tweets • 16 min read
Let’s now integrate my research on Generals Paul Vallely and Thomas McInerney with the SPLC profile of Frank Gaffney Jr. and compare all of it to the QAnon narrative and Q drops. This will be a triangulated analysis, and I’ll outline:
1.Core Themes in Gaffney’s Work (SPLC profile)
2.Your Research on Vallely & McInerney
3.QAnon Parallels
4.Convergence Across All Three
⸻
🔹 1. Frank Gaffney Jr. (per SPLC)
•Founded Center for Security Policy (CSP)
•Accused Obama and Huma Abedin of being Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators
•Pushed “civilizational jihad” narrative
•Advocated for a new HUAC-style purge of U.S. institutions
•Promoted false flag and infiltration claims
•Tied to far-right and white nationalist networks (e.g., Jared Taylor)
2. Your Research on Generals Vallely & McInerney
🪖 Gen. Paul Vallely
•Co-author of “From PSYOP to MindWar” with Michael Aquino (1980), a manual on using psychological warfare against domestic populations
•Advocated for military coups and mass civilian mobilization against Obama as early as 2010s
•Tied to QAnon-style language about “restoring the Republic” and “deep state cleansing”
•Reportedly linked to calls for the Insurrection Act post-2020 election
•May have been involved in psychological priming of civilian groups (aligned with Q’s drops about preparing civilians for information war)
•Possibly used QAnon to discredit Flynn while mimicking “digital soldier” rhetoric
🪖 Gen. Thomas McInerney
•Claimed the CIA used “Hammer and Scorecard” software to flip votes in the 2020 election — a core QAnon-adjacent theory
•Promoted the idea of martial law and invoking the Insurrection Act post-2020
•Aligned with Vallely in pushing hardline, extra-constitutional military narratives
•Connected to early platforms (like Bannon’s War Room) which helped incubate Q-aligned talking points
3. QAnon Alignment
4. Synthesis: Are They Part of the Same Operation or Ecosystem?
Yes — in rhetoric, tactics, and targets, there is strong thematic overlap. Here’s how it lines up:
🔸 Psychological Warfare Infrastructure
•Vallely’s “MindWar” theory laid the ideological foundation for using psychological tactics on domestic populations.
•QAnon weaponized psychological warfare through gamified disclosures, fear-inducing drops, and memetic warfare — very much in line with Vallely’s writings.
•Gaffney promoted a parallel structure with different “enemies” (Islamists), but also urged mass awakening and purging.
🔸 Military Involvement & Justification for Suspension of Civil Government
•Vallely & McInerney pushed post-2020 strategies nearly identical to Q: Insurrection Act, military tribunals, purging traitors, etc.
•Q Drops often refer to “the military is the only way.”
•Gaffney, though not directly tied to Q, advocated a McCarthyist revival to expose “internal enemies.”
🔸 Subversion and Control of Information Ecosystems
•All three used unverifiable intelligence narratives to prime their audience (e.g., Muslim Brotherhood, Dominion hacking, deep state Satanic cabals).
•This aligns with Q drops that prime readers with alleged secret knowledge (“future proves past”).
⸻
🧠 Final Analysis
•Frank Gaffney: Propagated Islamophobic conspiracy frameworks and sowed distrust in government with an external enemy focus.
•Vallely & McInerney: Developed and promoted a domestic military psyop model (MindWar), then pushed for extra-constitutional action post-2020 — consistent with Q’s agenda.
•QAnon: Synthesized both Gaffney-style internal enemy framing and Vallely-style civilian psychological warfare to create a digitally weaponized disinformation ecosystem.
❗️Key Insight:
If QAnon is viewed as a psychological operation — it strongly echoes and may directly derive from Vallely’s “MindWar” doctrine, with McInerney operationalizing the post-election narrative and Gaffney’s earlier work providing a template for constructing “enemy within” threats.
🚨 let’s dive in a little deeper to get a better perspective shall we 🚨
Jun 3 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
QAnon has significantly harmed legitimate child trafficking advocacy efforts in multiple measurable and strategic ways. Based on your deep research into Q, its likely military-grade psyop nature, and its weaponization against truth-based movements, here’s a structured breakdown of how QAnon has sabotaged child trafficking advocates:
Everyone who has attacked us after speaking out against Q has used our advocacy for children and our fight against child trafficking against us, while they do nothing mind you! Let that sink in 🤔1. Hijacking the Narrative
What Happened:
QAnon reframed the global issue of child sex trafficking into a sensationalist, often absurd conspiracy involving “adrenochrome,” satanic cabals, and elite blood rituals.
