In fiscal year 2023, 386 children were trafficked while in Texas state custody.

Ninety percent were girls.

This happened inside a child welfare system receiving billions in federal funding—and under court supervision that was later quietly removed.

If this data matters to you, help it reach someone who can’t ignore it.

This is not an allegation. It’s documented. 🧵 Scope & Money

A federal audit found Texas lost track of 1,164 children in custody, a 3.7% missing-in-care rate—one of the worst documented nationally.

During the same period, Texas distributed $11.04 BILLION in federal child welfare and UAC grants to 29 organizations.

Money moved. Children vanished.

ProjectMilkCarton.org

In 2019, 978 children went missing from Missouri’s foster care system.

Not over a decade.
Not cumulatively.
In a single year.
That’s nearly 7% of all children in state custody.

“If you care about child safety or government accountability, this data needs more eyes.” Scope & Money

Missouri’s foster care system served ~14,000 children in 2019.

Federal investigators later documented:

chronic understaffing

extreme case backlogs

caseworkers handling up to 150 cases each

The recommended maximum is 12–15.

This is not a small system failure. It’s structural.

Remember @RealCandaceO before you send your goons after me, “I’m only asking questions!”

Candace Owens, isn’t it just fascinating how your entire life story seems like one big, scripted psy-op designed to flip the narrative whenever it suits you?

Let’s start right at the beginning, shall we?

Back in high school, 2005, you claimed these racist voicemails and threats came your way, right?

You sued the Stamford Board of Education, got the NAACP involved, and walked away with a tidy $37,500 settlement after one kid got suspended and pleaded out as a youthful offender.

But wait….why did you settle out of court so quietly?
Was it because the whole thing was exaggerated for a payout, or was there something deeper, like maybe you knew the threats weren’t as cut-and-dry as you painted them?

And here’s the real kicker: just two years later, in 2007, you yourself got arrested for harassment!

What was that about, Candace?

Were you the bully all along, projecting your own tactics onto those poor classmates?

Why seal the juvenile record, afraid the truth would expose the pattern you’ve been running your whole life?

Isn’t it convenient how you trot out that high school “victimhood” story only when it fits your anti-bullying grift, but bury your own harassment charge like it never happened?

The way I understand it, these kids were your friends until an argument took place in school. One of the children was suspended. But that want enough for you, was it?

you yourself was arrested for harassment but you buried that.

Does this show a pattern of go against Candice and she will destroy you? Fast forward to your “anti-Trump, anti-conservative” phase—oh, this is rich.

As CEO of Degree180 in 2015-2016, you were all about “social change,” weren’t you?

Spewing blog posts calling Trump “racist, bigoted, and downright offensive,” even speculating if he was some twisted “social experiment” with that infamous penis joke.

Your writings were laced with harassing, ruthless jabs, mocking, tearing down, using the same bully tactics you claimed to hate from your high school days.

Who was really pulling the strings there, Candace?

Was Degree180 just a front for testing the waters, seeing how far you could push divisive rhetoric before flipping sides?

Why did the site go dark right as you “woke up” to conservatism?

Isn’t it suspicious how everything you railed against back then, bigotry, offensive speech, is exactly what you’ve accused others of while cozying up to the very people you once despised?

Remember, I am just asking questions......

Here is what I find very interesting. Before creating Degree180 @RealCandaceO you were VP-level at a private equity firm in Manhattan, why would you leave that position to start Degree180?

2010: Interned at Vogue magazine in New York. Wikipedia
2012: Took a job as an administrative assistant at a private equity firm in Manhattan and later rose to VP-level administrative duties there (firm not named in public sources???)

2015: Left to start her own marketing agency (Degree180).
Degree180 wasn’t meant to be a “tiny blog”, it was her first attempt at building a media brand.

It didn’t work, but it was her first break from obscurity.

And it directly led to:

Social Autopsy

Viral controversy

Media interviews

The “red pill” pivot

TPUSA discovering her

Her influencer career launch

Degree180 was essentially the launchpad.

@RealCandaceO has always been about building a brand, she has stepped on or destroyed anyone that has gotten in her way, my question is who helped her?

was it someone from the private equity firm in Manhattan, how did she go from a very hard Hating, social change, Racial injustice Blogger to conservative voice overnight?

This was not Organic........

how do you go from write this, too conservative overnight?

'Many of the writers for Degree180, which Owens registered in 2015, were college students.

And many of them expressed their displeasure with Donald Trump. In a December 2015 story, “Serious Question: Is Donald Trump a Social Experiment?” the site’s editor, Zoe Weiner, wrote of Trump’s now-notorious pledge to end Muslim immigration to the US, “You guys remember Nazi Germany, right?” (Weiner, now a freelance writer, declined to comment for this story.) In a sarcastic post titled “Thank You Letter to Donald Trump” in April 2016, one contributor to the site wrote: “The idea of you being my future President makes my skin crawl, but you did provide me with a new sense of political awareness.” An article from March 1, 2016, explained that even though Trump was married to an immigrant, he could still be racist. And a March 18, 2016, article titled “Does Donald Trump Actually Have a Small Penis?” concluded that “Donald Trump most likely has a penis the size of an infant. ... Hitler is the one guy that comes to mind that may have topped him.”

HEARTBREAKING REALITY:

Every day, thousands of kids vanish into a broken foster care system—torn from families, lost in bureaucracy, facing abuse, neglect, or worse.

But Trump's NEW Executive Order just dropped, demanding transparency, AI-driven fixes, and REAL support to rescue these vulnerable children!

Imagine: No more kids "aging out" into homelessness. No more hidden failures.
No More children being ignored.

Project Milk Carton is ALREADY fighting exposing missing children, unmasking system horrors, and tracking every dollar to hold the powerful accountable.

This isn't just policy, it's a LIFELINE for innocent lives!
But it only works if WE make it.

Dive into how PMC is leading the charge & how YOUR voice can save kids: [Link to Article in the comments]

With Community Support, We Can Do Much More

The Executive Order sets a federal direction. Project Milk Carton is already building many of the tools and public intelligence functions this direction requires.
But to fully “shine light on the missing” and sustain meaningful accountability, we need community support and participation.

Here’s how you can help.

JOIN THE MOVEMENT NOW: Contact ceo@projectmilkcarton.org

https://x.com/Ansgar_3/status/1989334753942925633

open.substack.com/pub/17sog/p/tr…

No pay wall on substack, however every paid Sub helps us continue our work and is tax deductible.

Explore the Data – and Share What You Find
Use the PMC platform to:

projectmilkcarton.org

Look up your state and county

Examine:

CPS investigation volumes

Maltreatment reports

Patterns of injuries and fatalities

Missing children information

Funding levels and how they align with results

Ask:

Are children here safer or less safe than in neighboring areas?

Are we seeing high risk with relatively high funding—suggesting deeper structural issues?

