THREAD 🧵 Who are the writers of the Gospels? Were they eyewitnesses? And how important is the answer?
It was stated in the book Encyclopedia of Church Fathers:
“The issue of identifying the author of the epistle was crucial to the Church, as its canonicity depended on it.
Thus, authorship was vital, since recognizing the book as canonical relied on it.”
Father Abd al-Masih Basit writes:
“To be canonical, a book must be written by an apostle or eyewitness under the Holy Spirit’s inspiration.
If it doesn’t meet these conditions, it isn’t accepted.”
Do these conditions apply to the Gospel writers? Were they eyewitnesses or known?
The Jesuit translation replies:
“Many Bible books were written by authors seen as God’s voice but many remained unknown.”
The Orthodox priest Theodore Stylianopoulos, in The New Testament: An Orthodox Perspective, states:
“Most Bible books were likely written by unknown authors addressing issues of their time and community.”
The Catholic priest (Raymond Brown) agrees with this, emphasizing that the gospel writers were not eyewitnesses and that most scholars doubt that any of the canonical gospels were written by an eyewitness.!
And supporting them in this are the editors of the book (Study of the Synoptic Gospels) where it states:
"Based on this our judgment is that the Gospels were indeed author unknown and that the names of the books were not known outside the circle of their immediate acquaintances.
Who wrote the Gospel of John?
Rev. Dr. Fahim Aziz writes in Introduction to the New Testament:
“This question is difficult and often ends with: only God knows who wrote it.”
The Jesuit translation states:
“No clear evidence exists for the author or date of this Gospel perhaps intentionally.”
Similarly, History of the Bible by Miller & Huber says:
“Once again, it is not known who wrote this Gospel.”
Who wrote the Gospel of Matthew?
Pastor Fahim Aziz says: “We can’t name the author it could be Matthew the Apostle or someone else.”
R. France (Modern Interpretation):
“Like the other Gospels, its author is unknown.”
Father Estefan Sherbitiyeh says:
"But the author of the current Gospel is unknown.
And Stephen Miller says:
"It does not seem that the author was an eyewitness, as he relied on Mark and other sources to obtain his material.
Habib Saeed says in (Introduction to the Holy Bible)
"We would have liked to know who this writer was who called himself (Matthew) and indicated that he was not one of the twelve disciples."
Who wrote the Gospel of Mark?
Though Matthew relied on it, its author is unknown.
The Biblical Encyclopedia says:
“No clear proof that Mark was a disciple or eyewitness.”
Stephen Miller:
“No one knows for sure who wrote this Gospel.”
And Father Pauls Al-Faghaly says: Nothing in the biblical text helps us identify the author of the Gospel of Mark.
Nor was the writer of the Gospel of Luke an eyewitness, like the rest of the gospel writers.
Likewise, the Epistle to the Hebrews is such that the author of this epistle is not known with certainty.
The Second Epistle of Peter fares no better. William Barclay says:
“Ancient and modern scholars nearly all agree Peter didn’t write it.”
Pope Tawadros II affirms:
“There’s no doubt it wasn’t written by the Apostle Peter.”
The author of Jude is also unknown, like the rest.
Were the Gospel writers inspired by the Holy Spirit?
Habib Saeed writes:
“New Testament authors likely never thought they were writing sacred scripture. That idea never occurred to them.”
“None of the sacred scripture writers knew their words would become part of the Bible not even Paul.”
So, the conditions set by Church tradition for accepting epistles as canonical don’t apply to the current Gospels.
James D. Tabor says all four Gospels are anonymous, written after the apostles, and not eyewitness accounts. The names were added later by tradition, not by the authors themselves.
Barrie Wilson in Searching for the Messiah says the Gospel of Mark was written around 70 CE in Greek by an anonymous author. The name “Mark” was added later to give it authority, but scholars agree there’s no solid reason to accept it. The Gospels are effectively anonymous.
Yale scholar Dale B. Martin says we don’t accept the old traditions that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote the Gospels. They were originally published anonymously.
The New Oxford Annotated Bible says the Gospels were written decades after Jesus to support faith, not as eyewitness accounts. Matthew, Mark, and Luke share many stories, so they’re called the Synoptic Gospels.
Scholars like Bart Ehrman, Graham Stanton, and others all agree the Gospels were written anonymously and not by Jesus’ disciples. The names were added later by unknown church figures.
