Metatron Profile picture
Jul 24, 2025 10 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🟥 Deconstructing the Narrative of the "Sunni Right". Its main staples, and how we are being deceived.🧵

🟥What is happening in the Levant is no longer a battle between Right and Left, or Axis and Axis, as the Left and its ally Iran/Hezbollah have mostly been defeated by Israel to acquiescence and irrelevance.
A better reading of the scenario is that it is in fact a Battle of Right Wings.

With one of the Right Wings, the Sunni Right, being an Islamo-fascist ideology choosing the genocidal path to power. 1/Image
Image
Image
🟥 One must first refute the illusion that there is one Universal Right Wing. There are many Right Wings that are in natural opposition due to having different foundational bases. Given the Right is naturally fundamental; refers to origin.

Only Federalism among the paradigms of power can solve Right Wing tensions without coercion or warfare, and ensure Right Wing pacifism to an extent. The Sunni Right hinging on religious extremism at its core takes the extreme fascist approach to rule.

Any notion of centralism with the Sunni Right automatically means persecution, coercion, and evidently in Syria: Genocide.Image
🟥 As for the Staples of the Narrative of the Sunni Right and their refutation:
Staple 1:

🟥 The Exaggeration of the Role of Iran and Hezbollah beyond any reality or common sense. This is usually through conspiracies such as the "ISIS is Iran" fictional narrative. While Iran and Assad might have invested in ISIS to kill and scramble Syrian Opposition forces in the Syrian Civil War, Ahmad Al Shareh (Al Julani) and his entourage are the exact people they had invested into. His Assad-allowed first convoy to Idlib was reported to have raised Hezbollah and Assadist flags then.

The exaggeration of this narrative is to hide the truer notion that ISIS is ISIS. The direct unadulterated truism. As thousands of Syrian Government Forces wear ISIS patches, behave and commit crimes and chant exactly like ISIS. That Al Julani is only a rebranded ISIS figure. The Sunni RIght uses the ISIS is Iran narrative for subterfuge. Conspiracy over truism.

Iran is more the dying Hyena of the region, rather than a plotting mastermind state orchestrating events. Iran can't even protect its domestic refineries. Hezbollah can't build back a destroyed house let alone fire a rocket. Israel alone can fully shame their forces.

Fake incompetent enemies are exaggerated to hide real menacing enemies. Iran is in fact allied with Al Julani through their common ally Turkey(Iran's President was there recently). Iran even condemned the Israeli airstrikes on Damascus to build the bridge with him.

ISIS is ISIS. Truism trumps over conspiracy.Image
Image
Staple 2:

🟥Victims are not victims. The killers are the victims. No victim is allowed to speak out or they are practicing hate speech against Sunnis. Regardless if they are only criticizing extremists. The Extremist Sunni is allowed to spill the blood of minorities, in media and in actuality. He is not allowed to be offended. Returning a word to a bullet is forbidden.

Nazis in Germany practiced the same staple against Jews. All anti-Jolani accounts for example, post-genocide, are demonized as Assadists, Zionists, or Iranian agents. Kurds as separatists, foreigners etc.

Any video of a crime against non-Sunnis (especially those that go viral or have international effect) must be discredited, shadowed, and mocked in its seriousness. Goebbels-inspired propaganda machines.Image
Staple 3:

🟥 The Good Jihadi Narrative. A false security promise that Ahmad Al Shareh Al Julani will eventually kill his own extremists and end ISIS and completely transform himself and his entourage. "The dream of Satan in heaven". As Al Shareh is clearly either encouraging extremist genocidal behavior as in the Alawite Coast and Suwayda, or is entirely incompetent and without word in his own country. Most likely the first with a sprinkle of the latter.Image
Image
🟥 Many Local Right Wingers have been deceived that the Sunni Right is the Universal Right and thus have adopted these staples and narrative despite their gut feeling and common sense. Given they are also from minority sects, they are investing in their own extinction and feeding the fire that will burn them. These Christian, Shia and Druze opposition figures have been manipulated into pro-ISIS stances, thinking it's the Right Wing direction. Unaware of the Battle of the Rights. That the Sunni Right will not allow any other Right, or Left, or Center.

These accounts share the "Good Jihadi" narrative, and to the benefit of the doubt, payroll. They are being manipulated into genocide-friendliness.Image
Image
Image
Image
🟥 While the US is sponsoring the Sunni Right through some of its Turkish elements like Jihadi Tom, Tom Barrack, in a historical Foreign policy blunder of creating an ISIS state that will empower all global Jihadis. Israel is the main state standing against the Sunni Right, for the good reason that it has Skin in the Game, a northern border, a historical problem with Jihadism (October 7), and a blood covenant with the Druze.