Then:

Share findings with:

Your networks

Local media

Community and faith-based organizations

Local and state representatives

Information becomes power when it is widely understood.

Imagine a big bully who doesn’t hit you but whispers mean lies to your friends so they stop playing with you.

That’s 5GW! The book says:

• The Bad Guys Aren’t Who You Think: It’s not your neighbors or people from other countries who disagree with you. They’re just confused like you. The real enemies are “shadowy governments” (sneaky leaders who hide), big companies like social media giants, and “globalists” (people who want one big boss controlling everything, like erasing country lines and taking away parents’ rights to decide for their kids). They use fake stories to make everyone hate each other, so they can make stricter rules and boss us around more.

• How the War Works: It’s all about “narratives” (fancy word for stories). They spread confusing info on TV, phones, and the web to make you worried or angry. If people fight, the bad guys use that as an excuse to take more control, like adding more “police” to watch everyone.

• What We Can Do: Don’t punch or yell, that’s what the bullies want! Instead, learn the truth (like reading this book), share it with everyone (even kids you don’t like), shake hands, and team up like a huge superhero squad.

The book quotes a smart guy named Malcolm X who says “fight for truth and fairness for all people, no matter who. “

And a general named McChrystal says “it takes a network (group) to beat a network” like making a big friend chain to stop the bullies.

• The Big Warning: If we lose, we’ll all be like puppets under one rich king who tells us what to do. But if we get smart and work together worldwide, we can win back our freedom. The book isn’t telling you to do anything bad, it’s just teaching so you make good choices based on facts, not feelings.

The whole thing is like a wake-up call: “Hey, war isn’t just boom-boom anymore. It’s mind games, and everyone’s in it!” Real-Life Examples Happening Right Now (in 2025)

This stuff isn’t just in books, it’s happening today! Here are some easy examples, like schoolyard tricks but on a huge scale. I’ll show pictures to make it clearer.

1. Fake Videos (Deepfakes) Tricking People: Bad guys use computer magic to make videos where famous people say things they never said. For example, in 2025 elections around the world, like in the US or India, deepfakes show leaders “admitting” bad stuff to make voters mad or vote wrong. It’s like someone editing a video of your teacher saying “No recess forever!” when she didn’t.

Look at this picture, it shows how deepfakes are used in scams and to mess with votes.

Ya”ll ready for the thread that got my OG account attacked, and suspended by Q “Anons”

🚨EXPOSE: QANON WAS A PSYOP - AND IT WAS USED TO TARGET TRUMP & FLYNN, NOT DEFEND THEM. 🚨

What follows is a deeply-researched breakdown that every patriot, journalist, and digital soldier should see. You have been lied to.

Donald J. Trump didn’t create QAnon, didn’t even back it outright-just nodded along like, yeah, cool fans.

But the whole cult ( Bernie Bro’s ) draped itself in his flags, his chants, his crowd.

Made people think it was legit White House intel.

First sucker punch: Thinking Q rode for Trump. Nah-it was built to gut him, herd his base like sheep with lies, guilt-trips, and mind-games.

Don’t go off the cliff 🤦🏻‍♂️ Setting the stage: Q was not what it seemed.

Contrary to mainstream belief, Donald J. Trump did not create QAnon, nor did he directly endorse it.

At most, he acknowledged its popularity, sometimes playfully, other times ambiguously-but never claimed ownership or origin.

Yet the movement wrapped itself in his imagery, his slogans, and his base-giving millions the false impression that Q had official backing.

That assumption was the first trap.

The second trap? Believing Q was created for Trump.

Our research indicates it was designed to destroy him-or at minimum, to control and corral his movement through disinformation, psychological framing, and guilt-by-association.

Listen to how @RepRaskin weaponized QAnon Against @nicksortor rather than answer his very important questions.

Investigation into the Open Society Foundations’ Role in Global Migration and United States Immigration Policy Influence

🚨It would be easier to ask what George Soros does not have his money/influence in🚨

The Open Society Foundations (OSF), established and funded by George Soros, represent a vast network of philanthropic influence that extends across borders, impacting migration patterns and immigration policies worldwide. This report examines OSF’s embedded role in facilitating migration from origin countries through humanitarian and advocacy programs, while simultaneously supporting legal and policy efforts within the United States to enable the long-term stay of immigrants. Drawing on documented grants and organizational ties, the analysis reveals a pattern of indirect support that, while ostensibly focused on human rights and equity, contributes to increased migration flows into the US and influences domestic policy to favor permissive immigration frameworks.
OSF’s global expenditures exceed $23 billion, with significant portions directed toward international NGOs that operate in both origin and destination countries. These organizations provide aid along migration routes, legal education on US asylum processes, and advocacy against local deterrents in countries like Mexico and Central America. In the US, OSF funds litigation, lobbying, and policy research that challenge deportation, expand asylum protections, and promote integration, often intersecting with federal programs for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC). This dual approach—pushing from abroad and pulling from within—creates a coordinated ecosystem that amplifies migration pressures on the US border.

Key findings include:

• OSF’s grants to international NGOs in origin countries create “pull factors” by offering support during journeys, indirectly encouraging migration toward the US.

• In the US, OSF-backed advocacy influences policy through lawsuits and lobbying, benefiting NGOs that receive billions in federal funding for UAC processing and resettlement.

• Soros’s influence is deeply embedded, with OSF serving as a hub connecting global and domestic efforts, often in partnership with USAID and other entities that recycle US taxpayer dollars into these networks.
This report recommends immediate congressional oversight, including audits of OSF’s tax-exempt status, investigations into potential violations of lobbying laws, and reforms to federal funding mechanisms for migration-related NGOs to ensure transparency and alignment with national security interests. The Open Society Foundations, funded primarily by George Soros with over $32 billion in contributions, operate as a global philanthropic entity dedicated to promoting open societies, human rights, and democratic reforms. While OSF’s mission is framed as advancing equity and justice, its funding patterns reveal a systematic approach to influencing migration and immigration policies. This influence spans from origin countries, where grants support programs that aid migrants en route to the US, to domestic advocacy that seeks to reform US laws for easier entry and prolonged stays.
OSF’s role is not limited to direct grants but extends through a web of international NGOs that receive funding for humanitarian aid, legal support, and policy lobbying. These organizations, many with headquarters in the US or Europe but operations worldwide, form a network that indirectly facilitates migration by addressing push factors abroad (e.g., poverty, violence) and advocating for pull factors in the US (e.g., expanded asylum, reduced deportations). This report details OSF’s embedded influence, listing all relevant organizations, their international connections, and how their work ties into US policy.
The analysis highlights how OSF’s grants, often routed through fiscal sponsors or partnerships with USAID, create a cycle of influence that benefits from US taxpayer dollars while shaping immigration outcomes. Although OSF maintains that its activities are lawful and humanitarian, the pattern raises concerns about organized efforts to alter US sovereignty through philanthropy.

