The “Conspiracy Theory” That Was Too Big for the CDC to Cover Up
Remember Pfizer executive Jordan Trishton Walker?
He said, “There is something IRREGULAR about [vaccinated women’s] menstrual cycles,” adding, “people will have to investigate that.”
“Conspiracy theorists” like Naomi Wolf were called “batshit crazy” for noticing what women were screaming from the rooftops.
But the data proves they were right all along:
• 42% of women with regular cycles reported heavier bleeding than usual after vaccination
• 71% of women on birth control experienced breakthrough bleeding
• 66% of menopausal women (who should NEVER bleed) started bleeding again
• And in one major study, 78% of vaccinated women reported some form of menstrual disorder.
What did Rochelle Walensky’s CDC do? They tried to COVER IT UP.
This report reveals how far they went to silence women, bury the evidence, and who profited from it all.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full 5000-word report here: midwesterndoctor.com/p/where-does-t…
@MidwesternDoc Is the CDC corrupt because of a hidden conspiracy—or is it just the natural result of a bloated government?
One thing is clear… Whether by design or decay, what we’re seeing now is not public health.
It’s systemic rot. And it’s all on purpose.
The CDC doesn’t just promote bad science. It protects bad vaccines at all costs—no matter how harmful they are.
It attacks alternative medicine, gaslights people who have been injured, and pushes ineffective policies like wearing a mask and getting yearly flu shots… all while claiming complete neutrality.
And behind that curtain lies a funding system designed to reward corruption.
Since 1983, the CDC has legally been allowed to accept “gifts” as long as they’re “for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its functions.”
What could go wrong?!
By 1992, Congress established The National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention—a backdoor for corporations to literally funnel cash to the CDC.
@MidwesternDoc Today, the CDC has received nearly $1 billion from corporate “donors”, including:
• Pfizer
• Moderna
• Merck
• Gates Foundation
• Google
• Facebook
• Coca-Cola
Ah yes, Coca-Cola “for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service.”
lol.
It doesn’t take a genius to connect the dots. These “donations” weren’t charity. They bought influence.
Roche paid to push Tamiflu, a failed flu drug.
Coca-Cola used the CDC to undermine sugar regulation.
Vaccine makers gave tens of millions to push testing and treatments they profit from—while the CDC wrote the “guidelines.”
This isn’t public health. It’s money laundering in a lab coat.
And it has real consequences for people like you and me.
@MidwesternDoc So how is the CDC responding to the MAHA policies and improvements that RFK Jr. is trying to enact?
It’s pulling all out all the stops to resist anything that may help make America healthy again.
Not exactly the unbiased agency it claims to be.
Some CDC scientists have tried to blow the whistle on the corruption.
In 2016, anonymous employees wrote to leadership exposing data fraud, intimidation, and internal cover-ups—including falsified screening numbers sent to Congress!
That’s huge!
But the review was buried. The lies continued. And the public never heard a word.
Until now.
@MidwesternDoc Want to see the full letter and all the receipts?
So, why exactly does the CDC push dangerous vaccines?
Yes, money plays a big role—but so does ideology.
Among doctors, vaccines aren’t just an aspect of medicine, they’re a belief system.
This blind faith drilled into doctors while in med school leads many to completely ignore evidence of harm—even when the harm is literally staring them in the face.
But trusting something so wholeheartedly without having all of the information (because that’s impossible), just seems to be a human quirk not limited to doctors and vaccines.
Confirmation bias is all around us. I do it. You do it.
It helps to be aware of this very common and very normal condition of being human.
Always remember that you do not and cannot have all of the information. And even if you’ve studied something for years and you feel quite passionately about a topic, you could still be wrong.
Always be open to learning more and shifting your beliefs when they’re challenged.
And always remember that this very normal human thing can be exploited and manipulated.
It’s clear that public trust in medicine and vaccines has been manipulated.
Public health, media, medicine, and society at large are convinced that vaccines are produced safely and tested adequately.
But true vaccine safety requires tough questions:
• What are the actual risks vs. benefits?
• How effective is the vaccine over time?
• What’s the rate of side effects?
• Are the rare deaths from the disease worse than the vaccine injuries?
Unfortunately, no one is asking these questions. Pharma highlights one benefit, the media repeats it, and the CDC ignores the rest.
Some people get richer and more powerful while the rest of us suffer. And some of them are unable to admit let alone see what’s caused their suffering.