The US and the West, ocean and sea afar, think of Syria as the refugee return dumpster, or free real estate place. In illusion that their military supremacy can handle an entire Jihadi state. The Israeli Right are the most self-aware Right Wing at the moment, and they seem to be the only ones fully understanding the scope of the Battle of the Rights.Image
🟥 Our natural allies as the Druze Right Wing are the Jewish State, Sunni Left (atheists, seculars, moderates), Kurdish Left and Right, Alawite Left and Right, Christian Self-Aware non-Dhimmi Right. And the Shia non-Iranian Right that doesn't exist yet. As these are the parties that first sympathize with us, acknowledge our strife, and share our existential concerns.

As these also are the parties that will break the blitz of the Jihadis and their overflow of power into genocide. Any notion that it is the Sunni Right we must ally with is absolute suicide. That the Battle of Suwayda broke the Sunni Right, means amnesty for all the other Rights. (And Lefts and Centers and non-Wahhabis in general)Image
tldr:

🟥The Sunni Right is built on:

🔺 Denying truisms such as ISIS is ISIS.
🔺On oxymorons such as the Good Jihadi.
🔺On fake exaggerated incompetent enemies (Fulul Al Nitham or Iran or Hezbollah).
🔺On denying basic eyesight of ISIS badges and figures and massacres.
🔺 On denying reality basically.

The Battle of Rights is what currently swings the Levant. All Rights, Lefts and Centers must unite against the Sunni Right. Or witness their extinction. Sheikh Hikmat Al Hajari and the Druze already took the battle for you. But it's a long fight.Image
@UnrollHelper

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Metatron

Metatron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Narreddine

Oct 20, 2025
🔴 Of the greatest libraries to have existed, the first University in history in the secular sense:
The Fatimid House of Knowledge, completed by Imam Al Hakim 11th Century AD.

Often described but never visualized, take a silent stroll in 11th Century Cairo with a student finding his class in the Dar Al Ilm Library.

My rendering and animation. Free to use.
Druze Heritage Series.
More on the Library Below. 👇
🔴 A young Imam Al Hakim had ordered the building of the greatest library of that time circa 1005 AD. Reaching according to sources 120000-200000 manuscripts, procured from all libraries of the world.

It was also designated to be place of teaching. Imam Al Hakim patroned the greatest scholars of the time, Al Hasan Ibn Al Haitham (the founder of optics), and Ibn Yunus a pioneering Astronomer. Lectures would be held on all subjects not only religious ones. As opposed to religious Universities like the Al Azhar University, also completed by the Imam. It was thus the closest in concept to a University in the modern secular sense of the word.

Furthermore, Al Hakim decreed that all castes of society could simply enter and seek learning, providing all ink and paper and fund. An early example of free education.

In a section of the University called Dar-et-Teb, House of Medicine, the first eye surgeries would be attempted. By surgeon Ammar Ibn Ali Al Mausili.

In a section called Dar-e-Nissa, House of Women, women would be allowed all learning.

The Druze faith elevates Ma'rifa, knowledge, as the main ladder of ascendance.
🔴 Ibn Al Haitham (Al Hazen) would there invent the first camera, the camera obscura.
He would also the first diagrams of the eye. Inventing there also the first lenses and reading glasses.

A pioneering astronomical chart, Al-Zij-Al-Hakimi would also be drawn there by Ibn Yunus.
The Sundial would be reinvented, as well as the advanced Pendulum.Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 13, 2025
🔴 Lebanese Christian visionary Dr. Hisham Bou Nassif @Hbounassif writes an article titled: "Waiting for a Maronite Hikmat Hijri".

It is interesting how our Sheikh, despite the smearing campaigns, has become an icon of self-determination, courage against all odds, and decolonization.

I have translated Dr. Hisham's article to English below with the original Arabic linked.
tinyurl.com/3pj6bmrmImage
"The attempt by Syria’s Druze to detach themselves from Damascus carries great risks for them. The regional lines, Turkish and Arab, are against them. U.S. policy is not on their side. And within Syria, the Sunni majority is mobilized against “partition and federalism.” Therefore, Hikmat al-Hijri’s project carries within it a major gamble.

