🔥🔥🔥Obama ordered the fraudulent ICA on Russia influence in 2016 before IC pulled PDB that @DNIGabbard released yesterday, declassified emails show! Working on deep-dive of release & just discovered this detail!
2/ Until now, everyone (unless I missed someone who already caught this) assumed Obama ordered the ICA during the 12/9/2016 meeting, but NO, this email from day before (12/8/2016) referenced that ordered ICA, noting goes to Obama 1/9. AND 12/8 email referenced upcoming 12/9 "PC" meeting.
3/ "PC" per @DNIGabbard release is “National Security Council Principals Committee," which met on 12/9, at which Obama reportedly gave order for ICA that @CIADirector found fraudulent & manipulated. BUT that order came on 12/8! Why does that matter?
4/ Because pulling of PDB before the 12/9 meeting now indicates it was pulled to allow the 12/9 meeting to go forward without the PDG contradicting Obama & his cabal's directive. NOTE: Email shows that those meeting on 12/8 who knew about Obama's ICA order still planned to release PDB on 12/9 BUT
5/ COMEY directly intervened to sideline it! Here's the trail: 12/8/2016 8:32 a.m. email "rooms thoughts" are PDB comes out now & "worst case" the ICA explains any changes. So at least at that point, Obama had already ordered fake ICA.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 6/ It appears though, that Obama may have ordered the ICA the day before, as this is email THREAD from bottom up.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 7/ It continues: So, yes, it appears Obama ordered the ICA on at least 12/7--before the 12/9 meeting. And DNI believed the PDB should go out still on 12/9.
8/ Then, out of the blue, Comey's FBI at 2:22 on 12/8 said it was dissenting from the PDB. DHS responds, basically WTF. FBI says at 4:47 "okay, we'll look closer"
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 9/ Here's Comey's FBI saying dissenting, and later okay, we'll take a closer look:
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 10/ 6 minutes later ODNI (Deputy Director) eight-sixed the PDB.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 11/ NOTE: That is the same person who previously suggested holding the PDB so it matched the ICA ordered by Obama, while others in DNI recommended PDB be published:
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 12/ And the "rooms thoughts" again were to publish the PDB.
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 13/ Bottom line: This time shows pulling the PDB was premediated to allow the fraudulent ICA to go forward unimpeded!
@DNIGabbard @CIADirector 14/ IC = Intelligence Community
ICA = Intelligence Community Assessment. ICA is the fake assessment @CIADirector exposed a couple week's ago.
DNI = Director of National Intelligence. Now @DNIGabbard Then, James Clapper
ODNI = Office of Director of National Intelligence
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The press (legacy and new) and the investing public seem to have no idea what the Obama Administration launched in the Consolidated Audit Trail and what current SEC is currently doing--computer searches of OUR private data without any basis! @NCLAlegal 1/
2/ I'm frankly shocked that more civil libertarians aren't screaming about this! And now SEC is trying to delay Plaintiffs' day in court! Details here: nclalegal.org/feds-are-steal…
I'm working on a piece tomorrow to counter all the spin on the courts refusing to issue arrest warrant against Don Lemon in first instance as somehow vindicating him. BUT I think it merits stressing WHY DOJ sought arrest warrant that way first. 1/
2/2 DOJ feared there would be widespread copycat assaults in places of worship the following weekend unless it moved quickly to show public such behavior was illegal and would be prosecuted.
THREAD: Yesterday @EdWhelanEPPC defended Judge Schlitz for not recusing in ICE cases even though he is publicly listed as a donor to Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota. @HarmeetKDhillon called him out. 1/
2/ Ed quoted from a section of the Compendium § 4.2-3(g)), a federal appellate judge shared with him that stated: “A judge may contribute financially to legal service associations that provide counsel for the poor. A judge need not recuse merely because lawyers who accept appointments by such associations are also counsel of record in cases before that judge.”
3/ @HarmeetKDhillon correctly pointed out that language is out-of-context & cherry picked & ignores other canons. Before explaining, let me provide some background so you can judge the analysis. For at least 6 (possibly 8) years, my federal appellate judge tasked me as sole
2/ Jordan lays out at high level all efforts to "get Trump" that has been going on for 10 years. Beginning with Clinton and Steele dossier, and Comey, and impeachment one, impeachment two, Bragg, and Fani Willis.
3/ Jordan notes how Smith brought on same people who ran raid at Mar-a-Lago and Jan. 7. And how Smith ignore procedures, gagged Trump, filed a 165 motion 33 days before the election.