A BIG part of the reason that the US continues to sanction Cuba is to integrate it into its preferred economic system — no matter the consequences for the people. As Cuba has had to grapple with multiple economic crises, opportunities for the private sector have expanded which
Is the leading cause of increased inequality in Cuba today. Theee hotel bans serve to further starve the Cuban government of funds, privileging the growing private sector which has opened in response to each economic crises faced, wherein USA pressures further starve the govt
So while people may say “this is useless” or “why is the USA going so hard on Cuba even with the embargo/sanctions” — it’s because they are trying to economically starve the govt from being able to provide for the Cuban people.
How the USA has historically starved certain sectors in Caribbean countries, whose revolutionary governments they didn’t like is documented, and I always like to analyse Cuba vis a vis Grenada
The USA intentionally starved the education sector in Grenada after its invasion in 1983, and encouraged increased inequality in the country as it predominantly targeted women (women seen as being viewed as the “carriers” of revolutionary education then)
So when the US starts to propagate its propaganda about a “failing” Cuban govt and then rush to blame socialism — we must always remember that socialism isn’t a failure, socialism is fought against by: racists, capitalists, and imperialists.
Hence the current (and compounded) economic onslaught against Cuba.
It’s also disgusting that the USA has prevented Cuban athletes from competing in international competitions by denying visas, as it ramps us this assault. The USA is the #1 threat to Cuban people today.
While the US economically starves Cuba AND attempts to isolate it by denying visas to Cubans during international events hosted by the USA + it’s allies, we should not be silent or see it as “business as usual” given the longstanding embargo and sanctions against Cubans.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given that I pointed out that the US tariff assault on China is because China has avoided the dependent development trap and has also worked to develop consumer bases in Africa and the Caribbean —typical anti-China propaganda have been levied, best summarized as:
Propaganda myth: “China is nefarious and preys on less developed countries to keep them indebted so China can get a stake in these countries governments who now owe China money. China is imperialist, forcing states to be permanently underdeveloped in Africa and the Caribbean.”
Prior to making this thread (I’ve debunked myth b4), I’ll share some important reads first:
Walter Rodney: How Europe Underdeveloped Africa
Norman Girvan: White Magic: The Caribbean and Modern Technology
Chen Ziye & Li Bin: Escaping Dependency and Trade War: China and the US
It should always be reminded that a large reason for the US tariffs on China and trade war against it , is because China has avoided the dependent development trap. More than ever, those who point out how poorer states are kept poor by wealthier states are vindicated:
If there exists a global division of labor (and it does exist), with the US and the other western countries at the helm — then a state outside of the West is always necessarily seen as threatening to it. I don’t think that the US tariffs alone will have the stated effects that
the Trump admin hopes that it does, precisely because China’s development is not (and hasn’t been) solely dependent on the US. This is why the US is also attempting to make the cost of doing business w/China high (eg costs to be born by Caribbean state who utilize China’s ships)
Harris has released an “issues” section on her site, and noticeably, Harris’s policies aren’t that distinct from Trump’s. These comparisons for readers to make are easy, since she links 2025 agenda under each “issue” area (that are mostly copied and pasted from Biden’s site)
The same “tough on borders” nonsense, same “tough on crime, fund police and give them training” nonsense, positions “Israel” as the US only ally against China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran, and will give people $25k (>3%) for home down payments as the housing market is 🗑️💸
Notably, majority of the “issues” read as rhetoric since none of these alleged policy responses that Harris will have are actually drafted ones — except the one on immigration, since it’s the same bipartisan bill Democrats have been saying they will pass for almost a decade now😵💫
Spontaneous organizing is liberal + easily lends itself to liberal “reform.”
I hope that now permanent organizing structures are being built to confront settler-colonialism + imperialism; & that combat western propaganda + the neo-colonial governances it supports elsewhere.
I’m putting this out there since sometimes I roll my eyes by how easily people, even in this moment, continue to be shaded by propaganda —1st still as it regards Haiti and most recently, Iran.
Questioning western propaganda, pro-imperial propaganda, requires fuller reflections
on all consumed propaganda, not just specific events. So long-lasting organization + structures that discipline + train (guard) the mind (consciousness) against propaganda which situates a world commandeered by capitalists hell bent on exploiting everything as “good/beneficial.”
Haiti and Cuba and Grenada are all informative cases of revolution in the Caribbean.
1: Haiti had a successful revolution that effectively abolished slavery on the island, but eventually was unable to consolidate itself — which opened it up to occupation + imperial aggression.
Given that history — of a revolution arising out of a slave context — the consciousness of the masses in Haiti have always been extremely clear in their suspicion + contempt of foreign aggression, occupations, etc. that undermines their liberty (incl PAYING FORMER SLAVERS!)
So Haiti is, and has continuously been, subjected to occupation and foreign intervention precisely because in the Caribbean (and elsewhere) integration into western capitalism has legitimized colonial wealth inequalities + foreign domination of industry, thus underdevelopment.
Just spoke with @tenementyaad_ about the crisis of imperialism on South America’s Caribbean coast and they asked a great question I’ll share my response here:
Q: On other platforms, you have referred to Venezuela’s actions as chauvinistic, could you elaborate?
A: I opted for the word chauvinism instead of imperialism or colonial expansion – which is how many in the Guyanese left have described Venezuela’s actions over the past month, given that I understood Venezuela’s tangible security concerns. I did research on why Guyanese Marxist-
-Leninists in the 70s opted not to call Venezuela an “imperial lackey” or “US puppet” – even though they described Venezuela as a state that aligned with Western imperialisms in the region. I found that they didn’t because they recognized that the majority of Venezuelans were