Nevertheless, it is enough to read the text of the Syrian constitutional declaration signed by Ahmad al-Sharaa in Damascus last March to realize that al-Hijri has no choice but to do what he is doing. The constitutional declaration made Islam the religion of the head of state, and Islamic jurisprudence the main source of legislation. Now, since traditional Islam (let alone Islamism) does not consider the Druze to be Muslims, the constitution guarantees that the Druze of Syria will remain marginalized in both state and society if their fate continues to be tied to that of the country.

Consequently, if al-Hijri’s attempt to break away from the Sunni-majority consciousness is a risky endeavor, surrendering to those who condemn an entire group of people to live in humiliation as a lower-class community simply because of their religious affiliation would be suicide.

Therefore, there is no serious alternative for the Druze of Syria other than what Hikmat al-Hijri is trying to do. I have been following what he says for some time, and I find him clear and courageous. In 1982, the Israeli army rid Lebanon of the tumor that was the Palestine Liberation Organization, but none of us thanked it, even though Yasser Arafat’s black record against our country was rivaled only by that of Hafez al-Assad. By contrast, Hikmat al-Hijri openly thanked Israel for protecting his community.

In contrast to a century of wooden Christian rhetoric in Lebanon, Hikmat al-Hijri declares that he does not trust the intentions of the Islamic regime in Damascus toward his sect, and that the guarantee of its future is the establishment of a separate region. In doing so, al-Hijri is right twice over: first, because he refuses to place his trust in those who do not deserve it; and second, because he understands that the politics of dissimulation and compromise cannot last forever. A day must come when living peoples must confront their fate if they wish to survive — and for Syria’s Druze, that day has arrived.

...Image
The same applies to Lebanon’s Christians. Not necessarily in the form of a war, they are weary of that, but in the form of the honesty required first with themselves, and then with others. Honesty demands that Christians express publicly what they often say in private: that handing over the neck of their community to the darlings of the regional axes in Lebanon is effectively handing it over to those same axes, something they reject.

True, not all of these axes are equally bad, and none are as malign, past or present, as Iran’s mullahs. But all of these axes are, ultimately, alien to their society. Therefore, they do not recognize the legitimacy of their brazen and continuous interference in Lebanon’s affairs. And if there are those in Lebanon who are comfortable with these axes, there are also those who are not. The solution, therefore, is for Christians to govern themselves, within a clearly defined geographical area of their own, controlling their own foreign policy based on total neutrality toward a surrounding environment whose intentions, values, and deep identity they distrust, and with which they wish to have only mercantile relations.

They are ready to abandon even those if the price is political submission. This is the solution that most Christians want for themselves, and for the other peoples of Lebanon, each within their own territory.

It is well known that the original pact between Lebanon’s peoples was supposed to be founded on the principle of “Neither East nor West.” Yet this pact has been violated a thousand times over, always by the “friends of the East.” The Shiite expansion, backed by Iran in recent decades, is only one link in a long chain of dependence on foreign powers that others began long before them, and the Christian people have grown tired of it.

If they are unwilling to try again with their neighbors, it is not because they are extremist or “isolationist,” but because they have lost thousands of their best young men in wars they feel they did nothing to justify, and hundreds of thousands of emigrants swallowed by exile during and after the war, whose mere right to vote is now begrudged them by Shiite resentment, embodied by Nabih Berri.

Therefore, the peoples of Lebanon must be honest with one another. Indeed, they would have been, had there been among the Christians their own version of Hikmat al-Hijri, someone who would decisively break with the stale “Lebanonist” rhetoric that most Christians can no longer stand. But such a Christian Hikmat al-Hijri does not exist. And because he does not, the discourse of Lebanon’s ruling Christian elites. both ecclesiastical and political, remains a broken record, repeating itself endlessly. The future, therefore, remains uncertain and unsettling, even if the dull present is occasionally interrupted by fleeting and illusory moments of relief."Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 20, 2025
🟥 The Fall of Nadine Barakat🧵
خريف نادين بركات (و توضيح الخلاف)

🟥 Who funds Nadine
🟥 Hostage of the Sunni Extremist Right
🟥 Light Nadine and Shadow Nadine
🟥 The Recruitment of the Julia Complex
🟥 How to Fight Back

It pains me to write this thread, given I care about Nadine, but I care more about what is right.
What she has been doing in the dark must be brought to the light. And she must be held accountable so she could at least stop.
So here are some necessary disclosures about Nadine.
After which I will probably abandon the subject.Image
🟥 Who Funds Nadine

