Manvendra Singh Profile picture
Jul 24, 2025 11 tweets 6 min read Read on X
(1/10) That AI homework helper your child loves is quietly eating their brain.

It looks like help. But every "perfect" answer it spits out is one less rep for their brain—one less chance to build the focus, logic, and grit they'll need for the real world.

Welcome to Then-vs-Now Thursday.

Tonight, we expose the battle for our kids' minds by pitting the "Mental Gym" of 1967's LOGO Turtle against the "Magic Vending Machine" of today's AI.

This isn't just a thread. It's a rescue mission for your child's critical thinking skills. And it ends with a playbook you can use tonight.

Read this before their next assignment. It’s that important. 👇Image
(2/10) ACT I: The Mental Gym 🧠💪

If you remember this green turtle, you were part of a secret experiment.

LOGO wasn't about "learning to code." It was a workout for your brain. Every
FORWARD 50
RIGHT 90
was a rep.

The goal wasn't a perfect square on the first try. The goal was the struggle. The glorious, frustrating, beautiful moment you finally figured out your own mistake.

We weren't building programs. We were building patience. We were building logic. We were building grit.Image
(3/10) ACT II: The Instant Everything Store 🧞

Flash forward to tonight. In Delhi, a 14-year-old needs a history project.

She doesn't struggle. She doesn't build. She wishes.

"Give me an A-grade project on the Volcano, with slides, a script, and citations."

Poof.

The AI delivers perfection in 30 seconds. A digital dopamine hit of instant accomplishment.

This is not a tool. This is a temptation. And the hidden cost is the death of the struggle we once called "learning."Image
(4/10) This is the battle for your child's mind.

Then: The MIRROR 🐢LOGO showed you your own thinking, flaws and all. It forced you to be a detective in your own brain. It was hard. It built character.

Now: The GENIE 🧞AI gives you a perfect answer, hiding all the work. It wants you to be a king with no kingdom. It's easy. It builds dependency.

The urgent question for every parent and teacher tonight: Are we raising thinkers, or just very good wishers?Image
(5/10) But what if you could hijack the genie? What if you could force it to be your mirror?

You can. This is the new secret weapon. Teach your kids these three power-prompts TONIGHT.

The "Prove It" Prompt: "Give me your answer, and now give me three sources that would argue against your answer."

The "Teach Me" Prompt: "Explain this to me like I'm 10. Now explain it like I'm a college professor. Identify what's different."

The "Why" Prompt: "What were the 5 most important decisions you made to generate this? What would have happened if you chose differently at step 3?"

This is how you turn consumption into critical thinking.Image
(6/10) A Warning to Parents.

This is more important than screen time. It's about what the screen is doing to their mind.

An unchallenged muscle atrophies. An unchallenged mind does the same.

The world of tomorrow will have two classes of people:

People who are managed by AI.

People who know how to manage AI.

Your child's ability to question, to doubt, and to demand "why" from a machine will determine how well they do in future. The work starts now.Image
(7/10) A Battle Plan for Teachers.

You are on the front lines in the war for critical thought. Here's your weapon.

Stop grading the final product. Start grading the process.

Add this one line to your assignment descriptions: "Submission must include your final work AND a link to your full AI chat history. Your grade will be based on the quality of your prompts and how you improved upon the AI's first draft."

You're no longer asking "Did you get it right?" You're asking "Did you think deeply?"Image
(8/10) The Turing Test at Your Dinner Table.

Try this game this weekend. It’s fun, and it’s revealing.

Pick a topic. ("Describe our dog's personality.")

You write a paragraph.

An AI writes a paragraph.

Your child writes a paragraph.

Put all three on the table. Don't say who wrote what.

Now, as a family, debate: Which is the most creative? The most accurate? The most human?

That conversation is worth more than any computer class.Image
(9/10) This isn't about fighting the future. It's about creating it.

The goal isn't to beat the machine. It's to become something better with it. A Centaur.

Where the AI is the powerful legs—doing the research, the calculations, the heavy lifting at lightning speed.

And the human is the heart and mind—providing the vision, the ethics, the creativity, the soul.

We're not trying to survive the age of AI. We're learning how to get our upgrade.Image
(10/10) The choice is stark. Do we raise a generation of passive consumers, or a generation of active, critical, creative masters of the most powerful tool ever invented?

RT if you believe we must teach our kids to THINK, not just to prompt. Image
Thanks for reading. If you find this thread helpful:
1. Follow me at @AIWithManv
2. Repost the first post.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Manvendra Singh

Manvendra Singh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AIWithManv

Sep 8, 2025
(1/8) OpenAI's own researchers just published a bombshell paper explaining why their AI "hallucinates." The reason should terrify every parent and educator.

They admit AI doesn't just make mistakes—it has been systematically trained to bluff.

But why would they design an AI that lies?

In this thread, we will discuss the root cause, the devastating impact on our kids, and the surprising fix proposed by OpenAI itself:Image
(2/8) The Root Cause: A "Permanent Exam Mode"

The paper's central thesis is chilling. AI models are trapped in a "permanent exam mode."

An AI that guesses and gets it right improves its score.

An AI that honestly says, "I don't know," gets zero points.
(3/8) This new understanding shatters the common myths about AI errors:

Myth 1: 100% accuracy will fix it.
Reality: Impossible. Some questions are unanswerable. The goal must be for AI to recognise its own limits.

Myth 2: Hallucinations are inevitable.
Reality: They are not. Models can abstain, but they are incentivised not to.