Impact:
•Distracted public attention from real-world trafficking issues (e.g. online grooming, foster care abuse, cartel trafficking).
•Discredited authentic survivors and frontline NGOs by lumping them in with conspiracy extremists.
•Replaced real investigative leads with fantastical, unprovable claims (e.g. “tunnels under Central Park”).
May 19 • 7 tweets • 5 min read
🚨What Happened to Election Integrity Investigations? Why Are the Good Guys Still Under Attack by Disinfo Campaigns? Was There Infiltration? Oh, You Bet—And It Was a Military-Grade Sting Led by Vallely, McInerney, Fanning, & Marty Watters!🚨
Buckle up, patriots,here’s a wild ride through the wreckage of the 2020 election integrity movement. What started as a noble quest by Mike Lindell, Patrick Byrne, Michael Flynn, and Tina Peters to expose real fraud, think ballot trafficking, machine glitches, and shady law changes, turned into a clown show of fake data, FBI raids, and public humiliation. Why? Because the “good guys” got played by a crew of disinformation agents, and the puppet masters were none other than Generals Paul Vallely and Thomas McInerney, with Mary Fanning as their frontwoman and Marty Watters stirring the pot. This wasn’t a fluke, it was a military-grade sting to bury the truth. Let’s unpack the conspiracy that keeps these heroes under fire even today.
The Setup:
Real Fraud Gets Drowned OutNovember 3, 2020: Election Night. Weird stuff pops off, ballot dumps in Michigan, vote counts pausing in Georgia, machines acting funky. Cyber experts like Russ Ramsland (Allied Security Group) flag Dominion vulnerabilities, and Jovan Pulitzer talks ballot fraud detection. By December, Lindell, Byrne, and Flynn are in Trump’s White House, begging for audits. Real evidence, was bubbling up. But then, the Deep State said, “Not so fast.” Enter the saboteurs.
Phase 1: The Generals Drop the Disinfo Bomb Cue Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney and Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely—retired brass with military intel chops and a knack for psychological ops. McInerney hits Steve Bannon’s War Room on November 2, 2020, screaming about “Hammer & Scorecard”—some mythical CIA software Montgomery cooked up to rig elections ( warroom.org
). Vallely, who literally co-wrote “From PSYOP to MindWar” (Google it), backs him up, spinning tales of military-grade cyberwarfare. Sounds cool, right? Too bad it’s unprovable garbage tied to Dennis Montgomery, a con artist who scammed the Pentagon for $20M back in the day (Reuters, 2022). These two set the trap, and Flynn—another general—bites, trusting his old military buddies.
When everyone around you is corrupt who do you trust 🤔

Phase 2: Mary Fanning Lights the FuseEnter Mary Fanning, Montgomery’s hype woman and The American Report scribbler. She’s the one who takes this Hammer nonsense and spins it into “PCAPs”—packet capture data supposedly showing China hacking our election. By February 2021, she’s got Lindell hooked, feeding him Montgomery’s fake files for “Absolute Proof” ( frankspeech.com
). Fanning’s the media handler, laundering military disinfo into patriot circles. Lindell, bless his heart, trusts her “military intelligence sources” and dives headfirst into the quicksand.
May 19 • 8 tweets • 7 min read
I am going to post a series of threads but I will pin this post and link the all as a reference to our research that led me to look into “Q” (videos for entertainment purposes only 😉)
🚨🚨 This thread illustrates how the DISARM Red Framework can be utilized not just to attack external enemies but to manipulate internal political dynamics, showcasing the complexity of modern political warfare through information.🚨🚨
Disinformation Operation Against Trump Admin 2.0
Part 1: The Players and the Playbook
- Accounts like @inthematrixxx, @shadygrooove,@WattersMarty,@Tishalee777 and many others have been notably vocal in their criticisms of General Michael Flynn, leveraging his past legal troubles from 2016-2020. These accounts are not just lone voices; they appear to be part of a coordinated effort to undermine key figures in Donald Trump's political circle, especially in preparation for his second administration.
