Tulsi Gabbard just made Obama GAG on his own Russia Collusion Hoax.
CNN tried to censor the moment.
But that didn’t stop her from dropping a NUKE, calling Obama’s ties to the scheme “IRREFUTABLE.”
Then came a new bombshell:
Turns out Putin held back CRIMINAL dirt on Hillary before the 2016 election.
This was a wild press conference. Watch it all unfold.
🧵 THREAD
It’s finally happening.
After years of speculation, suppression, and denials from every corner of the establishment...the truth is coming to the surface.
The declassified report is here.
And it proves what many have suspected for years: President Obama wasn’t just aware of the Russia Hoax.
He was behind it.
What started as a standard White House press briefing, quickly evolved into a historic disclosure.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stepped aside and introduced Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
What followed was a controlled demolition of the official narrative.
“At President Trump’s direction and with support from House Intel Chair Rick Crawford, today we released the declassified oversight majority staff report from September 2020.”
Then came the nuke.
“There is IRREFUTABLE evidence showing President Obama and his national security team knowingly created a false intelligence report to sell the narrative that Russia helped Trump win the 2016 election.”
“They made it up. It wasn’t true.”
Gabbard laid out the full scheme:
“They used fake sources, suppressed real intel, and ignored standard tradecraft to push a lie.”
“They conspired with the media to undermine President Trump and launched a years-long coup against his administration.”
“This should concern every American. It’s not about party—it’s about our democracy.”
This is the biggest political scandal in modern U.S. history.
That wasn’t conjecture.
That was the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, standing in the White House, telling the American public that a sitting president weaponized the intelligence community to interfere in a presidential election—and take down his successor.
The paper trail is now public.
“We’re here today because the American people deserve the truth, they deserve accountability, and they deserve justice.”
She outlined three separate data points now declassified and available for anyone to read: ODNI records, the DOJ’s “Clinton Annex,” and a full oversight report from the House Intelligence Committee.
“All come back to and confirm the same thing.”
“There was a gross politicization and manipulation of intelligence by the Obama administration, intended to delegitimize President Trump even before he was inaugurated, ultimately usurping the will of the American people.”
And now, it’s all on the table for the American people to see.
Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.
→ @VigilantFox
But Gabbard wasn’t finished.
She turned next to Hillary Clinton.
And to a revelation that changes the entire framing of 2016.
Gabbard laid out how according to the report, Vladimir Putin withheld the most damaging material he had on Hillary Clinton....because he believed she was going to win.
CRIMINAL material.
“I’m going to go over the key findings from the House Intelligence report, which investigated the claims that were made by an intelligence community assessment ordered by President Obama and published in January of 2017.”
“First, Putin’s principal interest relating to the 2016 election were to undermine faith in the U.S. Democratic election process, not show preference of a certain candidate.”
“In fact, this report shows Putin held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election to weaken what Moscow viewed as an inevitable Clinton presidency.”
But the real scandal wasn’t just what Putin had.
It’s what the Obama administration did to hide it.
“In the January 2017 intelligence assessment that president Obama ordered, John Brennan, who was CIA director at the time, and the intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the MOST damaging material he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory.”
And the content of that dirt? Nothing short of explosive.
“The report goes into great detail about the information Russia and Putin had on Hillary Clinton, which included possible criminal acts, like secret meetings with multiple named U.S. religious organizations, in which State Department officials offered in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton’s campaign for the presidency, significant increases in financing from the State Department.”
They had the information. They buried it.
And they lied about what Russia’s intentions were.
Right on cue, CNN punted with what could only be described as: damage control.
Just as Gabbard began walking through the most critical conclusions...CNN cut the feed.
She had just said:
“Multiple intelligence community assessments released in the months leading up to the November 2016 election concluded that Russia had neither the intent, nor capability to impact the outcome of the U.S. election—”
And then the she was muted as a network commentator was heard softening the blow:
“We’ve been listening there to the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, continuing on what has now been a multi-day effort—to attempt to back up the… quite extreme allegation that President Obama is guilty of treason and that he worked in some sort of ‘conspiracy’ with Hillary Clinton, etc.”
No debate. No context. Just the kill switch.
The irony wasn’t lost on anyone watching: an intelligence official presenting newly declassified evidence...muted mid-sentence, while a TV anchor reframed her words as a “conspiracy.”