This isn’t about who reported first, it’s about collaboration.

When we combine independent research on George Soros’s networks with @ryanmauro CRC report (Sep 2025) on OSF funding $80M+ to pro-terror groups, we uncover a fuller picture of what’s being weaponized against us: dark money fueling extremism, division, cultural manipulation, and narrative control. capitalresearch.org/app/uploads/Re…

Let’s collaborate for truth. @ryanmauro for insights, plus @glennbeck @bennyjohnson @nicksortor @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @TheJusticeDept @FBI @StateDept
time for investigations into these networks!

CRC report: OSF’s $83M+ grants (2016-2023) to 53 groups linked to terrorism/extremism, e.g., Category 1 ($23.275M for domestic violence like riots/sabotage), Category 2 ($50.571M for Oct 7 endorsements/PFLP ties). Emphasizes opacity (censored grants) and calls for IRS revocations/sanctions.

Below I’m gonna show what I have found via my research over the past 2 years combining close to 2 almost million and possibly more! Taxpayer subsidies enabling OSF’s agenda. OSF’s tax-exempt status means $11-13B in foregone revenue (37% rate on $32B+ contributions), indirectly funding extremism. Broader connection: This subsidizes not just CRC’s terror grants but cultural infiltration, amplifying division through unaccountable billions.

Not in CRC’s: OSF’s youth indoctrination via $258M to LGBTQ+ causes (2020), $36M trans-specific (2023), $50M youth pledge (2023)—infiltrating subcultures like furry/anime to “normalize confusion.” Connects to CRC’s Astraea ($5.182M, Oct 7 endorsement) by showing how “human rights” grants radicalize youth into extremism pipelines.

Deeper link: OSF to Astraea ($5.5M awarded 2024) for trans/queer activism intersecting Antifa (“Trantifa”) armed collectives. CRC focuses on Astraea’s terror endorsements; adding youth targeting reveals weaponized grooming, blending cultural warfare with CRC’s violence enablement.

🚨ABOLISH THE IRS 🚨

Report on the Funding and Amplification of Youth Indoctrination Through Fiscal Sponsorships: Origins, IRS Interpretations, and Connections to Activism in Oregon and Antifa

This report examines the mechanisms through which fiscal sponsorships, enabled by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) interpretations of tax laws, have facilitated the flow of funds to organizations and initiatives promoting ideologies related to LGBTQ+, transgender, and furry communities. These funds, often channeled through foundations like the Tides Foundation and Open Society Foundations (OSF) founded by George Soros, as well as government grants, have amplified activism that critics argue constitutes indoctrination of American youth. The report traces the origins of these communities, highlights their non-organic growth through targeted funding, and details intersections with Antifa in hubs like Portland, Oregon. Key findings include:
• The IRS’s Revenue Ruling 68-489 (1968) created fiscal sponsorship without congressional approval, allowing tax-deductible donations to support advocacy that skirts political activity restrictions.
• Major funding from OSF (over $2.7 million to trans-specific work between 2007-2010) and Tides (over $707,500 to trans groups in the same period) has scaled youth programs, protests, and education initiatives perceived as ideological indoctrination.
• Government grants from agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have supported LGBTQ+ and trans youth programs, raising concerns about federal endorsement of controversial curricula in schools.
• The furry fandom, with strong LGBTQ+ and trans overlaps (furries are 7x more likely to identify as trans), originated organically in the 1970s but has been amplified through funded activism, intersecting with Antifa in progressive hubs.
• Portland, Oregon, serves as a case study, where Antifa’s history of militant anti-fascism (dating to the 1980s) blends with funded LGBTQ+ activism, leading to protests and events that influence youth.
Recommendations include congressional oversight to reform IRS rulings, audits of fiscal sponsors, and restrictions on federal funding for programs promoting gender ideology in youth settings. This report underscores that such developments have occurred without direct voter consent, potentially weaponizing social issues in the political climate. The American people have historically voted for policies emphasizing traditional values, family structures, and educational neutrality. However, over the past several decades, a confluence of interpretive tax rulings, philanthropic funding, and government grants has enabled the amplification of ideologies related to LGBTQ+, transgender, and furry communities. These efforts, often framed as human rights advocacy, have been criticized as indoctrination of youth, introducing concepts of gender fluidity and non-traditional identities into schools, online spaces, and public discourse without broad democratic approval.
This report investigates how fiscal sponsorships—rooted in IRS Revenue Ruling 68-489—have served as a conduit for funds from entities like the Open Society Foundations and Tides Foundation, supporting programs that intersect with Antifa activism. It traces the origins of these communities, their growth through funding, and their role in Oregon as a hub for radical activism. The analysis draws on historical records, funding disclosures, and recent events, including the 2025 designation of Antifa as a terrorist organization by President Trump, to illustrate how these mechanisms have contributed to a polarized political climate.

In honor of @charliekirk11
Come for me, we are all Charlie Kirk
@POTUS @JDVance @bennyjohnson @nicksortor @RobertKennedyJr @JackPosobiec @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @EagleEdMartin
The American taxpayer you, me, hardworking families across this great nation, are footing the bill for a radical agenda that’s poisoning our kids’ minds and bodies, all in the name of this twisted “LGBTQ+ (Furry & Anime Fandoms as Standalone Communities fall under LGBTQ+ and arts more on this later) transgender lifestyle.” And it’s happening right under our noses, through a sneaky backdoor called indirect tax subsidies. We’re talking billions of dollars in foregone revenue your tax dollars essentially being siphoned off to prop up these woke foundations and fiscal sponsors that push gender confusion on innocent children.
First off, let’s call it what it is: indoctrination, not education. These elites in foundations like George Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF) and the Ford Foundation are dumping millions into fiscal sponsors—groups like Tides Foundation, Borealis Philanthropy, and Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice—that then funnel cash to activist networks. We’re talking $258 million poured into LGBTQ+ causes in 2020 alone, with $36 million specifically for transgender stuff in 2023. And guess what? A huge chunk of that is indirectly subsidized by you, the taxpayer, because when billionaires like Soros donate billions to OSF—$32 billion total!—they get massive tax breaks. At a 37% federal rate, that’s easily $11-13 billion in taxes the government doesn’t collect over the years. Ford’s $16 billion endowment? Same deal—hundreds of millions in foregone revenue every year. That’s money that could go to roads, schools, or border security, but instead, it’s enabling this grooming machine.

