The correct use of the Tea app hack isn't doxxing ugly users. It's scrutinizing the faces of the PRETTIEST users for consistent visual tells of unpleasant character, so you can avoid such women in the future. What common elements do you notice in these faces?
While I wouldn't say it's very consistent, to me the combination of disdain and egotistical pride seems to stand out disproportionately on these faces. I've pointed out in DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES that this genre of expression is an unseductive red flag.
I explain in more detail here:
Here are some better examples:
When I've written about facial details and facial expressions in the past, I've found that some men are unable to distinguish the differences, whereas others distinguish them easily.
While I wouldn't want to exaggerate the accuracy of facial tells, inability to distinguish subtle differences in faces undoubtedly increases the likelihood that you'll unsuspectingly walk into trouble!
I'm not saying my analysis above explains everything about these Tea app faces by any means. Happy to hear other observations about what they have in common.
If you want to read more of my writing on facial expressions and seductiveness, you'll find it in this section of DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES:
Ideal tropical design that is extremely energy efficient - but illegal in America because the windows are not double-glazed. Very stupid energy code.
You probably don't believe me, so here's Grok. American performance modeling assumes no ventilation from windows and requires them to be double-glazed instead (unnecessary, expensive).
American performance modeling ALSO doesn't reward good building geometry.
This is a travesty and makes no sense in ANY state.
The large majority of men can never be fully satisfied with their relationships if their women don't make explicit efforts to please them. But it has now become a point of modern ideology that women should never make such efforts. The result is predictable. What's in it for men?
Let me explain further. Human nature is such that when all things are equal, men experience more desire and women experience more pleasure. This observation goes back to the ancient Greeks. We don't notice this unless we pay explicit attention to it. Why?
Markets are driven by desire, not pleasure. In fact, markets often fail to serve pleasure and instead create pain. Consider consumerism. People buy things that don't bring them enough pleasure to justify the expense. They have a craving similar to an addiction.
Men never disliked dyed hair for fundamental reasons. It's common in artistic representations of very attractive women. They disliked it because they associated it with bad personalities and bad politics. So as soon as Amelia changes that, they're good to go.
Also, more chokers please.
Learn more in the definitive account of feminine beauty:
Can AI answer the oldest question in the world? In this sciencey thread we're going to find out.👇
Let's start with some peer-reviewed data. Everyone loves peer reviewed data!🧪
So, apparently men typically last 10-20 seconds while women last 20-60.
Ok, seems reasonable at first blush.
But... you might have noticed those numbers are different. By a factor of almost THREE.
Hmm...
I was a bit surprised by this so I asked ChatGPT to check the data three different times in two different sessions. And, it came up with very similar answers each time.
At some point feminism morphed from a movement seeking freedoms to one covertly aimed at masculinizing women. It's time to be open about the fact that this is a TRANS movement--just on a psychological level instead of a biological one.
The confusion derives from the dishonest name. "Feminism" sounds like it must be pro-female and pro-feminine. To be clear, that's certainly true of some strains. But it's not true of the dominant one today.
The strain of feminism that's dominant today valorizes masculinity in women and denigrates femininity in women. Explaining this point in detail would take many pages. But it's already obvious in the iconography, and I think you know it's true.