Nadine is being funded directly by elements in the US Administration. However we have learned that these particular elements are not the official Trump team as she shares, but Wahhabi Pro-Jihadi elements. The Saudi Lobby in the US Administration. Bought souls.
This group is also the main insider for Samir Geagea in the US Admin, hence the shared narrative and harmony.
🟥 Hostage of the Sunni Extremist Right

Given Nadine went headfirst in opposing Hezbollah and the deep state of the left(which we credit and appreciate), she was rained with malevolent lawsuits in the US, with egregious numbers and penalties. Nadine could not financially or legally handle all these lawsuits, and risked jailtime.
The only party offering her legal protection was the Saudi Lobby in US Admin and consequently the Sunni Extremist Right. So she became a slave to their narrative out of necessity. I.e. a legally kept hostage.
This became vastly more problematic when they asked her to deny the Druze narrative and genocide. A major conflict of interest, in which she took the worst choice.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 24, 2025
🟥 تفكيك سردية "اليمين السني": ركائزه الأساسية، وكيف يتم خداعنا 🧵

🟥 ما يحدث في المشرق لم يعد صراعًا بين اليمين واليسار، أو بين محور ومحور، حيث إن اليسار وحليفه إيران/حزب الله قد هُزِموا إلى حد كبير على يد إسرائيل، حتى أصبحوا في حالة خضوع وتهميش.

قراءة أفضل لهذا المشهد هي أنه في الحقيقة "صراع الأيمنة".

وأحد هذه الأجنحة اليمينية، وهو اليمين السني، يتبنى أيديولوجيا إسلاموفاشية اختارت طريق الإبادة الجماعية للوصول إلى السلطة. 1/Image
Image
Image
🟥 يجب أولاً دحض الوهم القائل بوجود يمين عالمي موحّد. في الواقع، هناك عدة أجنحة لليمين تختلف اختلافًا طبيعيًا بسبب اختلاف أسسها الفكرية والجذرية، فاليَمين بطبيعته يرتكز على الأصول والمبادئ المؤسسة.

ولا يوجد من بين نماذج الحكم سوى الفيدرالية ما يمكنه أن يحل توترات اليمين دون قسر أو حرب، ويضمن إلى حد ما السلم. أما اليمين السني، الذي يتمحور حول التطرف الديني، فيتخذ النهج الفاشي المتطرف في الحكم.

وأي تصور لمركزية السلطة تحت هيمنة اليمين السني يعني بالضرورة الاضطهاد، والإكراه، وكما هو واضح في سوريا: الإبادة الجماعية.Image
🟥 فيما يتعلق بركائز سردية "اليمين السني" والرد عليها:

الركيزة الأولى:
🟥 المبالغة في دور إيران وحزب الله إلى ما يتجاوز الواقع والمنطق. ويتم ذلك غالبًا من خلال نظريات المؤامرة، مثل السردية الخيالية القائلة إن "داعش هي إيران".
في حين أنه من الممكن أن تكون إيران والنظام السوري قد استثمرا في تنظيم داعش لقتل وتشتيت فصائل المعارضة السورية أثناء الحرب الأهلية، فإن أحمد الشرع (الجولاني) ومجموعته هم بالضبط الأشخاص الذين تم الاستثمار فيهم.

وقد ورد أن القافلة الأولى للجولاني التي سُمح لها من قبل النظام السوري بالذهاب إلى إدلب، رفعت أعلام حزب الله والنظام في ذلك الوقت.
إن الغرض من هذه المبالغة هو إخفاء الحقيقة الأوضح: داعش هي داعش، هذه هي الحقيقة المباشرة والبسيطة. آلاف من عناصر قوات النظام السوري الجديد يضعون شارات داعش، ويتصرفون ويرتكبون الجرائم ويهتفون تمامًا مثل داعش.
أما الجولاني، فما هو إلا نسخة مُعاد تسويقها من داعش.

اليمين السني يستخدم سردية "داعش هي إيران" كخداع وتمويه. يفضلون المؤامرة على الحقيقة.

في الواقع، إيران تشبه الضبع المترنّح في المنطقة أكثر من كونها دولة عقل مدبّر تدير الأحداث.
إيران غير قادرة حتى على حماية مصافيها النفطية داخل أراضيها.
وحزب الله عاجز عن إعادة بناء منزل مدمر، فكيف بإطلاق صاروخ!
وحدها إسرائيل قادرة على إذلالهم عسكريًا بالكامل.
الأعداء الزائفون وغير الأكفّاء يتم تضخيمهم لإخفاء الأعداء الحقيقيين والخطرين.
والحقيقة أن إيران متحالفة فعليًا مع الجولاني من خلال حليفهما المشترك: تركيا (وقد زار الرئيس الإيراني تركيا مؤخرًا).
كما أن إيران أدانت الغارات الجوية الإسرائيلية على دمشق في محاولة منها لبناء جسور التقارب مع الجولاني.

