🧵 THREAD: Why the UK–US Prosperity Deal is likely unlawful — and how it’s deregulating your food behind Parliament’s back.
This isn’t just a dodgy trade deal.
The UK–US Prosperity Deal was signed without a vote in Parliament.
Ministers say it’s just a non-binding agreement.
So why is it quietly being used to rewrite UK law?
Here’s what’s really going on. 👇
The deal was signed using prerogative powers, bypassing MPs.
Then it was implemented through statutory instruments (SIs).
No Parliamentary vote. No consultation. No impact assessments.
Just silent deregulation.
This surely breaches the UK’s own constitutional norms.
To avoid scrutiny, ministers say:
“It’s not a treaty — just a Memorandum of Understanding.”
But if it’s not binding, how can it change UK law?
This is the contradiction at the heart of the scandal — and it’s potentially legally explosive. ⚠️
Using SIs to implement a non-binding MoU may be ultra vires — beyond legal powers.
It violates the doctrine of legality: only Parliament can make major legal changes.
Courts have overturned similar overreach before (Miller I & II, UNISON, Privacy Int’l).
What’s in the deal?
Massive deregulation.
Example: SI 2025 No. 753 removes inspections, marketing standards, and traceability for fruit, veg, and potatoes.
Your food supply is being restructured for US agribusiness — with no debate.
Another SI removes oversight for food additives & GMOs.
Others fast-track gene-edited food.
Even protections against junk food advertising for children have been delayed.
This is a bonfire of standards — and it’s happening by stealth.
And the UK has broken WTO Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rules with this US deal.
Govt says the deal doesn’t qualify as a proper trade agreement.
Yet it creates tariff-rate quotas and deregulates trade barriers.
Retaliation or dispute proceedings could follow.
It’s not just unlawful — it’s reckless.
While the UK tells Brussels it’s aligning with EU food safety (SPS) rules, it’s doing the opposite at home.
That puts our exports — and our farmers — at risk.
This is a Trojan Horse strategy:
Use a “harmless” MoU to force through deep changes to UK law, deregulate the food system, and strip Parliament of oversight.
It’s executive overreach on a historic scale.
This isn’t just about one deal. It’s about how laws are being changed without consent — threatening our food, farming, and democracy.
Ministers must be held to account.
Legal action may follow — but the public has a right to know now.
@SaveBritishFood
#UKUSDeal #StopTheStealth
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵✅ Recent regulatory changes open the door to hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken.
Even if ministers deny it publicly, here’s how it works:
⚖️ 1. Post-Brexit UK regulation is no longer tied to EU food safety standards (SPS rules)
•The Retained EU Law Act gave ministers sweeping powers to rewrite or scrap food regulations via Statutory Instruments (SIs) — without full parliamentary debate.
•These changes weaken bans on things like hormone beef, chlorinated chicken, or pesticide limits without public oversight.
🤝 2. Trade deals create pressure to lower standards
•The UK–US trade deal has long demanded access for US meat and dairy, which is often produced using hormone growth promoters and chlorine washes.
•The UK–India deal involves pressure to accept pesticide residues and additives banned under EU law.
•The CPTPP allows imports from countries that do not follow EU-style SPS rules — making it harder for the UK to maintain higher standards.
🧨 3. Starmer’s team is quietly aligning with these deregulatory trade blocs
While claiming to “cooperate with the EU,” Starmer is:
•Refusing to rejoin the EU’s food safety system
•Signing deals with countries that operate on lower standards
•Failing to legislate clear protections for food and farming
Keir Starmer promised change.
He promised decency, justice, and a break from the chaos.
But what did we get?
The same old gruel — just served in a shinier bowl.
Thread 🧵
🎩 The Promise:
– “End of factionalism”
– “Stronger social safety net”
– “Green prosperity”
– “Closer EU ties”
– “Public ownership”
– “Integrity in politics”
🥄 The Reality:
– MPs suspended for defending the poor
– Welfare cuts, surveillance, silence
– Net zero stalled, fossil deals favoured
– No re-entry to EU, no single market talk
– Rail, water, post still privatised
– Labour selections rigged, members purged
Nigel Farage says a migrant deal with @EmmanuelMacron is wrong because “this is Brexit Britain—we voted to take back control, not to accept a deal from a French president.”
But here’s the thing:
This is Brexit Britain. And it means a permanent migrant crisis we can’t fix. 🧵
Farage is right—this is what Brexit Britain looks like:
•We left the Dublin Regulation, so we can’t return asylum seekers to the first EU country they entered.
•We scrapped freedom of movement, but kept labour shortages that drive exploitation.
•We burned bridges, then begged for lifeboats.
ow small boat crossings are up, and the UK has to beg France for cooperation.
That’s not “taking back control.” That’s losing the tools we once had, then complaining about having to deal with the consequences.
2. Russia — the world’s biggest wheat exporter — has slashed export taxes to zero.
Why? To stop bread prices rising at home.
Their harvest is down ~14% due to hail, frost, and drought.
A global grain shock is already underway. 🌾🌍
3. The UK won’t be spared.
We had:
•Winter floods (crops not planted)
•Spring drought (crops dying)
•No strategic grain reserve
And British farmers are being paid to take land out of production under post-Brexit schemes.