Ph.D. scholar Dan McClellan affirms the data shows all four Gospels were written anonymously, with traditional names only added in the 2nd century. He states this is the scholarly consensus no direct or indirect eyewitness accounts of Jesus’ life exist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No authentic narration has been established proving that any of the Companions wrote Surat al-Hafd and Surat al-Khal‘ in their copies of the Qur’an or that they considered them Qur’an. The most authentic report is that they were recited during qunūt (the supplication in prayer)🧵
either before or after bowing. 1. The report from Ibn Mas‘ūd:
It is narrated from ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr that it reached him that they were two surahs in Ibn Mas‘ūd’s mushaf and that he used to recite them in witr every night.
I say: this is a balāgh (a report with a missing link), and as is known, such a chain is munqaṭi‘ (disconnected) therefore, its isnād is weak.
2. The report from Ibn ‘Abbās and Abū Mūsā al-Ash‘arī:
Ibn al-Ḍurays said: Aḥmad ibn Jamīl al-Marwazī narrated to us from
1: The Sacrament of Baptism:
Baptism is the key sacrament marking entry into Christianity, also called the second birth, spiritual birth, or sacrament of immersion. THREAD 🧵
Baptism, for Christians, is a second birth that cleanses from original sin through death and burial with Christ granting new life. “Unless one is born of water and the Spirit he cannot enter God’s kingdom” (John 3:5). “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved” (Mark 16:16).
How to Perform Baptism:
Those wishing to become Christians are first observed by the church as catechumens. During baptism, they must completely remove all clothes and stand naked before the priest, as part of the sacrament required to enter the faith.
In short:
•Many Christian scholars say that this formula was placed on the lips of Christ and is not part of the original Gospel of Matthew (see images).
•Eusebius of Caesarea cited the formula differently several times: “Go and make disciples of all nations in my name”🧵
•Some might argue that Eusebius was an Arian, and that’s why he quoted the text this way. But the problem is that there are people more important than Eusebius who cited the formula in the name of Jesus only. Here are some texts where this occurs:
Acts 2:38 – Then Peter said to them: “Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”
Acts 10:45-48 – All the believers from among the circumcised who came with Peter were
Short Thread 🧵on Arab identity of Syria and its people.
Damascus was called Arab land by Justinus (2nd c. CE). Assyrians called Hazael of Aram-Damascus “king of the Arabs.” Romans named Phoenicia Secunda Arabia Augusta Libanensis Proof Arabs were native to Syria, not outsiders.
Homs & Surroundings: Cicero, Cassius Dio, and Diodorus Siculus show Iamblichus, prince of Homs, was Arab, making Homs Arab land. Arabs inhabited Homs, Apamea, and nearby areas. Sextus Africanus shows Golan, Hauran, and Lajat were also part of Arab lands under Herod.
Central & Southern Syria: Strabo notes lands east & south of Apamea were Arab-inhabited, including Parapotamia & Saracen herding regions. Palmyra: Polybius & Josephus show Arab leadership under Zabdibel/Zabelos. Inscriptions confirm most of Palmyra’s inhabitants were Arabs.
Prominent statesmen of the Mamluk state from the Levant and Egypt
- The Vizier Ibn al-Saluus al-Tanukhi: Levantine Arab from Palestine
- Mahmoud bin Salman al-Hanbali al-Halabi: Levantine Arab, a poet and Muslim scholar who served as a scribe in the chancery of the Mamluk state
- Ahmad bin Abdullah al-Tarabulsi: Levantine Arab, known as Ibn al-Hibbal al-Hanbali, served as a judge in Damascus and later in Tripoli during the Mamluk state
- Ibn Fadl Allah al-Umari al-Dimashqi: Levantine Arab, a historian and writer of official correspondence
- Ibn Wasil al-Hamawi: Levantine Arab, a judge and litterateur
- Ibn Muzhir al-Dimashqi: Levantine Arab, held positions in market inspection, special oversight, and confidential correspondence
- Ibn al-Barizi al-Hamawi: Levantine Arab, served as overseer of the armies and
Firearms in the Islamic World during the Middle Ages
• The armies of the Islamic world, such as the Mamluks, used gunpowder bombs against the Mongols and Crusaders since the 13th century. The Mongols were defeated in 1260, and the Crusaders were expelled from Acre in 1291..+
• During the Mongol campaign against China in 1276, they relied on Arab engineers from Iraq and Iran to develop an Arab-style trebuchet that launched bombs over longer distances.
• The armies of the Islamic world used an incendiary substance from Iraq
known as "Iraqi pots," which terrified the Crusaders according to de Joinville, and some Western sources, such as Partington, described it as resembling "ancient atomic bombs."
Ibn al-Rammah documented these techniques,