Thread by @acagamic

I've been a Prof 13+ years and have 300+ citations.

It took me a decade of reviewing terrible literature sections and deep analysis to learn what I'm about to tell you in 3 minutes:

The Problem:

Most PhD students organize related work completely wrong.

They create random catalogs:

Paper A did this.
Paper B did that.
Paper C found something else.

Sound familiar? 😅

What I learned:

The difference isn't finding more papers
Or writing longer summaries.

It's using established organizational strategies.
Create slick stories instead of boring shopping lists.

Your related work should answer:

WHY does your research exist?

Here are 4 proven strategies to transform your related work
(from random summaries into strategic stories):

1️⃣ Chronological organization

2️⃣ Thematic organization

3️⃣ Methodological organization

4️⃣ Problem-solution organization

Let's dive in:

Strategy 1: Chronological Organization

Use this to show paradigm evolution (not just timeline)

❌ Amateur: "Smith (1995) found X. Jones (2003) discovered Y. Brown (2021) shows Z."

✅ Professional: Show how each research wave solved previous limitations while creating new challenges.

Structure:

• Start with underlying foundational paradigms
• Identify the key problem that triggered shifts
• Show inevitable progression of ideas

⚠️ Warning: Don't force chronology when paradigms developed simultaneously.

That's when thematic works better.

Strategy 2: Thematic Organization

Perfect when multiple approaches coexist!

Group literature around concepts, not timelines.

Example for online learning platforms:

• Pedagogical approaches
• Technology platforms
• Student engagement strategies
• Assessment methods

Key rules:

• Each theme = 3-5 papers (synthesize, don't list)
• Themes must relate directly to your research
• Each section builds toward your contribution
• Flow logically from broad → specific

Strategy 3: Methodological Organization

Show technical contributions.

Perfect for engineering/CS papers
(where comparing research methods is crucial)

Organize around:

• Computational approaches
• Quantitative approaches
• Mixed-methods studies
• Qualitative methods

Within each category:

• Group similar techniques
• Analyze collective strengths/limitations
• Explain why methodological choices matter for YOUR problem

Don't just index different approaches:

Build an argument.

Strategy 4: Problem-Solution Organization

Build toward your contribution

Flow:

1. Define core problems clearly at the beginning
2. Discuss traditional approaches + limitations
3. Cover recent innovations

4. Identify remaining challenges your work tackles

This naturally sets up your contribution
(because you've systematically shown):

• What worked/didn't work
• What's still missing
• What's been tried

Perfect for applied research solving practical problems.

Bonus Tip for smart citation (make me happy):

✅ Aim for 1-3 citations per sentence

❌ Avoid "citation bombs" like: (Author1, 2023; Author2, 2022; Author3, 2021; Author4, 2020)

Quality beats quantity.

15-25 strategic citations > 50+ scattered ones.

TL;DR - Transform your related work:

• Use chronological for paradigm evolution
• Use thematic for a complex research area
• Use methodological for technical positioning
• Use problem-solution for practical contributions

Your lit review should tell a story, not just index papers.

Found this helpful?

→ Follow me for more academic writing tips
→ Repost
→ Read:
medium.com/@acagamic/4-pr…