داعش هي داعش. الحقيقة البسيطة تنتصر على المؤامرة.Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
May 16, 2025
🟥من هو ابو ابراهيم (ص) عند الدروز؟ 🧵
و لماذا ننادي عليه في الحروب؟

مولانا ابو ابراهيم اسماعيل بن محمد التميمي هو ثاني الحدود القدسية اي مولاي النفس في زمن المولى الحاكم في القرن ال 11 ميلادي. و النفس يُرمز لها بالأحمر الأرجواني في التقليد الدرزي.
الإمام حمزة (ص) يكنّي أبو ابراهيم ب أخنوح الأوان و ادريس الزمان و هرمس الهرامسة في رسالة تقليده, لافتا الى أدواره السابقة.
بعض الدروز ينادون عليه دون التعرّف على ما كان عليه. هنا لمحة موجزة عن مولانا ابو ابراهيم من خلال ما عُرف عنه و ما كَتب لنا.Image
🟥 عُرف عن مولانا أبو ابراهيم باجتماع الصفات فيه. فكان روحانياً, فيلسوفاً, عالماً, شاعراً و محارباً.

🔥 في الروحانية كتب مولانا أبو ابراهيم الرسائل 36 الى 40 في الحكمة الشريفة. و فيهم لخّص العقيدة الدرزية بإستعمال الفلسفة و العلم و الرموز. غير انه شرح اصعب المفاهيم في خصوص التجلّي و الصورة الوهمية. و ربط تاريخ تطوّر الأديان بتطوّر الجنين في الرحم. فتعتبر رسائله نموذجا للشرح.
🔥 في رسالة الشمعة رمز مولانا لمكانة كل الحدود القدسية من خلال تفاصيل الشمعة و موادها. و ترقّي الكثيف الى اللطيف.
🔥 في رسالة الزناد شرح مولانا العلاقة بين العقل الكلّي و النفس و تكوين الصور الروحانية (Spiritual Archetypes) من خلال قادح النار و الحجر.
🔥 في رسالة تقسيم العلوم قسّم مولانا العلوم الدنيوية و الروحانية. و شرح العلم الخامس و هو في باطن الباطن.
🔥 ختم رسائله في "شعر النفس" الذي يتلونه المشايخ في الخلوات كل خميس او ليلة الجمعة.Image
🟥 يوم القيامة يُعتبر ان أبو ابراهيم سيكون "خيّال الحرب" او صاحب الفرس الأحمر في سفر الرؤيا.
و هو الذي يأخذ بثأر الموحدين و يحشر ظالميهم الى النيران. و حينها تجري الدماء كالبحور و الأنهار.
لذا المناداة على أبو ابراهيم في الحروب هي كأنه الغائب الحاضر لنصرة الموحدين و تكون في الشدة حيث يأتي الخلاص في أوج صعوبة المحن و تنقلب الدفّة و يُردُّ السيف.Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 30, 2025
🟥 التقارب في لباس الرأس بين الدروز و الموارنة
🟥 تاريخ لباس الرأس عند الدروز

🟥 ملفت التقارب و التشابه في لباس الرأس الديني بين الموارنة و الموحدين الدروز. و هذا ليس غريبا كونهم سكان جبل لبنان في ضيع مختلطة منذ القدم.
على اليسار صورة البطرك ال 70 للقدس بولس بطرس مسعد.
على اليمين صورة شيخ الجزيرة الولي امين طريف.Image
🟥 اول وجه تشابه هي القلوسي و هي مشتركة بين اول درجة من المشايخ و الخوارنة. و عند الدروز تكون بيضاء او في الحرب خضراء او سمراء. و عند الموارنة تكون سوداء او حمراء او زهرية.
الإسلام يسمون نسختهم الطاقية و اليهود يسمون نسختهم الكيبا.
و قلوسة الدروز و الموارنة تتميز بالعقدة في رأسها.Image
Image
🟥 ثاني تقارب في الشكل هو بين اللفة المكولسة او المدورية عند الدروز و الطابية عند الموارنة. و هي أعلى لباس رأس ديني عند الإثنين. فيرتديها المراجع و الأولياء عند الدروز و البطاركة و الأساقفة عند الموارنة. و هي بيضاء عند الدروز و سوداء او حمراء عند الموارنة. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(