IbnHikmah Profile picture
Jul 19, 2025 24 tweets 12 min read Read on X
THREAD 🧵 Who are the writers of the Gospels? Were they eyewitnesses? And how important is the answer? Image
It was stated in the book Encyclopedia of Church Fathers:

“The issue of identifying the author of the epistle was crucial to the Church, as its canonicity depended on it.

Thus, authorship was vital, since recognizing the book as canonical relied on it.” Image
Father Abd al-Masih Basit writes:

“To be canonical, a book must be written by an apostle or eyewitness under the Holy Spirit’s inspiration.

If it doesn’t meet these conditions, it isn’t accepted.” Image
Do these conditions apply to the Gospel writers? Were they eyewitnesses or known?

The Jesuit translation replies:

“Many Bible books were written by authors seen as God’s voice but many remained unknown.” Image
The Orthodox priest Theodore Stylianopoulos, in The New Testament: An Orthodox Perspective, states:

“Most Bible books were likely written by unknown authors addressing issues of their time and community.” Image
The Catholic priest (Raymond Brown) agrees with this, emphasizing that the gospel writers were not eyewitnesses and that most scholars doubt that any of the canonical gospels were written by an eyewitness.! Image
Image
And supporting them in this are the editors of the book (Study of the Synoptic Gospels) where it states:

"Based on this our judgment is that the Gospels were indeed author unknown and that the names of the books were not known outside the circle of their immediate acquaintances. Image
Who wrote the Gospel of John?

Rev. Dr. Fahim Aziz writes in Introduction to the New Testament:

“This question is difficult and often ends with: only God knows who wrote it.” Image
The Jesuit translation states:

“No clear evidence exists for the author or date of this Gospel perhaps intentionally.”

Similarly, History of the Bible by Miller & Huber says:

“Once again, it is not known who wrote this Gospel.” Image
Image
Who wrote the Gospel of Matthew?

Pastor Fahim Aziz says: “We can’t name the author it could be Matthew the Apostle or someone else.”

R. France (Modern Interpretation):
“Like the other Gospels, its author is unknown.” Image
Image
Father Estefan Sherbitiyeh says:

"But the author of the current Gospel is unknown.

And Stephen Miller says:

"It does not seem that the author was an eyewitness, as he relied on Mark and other sources to obtain his material. Image
Image
Habib Saeed says in (Introduction to the Holy Bible)

"We would have liked to know who this writer was who called himself (Matthew) and indicated that he was not one of the twelve disciples." Image
Who wrote the Gospel of Mark?

Though Matthew relied on it, its author is unknown.

The Biblical Encyclopedia says:
“No clear proof that Mark was a disciple or eyewitness.”

Stephen Miller:
“No one knows for sure who wrote this Gospel.” Image
Image
And Father Pauls Al-Faghaly says: Nothing in the biblical text helps us identify the author of the Gospel of Mark.

Nor was the writer of the Gospel of Luke an eyewitness, like the rest of the gospel writers. Image
Image
Likewise, the Epistle to the Hebrews is such that the author of this epistle is not known with certainty. Image
Image
The Second Epistle of Peter fares no better. William Barclay says:
“Ancient and modern scholars nearly all agree Peter didn’t write it.”

Pope Tawadros II affirms:
“There’s no doubt it wasn’t written by the Apostle Peter.”

The author of Jude is also unknown, like the rest. Image
Image
Image
Were the Gospel writers inspired by the Holy Spirit?

Habib Saeed writes:
“New Testament authors likely never thought they were writing sacred scripture. That idea never occurred to them.” Image
“None of the sacred scripture writers knew their words would become part of the Bible not even Paul.”

So, the conditions set by Church tradition for accepting epistles as canonical don’t apply to the current Gospels. Image
James D. Tabor says all four Gospels are anonymous, written after the apostles, and not eyewitness accounts. The names were added later by tradition, not by the authors themselves. Image
Image
Barrie Wilson in Searching for the Messiah says the Gospel of Mark was written around 70 CE in Greek by an anonymous author. The name “Mark” was added later to give it authority, but scholars agree there’s no solid reason to accept it. The Gospels are effectively anonymous. Image
Image
Yale scholar Dale B. Martin says we don’t accept the old traditions that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote the Gospels. They were originally published anonymously. Image
Image
The New Oxford Annotated Bible says the Gospels were written decades after Jesus to support faith, not as eyewitness accounts. Matthew, Mark, and Luke share many stories, so they’re called the Synoptic Gospels. Image
Image
Scholars like Bart Ehrman, Graham Stanton, and others all agree the Gospels were written anonymously and not by Jesus’ disciples. The names were added later by unknown church figures. Image
Image
Image
Image
Ph.D. scholar Dan McClellan affirms the data shows all four Gospels were written anonymously, with traditional names only added in the 2nd century. He states this is the scholarly consensus no direct or indirect eyewitness accounts of Jesus’ life exist.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with IbnHikmah

IbnHikmah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BaytAlHikmah1

Oct 19, 2025
No authentic narration has been established proving that any of the Companions wrote Surat al-Hafd and Surat al-Khal‘ in their copies of the Qur’an or that they considered them Qur’an. The most authentic report is that they were recited during qunūt (the supplication in prayer)🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
either before or after bowing. 1. The report from Ibn Mas‘ūd:
It is narrated from ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr that it reached him that they were two surahs in Ibn Mas‘ūd’s mushaf and that he used to recite them in witr every night. Image
Image
Image
Image
I say: this is a balāgh (a report with a missing link), and as is known, such a chain is munqaṭi‘ (disconnected) therefore, its isnād is weak.