Back in the briefing room, Gabbard didn’t waver.
She closed with a clear summary of what the public now had in front of them.
This was a HISTORIC abuse of power and levels of corruption never before witnessed by the American people.
“The implications of this are far-reaching and have to do with the integrity of our democratic republic.”
“It has to do with an outgoing president taking action to manufacture intelligence, to undermine and usurp the will of the American people in that election, and launch what would be a year’s long coup against the incoming president of the United States, Donald Trump.”
She finished simply: “Thank you.”
This wasn’t Watergate.
It was orders of magnitude beyond it.
But there was one final moment. An epilogue if you will.
A reporter asked what no one else in the room wanted to say out loud.
“Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior?”
Gabbard didn’t blink.
“We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this.”
“For even President Obama?”
“Correct.”
And then the final blow:
“The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama LEADING the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.”
“There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.”
It’s all out now. No more hiding. No more denials.
The cat is officially out of the bag, and what comes from it?
That is the million dollar question.
Special thanks @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow!
—> @overton_news
@overton_news I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for defying mainstream narratives.
If censorship strikes again, you’ll always find my latest threads at VigilantFox.com.
I sift through the news so you can live your life.
Over 40 million Americans take statins, not realizing they’re depleting the “most vital nutrient for the heart.”
Statins are pushed to reduce cholesterol, but they also severely deplete CoQ10, a critical compound for energy.
And when the body is starved of CoQ10, your cells begin struggling to produce energy. Muscles weaken. Fatigue sets in. And the heart itself can start losing the fuel it depends on to keep beating efficiently.
Dr. Stephen Sinatra was a “choir boy for cholesterol” until a 1993 study exposed the unsettling CoQ10-depleting effects of statins.
“Didn’t make any sense,” he said.
“How could the most vital nutrient for the heart be knocked out of the box? The heart requires COQ10 for survival.”
In his own practice, Dr. Sinatra began to notice that he “wasn’t seeing a correlation of heart problems with higher cholesterol.”
He eventually concluded everything he thought he knew about cholesterol was a “myth.”
“Cholesterol is not the villain of heart health” we’ve been told. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
The more you dig into modern medicine, the more you realize how often “settled science” isn’t actually settled. It’s simply been rigged to build an industry.
In the 1960s and ’70s, two scientists squared off over the cause of heart disease.
John Yudkin pointed to sugar while Ancel Keys blamed saturated fat and cholesterol.
Keys won the battle, and his seven countries study became gospel.
But Yudkin didn’t just lose. He was ridiculed into obscurity.
This 75-year-old man, who’s been blind since birth, suddenly regained his eyesight after using DMSO to treat sinusitis.
It cleared his sinuses “instantly,” Murray says, but what it did to his sight was “unbelievable.”
For the first time in his life, he was finally able to see color in his left eye.
And when he kept using DMSO, his vision kept improving: He could make out details and even count fingers, something he “could never do before.”
It might sound like a coincidence, but DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can’t solve, like blindness, macular degeneration, floaters and cataracts.
It’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. And it’s hiding in plain sight for just $20 a bottle. 🧵
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below:
A registered nurse with 30 years of experience treating chronic pain says she saw “TEN TIMES” the positive effects after mixing DMSO with castor oil to treat her peripheral neuropathy.
Castor oil on its own has anti-inflammatory effects, but adding the DMSO is where she says it “got interesting.”
That’s because DMSO “isn’t just a treatment, it’s a carrier,” Danielle Minetti explained.
“It can pull medications and nutrients right through the skin barrier deep into the body.”
That’s why when Danielle mixed DMSO with castor oil, she saw “ten times” the positive results.
Because DMSO acts as the delivery system, carrying the castor oil deeper into the areas where she needs relief most.
DMSO is a naturally occurring compound that is primarily derived as a byproduct of the wood pulp and paper industry, which makes it widely and affordably available.
But that also creates a problem...
Because if a treatment can’t be patented, Big Pharma can’t profit.
And that simple reality is where the DMSO story takes a dark turn.
So what happened to DMSO, and why is a substance that is so medically promising still relatively unknown to this day?
Let’s take a closer look. 🧵
The real story isn’t whether or not DMSO worked.
The real story is how a low-cost, widely available substance became an early case study in medical distrust.
Regulators suddenly restricted it. Doctors dismissed it.
But patients kept using it.
