Barry Hunt Profile picture
Jul 25 14 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Good News!

Canadian Standards Association (CSA) has called for universal respirator use in healthcare settings & when performing patient care outside of healthcare settings (eg – in the home) in the latest edition of CSA Z94.4, Selection, use and care of filtering respirators.
How you can help:

The draft CSA Z94.4 Standard is now out for Public Review until August 19, 2025.

Please weigh in with your positive, constructive comments at .

Public Review comments are open to everyone who registers.publicreview.csa.ca/Home/View/2256…
The draft Standard embodies the Precautionary Principle.

In the absence of risk analysis, N95s are required because healthcare spaces & activities involve daily HCW exposure to Risk Group 2 (RG 2) pathogens like Influenza and RG3 pathogens like SARS-CoV-2, often unknown.
PAPRs are required for known or suspected lethal RG4 pathogens like Ebola.

PAPRs are also to be provided for HCWs who request them for reasons of comfort, fit or better protection.
Respiratory protection exemptions:

Respirators are not required for common non-pathogenic RG1 organisms like OC43 (the common cold).

Respirators are not required when RG2 and RG3 risk is low as determined by risk analysis by a Qualified Person.
Respirators are not required in Exempt Zones that have been engineered or otherwise determined to provide low risk of exposure, equivalent to wearing a respirator in a contaminated space, by a Qualified Person.
Access:

A variety of respirator models and sizes are to be provided.

Respirators are to be provided at all entrances, nurses stations and outside of patient rooms.

Patients and visitors are encouraged, but not mandated, to also wear respirators.
Impact:

In Canada, approximately 1/3 of respiratory infections in healthcare are due to transmission in the healthcare facility.
While CSA Z94.4 is an Occupational Health & Safety (OHS) Standard intended to protect workers, universal respirator use will also protect patients, visitors and local communities.
Leadership:

This will be the world’s first National Standard to require precautionary, universal respirator use in healthcare.

It may inspire other countries to follow suit.
Cost:

Hospitals, provincial governments & federal government warehouses are overstocked with hundreds of millions of respirators due to expire shortly.

They are already bought and paid for.

The cost to recycle or send them to landfill outweighs the cost of using them.
Opposition:

The usual anti-mask / anti-airborne leaders in IPAC and Infectious Disease who have long waged a campaign against precautionary use of N95s have taken aim to oppose the new CSA National Standard starting with a petition opposing CSA Z94.4.
Support:

It’s important that supporters weigh in on CSA’s precautionary approach to respiratory protection both publicly and through the official CSA Public Review process.
Share this information widely.

Show your public support for CSA Z94.4 and the precautionary, universal use of respirators in healthcare through media, social media and word of mouth.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Barry Hunt

Barry Hunt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarryHunt008

Jun 8
@alijzimmerman @naner81 @GhostOfSocrates @N0nyM00se @doctor_zeest Thx Alison,

hopefully we can all take the temperature down a few notches, after all, we're all trying to make the system better. 😊

Let's start with 20 ACH Laminar Air Flow (LAF) in ORs. Good idea from the 1960s & generally an improvement over lower airflows.
@alijzimmerman @naner81 @GhostOfSocrates @N0nyM00se @doctor_zeest Does it stop all airborne transmission?

Sadly, no.

Is it the best approach to stopping airborne transmission?

Sadly, no.

Does the medical community think it's the best approach to stop airborne transmission?

Sadly, yes. 😢
@alijzimmerman @naner81 @GhostOfSocrates @N0nyM00se @doctor_zeest First, several systematic reviews and comparative studies have shown that LAF is no more effective than Mixed Ventilation (MV).

Some comparative studies have shown MV to be superior
Read 15 tweets
Apr 17
BREAKING NEWS!

Health Canada PMRA just approved AutoUV.

👏👏👏 Image
Why is that important?

Because Hospital Acquired Infections are way too high & flash disinfecting air & surfaces immediately after occupancy, especially in hospital bathrooms, is a game changer for protecting patients (& HCWs) from exposure to pathogens Image
Because air and surfaces that are biologically clean don't transmit disease Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 6
Joshua Haldeman, Elon Musk’s maternal grandfather, led the Canadian branch of “Technocracy Incorporated” in the 1930s.