Watch this 👇👇👇 Report on Fiscal Sponsorship Mechanisms and Philanthropic Funding for LGBTQ+ and Transgender Social Justice Initiatives

This report examines the structure and application of fiscal sponsorship as a mechanism for channeling philanthropic funds, with a focus on its role in supporting LGBTQ+ and transgender social justice initiatives. Drawing from investigative threads on funding transparency, it incorporates detailed analyses of organizations, foundations, fiscal sponsors, and grant amounts from 2020-2025. Fiscal sponsorship enables efficient, often anonymous funding flows, but raises questions about accountability in activist networks. Key findings include significant grants from major foundations like the Open Society Foundations (OSF) and Ford Foundation to fiscal sponsors such as Tides Foundation, Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice, and Borealis Philanthropy, totaling millions for LGBTQ+ and transgender causes. Overall U.S. foundation funding for LGBTQ+ issues reached $258.1 million in 2020, with transgender-specific funding at $36.4 million in 2023, amid a 19% decline from 2022 to 2023. Recommendations include enhanced IRS oversight of fiscal sponsor reporting to ensure transparency.

🚨The CIA Intelligence community has allowed Antifa to operate prove me wrong?🚨

@FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @DNIGabbard @AGPamBondi @realDonaldTrump @bennyjohnson @JackPosobiec @RealAmVoice

Were are the Parlor servers?
I won’t stop we deserve the truth, Chaleie Kirk’s family deserves the truth!
@TPUSA

As conservatives, we’ve long warned about the dangers of radical left-wing groups like Antifa infiltrating our society. Declassified CIA documents from the 1950s reveal how Antifa was being trained in Austria by the Communist Party (KPÖ) as sleeper cells, with secret schools like the Alfred Klahr Seminar indoctrinating young functionaries in politics and public service. These were reserves held back until communists could seize power. Sound familiar?

Central Antifa School in Ogre — report about an Antifa training school (Camp No. 2040, Ogre); includes course info and note that the school was deactivated after a course ending 18 Dec 1949.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Antifa School in Ogre, Latvia — CREST entry / FOIA record referencing the Antifa school at Ogre.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

German Antifa School in Russia — report about a German Antifa training facility in the Soviet Union; describes curriculum and pledges required of graduates.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Trained Antifa Personnel — list/notes about Antifa courses and some named participants or cadres.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Organizations, blocs and action groups

Action Groups in Germany overview of anti-fascist groups forming in Germany after occupation; covers left-wing nuclei and organizational activity.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Association of Democratic Antifascists (Verband demokratischer Antifaschisten) — CIA file on a postwar Antifa association and related consolidation.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

League of Anti-Fascist Freedom Fighters (Verband Antifaschistischer Freiheitskampfer) — CREST/FOIA document on this organization and its character/controls.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Committee of Anti-Fascist Resistance Fighters — East German committee activity and reconstruction efforts (1950s).

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Political blocs / meetings / propaganda

Meeting of the “Antifa” Bloc — report on a meeting of the so-called “Antifa” bloc (postwar political bloc activity).

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

“Einheitsfront” of Anti-Fascist Democratic Bloc Parties — CREST record on the anti-fascist “popular front” style arrangements in the Soviet zone of Germany.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

German Press in Bucharest / related press notes — mention of German Anti-Fascist Committee activity in Romanian/Bucharest contexts.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Soviet / Communist indoctrination and programs

Russian Communist Indoctrination Program / Political School for Anti-Fascist Doctrine — report describing Soviet political schools used to instruct anti-fascist personnel (for POWs, refugees, German cadres).

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Other / contextual items
•Director of Central Intelligence — references to anti-fascist demonstrations etc. — various CREST summaries touching on anti-fascist actions and historical persons/events.

cia.gov/readingroom/do…

Historical biography & CIA stories referencing anti-fascist resistance (example: Maria Gulovich) — CIA Story pages that include anti-fascist resistance examples (useful context).

cia.gov/stories/story/…

I could keep going, but I think you get the point by now! Let’s continue… Fast forward to America today—this is exactly what we’ve seen under the radical left’s playbook. Antifa and their allies have indoctrinated our kids through schools and universities, inserting sympathetic politicians at every level: mayors like Ted Wheeler in Portland, governors like Jay Inslee in Washington, and even attorneys general who refuse to prosecute left-wing violence. DHS records from 2020 show internal debates on labeling Antifa-inspired actors as “Violent Antifa Anarchists Inspired” (VAAI), admitting they’re organized, using social media to incite violence, and attacking federal facilities night after night. Yet, these cities protected them.

cia.gov/readingroom/ho…

congress.gov/event/118th-co…

🚨This is important🚨

Are Antifa Members Domestic Terrorists?
According to news reports, since 2016 counterterrorism experts at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have been warning about the threat of violence from antifa supporters. At a DHS press conference on June 2, 2020, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf stated that DHS is “looking at designating [antifa] an organized criminal activity.” At a DOJ press conference on June 4, 2020, Director Wray confirmed active FBI domestic terrorism investigations involving antifa supporters and other extremists.
The FBI and other federal law enforcement must rely on their working definitions and available tools to appropriately investigate these incidents.
FBI Terrorism Investigations. The FBI is the lead agency for federal terrorism investigations (28 C.F.R. 0.85(l)). Its top priority is protecting the United States from terrorist attack. The FBI uses the term “domestic terrorism” for investigative purposes as defined in 18 U.S.C. §2331(5), which defines domestic terrorism as activities that
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
While an individual may still have committed criminal acts that are widely considered domestic terrorism, the individual cannot be charged with committing an act of domestic terrorism under current federal law. For example, Timothy McVeigh, widely considered a domestic terrorist in the United States, was convicted of murder, conspiracy, and using a weapon of mass destruction in the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City that killed 168 people.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) do not officially designate domestic terrorist organizations, but they have openly delineated domestic terrorist “threats.” These include individuals who commit crimes in the name of ideologies supporting animal rights, environmental rights, anarchism, white supremacy, anti-government ideals, black separatism, and beliefs about abortion.

Read the full report here:

congress.gov/crs-product/IF…

Every parent’s worst nightmare: A child goes missing. Or worse, gets caught in a broken system that’s meant to protect them but often fails.

As a mom/dad/guardian, I’ve felt that fear. But what if we could shine a LIGHT on the darkness?

Enter @P_MilkCarton – the game-changer for child protection.

Project Milk Carton isn’t just a website; it’s a lifeline.

The Guardian Decision Intelligence System pulls together REAL data from trusted sources like FBI, ACF, and more. State & national CPS stats? Check. Missing children alerts? Check. Foster care funding breakdowns? Absolutely. It’s transparency in action! 🌟 projectmilkcarton.org

Imagine clicking on YOUR state, zooming into YOUR county, and uncovering the TRUTH:
How many kids are in foster care? What crimes affect child safety?
Decision chains that reveal systemic flaws.
This empowers US – parents, advocates, educators – with FACTS to demand change. No more guessing; knowledge is power! 💪 #ChildWelfare

It educates like nothing else. Dive into crime data tied to kids’ safety. See where funding falls short, so we can fight for more.
For families torn apart by unfair CPS decisions, this is a tool to preserve what matters most: Keeping families together. Heartbreaking stories turn into actionable insights.