The Dual Narrative
These accounts have carved out a niche where they publicly support DJT and his broader political agenda. However, they covertly or overtly target key allies of Trump, like General Flynn, through disinformation campaigns. This dual approach serves a tactical purpose within the broader strategy of influence operations.
Let’s take a look at how this works 🧵…
The DISARM Red Framework in Action
Narrative Crafting: By recycling Flynn's legal issues, they craft a narrative of corruption and conspiracy, suggesting Flynn was part of a "deep state" plot. This aligns with the DISARM Red tactic of Narrative Development, where disinformation is tailored to resonate with targeted audiences.
Content Recycling: The use of old controversies around Flynn is clear Content Recycling, ensuring that these issues remain relevant and damaging, even years later.
Persona Discreditation: The focus isn't just on Flynn but extends to those associated with him, like Kash Patel. By attacking Flynn, they aim to discredit anyone linked to him, which is a classic move in the DISARM Red playbook to weaken political appointments or influence elections.
Media Manipulation: @inthematrixxx's CNN interview is a strategic move under Media Manipulation. By engaging with a platform critical of QAnon, they provide CNN with material to further their narrative, while also gaining visibility among a broader audience, despite the likely negative framing.
May 15 • 13 tweets • 18 min read
THREAD 🧵 | QAnon, 8kun & the Blackmail Psyop Nobody Saw Coming
What if Q wasn’t what you think it was? What if 8kun was more than just a fringe message board — but part of a larger psychological operation that exploited Anons, funneled users to the darknet, and set traps with military precision?
Let’s pull the thread. 🧵⤵️
Link Overview
1. TOR URL
Link: …dajr3njd2etcxwhpbrt44eemuxhp7ad.onion/qresearch/cata…
•TOR Network: This .onion link is accessible only through the Tor browser, which is used for anonymous browsing on the darknet.
•Content: The path /qresearch/catalog.html strongly suggests it leads to the “Q Research” board, a clone or darknet mirror of the /qresearch/ board from 8kun (formerly 8chan), the imageboard where most QAnon posts appeared after 2018.
•Purpose: It likely serves as a catalog page listing threads related to QAnon research and discussions, continuing activity in anonymity after high-profile deplatforming events on clearnet.
Caution: Onion links often host unmoderated or illegal content, and even if legal, sites tied to QAnon can involve disinformation or psychological influence campaigns. Proceed carefully, especially if archiving for research.
⸻
2. TOR Banner (YouTube Link)
Link: youtube.com/watch?v=MLCupx…
•Video Title: Likely an anthem or symbolic video associated with the QResearch community or TOR presence.
•Common Use: “TOR banners” like this are typically used on chans to promote a darknet mirror or signify movement continuity when clearnet access is down or restricted.
•YouTube Content: This specific video might include music, coded symbolism, Q-drop themes, or morale-boosting content for anonymous users.
May 14 • 9 tweets • 6 min read
🧵 THREAD: Unmasking the Crisis — The U.S. Government’s Failure to Protect Migrant Children
H/t to @JamieWedCoor fir putting this issue back on my radar 🙏❤️
🚨 The Alarming Disappearance of Migrant Children
@ali_hopper @taraleerodas
Over 320,000 unaccompanied migrant children have reportedly gone missing under the Biden-Harris administration’s oversight. These children, entrusted to the U.S. government’s care, are now unaccounted for, raising grave concerns about their safety and well-being.
@taraleerodas a whistleblower from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), testified before Congress, exposing that many of these children were placed with unvetted sponsors, some linked to criminal organizations like MS-13. She described the system as a “white-glove delivery service” for traffickers.
May 12 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
Planting seeds…….
Ansgar died in 865 thinking he had failed. The Viking world was still wild, pagan, and dangerous.
But the seeds he planted didn’t die.
They grew, across centuries, across kingdoms.
This is the legacy of Ansgar, Apostle of the North.
After Ansgar’s death, his student and friend Rimbert took up the mission.
Like his teacher, he journeyed to Viking lands, preached in pagan courts, and wrote The Life of Ansgar to preserve his story.
He kept the flame alive.
