So, I got a bunch of questions about reflexive control tactics, especially with the massive FIMI ops going on against Zelenskyy right now.

Here's a good source on reflexive control tactics and a short thread for you, curious minds: Image
How Reflexive Control Manipulates Your Mind — and Loses Wars

Russia's war plan in Ukraine wasn’t just tanks and missiles. It was built on an old Soviet trick: Reflexive Control.

A theory to make you choose wrong — on your own.
Source: Militaire Spectator, 2023



#reflexivecontrol #disinformation militairespectator.nl/sites/default/…Image
What is Reflexive Control (RC)?

A Soviet mind-hack.

Coined by V. Lefebvre in 1965.

Refined by the Red Army to guide the enemy’s decisions without force.

You don’t overpower the opponent. You make them decide to weaken themselves.

Like chess — but you pick their move for them
12 tactics of Reflexive Control (per Komov + Leonenko):

Deception — Create a fake threat

Disruption — Scramble decision-making

Deterrence — Project invincible power

Distraction — Pull attention away
Division — Split alliances or loyalties

Exhaustion — Waste their energy

Overload — Bury them in noise

Pacification — Pretend it’s all fine
Paralysis — Invent threats to freeze them

Pressure — Shame their leadership

Provocation — Force a reaction

Suggestion — Seed ideas that steer their will

Russia tried them all in Ukraine.

Some examples to illustrate:
EXAMPLE 1: “Zelensky is a Nazi”

Mechanism: Suggestion

Goal: Get Ukrainians (esp.Russian-speakers) to hate their own president and welcome Russian troops.

Result: Resistance hardened. South Ukraine dug trenches instead.
EXAMPLE 2: The ‘Military Exercise’ Lie

Mechanism: Pacification

Russia masked its invasion buildup as harmless training.

Ukraine had seen it before — and underreacted.

Result: Key forces were too focused on Donbas. Kyiv left exposed.
EXAMPLE 3: The Cyber Onslaught

Mechanism: Disruption

Russia knocked out Viasat comms, hit Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence with malware, and jammed air defenses.

Goal: Confuse, isolate, disorient.

Result: Starlink arrived in 48 hours. Ukraine adapted fast.
EXAMPLE 4: Fake Surrender by Zelensky

Mechanism: Pressure

Russian hackers aired a deepfake of Zelensky surrendering.

TV ticker: “Zelensky has fled Kyiv.”

Goal: Collapse morale

Result: Zelensky dropped a video rebuttal. No one bought it.
EXAMPLE 5: Putin’s Essay on ‘Brotherly Nations’

Mechanism: Division

Framed Ukraine as part of Russia, emotionally and culturally.

Goal: Split public opinion, deter volunteers.

Result: UAF had to turn away recruits — too many signed up.
Why it failed:

Reflexive Control only works if your target misreads you.

In 2014, Crimea was unprepared.

In 2022, Ukraine had lived 8 years under threat. They’d seen the playbook.
Why it still matters:

Reflexive Control doesn’t die when it fails. It evolves.

Russia, China, others — still use it:

🔸 To fracture Western support
🔸 To blur truth with suggestion
🔸 To provoke internal divides before conflict even starts
Reflexive Control isn’t about brute force.

It’s about infecting perception before the first shot.

And it’s still in play — online, in elections, in minds.

Know the tactics. Name them. Defuse the trap.

#reflexivecontrol #disinformation

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦

Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DucuGavril

Jul 23
<< Political scientist Taras Zahorodnii claims that NABU has become an FSB branch, and its work is ineffective and non-transparent. The adopted bill No. 12414 will allow controlling NABU and SAP, which will make their activities more transparent.>>

unn.ua/en/news/expert…
"This bill is a step towards finally taking control of a structure that for some reason began to turn into a branch of the FSB," the political scientist emphasized, commenting on the parliament's adoption of the bill "On Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine
regarding the peculiarities of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses related to the disappearance of persons without a trace under special circumstances in martial law" (No. 12414).
Read 13 tweets
Jul 23
10 ways fake political headlines give themselves away — backed by data

Before AI, fake news was already built for deception.

This 2018 study analyzed 276 real vs. fake political news articles.

What it found is still crucial today.

This thread on how fake news actually looks: Image
The study:
"Comparing Features of Fabricated and Legitimate Political News in Digital Environments"
By Toluwase Asubiaro & Victoria Rubin
University of Western Ontario (2018)
researchgate.net/publication/32…
The dataset:
🔹 138 fake articles
🔹 138 real articles
🔹 All U.S. political news, 2016–2017
🔹 Fake articles collected from “Pants on Fire”–rated sites (PolitiFact)
🔹 Real articles matched by topic (via Reuters + Google)

What they tested: language, punctuation, tone, structure
Read 14 tweets
Jul 23
10 ways fake headlines hijack your perception.

It’s not just misinformation.

It’s reflexive control — tactical manipulation through engineered suggestion.

And headlines are the first strike.

A thread on deception by design: Image
Reflexive control is a Soviet-born strategy.

Its goal: manipulate you into acting against your interests by feeding you warped cues.

It’s not persuasion. It’s steering.

Fake headlines aren’t just false — they’re constructed to trigger reflexes.

Oh, but how do "they" do it?
1. Flooded Factuality

Blend multiple claims — true, false, unverifiable — into one headline.

It creates the illusion of truth by association.
Read 19 tweets
Jul 21
Good Monday morning to you, curious minds.

What can a year-old report tell us about the evolution of troll farms?

Quite a lot, actually.

This one shows us how AI + social engineering replaced old-school spam with something quieter, and harder to trace.

Let’s take a look. Image
This is a case study from 2024, published by Clemson University’s Media Forensics Hub.

It documents a coordinated bot network using AI to reply, not post — shaping U.S. political discourse from inside the replies.
Digital Yard Signs

By Darren Linvill & Patrick Warren

open.clemson.edu/mfh_reports/7
Read 17 tweets
Jul 20
Okay, the evening’s here — but let’s do one more.

What else can we learn about modern disinformation today?

Let’s take a look at this together. Image
This one’s about AI-generated lifestyle influencers who looked like they just wanted to talk skincare and jewelry.

But they had a different job. Image
The report is called Only Skin Deep.

Published March 2025 by Clemson University’s Media Forensics Hub.

It documents how fake women — built with AI, styled like influencers — were used to push pro-Trump and crypto messaging before the 2024 election.

open.clemson.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Read 13 tweets
Jul 20
Disinfo evolves.

The tactics that worked in 2016? Too loud. Too easy to trace.

By 2024, Russia had changed the game.

No bots. No troll farms. Just content.

Believable. Untraceable. Designed to slide right past you.

But how did it worked—and how to see it coming? Image
Full source: Writing With Invisible Ink

Published June 2024 by Alethea

PDF: ink-alethea.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/Alethea-Writin…
Alethea’s report is about Russian interference in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

But there are no fake accounts, no stolen emails. This isn’t Cold War redux.

It’s something harder to spot.

They call it: Invisible Ink.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(