1/ Continuing claims a bit higher than I thought they would be, though still not that concerning.
We're probably going to be on a flattish trajectory in the published series for the remainder of the year due to residual seasonality.
2/ That flattish trajectory in the published series is an overly benign portrayal of what is actually happening in the underlying data, which is an ongoing slow creep upward.
3/ Initial claims continue to run below year-ago levels. We're still in the Hurricane Beryl base effect window so I'll want to wait a little longer before I declare that layoffs are coming down...
4/ ...But we're running below 2023 levels too, not just 2024. It really does seem like the labor market is moving in a different direction than pessimists like me expected.
5/ Claims whiffed in their June nowcast of unemployment-due-to-permanent-layoff, but here's what they're saying for July.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ Without taking future revisions into account, we’ve had a similar trajectory to the unemployment rate in the first 5 months of this year with 124K/mo (vs 180K/mo a year earlier.)
Consider future revisions into account and we’re probably talking 154K vs 59K.
3/ I am in general mildly pessimistic about the labor market trajectory - I don’t intend to be a Pollyanna here.
But a lot of the slowing in employment growth is coming from the supply side, not the demand side.
Business Trends & Outlook Survey from the Census Bureau:
1/ Employers are becoming slightly less pessimistic, relative to a year earlier, about future headcount (probably reflecting less-high tariffs).
We haven't seen actual behavior (modestly contractionary) change much since
2/ The improvement in headcount plans (relative to a year ago) is coming from fewer firms planning to cut headcount, and more firms planning to expand it.
Again, they are more pessimistic than 5-6 months ago - but less pessimistic than 1-2 months ago.
3/ A slightly smaller share of employers are currently/recently expanding headcount, relative to a year ago. The share of employers cutting headcount is unchanged relative to a year ago.
1/ TL;DR: We are very likely going to get large negative downward revisions to the growth of non-farm employment in the year from March 2024 to March 2025.
2/ To recap: the QCEW is the source data for the annual benchmark revision to nonfarm payroll employment.
The next benchmark date is March 2025. We'll get a preliminary estimate in late summer. We'll get the final benchmark revision in early February 2026.
3/ As of this morning, we have 3 quarters of the QCEW data that will constitute the benchmark source data.
QCEW data are noisy. They're also, themselves, subject to revisions (more later). So this is speculative based on 3 rather than the full 4 quarters. Nevertheless...
1/ With the reduction in US tariffs on China (from astronomical to very high levels), business hiring plans have become a little less downbeat. (Still more glum than a year ago, but the deficit is smaller.)
2/ This modest improvement in plans is due to more firms planning to increase headcount, and fewer firms planning to cut back.
But it's still true that fewer firms plan to expand than a year ago, and more firms plan to cut back than a year ago.
3/ Firms' current actions aren't as downbeat as their plans. They're only modestly more contractionary than they were a year ago.
That small contraction is coming via a smaller share of firms planning to expand. The share of firms planning to cut back headcount is unchanged.
1/ US firms continue to be very pessimistic about their future headcount, but no change in that pessimism relative to 2 weeks ago.
We're not seeing any leakage, yet, from that pessimism into current action. (Soft data & hard data agree.)
2/ The deterioration in employer headcount expectations has come from both a falling share of firms planning to expand, and a rising share of firms planning to cut employment.
(But no additional worsening in the last 2 weeks.)
3/ Relative to a year ago, we see about the same share of firms currently reducing headcount (no surge in layoffs) but a slightly smaller share expanding headcount (lower hiring).