boswelltoday Profile picture
Jul 23 15 tweets 2 min read Read on X
👇(so far). Image
“I don’t know what sex I am - I’ve never had my chromosomes tested.”
—Isla Bumba, Equality Lead, NHS Fife.

This was her reply when asked about her own sex in a tribunal about single-sex spaces.
📄

(2/15)
“Being called a man is derogatory.”
—Dr Teddy Upton, the male A&E doctor who changed in the women’s room.

This was part of the hate incident report filed against nurse Sandie Peggie.
📄

(3/15)
“You can’t tell if someone is a man just by looking.”
—Esther Davidson, Nurse Manager.

Asked how women could know who was in their changing room: “You can’t. They might pass.”
📄

(4/15)
“If he says he’s a woman, he’s a woman. That’s the rule.”
—Isla Bumba.

There was no trans policy at NHS Fife. But this was the de facto rule.
📄

(5/15)
“We didn’t ask if any women had trauma or religious objections.”

—Bumba and Davidson, separately.
No consideration was given to female staff with past sexual assault or protected religious belief.
📄

(6/15)
“Trans women are less of a threat than men—except Isla Bryson.”
—Bumba, naming a convicted rapist who was placed in a women’s prison.

This was the only example she gave of risk.
📄

(7/15)
“Women haven’t lost anything… unless you believe in biological sex.”
—Bumba again.

She insisted that letting male staff into women’s changing rooms wasn’t a problem unless you notice the sex difference.
📄

(8/15)
“Periods aren’t sexual, so boys mocking them isn’t either.”
—Dr Upton.

This was his response to questions about whether menstruation-related taunts were sexually harassing.
📄

(9/15)
“It’s not that black and white.”
—Gillian Malone, Head of Nursing.

Asked if letting a male into the women’s changing room meant female staff no longer had a single-sex space.
📄

(10/15)
“Biological sex is just a belief.”
—Jane Russell KC, counsel for NHS Fife.

She repeatedly objected to witnesses calling Dr Upton “a man,” arguing that was merely a belief—not a fact.
📄

(11/15)
And yet it was Sandie Peggie - an experienced A&E nurse - who was suspended for wanting a female-only space to change her clothes.

She said no. They called her “misbehaving.”
They investigated her for a hate incident.
They made her the problem.
(12/15)
This is not just one rogue employer. NHS Scotland had no single-sex safeguarding process for staff. Managers enforced inclusion by suppressing dissent—not by balancing rights.

The consequence? If you say “he’s a man,” you go.
(13/15)
Every one of these quotes was said under oath, and they go to the heart of this case:
→ Sex
→ Belief
→ Inclusion by coercion
→ Women erased, one by one
The final ruling hasn’t yet been handed down. But the evidence is already public.
(14/15)
If this shocked you, please follow the hearing.
@tribunaltweets is reporting it live.

Sex-based rights are on trial.

The Sandie Peggie case isn’t fringe. It’s the future—unless we make it stop.

#SexMatters #PeggieTribunal #EqualityAct #SingleSexSpaces

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with boswelltoday

boswelltoday Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @boswelltoday

Jul 22
Day 5 | PM Session | Peggie v NHS Fife & Dr Upton

How to Bury an Email (and a Woman’s Rights)

The fifth day of Peggie v Fife NHS Board & Dr. Upton closed with two afternoon sessions that drilled straight into the case’s procedural and moral core. Dr. Kate Searle - A&E consultant and supervisor to Dr. Upton - returned to the stand, first under Jane Russell KC’s questioning, then under cross-examination by Naomi Cunningham. If the morning laid foundations, the afternoon cracked them open.

At issue were two strands of institutional behaviour: the framing of Peggie’s conduct as “escalation,” and the mysterious non-disclosure of a key internal email - one sent by consultant Maggie Curran on 5 January and copied to six recipients, including Searle. That email, we now know, discussed controlling witness narratives, limiting leaks, and appointing an internal “small need-to-know group” following Dr. Upton’s Christmas Eve complaint.

The email did not surface until April.

Asked why, Searle offered a cocktail of confusion and technical deflection. She hadn’t seen the case management order before. She wasn’t instructed to trawl her inbox properly until months later. “I’m not a legal expert,” she said. “I believe I complied.” Cunningham pressed: six people received it. Six failed to disclose. Could they all have forgotten?

“I can’t believe we would have held back emails,” Searle insisted. “I’m a doctor and trustworthy.”

But trust has never been the issue. The issue is a coordinated failure that just happens to shield the Respondents - and obscure the truth. Searle admitted the email’s language was “serious” and “inappropriate.” She agreed it would be embarrassing to the Respondents. But she denied any intent to suppress. She just… didn’t remember.

What she did remember - clearly - was giving Upton the green light to use the female changing room. Not because NHS policy demanded it, nor because she’d consulted female staff, but because she Googled it. “There are many references for trans people and changing rooms,” she said. Equality guidance was taken as gospel, though no one knew if Isla Bumba - the Equality Lead - could even define her own sex.

Searle’s handling of Peggie’s protest was telling. She didn’t speak to Peggie directly. She didn’t facilitate a conversation. She didn’t recognise that a woman removing herself from a shared changing space might be doing so to avoid distress. Instead, she accepted Upton’s framing: that Peggie’s behaviour was “escalatory,” that it was bad, and that it warranted formal concern.

