I deal in realities, not hopium/wishium. There are two big ones: 1) Obama (Zero) was up to his eyeballs in a conspiracy to overthrow an elected president via fraud. He directed it. 2) No court will ever convict him of "treason." This is just a reality from the Americans who . . .
2) . . . contd reelected this bubblepuffer in 2012 on the sole reason that they did not want the first "black president" to fail.
3) THEREFORE, President Trump should just preemptively pardon Zero.
4) He would become only the second president after Nixon to require a pardon.
5) There are good reasons that even indicting him might require a long, court-determined process. For example, some have argued (when it was Trump) that he cannot be charged with violating a crime unless he was first (even as an ex-pres) impeached and convicted.
6) By pardoning Zero, Trump would immediately affix guilt to him. He can run around and squawk all he wants, but he will be permanently tinged.
7) Many of the other creepazoids would not have the benefit of presidential immunity to be determined by courts.
8) Trump cannot back down. But I don't think he can go far with the process. A pardon would establish Zero's guilt for all time. Maybe that's the best we can hope for.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Oops, I forgot to answer my first question in the threat, "Why Tulsi and not Bondi?"
2) It seems pretty clear that they have communicated on this, that Bondi was ready to go with the "Strike Force" when she got the referrals. Now, as in all things, personnel is policy.
3) If Bondi puts a bunch of go-getters on that Strike Force, the conspirators are in trouble. If she allows a bunch of holdover Maureen Comeys on there, well, fuggedaboudit.
4) I think the reasons all this is coming first from Tulsi is that SHE, not Bondi, has access to ALL . . .
4) contd . . . secret and classified material, which Bondi may not. Bondi could have "requested" from various departments/agencies and been ignored. Tulsi's staff can do it themselves.
5) I think Trump is FULLY BRIEFED and absolutely on top of this, hence his "Obama/treason."
1) Ok, guys I've given this a lot of thought. My questions were, "Why Tulsi and not Bondi releasing this stuff?" "Can Zero really be indicted?" and so on.
2) Let's start with the second question first.
We know from the Supes ruling on presidential immunity that a president . . .
2) contd . . . cannot be indicted for actions he took while president. Some have even argued that after a president leaves, to be convicted of a crime they must first be impeached in abstentia and convicted by the senate, in essence taking away any pretense of immunity.
3) I don't believe that, and neither does Zen Master. Once a president is out, he is subject to all laws of a civilian. SO . . .
3) The various pieces of evidence of Obama conspiring with the Couptsters in 2016 would be off the table as a source of an indictment.
1) There is Panican Influencer Chum and there is real world evidence, whether it's the Iran bombing or the Epstein Drizzle.
2) None of the real-world political indicators-I don't do polling as you know-suggest the DemoKKKrats can re-take the House except by running the table.
3) Shall we look at some very real pieces of evidence?
4) Today Senate DemoKKKrats walked out of a judiciary hearing, incapable of stopping the oncoming Trump Judge Express. Mostly, they were freaked about Trump loyalist Emil Bove getting on the bench.
1) Everyone is focused on either Muskrat Love or the Epstein list.
2) I'm here to tell you that by far the most significant story of the last TWENTY YEARS other than Trump's rise is in front of our faces. It is the utter fracturing of the DemoKKKrat Terror Party.
3) Remember, my focus in reading the left is on the "commonsense" DemoKKKrats who know they are losing--ppl like Nate Moore, Ruy Teixeira, and the guys at the "liberal Patriot."
4) They have been throwing lifeline after lifeline to DemoKKKrats for a year. No one listens.
5) If you read my stuff you know that about three mo ago it was "abundance economy" & "good mgt of cities" that was the hot ticket. Well, over the Fourth of July in Benghazi-by-the-Lake, 51 were shot, 6 fatally. Yah, great management.
2) I think they found Ft. Knox of human trafficking.
3) Beginning in Feb., we saw a very sharp uptick in human trafficking busts---50, 80 people at a time, dozens of kids rescued. This has continued to present. In my substack I presented a whole list:
1) Well, it appears Elon got his wish & turned the entire conversation back to him, but I think there was something much more important that happened this weekend. I saw "Mission Impossible: The Final Chapter."
2) Without question, Tom Cruise is the Last Movie Star.
3) Probably he alone can draw people to a theater just on his name. Moreover, it is an image he has cultivated by staying the hell out of politics.
4) Case in point: a trailer shown before MIFC opens features Tom Cruise directly thanking the audience for supporting the movie.
5) Can you see MIFC without having seen part 1? Probably. There is a lot of recap, but also it's clear:
"Entity"=bad, MI team, good. But then there are third party actors, including the CIA.
6) Most of the movie, however, focuses on Ethan Hunt (Cruise) and his efforts to . . .