🔥🔥🔥Obama ordered the fraudulent ICA on Russia influence in 2016 before IC pulled PDB that @DNIGabbard released yesterday, declassified emails show! Working on deep-dive of release & just discovered this detail!
2/ Until now, everyone (unless I missed someone who already caught this) assumed Obama ordered the ICA during the 12/9/2016 meeting, but NO, this email from day before (12/8/2016) referenced that ordered ICA, noting goes to Obama 1/9. AND 12/8 email referenced upcoming 12/9 "PC" meeting.
3/ "PC" per @DNIGabbard release is “National Security Council Principals Committee," which met on 12/9, at which Obama reportedly gave order for ICA that @CIADirector found fraudulent & manipulated. BUT that order came on 12/8! Why does that matter?
4/ Because pulling of PDB before the 12/9 meeting now indicates it was pulled to allow the 12/9 meeting to go forward without the PDG contradicting Obama & his cabal's directive. NOTE: Email shows that those meeting on 12/8 who knew about Obama's ICA order still planned to release PDB on 12/9 BUT
5/ COMEY directly intervened to sideline it! Here's the trail: 12/8/2016 8:32 a.m. email "rooms thoughts" are PDB comes out now & "worst case" the ICA explains any changes. So at least at that point, Obama had already ordered fake ICA.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 6/ It appears though, that Obama may have ordered the ICA the day before, as this is email THREAD from bottom up.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 7/ It continues: So, yes, it appears Obama ordered the ICA on at least 12/7--before the 12/9 meeting. And DNI believed the PDB should go out still on 12/9.
8/ Then, out of the blue, Comey's FBI at 2:22 on 12/8 said it was dissenting from the PDB. DHS responds, basically WTF. FBI says at 4:47 "okay, we'll look closer"
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 9/ Here's Comey's FBI saying dissenting, and later okay, we'll take a closer look:
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 10/ 6 minutes later ODNI (Deputy Director) eight-sixed the PDB.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 11/ NOTE: That is the same person who previously suggested holding the PDB so it matched the ICA ordered by Obama, while others in DNI recommended PDB be published:
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 12/ And the "rooms thoughts" again were to publish the PDB.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 13/ Bottom line: This time shows pulling the PDB was premediated to allow the fraudulent ICA to go forward unimpeded!
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 14/ IC = Intelligence Community
ICA = Intelligence Community Assessment. ICA is the fake assessment @CIADirector exposed a couple week's ago.
DNI = Director of National Intelligence. Now @DNIGabbard Then, James Clapper
ODNI = Office of Director of National Intelligence
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨BREAKING: Lawyers in Alien Enemies Act case representing aliens removed to El Salvador now want Trump Administration to bring them back from Venezuela where they are now, to provide them habeas. IF they want asylum, though, they can seek from Venezuela. 1/
2/ If citizens, they could show and come without habeas (and none are). And none of the others have a right to be in U.S., plus they'd be nuts to agree to come back to U.S. now. Trump Administration also has stronger argument that they are enemies given Venezuela wanted them.
😡😡😡Holy BEEP! So, I've been re-reading yesterday's report at Real Clear Investigations teasing an upcoming release of Russia-collusion hoax info and this passage sent me back to the Durham report. Well, what did Durham say about the ICA? 1/
2/ Durham frickin' cited the ICA as one of those "careful examinations" in footnote 19!!! (Still digging in so maybe he makes note of issues later BUT if he does WTF is he including it in this footnote as a see also and if not, did Durham not know of it?)
3/ Durham's report later discusses politicalizing of intelligence, noting the IC Omnibus person noted a couple instances but didn't mentioned the Carter Page FISA. But Durham makes no mention of the 2016 ICA either, suggesting he remained in dark about that politicalizing.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: @ChuckGrassley released emails include a smoking gun exposing how Tim Thibault was searching for a crime to investigate! 1/
2/ They wanted to open an investigation to allow for investigative activities. NOTE open an investigation to investigate a crime of which they had evidence!
3/ Thibault says we could open an assessment, but that ain't good enough. Why not? Because they can't do what the US Attorney's office wants them to do if it is only an assessment.
🚨🚨🚨Trump Administration files response in opposition to Preliminary Injunction in Planned Parenthood case. The Court already entered a blatantly improper TRO. 1/
3/ New York and several other leftist states sued Department of Education, challenging reduction in forces & Dept of Ed's implementation of Trump policy provisions. Lower court entered injunction mandating rehiring & barring executing Trump's EO.