There is a lot of commentary on this rather alarming video of a fly past that very nearly had a tragic ending. Lots of theories out there - here’s mine! I’ll use snapshots from the second video to explain what I think happened. Spoiler alert: I think it was pilot error.🧵1/7
2/ An EF-18 of the Spanish Air Force was performing at the Gijón Air Festival held on Sunday July 27 over San Lorenzo Bay in Asturias, Spain: it’s not clear if it was meant to be a full display or an “enthusiastic” flypast - I suspect the latter. festivalaereogijon.com/#programa
3/ The aircraft approaches from the North and follows the coastline of the grassy promontory (see below). There are a few birds around but I don’t think they are a factor. As the pilot points at the beach they should just reverse the turn to follow the coastline, but they don’t
4/ They decide to roll under (i.e. continue to roll right through 180+ degrees in order to reverse direction). But with the nose already dropping they would have a canopy full of sea and rapidly realise that this is going to take the aircraft a lot lower than intended.
5/ So they reverse the turn (between 8 and 10 seconds on the video), using plenty of rudder, hence the rather skidding motion as it reverses, and full power, hence the black smoke as it climbs away.
6/ The recovery is flown as well as it could be under the circumstances, but it’s a very near miss. We will never know how much height would have been lost in the roll under, but it would have probably been worse and pointed straight at the beach….
7/ The rather meek departure of the aircraft slowly climbing away wings level tells us that this was one rather shaken pilot. Flypasts at unfamiliar places, with a crowd watching can carry all sorts of risks. Fortunately, this pilot gets to learn the lesson and live another day.
POST NOTE. The alternative theory is they just overbanked too far and then reversed later than they should - either way, I doubt the pilot meant the end result and the departure suggests that to be the case.
For balance, this was apparently the display aircraft/pilot so not a hot shot flypast. And the Spanish Air Force have posted saying they were avoiding birds 👇. It’s a plausible explanation, but avoiding down at low level is never a good way to go. Birds tend to break down too!
Birds are an occupational hazard, especially at low level and near coastlines. So flying close to one will almost certainly encounter birds. I’ll leave the Air Force explanation as the official line, but “fly the aircraft” remains the first rule of any emergency/hazard avoidance.
And the ground has a Pk of 1.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The lessons from the Israel/Iran“12 Day War” are far more profound and relevant to us in the UK than those learned in Ukraine.🧵1/n warontherocks.com/2025/07/lesson…
2/ “It not only reaffirmed the continuing relevance of conventional capabilities but also underlined the importance of cyber integration, information dominance, strategic precision, and alliance cooperation in 21st-century conflict scenarios.”
3/ “Air superiority remains the cornerstone of operational success, but it ought to be supplemented by cyber dominance, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance integration, and electronic warfare.”
There has been plenty of heat and light surrounding the recent act of sabotage at Brize Norton. Let’s unpick some of the facts and add some thoughts. 🧵1/15telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/2…
2/ As usual, everyone focusses on the things they can see. Airfield perimeters are very hard to make impervious, which is why we have defence in layers. I’m not going to discuss those layers here, but it’s possible that some were either not in place or failed at Brize Norton.
3/ The section of fence that the “security experts” at the Telegraph have identified, is what’s known as a frangible fence. It’s a compromise between security and causing an over-running aircraft to crash & erupt in a ball of flame.
Ok, I’m going to say it. This was somewhat over complicated, and looks more like the perfect execution of the plan they would had prepared assuming that it was a US pre-emptive strike and that they were the first ones in.🧵1/8
2/ But, over a week of Israeli strikes has brought the Iranian defence network to its knees, and their Air Force have been able to operate even 4th generation aircraft overhead Iran with impunity. Air supremacy is a tough state to achieve but it has been over Iran.
3/ The deception feint of the Pacific route seems more of a political stunt than a military tactic, especially as it mirrored & signposted the very nature and timing of the attack it was meant to mask. It also used up precious strike power and tankers. But a nice option to have!
A very complex and fatiguing mission that resulted in 7 x B2s dropping 2 x GBU-57 MOP bombs each on the two primary nuclear sites of Fordo and Natanz, with Isfahan being struck by at least 24 submarine launched TLAMs (Tomahawk missiles).🧵1/7
2/ The B2s launched overtly into the Pacific yesterday were a deception (but it is not clear what that achieved, other than reducing the size of the actual bomber force). The real strike package flew across the Atlantic, and joined up with fighter aircraft already in the region.
3/ The B2s released their weapons on the two primary sites, protected and proceeded by a package of 4th and 5th generation fighters as a screen and decoy. These would have been used to suppress any potential threat - but no missile intercepts were observed.
A few guesses (leaks?) ahead of next weeks’ release of the long awaited UK Defence Review👇. So what can we expect and what should we look out for? 🧵1/18
2/ The budget is set: 2.5% rising to 3% by next Parliament (Healey says 2034). And there are rumours of a future 3.5% target for NATO nations. Whilst 2.5% will probably only paper over the cracks, the higher %s will depend on National economic performance and HMT good will.
3/ Those hoping for a shopping list may be disappointed - the detail may come later. But how it frames the threats of Russia & China will signpost where the primary focus will be. I expect Russia to be that now, but with China seen as the critical pace setter on future threats.
Does the UK have a Defence Strategy problem? All we ever hear these days is that our Defence is underfunded, overspent, gapped & overstretched. So what can the 2025 review do to fix it, because we already know what the budget is. 🧵1/20
2/ The fundamental truth is that over the last few decades we have spent less & delivered even less, yet our ambition of global reach and influence has hardly wavered. Previous reviews have singularly failed to bridge this gap, whilst many plead for money we just don’t have.
3/ The UK, of course, is not alone in seeking a post Cold War peace dividend, and on some of the key numbers we still compare favourably with allies, and we remain one of NATO’s highest spenders in % GDP terms and real terms.