Seen the latest 'massacre at aid site' headlines? They are the result of a vicious and deliberate demonisation of Israel pantomime in Gaza directed by Hamas - that is happening every day.
Thread:
⬇️⬇️⬇️
First, setting the scene. Since October 7 Israel has been fighting in Gaza to rescue hostages and to break Hamas's grip on power. A key part of this has been separating Hamas from aid distribution - which is why US contractors have been brought in to manage aid sites.
Hamas needs to control aid - so making the aid effort fail is in its direct interest. NGOs infiltrated by Hamas and other terrorist groups have aligned themselves with this goal. Their objective isn't feeding Palestinians - it's ensuring the aid program is seen to fail.
Which brings us to the daily pantomime.
Scene 1: Early in the day, (every day) and before the aid distribution starts, Hamas fighters approach & deliberately provoke IDF positions.
The IDF respond to this threat. Mostly by firing warning shots.
Behind the scenes and off camera - in an area far from the aid centre.
Hamas fighters and the IDF are engaged in a war. Several Hamas terrorists are killed and wounded. The bodies of these terrorists are taken to hospital.
Scene 2: Cut to local hospital. Images of dead - mostly men of fighting age are seen. Random people speak to camera about how they were shot at by tanks for just wanting food. Doctors are used to confirm the terrorists were civilians killed near an aid site.
Scene 3: Western media sources - now overrun by ex Al-Jazeera staffers & other Islamists who hate Jews - spring into action. Stories begin to circulate about the latest 'massacre'. The 'journos' know what they are going to write - but reach out to the IDF for a 'right to reply'.
Scene 4: The IDF receive questions from media. They know there was no massacre and know the incident took place not at the aid station, but some distance away. The IDF respond acknowledging their forces were under threat and they fired warning shots.
Scene 5: The activist journo has his story. Hamas (who they believe) say 'massacre'. There are bodies at hospital. The IDF (who they don't believe) say they just fired warning shots.
'Massacre at aid site' headline is built in places like @bbcnews @skynews.
Off camera. No editor questions why with 60 million cameras in Gaza, there is never clear footage of these events. Nobody asks the doctor in hospital how he knows what happened at the aid site if he wasn't even there. The goal is clear. Another chance to demonise Israel.
Final scene: 'Massacre' headline runs at media outlets that have turned into pro-Hamas mouthpieces. Curtain falls.
Journos stand to applause from audience of antisemites & Islamists.
'Come back tomorrow' the Gazans shout, we are running the show again. The journos wink back.
Off camera...
Hamas terrorists congratulate themselves over another successful production.
One asks - how can western media be so stupid? They put into headlines whatever nonsense we give them..
Another replies. It is easy... we have lots of friends there now. END.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Peter Johnston review into @bbcnews Hamas documentary scandal isn’t just damage control -
it is an outrageous whitewash - a scandal in its own right.
I have just published a response. 1/13
Thread 🧵⬇️⬇️⬇️
Hidden in footnote 38! A production team member admitted they hid the Hamas affiliation because it would ‘scare' the BBC. The BBC's review dismisses this as irrelevant, relying on 'good faith'.
This assumption of innocence - despite evidence - is institutional naivety. 2/13
The father of the narrator was a senior Hamas official. Yet the BBC claims this had no influence.
The boy went home to his Hamas father every night for months while filming took place. To suggest this dynamic had no influence at all defies all common sense. 3/13
Exclusive research: What happens when a pretty-looking media accuracy watchdog is actually an attack dog for the Muslim Council of Britain, dressed up for show?
Misinformation. Misrepresentation. Misleading and manipulated statistics.
Thread - 🧵⬇️⬇️⬇️
The Centre for Media Monitoring claims the anti-Israel BBC actually has a pro-Israel bias! Yes, you read that right. I read all 188 pages of CfMM’s report - so you do not have to.
Their argument is dressed in manipulated data - and @cfmmuk statistics are wildly misleading.
The first big lie: Their headline claim was that Israeli deaths were covered 33x more than Palestinian ones.
But this stat is built on deceptively counting boilerplate references. A contextualising para at the end of most BBC articles. It’s junk methodology and they know it.
Exclusive: The National Union of Journalists does not like press freedom or Jews very much.....
A personal journey of abuse and discrimination as I reapplied for a press card.
🧵🧵🧵⬇️⬇️⬇️
Because I work behind enemy lines, I have often been targeted at protests. A press card afforded me some protection - so I had held a NUJ card for several years. As my work evolved I was on the street less and I let my last NUJ card expire. The date? October 2023.
October 7 changed everything, and following a very threatening incident I reapplied. I had done it twice before, so did not give it much thought. I made the application in spring 2024 expecting a swift turnaround. This time however, things were going to go very differently...
Exclusive: @Channel4News won awards for its early reporting covering the Gaza conflict. I went looking to see what was so 'award worthy' about their reporting, Guess what I found..
Thread ⬇️⬇️⬇️
I found a 7 minute clip from October 25 2023. The very first 'witness' tells the viewers doctors at Nasser hospital are left working on the patients with the light from mobile phones (those filming do not stop to ask how they charge the mobile phones if there is no fuel).
This story, of the Gazan surgeons performing operations using only the flashlight of their mobile phones, became one of the early viral stories of the conflict. All given to western media, by the doctor Mohammed Qandil
BBC Verify was meant to be an elite ‘fact-checking’ unit for @bbcnews - one of the largest broadcast news organizations in the world.
It turns out BBC Verify is just another obsessive BBC anti-Israel unit manned by amateur hacks.
Thread
⬇️⬇️⬇️
On May 13, 2025, Palestinian propaganda began circulating stories of a mass casualty strike on the European Hospital in Gaza. Israel *swiftly* released information they had struck a Hamas centre. Israel had targeted Mohammed Sinwar - the Hamas leader - hiding by a hospital.
Although they could not verify anything at the time - the BBC Verify team went for it. They spent the first 56 seconds just rolling shocking footage of the strike on civilians. BBC Verify spent the rest of the clip drawing doubt on Israel’s version of events.
Why has nobody but Israel and the US demanded that the civilians in Gaza be allowed to leave?
And hold your reflexive answer to that question to the end.
Thread
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Given the behaviour of western media, the NGOs, and western political leaders, it would be fair to conclude that much of the international community would rather every single Gazan civilian die in this conflict, than see Israel gain any perceived benefit from the outcome. 2/18
What we see from the international community appears unique in the history of modern conflict (and we have endless examples). When conflict arises, civilians flee when they have a choice. Mothers and fathers pick up their children and simply run towards safety. 3/18