Check out this video for additional information on what you can expect. How to navigate to educate yourself and your communities for effective change to defend and protect our Children 🙏❤️ I’ve seen too many headlines about missing kids, exploited children, systems failing. Project Milk Carton turns grief into grit.

It’s for the voiceless – our children. By supporting, we build better protections.

VISIT and SHARE! Let’s make this viral. 🚀 projectmilkcarton.org

Together, we can reform child welfare. Educate yourself, empower your community, protect the innocent. If this thread touches you, RT, like, and tag a friend. Every share saves lives. Who’s with me? 🙌

Some will say I’m divisive and that I should “let it go.” But isn’t ignoring these issues exactly how we got here in the first place?

If not me then who?

This thread isn’t for comfort. It’s a line in the sand. I’m going to show you how certain QAnon podcasters are taking information meant to educate and protect — and twisting it into gaslighting, projection, and compliance theater that ultimately hurts kids.

That’s a red line I refuse to ignore. 🚨

Because let’s be honest: if anything these podcasters say were true, that would mean President Trump and his administration (General Flynn and Boone Cutler) are actively lying to you, harming kids, and sabotaging the country.

👉 Does that make sense? Of course not.
👉 What makes more sense is these individuals are knowingly misleading you, milking donations, and keeping you complacent.

Meanwhile, instead of exposing how kids are targeted and groomed into school shootings, gangs, drugs, child labor, and sex trafficking — they play dress-up with Q drops, false flag theater, and “watch the movie” slogans.

❌ Kids are dying.
❌ Families are being destroyed.
❌ And these podcasters want you to clap like it’s entertainment.

If you want to support real work, support those actually fighting to defend children. That means getting involved locally and backing organizations like America’s Future (General Flynn’s org) that are building programs to stop trafficking and exploitation.

Not handing over your money to clout-chasers riding Flynn’s coattails for clicks and cryptic riddles.

Bottom line: this is not a movie.
Your hat color doesn’t save children.
Complacency does not protect the vulnerable.

You are being misled. And while they play games, children suffer.

End of intro. Now let’s look at the receipts. 🧵👇

In the first video, these individuals are using a post from @boonecutler and repost by @GenFlynn that was meant to bring Awareness and education on what is weaponized against us and our children and we will break that down. The podcasters use it to bring relevance to Q while ignoring the message.

The second video shouldn’t need an explanation on how disgusting it is, but listen to how they say “ allegedly killed”
And how if you believe children were killed in that Catholic school shooting “You are following a narrative” while they are pushing a “narrative”!

Wake up and stop giving these people your attention. This isn’t a game 😡
Here is the link to @boonecutler post.

what’s described in these two screenshots from The Citizen’s Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare is very much a scenario that can (and does) take place on social media. Here’s how it lines up:

📌 Social Media as a Recruitment and Radicalization Space
•AI-driven bots and chatbots on platforms like X (Twitter), Facebook, Telegram, Discord, and TikTok can mimic human interaction.
•These bots use personalized engagement, just as the text describes, to “groom” individuals by feeding them extremist narratives, memes, or “inside information” that builds trust and belonging.
•Social media’s algorithmic amplification accelerates exposure: once someone engages with extremist-leaning content, recommendation systems can funnel them deeper into echo chambers.

📌 “Lone Wolf” Radicalization Online

The text outlines how recruiters (traditionally humans) might:
•Target isolated or vulnerable individuals.
•Build trust through repeated interactions.
•Gradually desensitize them to violence.

On social media:
•AI-driven accounts now do this at scale, blending into online communities (e.g., gaming forums, incel boards, niche Telegram groups).
•“Digital grooming” phases (exposure → grievance development → new identity → action) can unfold entirely online.

📌 Why Social Media is Effective
•Anonymity makes it easier for recruiters or bots to hide their true identity.
•Global reach allows extremist networks to reach isolated individuals anywhere.
•Constant availability: bots can engage 24/7, unlike human recruiters.
•Low traceability: as the guide notes, AI-driven manipulation leaves little or no footprint—harder for authorities to detect.

📌 Real-World Indicators

The second screenshot even references case studies like Elliot Rodger (Isla Vista killings) and Chris Harper-Mercer (Umpqua shooting). While not all such cases can be tied directly to AI manipulation, incel forums, extremist groups, and algorithm-driven radicalization pipelines on social media have been well-documented by researchers.

In this exact scenario (AI-driven radicalization and grooming for “lone wolf” style violence) can and does occur on social media. What the guide is pointing out is that what used to require human recruiters is now being outsourced to AI bots and amplification networks online.

Structural Parallels Between UAC/Eisner and Soros/Arabella Networks

This report examines two seemingly distinct financial ecosystems — the UAC/Eisner nonprofit management system and the Soros/Arabella Advisors advocacy network — and demonstrates that they share the same structural DNA: management-company–based obfuscation. Both operate as multi-EIN, multi-entity networks that consolidate financial control in a hidden for-profit or centralized hub while presenting the appearance of decentralized, independent nonprofits.

By analyzing the flow of federal UAC funds (via Eisner Advisory Group and other management firms) and progressive advocacy dollars (via Soros-linked philanthropy and Arabella Advisors’ nonprofit funds), we show how billions of dollars are cycled through “legal” but opaque structures to fund political influence, advocacy campaigns, and institutional capture.

President Trump’s recent call for RICO scrutiny of Soros networks underscores the political resonance of these structures, and reinforces the need for systemic investigation of management-company obfuscation, whether in child welfare or political advocacy.

@GenFlynn @POTUS
@P_MilkCarton @SpartanX_Ray we have all the data to back this up, it’s to massive to post here

open.substack.com/pub/jeremibull… The UAC/Eisner Shell Game

Key Findings (from PDFs 1–10)
•$5.24B extracted from UAC program funding versus $2.6B federal allocation.
•69 mega-management firms (e.g., Eisner, KPMG, Baker Tilly) controlling 2,407+ nonprofits with $1.86B in executive compensation.
•Eisner Advisory Group LLC alone: 122 nonprofits, 186 EINs, $233.9M in compensation, concentrated in NY/NJ/PA.
•Shell EINs and zero-comp entities obscure real executive pay, which is consolidated under Eisner’s umbrella.
•Systemic tactic: affiliates appear “small” and “lean,” but actual pay and extraction are routed through the manager.

Pattern
•Obfuscation: EIN proliferation, name mismatches, address clustering.
•Control: management company dictates finances, while nonprofits retain the optics of independence.
•Extraction: funds siphoned out under “management fees” and “consulting,” invisible in affiliate Form 990s.

