Tesla finally opens its first India showroom in Mumbai's Bandra-Kurla Complex, taking orders for the Model Y at ₹60 lakh. But behind this entry lies a 4-year negotiation deadlock and a question: is Tesla too late to India's EV party?🧵👇
Tesla's Indian subsidiary launched in 2021, but talks stalled over a familiar dispute. Tesla wanted lower import duties. India demanded local manufacturing. This detente signals more than just Tesla's entry—it reveals India's evolving automotive ambitions.
India has always wielded some of the world's highest car import tariffs—even reaching 110%. The reason? Industrial policy. We've consistently kept foreign automakers from capturing our market before domestic players could compete, using tariffs to force local investment.
This strategy worked. Foreign carmakers like Maruti Suzuki came to India, brought expertise, and set up factories to escape duties. Post-1991 reforms made entry easier—100% foreign equity, fewer sourcing rules, tax breaks—but the message remained clear: build here to sell here.
Global automakers flocked to India, often importing parts and assembling locally. Chennai became the "Detroit of India." But despite favorable investment climate, restrictive laws caused spectacular failures, creating a graveyard of foreign car brands.
Ford's story is telling. Entered in 1995, spun off subsidiary by 1998, but assumed Indians would buy their existing models unchanged. They launched the Ford Escort—a large, expensive sedan built for right-hand driving. It flopped badly in our market.
Indian consumers in the 2000s wanted smaller cars, maximum value, strong resale potential, and vehicles suited for Indian roads. Ford eventually tried India-specific models like the Ikon, but expensive maintenance and rare spare parts couldn't compete with Maruti-Suzuki and Hyundai's wider, cheaper lineups.
Ford exited in 2021, leaving thousands jobless and dealers burned. They joined a long list of failures: General Motors, Fiat, Daewoo, Mitsubishi—all unable to crack India's tough, hyper-competitive market despite years of trying.
Tesla faces an even steeper challenge. The Model Y carries a crushing 70% import tariff, explaining its ₹60 lakh price tag. Elon Musk has publicly criticized our tariffs, but India's industrial policy remains non-negotiable.
India offers foreign EV makers just 15% import duties, but with strict conditions: invest $500M within 3 years, achieve 25% domestic value-addition by year 3 (50% by year 5), and post bank guarantees equivalent to foregone duties. These terms are stricter than anything Ford faced.
The policy has flipped from carrots to sticks. Earlier, incentives encouraged targets. Now, incentives only come after meeting targets. Union Minister HD Kumaraswamy confirmed last month: Tesla remains unwilling to set up Indian manufacturing.
Tesla's playbook mirrors Ford's mistakes: global designs without India-specific modifications, limited model portfolio, no local manufacturing base. But Tesla has one advantage Ford lacked—India's exploding millionaire population hungry for luxury.
Luxury car sales crossed 50,000 units last year, growing at 20%—double mainstream cars' pace. Mercedes-Benz India hit record sales, with average selling prices jumping from ₹57 lakh to ₹88 lakh since 2020. The luxury market has real purchasing power now.
Within luxury, EVs are surging. January-May 2025 saw 66% growth in luxury EV sales, capturing 11% of the luxury segment despite heavy import duties. Tesla plans to ride this wave, even building charging stations across tier-1 cities with 4 promised for Mumbai.
Tesla's pricing strategy avoids competition entirely. At ₹60 lakh, it's not competing with Indian EVs or even BYD (whose Sealion 7 costs ₹6 lakh less). Industry experts believe Tesla is banking on brand power and anti-China sentiment rather than features.
But globally, Tesla is struggling. Its EV market share fell from 75% in 2022 to 50% in 2024 in the US alone. This year brought its biggest sales decline ever, first back-to-back yearly drops, and profits crashed 71%. Chinese competitors are winning through aggressive pricing.
Tesla's inventory overflows with unsold cars. JPMorgan said they couldn't find a similar stock crash in automotive history. Tesla desperately needs new markets. After China, India might be its only hope—making Tesla more dependent on India than vice versa.
Meanwhile, India's FAME scheme doubled EV sales to 1.5 lakh four-wheelers, with Tata and Mahindra emerging as major players. Foreign companies like Skoda, Volkswagen, Hyundai, and Kia are now entering under India's evolved EV policy.
