Alonso Gurmendi Profile picture
Jul 26 17 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I’m pretty sure I’m one of the people who knows most in the world about a relatively obscure Brazilian diplomat and nobleman called Felippe Lopes Netto. I came across him researching for my PhD and I’ve been obsessed with his life ever since. 🇧🇷 😍
I was looking for non-Euro-American actors implementing the laws of war in the 19th Century. One of the key arguments I make in my dissertation is that 19th Century laws of war were really, literally, *laws* in plural, with different parts of the world adopting different readings
I argued that the Euro-American Clausewitz-inspired interpretation that puts military necessity at the heart of the discipline was just that: one interpretation among a larger global ecosystem. In fact, I argued, it was one that was not as popular as people tell us today
So I looked at how the Nama people of Namibia complained about German “barbarism” in the 1890s, how Western observers decried the Japanese atrocities in Port Arthur in 1895, and how Latin American scholars objected to the “brutal” principle of military necessity
Eventually, while going through consular documents at the @UkNatArchives, I read the minutes of the Italo-Chilean Mixed Commission, which resolved claims by Italian nationals claiming Chile had caused them harm during its war with Peru in violation of the laws of war
These mixed commissions were common at the time and usually they just rubber-stamped military operations by saying they were necessary and thus legal. But not this one. No these ones were presided over by Brazilian Councillor Felippe Lopes Netto. And, well, he was special 💕
Lopes Netto had been a revolutionary in his youth, rising up in arms against absolute monarchism in his native Pernambuco, during the Praiero Revolt. He wrote articles about how insurrection was a “natural right”. He was def very different from your usual 19th C military lawyer
So when he was confronted with Chile’s very Clausewitz-inspired style of war, he was horrified. He believed in reading military necessity through a proportionality and absolute necessity lens - a way of reading IHL that would not be codified until almost 100 years later.
Where his peers believed bombarding civilian areas was legal if it meant the defenders would surrender, he pondered the unusual question: was it really necessary to do this? Or could the same objective be achieved through less harmful means? Truly a man ahead of his time
His Chilean co-arbitrator *hated him*. And Lopes Netto was a grumpy old man. In one hearing, the Italian arbitrator had to separate them bc Lopes Netto had driven the Chilean so mad that he tried to punch him. He thought he was perverting the law by making it more humane
Eventually, Lopes Netto’s decisions made him a foreign policy liability for the Brazilian Empire, that really didn’t need this kind of drama, so they claimed Lopes Netto got sick and had to be replaced. His replacement, Lafayette Rodrigues Pereyra, was a classic Clausewitz guy
(Fun fact: he was called Lafayette because his father was obsessed with the US Revolution and called his kids Lafayette and Washington)
So Lopes Netto’s days as an arbitrator were over quickly and unceremoniously. He never became a famous jurist (Lafayette did). He never influenced anyone with his weird ideas about *not killing civilians*. He was a small blip in the otherwise inhumane history of the laws of war
But he was ahead of his time. A stubborn grouch of a man willing to put his career in the line and punch people in the face in defence of a simple idea: that humanity mattered more than necessity.

And for that, despite his absolute failure as a jurist, I absolutely love him
I hope one day to travel to @prefrecife and visit the places he frequented. Honestly at this point he’s like family to me
@prefrecife If you want to learn more about my adoptive grandpa Lopes Netto, here’s the article I wrote about him:

springerprofessional.de/en/des-encanto…
@prefrecife (Yes the title is a pun about the Encanto movie, I’m a nerd sue me)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alonso Gurmendi

Alonso Gurmendi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Alonso_GD

Jul 26
I’ll play
Here’s what Elliot is neglecting: we are not establishing the genocidal intent *of the war cabinet* but *of the Israeli state*. This is part of an ecosystem of genocidal beliefs in Israeli society, from Netanyahu to the IDF grunt singing may your village burn in Gaza 🧵
If this was “just” Israeli leadership making genocidal statements, what we’d have is a “risk” of genocide, demonstrated by the leadership’s “incitement”. But the idea that this neat division can exist in practice is absurd given what we know irl.
First, like I said, these are not isolated statements. When a cabinet member says something, it’s then repeated by a military officer and then eventually by a soldier and then, importantly, *carried out* on the ground.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 25
All this tells me frankly is that the hubris and sense of absolute impunity of the past 21 months is gone.
In meme form:
“We wont punish incitement to genocide”
Read 4 tweets
Jul 23
This article makes two main claims

“If it doesn’t look like The Holocaust it can’t be genocide”

“If it were genocide, Israel would kill more people”

Both make little sense 🧵
First: No genocide looks like the Holocaust. Just like no genocide looks like the Rwandan genocide or the Herero genocide. There are common aspects and patterns. But genocide does not come with a franchising manual.
Russia’s kidnapping and transferring of Ukrainian children to Russian families is also genocidal under int’l law. It looks *nothing* like The Holocaust. What it has in common is the intent to destroy another group. Russia does not believe Ukrainians exist as a people
Read 20 tweets
Jul 21
We’ve gone from “Hamas hides under hospitals” to “Hamas made us to build insufficient food hubs in the south far from people in the north and put kill zones in between then Hamas made us to shoot at those who survived the trip and torture those our AI said had a cousin in Hamas..
“Then Hamas forced us to displace those who remained so that we can put everyone in a ghetto while we try to deport them away from Gaza so that we can take control of and colonise this land. Don’t you see? It’s all Hamas’ fault!”
Like seriously who could possibly take this ridiculous take seriously anymore other than the most inhumane and racist twitter ideologues at this point?
Read 5 tweets
Jul 18
Some are pointing to Salo’s list in response to this post (cant RT cuz Im blocked). There is of course disagreement in both genocide studies and int’l law about this but there’s 3 things you should know about his list… Image
1) Many of the Genocide Scholars he cites like Yehuda Bauer and Benny Morris have ideological limitations that prevent them from concluding that Israel can commit genocide at all.
Bauer, for instance, famously argues that the Holocaust can only be understood as the genocide *of Jews* and excludes Roma and disabled people (presumably LGBTQI+ people too) from it, claiming the *G-words* were “not important enough” to the Nazis jstor.org/stable/494357?…
Read 13 tweets
Jul 11
See, if you treat suicide bombing as “barbarism” - “what kind of culture does this?”, you’ll respond with an “exterminate all the brutes” kind of mindset. If you instead see it as a type of modern political violence, you can understand the politics and address root causes
People like Eyal want to simply state “they are savages that only understand violence”. Mamdani is saying “wait a minute, these people aren’t just insane, there’s modern political concerns that we need to understand to explain why someone would transform themselves into a weapon”
Eyal’s take leads to the kind of world we currently live in. Bomb the barbarians, they are monsters, you can’t talk to them they only understand violence, they don’t deserve the privilege of rules and rights. It’s Iraq, Gaza, Sde Teiman, Guantanamo, “there’s no uninvolved”
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(