Research on the Story and Prevalence of Child Removal into Foster Care

The story shared— involving parental drug and alcohol addiction, infidelity leading to family separation, physical and emotional abuse, exposure to inappropriate adult behaviors, child abandonment, runaway at age 11, homelessness at 13, involvement in gangs for survival, sexual assault, and lifelong mental health impacts like unresolved trauma and estrangement from siblings— aligns with many documented experiences of children from dysfunctional or “broken” homes in the United States. Such narratives are unfortunately common, often stemming from intergenerational cycles of poverty, substance abuse, neglect, and domestic instability. Research indicates that these factors frequently result in children being removed from their homes and placed into foster care or, in cases where the system fails to intervene early, leading to homelessness or street involvement. According to national data, neglect is the leading cause of child removal, accounting for about 63% of foster care placements in recent years, while parental drug abuse contributes to around 32-36% of cases. Overall, substance abuse (including drugs and alcohol) is a factor in up to 39% of removals. Between 2000 and 2023, approximately 5.9 million children entered foster care in total, with over 1.6 million entries explicitly because of parental drug abuse; the proportion rose from 15% in 2000 to a peak of 36-39% around 2017-2021, before slightly declining to 32% by 2023. In 2023, 175,283 children entered foster care, with neglect at 63% and parental substance abuse at 32% as primary reasons. Children under age 5 are particularly vulnerable, comprising the fastest-growing group in foster care, often due to parental addiction.
Stories like this are not outliers; they reflect systemic patterns. For instance, nearly 60% of youth identified as homeless have histories of foster care, abuse, or domestic violence. Media and personal accounts often highlight abuse in broken homes leading to foster placement or runaway scenarios, with some children experiencing further trauma in foster care itself. The child welfare system handles millions of reports annually, and nationally, poverty-related neglect (not always intentional abuse) drives most removals—up to 80% in some areas. Long-term effects mirror the described lifelong pain: increased risks of mental health issues, substance abuse, incarceration, and unstable relationships for those from such backgrounds.

IF WE DON’T WHO WILL

Imagine this:
A 14-year-old boy laughs while typing on his computer.
But hidden in those messages? A predator grooming him. This is the heartbreaking reality in our video “If We Don’t, Who Will” Watch and share to save lives. @P_MilkCarton

Your child is being groomed when you’re not paying attention. Mom walks by without a glance, Dad’s in the garage with friends. Distractions are everywhere, but so are the dangers. Online predators thrive on our unawareness.

He runs away, thinking he’s meeting a friend his age. But it’s a trap—an older man waiting. He senses danger, tries to flee, but a car pulls up… and he’s gone. Kidnapped into the nightmare of trafficking.

Back home, parents are comfy on the couch, texting and laughing. They feel safe. But their son is now chained, abused, sexually assaulted, forced into slave labor and sex work. Years pass, the pain never stops. They search endlessly, guilt-ridden, wondering if he’s alive.

Life goes on around them—kids swinging in parks. But those swings empty as more children vanish. Police are overwhelmed, doing what they can. Then, a young man arrested for trafficking and drugs… it’s their son, now a perpetrator himself. The cycle continues.

@Amerifuture @ShepherdsWatchF @GUARDATOfficial Break the cycle! Our video ends with shocking stats: Every year, 4.2 million youth (ages 13-25) experience homelessness in the US, many as runaways vulnerable to traffickers. Nearly 1 in 3 runaway youth engage in survival sex.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10474560/

🙏 “THIS IS BIBLICAL: The Serpent’s Cult—How Psyops, Satanism, and Splintered Faiths Became the Devil’s Digital Army”

A spiritual warfare exposé tracing PSYOP doctrine from Aquino to TikTok, from cult temples to classrooms, from altars to algorithms. 🛐

These scriptures collectively emphasize the need for discernment, understanding God's Word, and relying on divine strength to identify and oppose harmful influences. 

Revelation 12:9

9. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

2 Corinthians 11:13-15

13. For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ.

14 . And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

15. It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.

Matthew 7:15-20

15. “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.

16. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?

17. Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.

18 . A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.

19. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

20. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.

Romans 16:17-18

17. I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them.

18. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people.

James 4:7

7. Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

Romans 12:21

21. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

Before you read any further, it is important to read this and pray, as evil exists in our world as we know it and has infiltrated every aspect of our lives, and our children have become the target. ~JeremiahBullfrog

Ephesians 6:10-18

10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

11. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.

12. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

13. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

14. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;

15. And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;

16. Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.

17. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

18. Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

John 8:32

32. And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. Let’s start with a detailed timeline of
Lieutenant Colonel Michael

Here’s a detailed and sourced profile of Lieutenant Colonel Michael Angelo Aquino, focusing on his U.S. Army Reserve service, his involvement in psychological operations (PSYOP), and the controversial claims surrounding “Project Monarch” and many other “accusation”

Military Career & Psychological Operations

Michael A. Aquino (born October 16, 1946 in San Francisco; died September 1, 2019) served in the U.S. Army specializing in psychological warfare (PSYOP). He joined in 1968, served in Vietnam, and rose to Lieutenant Colonel in military intelligence, retiring from active duty in 1994 with a Meritorious Service Medal.

He authored the influential 1980 doctrinal paper From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory, in collaboration with Colonel Paul Vallely. This proposed expanding psychological operations to a strategic, global “MindWar” concept.

Aquino obtained advanced degrees, including a Ph.D. in political science (1980) from UC Santa Barbara and an M.P.A. in National Resources Management (1987) from George Washington University and the U.S. Army’s Industrial College of the Armed Forces.

The Temple of Set & Occult Leadership

After serving in Vietnam, Aquino left the Church of Satan (which he had joined in 1969) due to disagreements with Anton LaVey. He then founded the Temple of Set in 1975 and became its High Priest, establishing a more occult-intellectual tradition called Setianism .

The Temple of Set still exists today, with Aquino acknowledged as a central figure in its doctrinal formation and organization.

Project “Monarch” Allegations

Various fringe conspiracy sources claim Aquino directed “Project Monarch”, alleged to be a secret trauma-based mind-control program linked to MK-Ultra. These allegations portray it as a pseudo–CIA operation targeting victims for coercive programming .

However, no mainstream or officially documented evidence supports that Aquino had any formal role in such a program. The Project Monarch narrative remains within conspiracy and paranormal literature, not corroborated by credible official sources.

Controversies & Investigations

Aquino faced public scrutiny in the Satanic Panic era. In 1986–87, he was accused of sexual abuse linked to a San Francisco military childcare center. Investigations found insufficient evidence, charges were never filed, and the allegations were widely considered unfounded. Subsequently, his full-time reserve contract was terminated in 1990. He remained in the reserves until formally retiring in 1994.

The broader claims linking him to high-profile conspiracies, such as elite satanic networks or Franklin scandal ring allegations by John DeCamp, are unsubstantiated and were pressed forward without legal outcomes. Investigations repeatedly found no credible evidence

Key Takeaways
•Michael Aquino was a real U.S. Army officer, well‑educated and specializing in psychological warfare and intelligence.
•Later, he channeled his interests into occultism, founding the Temple of Set and authoring esoteric and strategic writings.
•Project Monarch remains a speculative conspiracy without credible documentation or verification.
•The 1980s molestation allegations involved serious accusations, but investigations found no evidence to support them; Aquino was never charged. Due to Lack of evidence although the allegations were credible.