Does Tesla risk being late to India’s EV gold rush? This could well be one of the most important questions for the company’s survival.
We cover this and one more interesting story in today's edition of The Daily Brief. Watch on YouTube, read on Substack, or listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Last week, SEBI passed a settlement order that might look routine on the surface. But look closely, and it reveals how shady forex platforms have been exploiting regular Indians — and how regulators are finally cracking down.🧵👇
The case involves Tauga Private Limited, better known as OctaFX India Private Limited. You've probably seen their ads — cricket players telling you how easy it is to make money trading forex, showcasing expensive cars and foreign vacations.
These ads featured people claiming they turned a few thousand rupees into lakhs overnight, all by trading currency from their phones. Sounds tempting? That's exactly what makes this story so important.
Imagine ordering tomatoes and a nail cutter on a quick commerce app. How does it reach your doorstep in 10 minutes? The answer lies in an invisible world of operations that work in tandem - faster than the time it takes to shower.🧵👇
Just four years ago, 10-minute delivery was almost inconceivable. The common response was: "Why would anyone need fruits delivered in 10 minutes?" Today, that skepticism has flipped into dependence. It's hard to imagine life without it.
The scale is mind-boggling. Total Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) on quick commerce platforms has surged to roughly ₹64,000 crores in 2025. A model that struggled in most global markets has found fertile ground in India.
"Make in India" needs a place to sleep. Last week we covered Foxconn's trials in India. Mountains were moved to ease their entry - land grants, legal waivers, geopolitical maneuvering. But there's one aspect we haven't touched: where do 18,000 workers sleep?🧵👇
To house its Sriperumbudur workforce, Foxconn spent $230 million on giant dormitories. This is just one project. As India builds out industry, we need many more such projects lining every industrial cluster. Without that, "Make in India" dreams won't translate to reality.
A NITI Aayog report echoed this need for worker housing and India's shortfall. What's stopping us from building more worker housing? The answer lies in how Indian real estate is organized, regulations that hinder construction, and ultimately, money.
It's been a stormy time for ONDC, India's public infrastructure for e-commerce. Monthly retail orders fell 31% to 46 lakh between Oct 2024-Feb 2025. The CEO, CBO, and non-executive chairperson have all resigned this year. Yet ONDC just announced a new ₹150 crore subsidy plan.🧵👇
ONDC wants to fundamentally change how e-commerce works. Think about your last Amazon order - you searched, bought through their payment gateway, got it from their warehouse via their delivery driver. Amazon owns this entire process and extracts value at every step.
Sellers pay Amazon for listing their goods. The more they pay, the more they show up in your search - even if they aren't the most relevant to you. Buying an Amazon listing is like paying rent for prime property. This has made small Indian sellers very unhappy.
We spend a lot of time talking about parts of our economy that don't work. But there are pockets of excellence where we're world-class — or even lead the world. A recent IMF paper gave us the chance to look deeply into one: UPI.🧵👇
A lot of the world is trying to crack digital payments. If you're reading this, there's a good chance you've seen the benefits first hand. UPI made it infinitely easier to work with digital apps. Transaction costs almost disappeared. You no longer need to carry cash around.
But despite these benefits, many countries simply haven't managed anything nearly as good. On the surface, this sort of system might seem easy enough to create. If you have a smartphone and a bank account, how hard could it be to build everything else? Turns out, it's extremely hard.
Fifteen years ago, mutual funds in India were a footnote in most people's portfolios. Your neighbourhood LIC agent was the closest thing you had to a financial advisor. ULIPs seemed like excellent savings products — "insurance with stock market returns."🧵👇
Today, mutual funds have become a strong pillar of the Indian retail investing ecosystem. Yet there are miles to go. Of more than 70 crore PAN holders in the country, just around 5 crore are mutual fund investors. The actual number is closer to 3.8 crore — barely 5% of our population.
For every Indian the industry has reached, there are another 19 it hasn't. That's the context in which ICICI Prudential AMC, one of India's largest mutual fund houses, has decided to IPO. This comes when the business model of active fund management is being reshaped by regulation.