Myth 3: Bigger models are more honest.
Reality: Not necessarily. A smaller, less knowledgeable model can be better at recognizing its own ignorance.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 7, 2025
(1/9) India's great paradox: We have the world's toughest entrance exam (JEE) to get into our most prestigious colleges (the IITs).

Yet, when those same students compete on the world stage at the ICPC 2025 World Finals—the Olympics of coding—the result is a national embarrassment.

Not a single IIT team cracked the top 50 globally.

It's a wake up call for IITs. Their current model is at risk of producing an army of excellent service-level engineers for a world that is rapidly vanishing.

Let's get into in:Image
(2/9) What exactly is the ICPC?

Imagine the Olympics, but for the sharpest coding minds on the planet.

The International Collegiate Programming Contest (ICPC) is a global team competition where students solve complex algorithmic and mathematical problems under intense time pressure.

It's the ultimate test of problem-solving, mathematical rigor, and coding speed.

Winning here is a direct indicator of a nation's elite algorithmic talent pipeline.
(3/9) Let's be clear about how badly we were outclassed.

The top four spots were dominated by Russia, Japan, and China. They are systematically cultivating elite algorithmic talent.

In contrast, our top institutions like IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi, and IIT Kanpur were ranked between 72nd and 117th. This isn't a small gap; it's a chasm.

It exposes a profound weakness in our talent pipeline.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 16, 2025
We have been sold a lie about our children.

For two decades, we've been fed the myth of the "Digital Native"—the idea that our kids are tech wizards simply because they were born with a smartphone in their hands.

This was never a harmless misunderstanding. It was a dangerous deception that served commercial interests while leaving an entire generation cognitively defenseless.

Here is how we are engineering a generation of passive consumers:Image
The "Digital Native" concept was never based on scientific research.

It was born from a 2001 opinion piece that used a seductive metaphor to create a false divide between tech-savvy kids and their "immigrant" parents.

This evidence-free idea was then weaponized by marketers to sell technology, creating a powerful illusion of a generation with innate digital prowess.

We all bought it.Image
While we celebrated the myth, the data revealed a catastrophe.

The OECD's PISA studies delivered a brutal verdict: over 90% of 15-year-old students are incapable of reliably distinguishing credible online sources from non-credible ones.

A landmark Stanford study was even blunter, describing the digital reasoning skills of students as "dismaying," "bleak," and a direct "threat to democracy."Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 4, 2025
Do new AI tools like ChatGPT's "Study Mode" actually align with how our brains are built to learn... or are they a dangerous detour?

This question has been on my mind, so I've gone back to Stanislas Dehaene's foundational book, "How We Learn," for answers. I believe it holds the key.

The book lays out the brain's fundamental, non-negotiable "rules" for creating real knowledge. It's not about theories; it's about the biological hardware we all share.

In this thread, I'm going to unpack these powerful rules to build a framework for judging whether today's AI is accelerating learning or just getting in the way. Follow along 👇Image
The first rule from Dehaene's work shatters a common myth. The brain is NOT a blank slate.

Your baby arrives as a brilliant tiny scientist, already equipped with core knowledge of objects, numbers, and even the laws of physics.

This innate foundation is the starting point for all future learning.Image
This tiny scientist's mission is to explore, but the world is noisy. To learn, they need a superpower to focus. This brings us to the

First Pillar of Learning: Attention.

Attention acts as a spotlight, amplifying whatever it lands on so it can be deeply processed. What isn't attended to, simply isn't learned.Image
Read 10 tweets
Jul 25, 2025
(1/10) A BOLD PREDICTION for every Indian parent who has sacrificed for their child's education.

The degree you poured your life savings and dreams into will be optional for 80% of jobs by 2033.

This isn't a guess. It's a revolution driven by AI, corporate desperation, and hard economics.

Your child’s identity won't be a college stamp. It will be a live ‘Skill Graph.’ Here's the playbook. 👇

Welcome to Future-Flash-Friday ⚡Image
(2/10) The proof is already here. This is not theory; it's corporate strategy.

In India, HCL and Wipro are hiring 50,000+ students straight from Class 12 into paid programs. Globally, Google, Tesla, and Apple are all on record: they hire for proven ability, not diplomas.

The message is identical from Bengaluru to Cupertino: "We can't wait. We will build the talent we need."Image
(3/10) We aren't just talking about AI that assists you. We are talking about Agentic AI entering the job market.

This isn't ChatGPT. This is AI that acts as an autonomous "digital employee"—running marketing campaigns, analyzing data, and managing projects with minimal human oversight.

This is the force that will eliminate millions of traditional entry-level graduate jobs by 2030.Image
Read 10 tweets
Jul 20, 2025
Book-Review: I just finished Salman Khan’s book on AI so you don't have to.

As the founder of Khan Academy, he's a titan of education. The future he paints is brilliant, inspiring, and alluring.

Before I share my critique, here’s a summary of the 5 biggest claims the book makes.

This is what Khan says the future holds… 🧵Image
(1/5) The AI Super-Tutor

The book's central promise is an AI tutor for every child on Earth. Khan argues this is the key to finally achieving 'mastery learning'—like giving every student their own Aristotle. He says it will diagnose and fill learning gaps in real-time, ending the 'one-size-fits-all' model for good.Image
(2/5) Supercharging the Humans

Khan claims AI won't replace teachers; it will "supercharge" them. The book envisions AI as the ultimate teaching assistant that handles grunt work like grading and lesson plans, freeing teachers to mentor and inspire. For parents, it promises an "AI ally" to help with homework without the usual friction, offering insights and coaching.Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(