Simon Taylor Profile picture
Jul 22 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Western Union is

- A $4.2bn revenue business
- Revenue down 3.2% YoY
- $150bn annual volume

Meanwhile Visa estimates "Retail-sized stablecoin transactions"

- $4.8bn monthly volume
- $57.6bn annualized
- Growing 1x to 4x YoY (if not much higher)
At 2.6bn Market Cap Western Union trades below its top line revenue ($4.2bn)

Contrast this with Circle trading at $48bn market cap - trading at 20x+ revenue, and 70x+ earnings

Clearly, CRCL is crowded, and there's hype.

But can the incumbent get innovation before the innovator gets distribution?
Excited to chat more about this on @TokenizedPod this coming week

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Taylor

Simon Taylor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sytaylor

Jul 18
We just lived through most consequential 24 hours in financial services law for the past two decades.

And it will bring the biggest transformation of financial technology since the 1970s.

Here's what happened and why it matters 👇
What Happened? 🤔

1. The GENIUS Act passed with a 308-122 bi-partisan vote in the House and is heading to the Presidents desk.

2. The CLARITY Act, clarifying SEC vs CFTC oversight passed House 294-133

3. Anti-CBDC Bill, prohibiting a retail CBDC also passed the house.
The last major bill was Dodd-Frank in 2010 which among other things:

1. Created capital requirements on banks - arguably making them less profitable

2. Carved out smaller banks (Sub $10bn in assets) to have less stringent oversight and make more from even swipe fee.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 2
While everyone is debating Stablecoins. Pay by Bank is quietly becoming a FORCE in payments.

TrueLayer just launched Pay by Bank with Stripe in Germany.

But here's the timeline that explains why this matters: Image
2019: "What's Pay by Bank?"
2021: "Interesting experiment in the UK"
2023: "We should probably test this"
2024: Every major PSP picks their dance partner
2025: The invasion begins

Stripe + TrueLayer aren't just expanding to Germany.
They're taking the fight directly to Adyen + Tink's strongest market.

The numbers that explain why this was inevitable:
→ TrueLayer processes €1.4B annually in Germany
→ Merchants see 42% conversion uplift with Pay by Bank
→ Card fees: 1.5-2.9% vs Pay by Bank: 0.1-0.3%
Read 5 tweets
Jun 26
Why did Kalshi just raise $185m at a $2bn valuation more than DOUBLE Polymarket's recent reported $1bn?

- Polymarket dominated election coverage.
- Had 10X the volume.
- Every journalist quoted their odds.
- They owned the narrative.
- But they can't touch US users.

The biggest prediction market in history... banned from its biggest market.

Kalshi is CFTC-regulated and able to advertise to US customers.Image
But what about prediction markets generally? Isn't it just gambling?

When you can't afford a house, can't trust institutions, can't build wealth through traditional means... why not bet on elections?

This is financial nihilism pricing in.

The social contract broke.

Prediction markets filled the void.

Young Americans are gambling because the "legitimate" path to wealth feels rigged anyway. Same odds, different casino.
But institutions see something else entirely.

- Paradigm didn't invest in sports betting.
- They invested in the infrastructure for conditional finance.
- Prediction markets are just conditional settlement rails.

Today it's "Will Trump win?" Tomorrow it's insurance contracts, derivatives, conditional payments.

If x outcome happens pay y to person z.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 20
🚨 BREAKING: Revolut — the neobank with 50M customers — is quietly building its own stablecoin.

Does everyone need their own stablecoin? Can this threaten Circle and Tether's dominance?
Revolut has a distribution advantage:

- 50M active customers
- Full banking in 30+ countries (EU + UK + MX)
- Live crypto exchange already running (Revolut X)
- Crypto support in their core product
Is this a good business case?

If they got to $7.5B in stablecoin assets at current treasury yield that's ~$300M+ annual revenue

- Tether made $5.2B profit last year.
- Circle has to give away most of its profit for distribution
- Revolut *already has distribution*
Read 6 tweets
May 26
Visa wants to give AI Agents "tokens" so they can pay without you ever seeing a checkout page.

Visa's CEO told investors this is their #1 priority.

Here's how it will work 👇 Image
Imagine telling your Agent.

"I want a signed Pedro Pascal shirt from The Last of Us" don't spend more than $100" -

Then you tap your phone.

The next thing you know, the payment is complete.

Let's unpack the flow as I understood it 👀
1. Tap a card to a device to get a token for their AI Agent
2. The AI Agent registers with the network as a "trusted wallet" in the same way Apple Pay can register with networks and processors
3. The user gives the AI Agent a mandate (Find a Pedro Pascal shirt, don't spend more than $100)
4. The Auth instructions are finalized ($100 budget, Pedro shirt)
5. The Auth instructions define when step-up or biometric authentication is required (e.g. > $100, or some level of fraud risk detected)
6. The auth instructions are matched between the Agent, and the network at the Merchant (e.g. This agent has a mandate to buy for a max of $100 this SKU)
7. The payment is complete. BUT, Liability remains with the merchant for fraud (!!)
Read 6 tweets
Mar 31
A founder sold her startup to JPMorgan for $175M.

The bank thought they were getting 4 million customers.

They actually got 300,000.

Now she's going to prison.

The Charlie Javice story is a masterclass in how NOT to exit your startup... Image
Charlie Javice founded Frank, a financial aid platform for students. By 2021, she'd raised over $20M from notable investors.

She'd even been featured in Forbes 30 Under 30.

JPMorgan saw a golden opportunity: acquire Frank and sell banking products to millions of students.
But there was one problem...

Frank didn't have millions of users. Not even close.
When JPMorgan asked for customer data during due diligence, Javice faced a choice:

- Walk away from $175M
- Create fake customers

She chose option B.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(