2. The report from Ibn ‘Abbās and Abū Mūsā al-Ash‘arī:
Ibn al-Ḍurays said: Aḥmad ibn Jamīl al-Marwazī narrated to us from Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Oct 12, 2025
[ The Seven Sacraments of the Church ]

1: The Sacrament of Baptism:
Baptism is the key sacrament marking entry into Christianity, also called the second birth, spiritual birth, or sacrament of immersion. THREAD 🧵 Image
Baptism, for Christians, is a second birth that cleanses from original sin through death and burial with Christ granting new life. “Unless one is born of water and the Spirit he cannot enter God’s kingdom” (John 3:5). “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved” (Mark 16:16). Image
How to Perform Baptism:
Those wishing to become Christians are first observed by the church as catechumens. During baptism, they must completely remove all clothes and stand naked before the priest, as part of the sacrament required to enter the faith. Image
Read 17 tweets
Sep 30, 2025
In short:
•Many Christian scholars say that this formula was placed on the lips of Christ and is not part of the original Gospel of Matthew (see images).
•Eusebius of Caesarea cited the formula differently several times: “Go and make disciples of all nations in my name”🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
•Some might argue that Eusebius was an Arian, and that’s why he quoted the text this way. But the problem is that there are people more important than Eusebius who cited the formula in the name of Jesus only. Here are some texts where this occurs: Image
Image
Image
Image
Acts 2:38 – Then Peter said to them: “Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”

Acts 10:45-48 – All the believers from among the circumcised who came with Peter were
Read 9 tweets
Sep 8, 2025
Short Thread 🧵on Arab identity of Syria and its people.

Damascus was called Arab land by Justinus (2nd c. CE). Assyrians called Hazael of Aram-Damascus “king of the Arabs.” Romans named Phoenicia Secunda Arabia Augusta Libanensis Proof Arabs were native to Syria, not outsiders. Image
Image
Image
Image
Homs & Surroundings: Cicero, Cassius Dio, and Diodorus Siculus show Iamblichus, prince of Homs, was Arab, making Homs Arab land. Arabs inhabited Homs, Apamea, and nearby areas. Sextus Africanus shows Golan, Hauran, and Lajat were also part of Arab lands under Herod. Image
Image
Image
Image
Central & Southern Syria: Strabo notes lands east & south of Apamea were Arab-inhabited, including Parapotamia & Saracen herding regions. Palmyra: Polybius & Josephus show Arab leadership under Zabdibel/Zabelos. Inscriptions confirm most of Palmyra’s inhabitants were Arabs. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 6, 2025
Prominent statesmen of the Mamluk state from the Levant and Egypt

- The Vizier Ibn al-Saluus al-Tanukhi: Levantine Arab from Palestine
- Mahmoud bin Salman al-Hanbali al-Halabi: Levantine Arab, a poet and Muslim scholar who served as a scribe in the chancery of the Mamluk state Image
- Ahmad bin Abdullah al-Tarabulsi: Levantine Arab, known as Ibn al-Hibbal al-Hanbali, served as a judge in Damascus and later in Tripoli during the Mamluk state
- Ibn Fadl Allah al-Umari al-Dimashqi: Levantine Arab, a historian and writer of official correspondence
- Ibn Wasil al-Hamawi: Levantine Arab, a judge and litterateur
- Ibn Muzhir al-Dimashqi: Levantine Arab, held positions in market inspection, special oversight, and confidential correspondence
- Ibn al-Barizi al-Hamawi: Levantine Arab, served as overseer of the armies and
Read 7 tweets
Sep 4, 2025
Firearms in the Islamic World during the Middle Ages

• The armies of the Islamic world, such as the Mamluks, used gunpowder bombs against the Mongols and Crusaders since the 13th century. The Mongols were defeated in 1260, and the Crusaders were expelled from Acre in 1291..+ Image
Image
using the same bombs.

• During the Mongol campaign against China in 1276, they relied on Arab engineers from Iraq and Iran to develop an Arab-style trebuchet that launched bombs over longer distances.

• The armies of the Islamic world used an incendiary substance from Iraq
known as "Iraqi pots," which terrified the Crusaders according to de Joinville, and some Western sources, such as Partington, described it as resembling "ancient atomic bombs."
Ibn al-Rammah documented these techniques,
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(