Men routinely assume SUCCESSFUL cosmetic surgery is natural, even when it's completely implausible. They only identify badly executed surgery for what it is. That's why they fall for the silly idea that surgery doesn't work. Of course it does. The top glamour models all use it.
Not keen to do a deep dive on this account, but you can find a thorough guide here if you're interested:
HOW TO MANIPULATE YOUR GIRLFRIEND INTO BEING HOTTER: AN INTRODUCTION
In fairytale days of yore, men could expect girlfriends to learn the arts of beauty and seduction on their own initiative. But those days are long gone. And now, there's only one solution. It's in the title...
We're living through an epidemic of aggressive indifference. Girlfriends have been trained to not care about beauty and seduction even though they would, if they tried, find them fun. They've been taught backward ideas that prevent the natural expression of their femininity.
That's not the only obstactle. Every source of authority is pushing them in the wrong direction. Including social media. I call this problem “Darth Algorithm.” Hateful content that makes men and women angry at each other always goes more viral than useful advice.
The correct use of the Tea app hack isn't doxxing ugly users. It's scrutinizing the faces of the PRETTIEST users for consistent visual tells of unpleasant character, so you can avoid such women in the future. What common elements do you notice in these faces?
While I wouldn't say it's very consistent, to me the combination of disdain and egotistical pride seems to stand out disproportionately on these faces. I've pointed out in DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES that this genre of expression is an unseductive red flag.
WHY “HYPERGAMY” IS THE WRONG DIAGNOSIS FOR TODAY'S RELATIONSHIP DROUGHT
“Average men can't get laid today. Why? Because girls only want the best.” It's a story I've now heard over and over. And in this thread I'm going to explain why it's the wrong diagnosis.
For starters, let me make a simple observation. Everyone wants the best they can get. They always have, they always will. That's pretty much what “the best” means. How many men will pick right over left here? None. Men: the original hypergamists.
When you're looking for a vacation rental on the beach, you're looking for the best one that fits your budget. Same thing when you're shopping for a car, or boat, or laptop, or house. And when you're looking for a girlfriend, you're looking for the best one you can get too.
The idea that popularity doesn't matter is a case of reverse snobism. It matters a great deal. Take my proposal to expand low-density housing. Can the relevant policies be implemented in the absence of popularity? No--popularity is precisely what decides whether it will happen!
By contrast, the fact that a small number of smart and open-minded people agree with some unconventional idea is totally insufficient to change society or even meaningfully increase the number of people who encounter that idea.
There's a temptation to extend a true idea--that you, as an individual, don't need to adopt conventional beliefs, and shouldn't judge their value by their popularity--into the social realm. Doesn't work, because in the social realm popularity is often a prerequisite for change.
For reasons I don't understand, fertility experts routinely talk past an elephant in the room: the declining birthrate is downstream of declining relationship formation. I suppose "selfish couples who hate babies" are a more respectable topic than the death of romance (and sex)?
Why does no one care about bringing back romance and seduction? These would be good things even if the birthrate weren't a concern at all. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Possibly mediating all social interaction through a six-inch block of plastic and metal was not as great an idea as it first seemed...
FOUR REASONS AI COMPANIONS ARE THE MOST PROFITABLE USE-CASE FOR LLMS
1. You can lock-in customers by holding their saved chat history hostage. This makes it hard for them to cancel their subscriptions, so you can juice them for more money.
2. Each chat history is known only to one company. If it accumulates more histories than its competitors, it can use them to better improve the experience. This allows it to accumulate more users, which means more chat histories. As the gap widens, it can charge a premium.
3. Other LLMs are basically interchangeable, with no lock-in. This makes competition stiff and allows for only very small profit margins. Points #1 and #2 above allow the winning AI-companion company to lock-in users AND have a quality moat that other companies can't touch.