Now if you a re like me, this has lead me to question this a little deeper 🤔

Let’s get into it ……

QAnon as a Hybrid Disinformation and Domestic Narrative Control Operatio

‼️ Deliver The Truth No Matter The Cost‼️

QAnon emerged in late 2017 as an anonymous online persona (“Q”) claiming inside knowledge of a “plan” by patriotic insiders to defeat a corrupt elite cabal. Over the next three years, this phenomenon grew from fringe message boards to a wide social media audience, spreading cryptic posts (“Q drops”) that followers interpreted as prophetic clues . The origins of QAnon remain ambiguous – forensic analyses suggest at least two individuals were behind Q’s early and later posts , yet no law enforcement agency has definitively identified its creators. What is clear is that the narrative spread rapidly, captivating tens of thousands with its promise of a hidden plan and coming “Storm.” By 2020, QAnon had infiltrated mainstream political discourse and even inspired public office seekers , illustrating its remarkable reach.

QAnon served a dual and troubling function.
First, it operated as a tool of psychological manipulation, encouraging believers to “Trust the plan” and passively await salvation by hidden forces . This pacified genuine anti-corruption and anti-elite activism, neutralizing would-be populist movements with reassuring slogans instead of mobilization.

Second, the most outlandish QAnon content rife with baseless allegations of satanic pedophile cabals and fantastical conspiracies provided a convenient justification for authorities to increase surveillance and censorship. Federal agencies and private groups pointed to QAnon-driven extremism as a rationale for enhanced domestic monitoring, social media deplatforming, and the marginalization of legitimate investigative journalism as “conspiracy theory.” For example, the FBI in 2019 warned that “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists” like QAnon could pose a terrorist threat , and in 2020 the House passed a bipartisan resolution formally condemning QAnon’s “baseless” theories . These responses, while ostensibly addressing public safety, also set the stage for broader suppression of dissent under the guise of combating “extremist disinformation.”

theguardian.com/us-news/2022/j…

Our investigation highlights how an unaccountable influence network – spanning anonymous online actors, federal officials, government-aligned NGOs, and media outlets – weaponized the QAnon phenomenon in two directions. Internally, the movement deflected grassroots energy away from constructive political action, effectively keeping a segment of the populace occupied with elaborate but hollow “research” and slogans. Externally, the specter of QAnon was wielded to paint broad swaths of political dissent as dangerous conspiracy extremism, thereby legitimizing unprecedented campaigns of online censorship and surveillance . We find it telling that no serious federal inquiry was ever launched into who or what was actually behind QAnon’s inception. Instead, the narrative was implicitly treated as a useful foe, one that could be used to justify crackdowns while conveniently obscuring any role that intel or government-linked actors may have had in seeding or amplifying this disinformation. The lack of transparency and accountability regarding QAnon’s origins, combined with its tactical use to curtail rights, signals a grave oversight failure.

QAnon’s story is a cautionary tale of how hybrid disinformation can be leveraged to manipulate citizens and expand government power simultaneously. We recommend a series of reforms – from limiting outsized NGO influence on speech, to mandating disclosure of government partnerships in social media content moderation, to overhauling surveillance authorities – to ensure that nebulous online conspiracies can no longer be cynically exploited at the expense of Americans’ freedoms. This report seeks to document those risks and outline a path forward to prevent any similar “digital mass panic” operation from undermining our democracy in the future. Background: Emergence and Structure of QAnon (2017–2020)

QAnon’s inception dates to October 28, 2017, when an anonymous poster using the moniker “Q Clearance Patriot” began a thread on the 4chan forum titled “Calm Before the Storm” . The individual (or group) behind “Q” claimed to be a high-level U.S. government insider with access to classified information, including an alleged secret plan by President Trump and military intelligence to dismantle a global cabal of corrupt elites. Q’s early posts falsely asserted, for example, that Hillary Clinton was about to be arrested and that massive unrest would ensue . None of these predictions materialized, yet the cryptic messages sparked a keen following. In late 2017 and early 2018, Q continued to post “drops” on 4chan and later on 8chan (an imageboard known for minimal moderation) once the original forum became overcrowded . Each Q drop consisted of short, enigmatic phrases, leading questions, or slogans. Followers coalesced into online communities to decode these clues, treating them as a giant crowdsourced puzzle. Adopting the self-designation of “bakers” assembling Q’s “crumbs,” adherents wove elaborate theories to reconcile Q’s hints with real-world events .

By design, QAnon’s narrative structure was both grandiose and open-ended. It presented a powerfully dualistic myth: on one side, a nefarious “Deep State” cabal engaged in child exploitation and treason; on the other, righteous patriots in the government working behind the scenes to defeat evil. Q promised that at an imminent reckoning (referred to as “The Storm”), the cabal would be unmasked and justice served in dramatic fashion. Crucially, Q framed all developments as part of a master plan. To sustain believers’ faith in an eventual victory, Q employed recurring catchphrases such as “Trust the plan,” “Enjoy the show,” and “Nothing can stop what is coming.” These mantras were repeated constantly in Q drops.

The messages reassured followers that “everything [is] going as planned, that Trump [is] in control, and that all his adversaries [will] end up in prison” . This rhetoric had a calming, almost sedative effect on Q’s audience: no matter how chaotic current events seemed, devotees were told that a benevolent outcome was preordained.

Public engagement with QAnon often took on the character of an interactive game or religious prophecy. Adherents congregated on Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, sharing research and spreading Q’s slogans into mainstream circulation by mid-2018 . Memorable phrases like “Where we go one, we go all” (abbreviated “WWG1WGA”) became rallying cries both online and at real-world political rallies, appearing on t-shirts, flags, and placards.

A protest sign referencing QAnon slogans at a demonstration in Olympia, Washington (May 2020). QAnon messaging, such as the phrase “Where we go one, we go all,” spread from obscure imageboards to the physical world as followers displayed them at rallies and events.

From 2018 through 2020, QAnon’s reach broadened significantly, aided by world events and social media algorithms. The movement adeptly latched onto contemporary fears. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, QAnon channels incorporated pandemic-related conspiracy theories (anti-lockdown, anti-vaccine, anti-5G) to recruit from health and new age communities .

QAnon supporters also piggybacked on genuine concerns about child trafficking by hijacking hashtags like #SaveTheChildren, thereby attracting people initially unaware of QAnon’s fantastical core claims.

By mid-2020, surveys indicated that a non-trivial share of Americans had been exposed to or even believed some elements of the QAnon narrative. The public engagement crossed into politics: that year roughly 90 candidates for U.S. Congress or state offices had made statements sympathetic to QAnon .

Buckle up this will be a long thread but, based on the pattern of documented events, congressional hearings, and investigative reporting — what initially appeared as isolated “disinformation countermeasures” can now be seen as part of a broad and coordinated influence operation, involving both foreign and domestic actors, that extended far beyond “Russiagate” or General Flynn.