This radical movement advocated replacing democratic governments in the U.S. and Canada with rule by technocrats and businessmen.
Under Haldeman’s leadership, the movement adopted fascist characteristics.

Members wore gray uniforms modeled after Nazi attire.

When Canada declared war on Germany in 1939, the group was banned for Nazi sympathies.
Canada arrested Haldeman after finding Nazi-sympathetic documents in his home.

He was imprisoned for several months and remained on a subversion watch list throughout World War II.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 19
I would be excited about this inhaled Covid vaccine being developed at McMaster if it was a traditional protein-based vaccine delivering a known volume of antigen(s) (similar to Novavax)

But it's not
Novel vector vaccines (like this one) & mRNA vaccines are a neat trick

And manufacturers like them because they're easier, faster & cheaper to produce than protein-based vaccines
Vector & mRNA based vaccines make sense as a FIRST RESPONSE to a novel virus to speed vaccines to market when none had existed before

But they make no sense as a vaccine platform for an ongoing endemic virus
Read 10 tweets
Jan 29
"Quad-demic"?

What do you call this???

Octadeca-demic?

H/T @1goodtern for graphs Image
Image
If you add these 18 to the quad-demic

And add in HMPV for good measure

You would have a
"vigesima-tredecim-demic"

23 diseases on the rise
But if you wait a few minutes, & look around, you will find more diseases rising

100 diseases would be a "hecto-demic"
Read 4 tweets
Jan 24
I enjoy working through thought experiments & math models with Perplexity

Especially ones that challenge the dogma rife in IPC World

Especially simple ones that serve as sanity checks

That everyone in IPC World could & should be asking

But aren't
Five or 10 minutes of prompts and interaction can erase 100 years of toxic misinformation

Supported with sources

For example:
The CDC’s estimate and other studies’ findings regarding the significantly higher risk of COVID-19 transmission through inhalation compared to touch are supported by the available evidence.

This substantial difference in transmission risk can be attributed to several factors:

Exposure Levels

1.Inhalation exposure is much higher than touch exposure:
•People inhale approximately 10 billion bacteria and viruses per day through normal respiration.
•In contrast, touch transfer to the T-zone (eyes, nose, mouth) is estimated at only about 1.94 million microbes per day.

2.Airborne concentration:
•Indoor air typically contains 100,000 to 1,000,000 bacteria and virus particles per liter.
•This high concentration in the air we breathe constantly exposes the respiratory system to potential pathogens.
Transmission Efficiency

3.Respiratory system vulnerability:
•The respiratory tract is directly exposed to inhaled particles, making it more susceptible to infection.
•Aerosols can penetrate deep into the lungs, increasing the likelihood of infection.

2.Touch transmission barriers:
•The skin provides a physical barrier against pathogens.
•Transmission via touch requires transfer to mucous membranes, which is less efficient.

Viral Persistence

5.Airborne viability:
•SARS-CoV-2 can remain viable in aerosols for hours.
•This prolonged viability increases the chance of inhalation exposure.

2.Surface viability:

•While SARS-CoV-2 can persist on surfaces, the risk of fomite transmission is considered low.
•Surface contamination plays a less significant role in transmission compared to airborne routes.

Environmental Factors

7.Indoor settings:

•Poor ventilation in indoor spaces can lead to accumulation of airborne viral particles.
•This accumulation increases the risk of inhalation exposure over time.

2.Close proximity:

•Short-range airborne transmission is particularly efficient in close-contact scenarios.
•This efficiency contributes to the higher risk of respiratory transmission.
The vast difference in transmission risk between inhalation and touch routes (10,000:1 to 100,000,000:1) reflects both the higher exposure levels through respiration and the respiratory system’s susceptibility to infection.

The ease of colonization and infection through the respiratory route is indeed a significant factor, as the respiratory tract provides an ideal environment for viral replication and spread.

This understanding emphasizes the importance of measures such as proper ventilation, mask-wearing, and maintaining distance in reducing COVID-19 transmission, while also explaining why surface disinfection, while still recommended, plays a less critical role in prevention strategies.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(