This ideology is why so many people—including injured doctors and politicians—won’t admit they were harmed.
It’s why vaccine injuries are dismissed as “coincidence,” “rare,” or “anecdotal.”
And it’s why, to this day, not one Democratic senator has publicly acknowledged a COVID vaccine injury—despite several having obvious neurological issues.
Senator Ron Johnson is trying to change that.
He recently held a hearing giving vaccine-injured Americans the platform they were denied.
One key takeaway?
Many politicians and medical leaders aren’t malicious. They’re just trapped in dogma.
When you expose them to real people and their stores, some begin to wake up.
One of the CDC’s most powerful tools is ACIP—the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
This group votes on which vaccines end up on the childhood schedule.
The ACIP makes the public think that there’s an impartial and trusted “third party” checking everything. But it’s a trick.
Here’s the problem with the ACIP:
• Most members have financial conflicts
• They ignore injury reports
• They rubber-stamp every new vaccine
To date, the ACIP hasn’t protected children. It’s just promoting pharma.
Even when evidence of harm is overwhelming, the ACIP doesn’t budge.
But emotional anecdotes from grieving parents in support of Big Pharma’s whims? That gets results.
One woman testified that her sister died of the flu as an infant. Her family lobbied the CDC.
So the ACIP changed flu shot policy—despite flu deaths in that age group being extremely rare.
@MidwesternDoc The Menveo meningitis vaccine followed the same pattern.
To prevent one death, over a million babies had to be vaccinated—at a cost of $100–$500 per child.
The math makes zero sense. Anyone can see that. But pharma-backed parents testified, and the ACIP approved it.
So the ACIP responds to vaccine injury testimonials, right? Well, those are just “anecdotal” stories.
Either you listen to no families and their stories or listen to them all.
You can’t cherry pick traumatic stories just to further your narrative.
Except that’s exactly what the ACIP does.
What a joke.
So, what’s behind this imbalance?
Simple: the entire evidence system is rigged.
And it was designed this way.
Evidence-based medicine was supposed to challenge dogma. Instead, it got hijacked by industry.
Now only favorable studies get published, and inconvenient data gets buried—or never even collected in the first place.
And if data isn’t buried, it’s simply hidden.
COVID exposed this system in real time:
• CDC refused to release its Vaccine Safety Datalink
• Lawsuits revealed that the CDC had evidence of harm—but then lied about it
• Experts claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective,” but they had no data to prove it
We were told to “trust the science.” But trust was just another trap.
Pfizer skipped major safety studies in its vaccine application—and the CDC let them!
Even today, the CDC claims its “private analysis” shows no link between the vaccine and seizures, strokes, pregnancy loss, and abnormal menstruation.
All while denying the public access to the underlying data and ignoring the heaps of evidence and countless stories.
The CDC’s claims that the COVID vaccines were safe and certainly did cause menstrual abnormalities led to the gaslighting of hundreds of thousands of women who knew something was different.
Yet the media, doctors, and millions of people with blinders on told them they were wrong.
Did you know that abnormal menstrual bleeding is one of the most common side effects of the COVID vaccines?
Among 165,000 women, 42% experienced abnormal bleeding. 71% on contraceptives had abnormal bleeding. And shockingly, 66% of menopausal women also had abnormal bleeding!
In a group of 14,153 vaccinated women, 78% experienced abnormal menstrual bleeding.
Non-menstruating women were 2-5 times more likely to bleed. Menstrual bleeding was often extended by 2.5 days.
And it wasn’t just a one time thing. For some women, this went on for months.
How did the CDC, public health officials, and doctors just ignore this?
Another example stands out:
The CDC claimed that 83% of myocarditis patients “fully recovered” in 90 days.
But data showed us that 18 months later, 35% still had symptoms, 13% needed medication, and 5.6% were hospitalized again.
It doesn’t add up.
The CDC buried this data to protect the vaccine narrative.
@MidwesternDoc They even admitted they can’t track long-term complications.
Why?
Too many “confounding variables.”
Translation: they have no plan—and no interest—in finding out how many people were harmed by the COVID shots.
But isn’t that their job?!
Watching ACIP meetings became a grim ritual during COVID.
No matter how absurd the justification, the outcome was always the same…
More vaccines, less transparency. Again and again.
Like a script written in advance.
But for the first time in decades, the script is starting to fall apart.
@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. midwesterndoctor.com/p/where-does-t…
@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.
He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.