And once that happened, official medicine no longer controlled the story.
DMSO was discovered in 1866 by a Russian chemist, then largely forgotten.
In the 1950s, the paper industry needed new solvents. Dimethyl sulfide from wood pulping could be oxidized into DMSO.
That industrial turn set up one of the most unusual medical controversies of the 20th century!
The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans.
They kept injecting anyway.
One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.
She was shut down.
Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.
On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”
She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.
These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:
• Bell’s palsy
• Cardiac failure
• Acute left ventricular failure
• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)
• Pulmonary infarction
• Cerebral artery occlusion
• Aortic stenosis
• Sudden cardiac death
• Hypertensive emergency
• Basal ganglia stroke
When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”
Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”
As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.
In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.
He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”
Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.
She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.
Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”
Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵
For years, Americans were told the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective.”
Not mostly safe.
Not partially effective.
Not still being studied.
Safe. Effective. Full stop.
The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.
But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.
The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.
That debate has been raging for years.
The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.
Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.
The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.
That’s the part we can’t ignore.
Vaccine trust was built on a very simple promise.
The government said the products had been carefully tested, monitored, and transparently evaluated.
If a serious safety issue appeared, the public would be told.
But according to the records Johnson released, that isn’t how the COVID vaccine rollout worked. Not even close.
Republicans are once again teaming up with Democrats to ram Digital ID through at the federal level.
The bill they’ve just introduced is, if you can believe it, worse than all the others before it.
HR 8250, deceptively named the Parents Decide Act, doesn’t just force everyone to link their identity to use apps on their phones, it mandates that they must do it to use ANY operating system. That means Apple, iOS, Windows, Google, Android, even Samsung—basically everything.
And once that’s in place, there’s nowhere to step outside of it.
But one brave group is refusing to go along.
GrapheneOS has made a statement saying: GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification, or an account.
@glennmeder from PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse has been working to educate people on how to escape the digital control grid, including how to put GrapheneOS on your phone—for free. And they have a solution to Digital ID right now.
He joins us to discuss. 🧵
You’ve seen this pattern before.
When the same thing starts appearing everywhere at once, it’s usually not random.
A new push for Digital ID laws isn’t happening in just one place. With bills like the Parents Decide Act (HR 8250), it’s now moving directly into the systems we use every day. It’s happening in a very coordinated way across countries, across platforms, and now, at the operating system level.
This isn’t about regulating a few apps anymore. The focus has moved underneath them—to the operating system itself—the software that runs your phone and computer. @GlennMeder described it plainly, they’re trying to “lock it down on an operating system level,” because that’s the one layer you can’t avoid.
Apps can be swapped. Accounts can be deleted.
But if access to the operating system requires Digital ID, there’s nowhere left to step outside of it.
That’s the inflection point.
Glenn called it “the hill to die on,” not because of how it looks today, but because of what it enables once it’s in place. In his words, this isn’t just verification, it’s the foundation for removing privacy and building a system that monitors “everything we say.”
He warned it would “change instantly,” the kind of shift you only recognize after it’s already locked in.
Access to your phone. Your apps. Your accounts. All tied to one digital identity.
And once that becomes the standard, stepping outside of it stops being an option.
Your phone is a surveillance Trojan Horse.
Big Tech and Big Brother have colluded together to create a spyware monopoly.
Your phone tracks your location at all times, who you text, what you read, whether you’re skeptical person or not, how you spend your money and where your finances are stored... This list could go on forever.
Privacy Academy is hosting a FREE webinar on Thursday, May 7th at 7pm CT (8pm ET / 6pm MT / 5pm PT) where you can learn how to escape the cell phone surveillance state.
For four years, Ron Johnson has wondered how US health officials could ignore “overwhelming evidence of harm” from the COVID vaccine.
“Now I know,” he says.
The truth is, health officials didn’t “ignore” safety signals. They buried them instead.
And now we have the receipts:
The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it—and dug out a timeline that would make any American furious.
This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.
(Post 1 of 7)
According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.
More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).
It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).
And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.
But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?
(Post 2 of 7)
The U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it.
It turns out they knew the safety signal was there. But they didn’t see it as a warning sign. They saw it as “pest.”
So much of a “pest” that they decided it was better to ignore the devastating safety signals and let people die than to deal with the data head-on because it could stoke “vaccine hesitancy.”