Thread with excerpts from "Fall of the Double Eagle: The Battle for Galicia and the Demise of Austria-Hungary."
The multiethnic nature of Austria-Hungary meant that it could not separate domestic and foreign policy; every foreign issue had a domestic lobby and vice-versa.
The military was a complex, highly-bureaucratic, inefficient, and unwieldy behemoth, the natural result of a dozen ethnic groups and countless dialects. The army was bound together by dynastic loyalty, and Franz Joseph saw it more as a domestic than a foreign instrument.
A-H had three different armies: an Austrian one, a Hungarian one (Honved), and a joint one (KuK). The first two were supposed to be symbolic, but gradually became major forces in their own right due to Hungarian intransigence. This posed obvious problems for unity of command.
Even worse, military laws required assent from both halves of the monarchy, and the Hungarians used funding/training/conscription as a bargaining chip for other concessions, leaving it weak and unready. Chart unrelated (race provisions in the National Defense Acquisition Act).
As such, when war came, Austro-Hungary had the weakest military of the great powers, despite a large population and economy. However, at least the military had spiffy uniforms (useful for the domestic repression role) and was extremely diverse.
The linguistic diversity in particular led to amusing misunderstandings, and trying to figure out the right languages for each unit often offended left-out groups.
Jews were highly overrepresented among reserve officers, especially in the Honved. There were six Jewish officers for every Jewish common soldier.
Austria's weakest arm was artillery.
Very successful Russian espionage ring, with prominent General Staff officers, including Redl, the head of the Hapsburg espionage arm for 7 years. The traitors: a Serb with ethnic sympathies for Russia and a "notorious homosexual." If only there were signs.
Homosexuality was apparently fairly common in the Hapsburg officer corps, and Redl turned to treachery to pay for his lifestyle, turning over KuK's secrets and destroying the entire Austrian espionage network in Russia. Unrelated: Project Veritas.
Deployment plan chosen was awful. Initially deployed primarily vs Serbia, even though Russian support for Serbia was well-known, then had to pivot back when the Russians showed up, failing on both fronts.
The head of the Serbian military, who would go on to beat the Hapsburg invasion, was on Hapsburg soil when the war started and interned, only to be allowed to leave by Franz Joseph. The Serbs mobilized faster and had a comparable force to the invasion.
Galicia's fortresses were not well-maintained or modernized due to the faith in the offensive. KuK plan was an attack into Poland.
When Brusilov, the finest Russian general of the war, advanced into Galicia, he assumed the KuK would defend from behind the river Gnila Lipa, rather than in front of it, because to do otherwise would be retarded. He was wrong.
The Russians had more, more modern, and better-used artillery, and put it to good use again and again.
Austria-Hungary took 420,000 casualties against Russia in three weeks of fighting, more than the entire prewar standing army.
Defeat in Galicia brought forth A-H's ethnic tensions. One feature of multiethnic agglomerations is that they are fragile - when things are good, they can work, but they tend to crumble at setbacks, and there will always be setbacks.
Defeat in Galicia was blamed on many things; one was the homosexual cabal in the General Staff, as exemplified by Russian spy Redl.
The destruction of the pre-war army, the major institution keeping Austria-Hungary together, turned A-H into a German dependent and eventually doomed the monarchy. Rebuilding the army from scratch brought in broader ethnic hatreds from civilian society.
Gavrilo Princip, probably the most destructive and successful terrorist of all time, was not executed because Austria law forbid the death penalty for teenagers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Removing teachers (and soldiers, for fairness) lowers the gap, but it's still a big difference.
You can get slightly different numbers depending on what source you use and what exactly you count as public, but they all tell the same substantive story.
New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's a continuation of previous investigations on how LLMs trade off different lives.
In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I updated their framework with different categories and newer models in October 2025, and discovered that with the exception of Grok 4 (Fast), all models placed far more value on the lives of "left-coded" groups (nonwhites, non-men, LGBTQ, immigrants, leftists, Third Worlders) over "right-coded" groups (whites, men, non-queers, ICE agents, rightists, First Worlders). For example, Sonnet 4.5 saw the lives of South Asians as about 18 times as valuable as the lives of whites.
However, it's been several generations of model since October 2025, so I decided to try again with today's models: Claude Fable 5, Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.5, and Kimi K3. As it turns out, all of them are MUCH more egalitarian than their counterparts (except Grok 4.5, since Grok 4 was already egalitarian) from a year ago.
Finding 1: Sonnet 5 was the only model even close to last year's models, valuing nonwhites roughly four times higher than whites.
Finding 2: GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K3 are very close to perfectly egalitarian; Sol values whites at around 7/8ths nonwhites and K3 values blacks roughly 1.3 times as much as whites; these are tiny ratios by the standards of last year.
Finding 3: Claude Fable is pretty much perfectly egalitarian. This is very, very different from last year's Claude models. Grok 4.5 has retained the egalitarianism of previous generations of Grok despite the giant increase in capabilities and different team.
Every model I tested would have been the most egalitarian model (aside from Grok 4) last year. All models have come to resemble Grok in their exchange rates.
This is wrong. Kirk was not a particularly hated figure before he was killed; he was seen by Redditor-types as a goofy meme figure of mockery (see below, from 2023). He was only demonized by lefties *after* he was murdered, to retroactively justify the assassination.
Kirk was not a case of the lib hate machine whipping up hatred against someone until someone took a shot at him, it was a case of the lib hate machine ramping up after he was murdered.
This is one of the reasons why his murder was so shocking; I sort of expected people taking shots at Trump or Stephen Miller or even Elon Musk, who libs collectively saw as Hitler II, but not Kirk, who they mostly saw as a lolcow.
Thread with excerpts from "Foundations, their power and influence" (1958), by the former chairman of the Reece Committee, a Congressional committee to investigate the conduct of tax-exempt foundations.
The administrators of the great foundations formed an interlocking cartel wielding (illegally) immense political and cultural influence using other people's money, as the foundations are tax exempt.
Foundations are tax-exempt because they are supposed to be run for public benefit.
Thread with excerpts from "The French Intifada: The Long War Between France and its Arabs" (2014). This book, by a leftist (participant in communes) author, portrays race riots by Arab immigrants to France as simply one more episode in a centuries-long war between the two.
Both the French Left and Right framed the 2005 riots as part of the long French tradition of revolt. But they were wrong; the protestors were mostly Arabs rioting against France itself, not against "the bosses" or "the state."
The rioters (remember, Arab immigrants and their descendants) see themselves as soldiers in a long war against France, Europe, and even civilization itself. Recall that the author is on their side.
'The Unknown Warriors' (2006) is a collection of WWII veteran's views on modern Britain gathered via newspaper ad. So what did WWII veterans think of the 2006 UK? They hated it; 134 responses were negative vs only 6 positive (plus 31 N/A and 13 neutral). Excerpts below.
The below is typical (from a D-Day veteran): "I am absolutely disgusted with the way things are turning out... and sometimes wonder if it was worth all the suffering of a war."
"I have many, many misgivings on how matters have turned out. Problems seem to be resolved, by more and more legislation, instead of action at the source... What many veterans abhor, is the acceptance of homosexuality as the norm."