The number 1 mistake ex-engineers make in PM roles:
Prioritizing possibility over value.
Let's uncover this fallacy and reverse it in just 3 minutes. 🧵
1/ the engineering brain is wired to ask "can we build this?"
feasibility becomes the primary filter.
technical complexity becomes exciting.
user value becomes secondary.
this creates predictable patterns:
2/ the ex-engineer pm gets excited about machine learning recommendation engines while users abandon the app because basic search returns no results.
they architect elegant microservices while user research sits unread on their desk.
3/ ever heard about "what got you here won't get you there"?
this is why these career transitions can take years to settle
the first 2-3 years you're still driving down the old train tracks wondering why you're not getting where you want to be
4/ engineering excellence without user value is just expensive art.
the cost compounds quickly, and after the initial excitement, you're sitting there questioning your career change
meanwhile, product-minded pms win by starting with different questions.
5/ the value-first framework:
step 1: what job are users hiring this feature to do?
step 2: how do we know this job matters to them?
step 3: what's the simplest way to test if solving it creates value?
step 4: only then ask: how might we build it?
this sequence protects against the feasibility trap.
6/ user problems get validated before engineering starts.
technical solutions serve business outcomes instead of engineering curiosity.
resources flow toward features that drive adoption & revenue.
7/ here's how this works in practice:
instead of "we could build a recommendation engine with collaborative filtering"
start with "users spend 4 minutes looking for relevant content & 30% leave without finding anything"
8/ instead of "we should implement redis caching to improve response times"
start with "checkout abandonment spikes when page load exceeds 2 seconds & we're losing $50k monthly"
9/ instead of "let's refactor this into microservices for better scalability"
start with "customer support is overwhelmed because users can't complete their workflows"
the pattern becomes: problem → impact → solution
10/ engineering background becomes an advantage when channeled correctly.
you understand technical constraints that pure business pms miss.
you can estimate feasibility accurately during discovery.
you can communicate effectively with engineering teams.
11/ the key shift: use technical knowledge to serve user value instead of technical curiosity.
feasibility checking happens alongside value validation.
technical complexity gets measured carefully against user benefit.
don't bet on a horse that will take years to finish
12/ teams that master this balance build products that scale both technically & commercially.
users get solutions that work reliably & solve real problems.
engineering teams build features that get adopted & appreciated.
stakeholders see clear connections between technical investments & business results.
13/ the ex-engineer pm becomes the product leader who delivers both technical excellence & user value.
14/ the ai prompts for product work collection has specific prompts for validating user problems before technical solutions - might help if you're building this muscle.
Most PMs chasing "technical skills" think they need to learn code.
But what they’re really chasing is credibility, confidence, and career security.
The myth of the "technical PM" keeps you stuck.
I'll teach you in 2 minutes what took me 5 years to see:
🧵 1/16
When someone says they want to be "technical," they're really saying they want job security in a world where engineers make the rules.
They want to belong in technical conversations instead of feeling like an outsider.
They want respect from people who think non-technical means less valuable.
This has nothing to do with code.
2/16
The "technical PM" meme spreads because it serves specific interests.
Recruiters can charge more for "technical" roles. Engineers prefer PMs who think like engineers. Companies can pay less because you feel grateful for the technical label.
If you chase the technical label, then you stop focusing on what actually makes PMs valuable.
Why most junior Product Managers fail to develop these core skills:
(It's not lack of talent. It's predictable failure modes that can be avoided.)
1/ Failure Mode #1: The Analysis Paralysis Trap
Junior PMs over-research instead of testing assumptions.
→ Spend weeks on competitive analysis vs. talking to 5 users
→ Write 20-page strategy docs vs. shipping small experiments
→ Request more data vs. making reversible decisions
Falsifier: If you can't ship something testable in 2 weeks, you're overthinking.
2/ Failure Mode #2: The Feature Factory Mindset
Measuring success by output, not outcomes.
- "we shipped 12 features this quarter"
- celebrating launches vs. user adoption
- building what stakeholders request vs. what users need
Test: Can you name 3 features you'd remove from your product tomorrow?
The 7 product management skills that separate senior PMs from junior ones:
1/ Prioritization
Not just "what to build next" but:
→ Which themes get roadmap focus
→ How to sequence projects for maximum impact
→ When to kill projects that aren't working
→ How to say no without burning bridges
Test: Can you defend your top 3 priorities to skeptical engineers?
2/ Simplification
Break complex problems into "the one thing that matters most."
➔ Apply the rule of three (max 3 priorities/points)
➔ Read your PRDs aloud to catch complexity
➔ Cut features that don't serve the core job-to-be-done
Test: Can a new engineer understand your strategy in 2 minutes?