What I am pointing to isn’t just a soft coup against President Trump’s first administration, it reflects the systematic weaponization of disinformation infrastructure to suppress dissent, manipulate public perception, and interfere in electoral processes on U.S. soil, in ways that arguably:

🚨 Violated Civil Liberties, Subverted Elections, and Obstructed Political Accountability

Let’s lay out the investigative framework to back that claim — with timelines, actors, tactics, and outcomes. PHASE 1: Psychological Operations & Perception Shaping (2016–2018)

Russiagate becomes the justification. NGOs become the vehicle.
•NGOs like Alliance for Securing Democracy (Hamilton 68), New Knowledge, and Atlantic Council seeded “bot” and “Russian disinfo” narratives, many of which targeted MAGA users, Trump allies, and dissenting media.
•These claims were echoed by legacy media (CNN, MSNBC, NYT), citing NGO reports as objective intelligence.
•Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Google began receiving input from these NGOs and U.S. intelligence agencies on what to suppress.

🧾 Proof: The Twitter Files revealed internal staff knew Hamilton 68 was falsely labeling Americans as Russian bots, but the lie persisted — because it supported a political narrative.

PHASE 2: COVID-19 & Suppression of Scientific and Political Dissent (2020)

The same censorship infrastructure was turned inward on Americans during the pandemic.
•Facebook and Twitter throttled doctors, scientists, and elected officials questioning lockdowns, masks, or vaccine mandates.
•Stanford’s Virality Project, working with NGOs and government partners, advised platforms to censor “true information” if it could cause vaccine hesitancy.
•The White House pressured Facebook and Twitter to ban or silence specific users, including Tucker Carlson and Alex Berenson.

🧾 Proof: Twitter Files #19 showed DHS, HHS, and NGOs participated in real-time censorship operations via “misinfo dashboards” and regular email chains.

⸻

PHASE 3: The 2020 Election Interference via the Hunter Biden Laptop Coverup

Same networks. Same tools. Explicit domestic suppression of critical election-impacting data.
•The New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story was suppressed by Twitter and Facebook days before the election.
•FBI’s Elvis Chan and others warned platforms of a potential “Russian disinfo dump” weeks in advance, despite already having the laptop since Dec 2019.
•The Atlantic Council and other NGOs, funded by Burisma and connected to Biden, were advising platforms during this period.
•51 former intel officials released a letter falsely labeling the laptop “Russian disinformation,” which was promoted by MSM — knowingly.

🧾 Proof:

•Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan the FBI warned them to suppress the story.
•The House Judiciary Committee’s Weaponization Subcommittee confirmed the FBI and DHS’s role in suppressing the story.

PHASE 4: 2024 Pre-Bunking & Behavioral Modification

Moving from censorship to preemptive psychological conditioning.
•NGOs like the Election Integrity Partnership, NewsGuard, and Global Disinformation Index (GDI) received federal funding to rank or blacklist conservative and populist outlets.
•CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) was revealed to have coordinated with Stanford and NGOs to monitor social media content and preemptively “debunk” narratives about mail-in voting, Dominion, or ballot harvesting.
•Misinformation research at Harvard, Princeton, and Stanford helped build AI and behavior-based models to influence what Americans believed before they even saw a story.

🧾 Proof:

•Twitter Files and Missouri v. Biden case filings showed that CISA was deeply involved in real-time flagging of “dangerous” narratives — even when true.
•NewsGuard’s Pentagon contract and GDI’s NED/U.S. State Department funding are public records.

Let’s break this down by timeline 😎

Systematic Failures in Unaccompanied Children Processing Under the Biden Administration (2021-2024)

This Thread examines systemic failures in the processing of unaccompanied children (UCs) at the U.S. border during the Biden administration (2021-2024), focusing on policies, inter-agency coordination, and oversight gaps that contributed to losing track of over 300,000 UCs. It highlights key structural issues, such as reliance on Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for Notices to Appear (NTAs), separation of roles under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2008 and the Flores Settlement Agreement, lack of unified tracking, and the termination of the 2018 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on information-sharing. All sources, including Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports, case studies, and additional findings, are documented for evidentiary purposes. Executive Summary
The Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis resulted in unprecedented surges of UCs, with over 500,000 entering the system from 2021-2024. Systemic failures—rooted in policy reversals, resource shortfalls, and inter-agency silos—led to inadequate vetting, rushed releases, and minimal post-release monitoring, rendering approximately 323,000 UCs untraceable. This includes 291,000+ without NTAs and 32,000 who missed court hearings. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

Key failures include DHS/ICE’s delays in issuing NTAs, HHS/ORR’s limited follow-up (e.g., undocumented 30-day calls in 22% of cases), and the March 2021 MOA termination under Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, directed by President Joe Biden, which hindered real-time data sharing on sponsor addresses and safety concerns. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…

These gaps exposed UCs to risks like trafficking, exploitation, and unknown fates, as evidenced by OIG audits, congressional hearings, and case studies. Recommendations urge restored data-sharing, mandatory NTAs pre-release, and enhanced tracking.

🧵Stop Doing the Bidding for the Deep State and Pay Attention to the Actual Crime: NGOs and Intel Agencies Are Weaponizing Psychological Ops to Sow Division Against the America First Agenda

🚨 Yesterday during the DHS Oversight Hearing, Democrat Rep. Mr. Goodman and others strongly implied that President Trump is personally blocking the release of Epstein files… because he’s in them.

👀 Watch the attach video that shows just how everyone screaming for the release of the Epstein Files allowed for the weaponization to derail actual investigations into crimes against Children!
@GenFlynn @MaryFlynnONeil1 @taraleerodas @SunTzusWar @boonecutler @briangamble_v1 @Crux41507251 @LizCrokin @LynzPiperLoomis

@RepClayHiggins @RepLuttrell
@RepBrecheen @RepMichaelGuest
@RepPfluger @RepGarbarino @RepMcCaul @RepMarkGreen

Thank you for taking action on this issue these NGOs are the Criminal elements to crimes against our great Nation!

Watch the full Hearing: youtube.com/live/BX0mimyt-…

Follow @ali_hopper @JarrodSadulski
Their Organization : x.com/guardatofficia…

Follow: @P_MilkCarton
Big updates coming to the Website soon projectmilkcarton2025.web.app

Follow: x.com/shepherdswatch…

Follow: x.com/amerifuture?s=… Let me be clear:
There is NO evidence that President Trump is named in any unreleased Epstein files.

This isn’t oversight — this is optical warfare. This is a political op—an old playbook being used again to confuse Trump’s base and fracture America First unity.

This is why @POTUS made this statement and if you had been paying attention during his first administration you should be aware of the tactics and ashamed of yourselves. I’d go as far as to say some of you are aware and pushing the deep state agenda, but I digress!