When asked whether trauma histories could explain female discomfort, Searle agreed. “Male violence. Unwanted behaviour by men.” But these women, she added, don’t wear badges. They don’t announce their discomfort. Which is precisely why single-sex spaces exist—and why self-exclusion should be seen as principled, not punitive.

Cunningham closed in on the deeper question: Did Searle ever consider Peggie’s belief - that sex is real and can’t be changed - might be protected under law?

“Yes,” said Searle.

Did she consider that Peggie was not misbehaving, but asserting that right?

No answer.

As proceedings ended, Searle was asked if her email correspondence with Beth Upton - used to coordinate policy, press for trust-wide reforms, and exclude Peggie from shared spaces - was ever scrutinised for balance. It wasn’t. Her evidence revealed not just poor judgment, but a culture allergic to dissent.

Two sessions, one message: NHS Fife protects feelings. But only some. Women’s rights? Belief-based objections? Evidence chains? Those are inconvenient truths - easily forgotten, like a CC line in a damning email.

And if six people forget it at once?

That’s called a policy.

Searle back for more tomorrow AM.Image
Second correction today: Maggie Currer *not Curren. Thanks @WingsScotland. Sorry folks.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 15
🧵 WHO’S WHO in the Peggie v NHS Fife tribunal

10 players. One massive case.
A career on the line. A policy on the ropes.
And a government refusing to accept biological reality - despite the law.

Here’s some of the cast of the most consequential workplace tribunal in modern Britain.Image
1. Sandie Peggie – The Whistleblower Nurse
30 years in A&E.
Suspended after objecting to a male-bodied doctor in the women’s changing room.
Claims sex-based belief, harassment and whistleblowing protection.
Was she punished for prejudice - or punished for honesty?Image
2. NHS Fife – The Board in the Dock
Spent £220,500 defending the case.
Blocked FOIs. Tried to silence live coverage.
Internal HR emails called Peggie’s suspension “ludicrous.”
Now on trial for its culture, risk management and submission to ideological HR policy in defiance of the law.Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 11
🧵The Cringe Countdown – Top 10 Most EDI-Obsessed Police Forces in the UK 🇬🇧🚨
Policing, but make it HR.

1/
Policing used to be about catching criminals.
Now it’s rainbow patrol cars, TikTok dances and HR-approved pronoun badges.
Here’s the Cringe Countdown: the 10 UK police forces most committed to fighting crime... against feelings. 🧵Image
2/
🔟 @PoliceServiceNI – The Wrap Patrol

PSNI unveiled a rainbow squad car for Belfast Pride so bold it could double as a RuPaul tour bus.
Visibility? Maximum. Deterrence? Minimal.
Still, great photo op.

belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-…
3/
9️⃣ @NorfolkPolice – 37 Genders Later

Issued staff a guide with 37 identities and the “Genderbread Person.”
Includes “neutrois” and “grey-asexual.”
No arrests made, but several neurons were.

christian.org.uk/news/norfolk-p…
Read 12 tweets
Jul 10
1/🧵The @GoodLawProject receives much applause from the legally adjacent; it is time for a colder appraisal. Its litigation record is poor; its public representations are selective; its founder cultivates notoriety rather than trust. Let us begin.👇 Image
2/ GLP claims a 45% win rate. This includes cases it did not bring, including Miller (2016). A forensic audit by Labour Pains identified just 8 genuine wins in 49 cases - a strike rate of 16%. A spreadsheet of failure.
🔗 labourpainsblog.com/2022/12/05/goo…
3/ In a PPE case, GLP’s lawyers served the claim form one day late. The Court of Appeal dismissed the case, calling the error “careless”. The court never heard the merits; £427,000 of donor funds vanished on a procedural misstep.
🔗 lawgazette.co.uk/news/good-law-…
Read 11 tweets
Jul 9
Ever wonder where gender ideology actually came from?
Not TikTok. Not Reddit.
Academia.
And one philosopher in particular mechanised it: Judith Butler.

The architect of the belief that sex is fiction, womanhood is theatre and identity is a script.👇Image
Let’s begin with the foundation:
Butler claims gender isn’t something you are; it’s something you do.
Not truth and most certainly not biology. A socially rehearsed routine, in fact.Image
But it gets worse.

There is no identity behind the act.
No core self. No anchor. You’re not expressing gender - you’re producing it!Image
Read 11 tweets
Jul 7
🧵
Ever wonder why your GP, BBC and local HR suddenly talk of ‘gender identity’?
Not chance. It’s a blueprint.
This thread digs into how euphemisms were strategically embedded into everyday British language.
👇Image
1. Judith Butler, Gender Trouble (1990)

“There is no gender identity behind the expressions of gender… identity is performatively constituted.”

This wasn’t just ivory tower babble.

It seeded the idea that gender is something you do; not something you are.

By the 2000s, this theory was being quietly smuggled into policy.Image
2. Ruth Hunt, Stonewall CEO, 2015

“Silence is not neutrality. It is collusion.”

This was the moment Stonewall dropped the LGB mask and went full TQ+.

From that point, silence wasn’t allowed. Every public body was expected to speak the new language—or else.Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(