I was at a restaurant in my hometown (Shaughnessy's Cove in Summerland, BC) and noticed the outdoor air conditioning system.
Whether they know it or not, they are using aerosol science to cool the air. I figured I’d put together a thread to explain how these work.
So, what is actually happening?
By spraying a mist, the outdoor eating area is cooled. Now, the area isn’t cooled because water is being sprayed all over the surfaces, akin to spraying a hose of water everywhere. Something more interesting is happening.
Mist is sprayed from a hose. Now, mist is simply a large population of individual aerosol droplets. The composition of each droplet is pure (or at least nearly pure) water. The size distribution of the aerosol will range from 50 to <1 microns.
Once pure water is aerosolized, the droplet that is formed will begin to evaporate. All of the water will evaporate until the droplet is gone, where all of the water has converted to vapor.
This is why you won’t get soaked by the spray.
The rate that the water droplet evaporates is largely dependent on:
-Droplet size
-Relative humidity
-Temperature
At the same relative humidity and temperature, smaller droplets will change size much faster. Shown here is the size of water droplets evaporating into 80% humidity and 20C.
Effect of Temperature:
In cooler air, water droplets evaporate more slowly.
Effect of Relative Humidity:
The drier the air, the faster the aerosol droplet will evaporate.
None of the previous 3 slides may be all that surprising. And the bigger question is, what does this have to do with how mist cools an outdoor space?
The answer, as It turns out, is “everything”.
What matters is what happensINSIDE each droplet.
Context: The body uses sweat to regulate its temperature. As the water in the sweat evaporates from the skin, the surface of the skin is cooled.
Energy is required to convert water from a liquid to a gas. Termed the “energy of vaporization”, this is the energy that is taken up by the water during evaporation.
Temperature is a measure of energy. As energy is transferred from the liquid water to water vapour, the temperature of the surface of the skin is cooled.
An identical dynamic occurs in an evaporating mist. As each water droplet evaporates, the temperature of the aerosol droplet gets much cooler.
But how much?
Shown here is the temperature of a 10 micronwater droplet evaporating into different relative humidities. In dry air, the droplet will reach temperatures well below freezing.
Fun Fact/Aside: Pure water droplets do not freeze at 0 C. Pure water droplets can reach as low as -37C before forming an ice crystal.
Alright, so the reason why these misting systems work so well is that the aerosol is incredibly cold. This cold mist in turn will lower the temperature of the surrounding air, leading to a comfortable environment.
I hope you found that interesting. At the very least, you have a couple fun facts you can use on the patio this summer.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Epidemiology is a powerful tool to determine the major route by which diseases such as HIV are transmitted. If a disease is spread via sexual intercourse, track tracing is easy.
When the pathogen spreads through the air, things are less obvious. Hence the Covid failure.
Aerosols are very small, have a high surface to volume ratio and can readily reach super saturation. This combination makes them a unique environment for chemical reactions. We had a paper published in JACS that looked into the rate of chemical reactions within and on aerosols.
This work has implications from material fabrication through to understanding disease transmission.
The project was headed by Bryan Bzdek (University of Bristol, whose office is 3 doors down from mine).
Context: The chemistry at the air-liquid interface of a sample will be different than in the bulk. There are many reasons for this, such as the molecular orientation, higher solute concentration (due to evaporation of the solvent at the surface) and unusual acidity/basicity.
A preprint came out that measured how acidic vapour affects influenza aerostability.
How the pH of exhaled aerosol evolves over time will dictate both how long microbes remain viable in the air, but also how effective different mitigation strategies will work.
Context: Our team has studied how long numerous microbes remain viable in the air. In these studies, we found that the alkalinity of exhaled aerosol drove the decay of SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, elevated levels of CO2 results in SC2 remaining viable in the air for a longer period.
An article came out recently that looked at the effect of CO2 on influenza decay in sessile saliva droplets.
The study confirms what we have been saying since 2022: respiratory fluids become highly alkaline when they leave the body, and this in turn affects microbe viability
Given that this is a research area where our team has made a lot of waves, I thought I should share my thoughts.
Context: Prior to 2020, the assumption in the literature around respiratory aerosol pH was that was acidic. There were a few reasons for this, but it largely came down to the fact that almost all environmental aerosol is acidic, so it was assumed respiratory would be the same
I got this question over on BlueSky that I thought some might find interesting.
In short, why does the CO2 levels in a hockey arena trend upwards even though it has an upgraded HVAC?
When HVAC systems are installed, certain assumptions are made, largely because they need to be. One is that the air within the space is evenly mixed.
The problem is that it rarely is.
In a perfectly designed space, for every litre of fresh air brought into a space, 1 litre of air would be removed. For this to occur, a room would have be essentially a pipe.
The risk of the airborne transmission of disease correlates with the amount of infectious exhaled aerosol. Since people exhale CO2 with aerosol, its conc has been used as proxy for exhaled aerosol
In this article, researchers propose a new way to estimate risk of transmission
Here’s a link to the article (the first author is Henry Oswin, a former PhD student from our group who is currently working with Lidia Morawska):
For a variety of reasons, CO2 may not be a good proxy for exhaled aerosol. eg, it will underestimate the risk when people are talking, or overestimate when filtration is used.
I walked through some of this in my explainer video (excerpt shown below):