Rufybaba Profile picture
Jul 30 31 tweets 6 min read Read on X
I see that pension fund guys are loading up Okomu in a pair trade kinda form. In their heads, 'Presco is ₦1k+, Okomu should also follow suit'.

Lol, I sense an 'anchor bias' here, because Okomu is now very pricy and significantly above historical multiples... Image
A quick detour:

Business model overview
Presco
Presco is an integrated palm oil coy (the 'integrated' is not mere grammar). Its operations cover:

▪︎ oil palm cultivation
▪︎ palm oil milling
▪︎ refining of palm oil
▪︎ packaging and distribution of refined products
Presco operates a fully integrated value chain and earns both local and export revenues.
Okomu primarily focuses on:
▪︎ cultivating oil palm and rubber trees
▪︎ producing crude palm oil (CPO) and natural rubber
▪︎ selling unrefined oil to local manufacturers and exporters
Okomu is more plantation-driven, with emphasis on growing and harvesting, and less integrated downstream compared to Presco.
Their similarities
▪︎ core product is crude palm oil
▪︎ both are affected by weather, global palm oil prices, and government trade policies
▪︎ both benefit when there is FX crisis
▪︎ both benefit from tax incentives
Their differences
▪︎ integration
Presco does cultivation --> refining--> packaging (fully integrated). Okomu does cultivation --> milling

▪︎ downstream play
Presco has refinery and produces refined oil for retirement. Okomu does not refine
▪︎ product diversification
Presco is oil palm-focused. Okomu has a rubber business that accounts for about 15% of revenues.

▪︎ export exposure
Presco's stronger due to refined product export capacity. Okomu's export exposure is limited.
▪︎ revenue per hectare
Presco's higher due to value-added processing. Okomu's lower, as it is driven by volume and yield.

▪︎ capex intensity
Presco's higher due to its refinery and processing facilities. Okomu's lower because it focuses on land and yield expansion.
▪︎ landbank utilisation
Presco has less unused land compared to Okomu (which means a future upside for Okomu).
The strategic implications of the business models of the two companies are:

▪︎ Presco's margins are expected to be better because of its value-adding processing and pricing power. It also means that Presco is less susceptible to volatility in the global CPO prices.
▪︎ However, Presco's business will require a lot investments in capex (which affects free cash flow).
▪︎ Okomu has more room to scale production in the future, anyway, especially with its idle landbank. However, for now, Okomu remains more exposed to raw palm oil swings.
That said, lemme state why the investors buying more of Okomu, as a form of trade pair, may be wrong...

First, it is true that Okomu historically traded above Presco - but that is based on price-to-earnings multiple (not absolute share price).
Howver, that premium had always remained at 2x on average. At respective current share prices, Okomu is trading at 2.5x Presco's multiple and that may not be justified.

Let's see the numbers together.
Revenue
Over the past six years, Presco's revenue CAGR is 65%, while Okomu's 48%. Presco broke away in 2021 via inorganic growth (an acquisition of Siat), and it's been moving mad since then.Image
EBITDA

Presco's EBITDA and EBITDA margin are now well above Okomu's (recall the business models of the two entities).

When the FX crisis bit hard, local manufacturers of goods considered localising more of their inputs, and this was where Presco benefitted. Image
As a form of import substitution, Presco fed fat (lad charged proper prices). Image
Effectively, Presco's profits have swelled in recent times. Profit CAGR is 96% (from ₦2bn levels in 2019 to ₦172bn in 2025).

Okomu's done 53% CAGR from ₦4bn to ₦50bn thereabout.

Presco now makes 2x - 3x of Okomu's profits. Image
The flip of Presco's model (of vertical integration) is its relatively high capex requirements.

Although margins will be stronger, your asset turnover may not be so high. That's the tradeoff.

Okomu has always been seen as the most efficient company, but that's because.... Image
... of the business model differences.

Because of Okomu's simpler model, its cash generation has been relatively stronger, and it's been considered more efficient.
Okomu has been able to make so much money in recent years because of the rising protectionism across the globe. Since COVID, the gbasgbos in the global market has favoured the oil palm guys.
Indonesia has come out multiple times to threaten global supply through its protectionist policies. And when that happens, the prices of CPO rise.

When prices rise, folks like Okomu feed fat. That development has been working for Okomu very well so far.
Capacity expansions, capex requirements, etc. all led to a significantly higher leverage (debt) for Presco. But in recent times, Presco has been making crazy money, and the capital structure is gradually improving... now at par with Okomu's. Image
As mentioned earlier, Presco is reaping a lot from its past investments. With customers now substituting their imports, Presco is their go-to guy. Meanwhile, Okomu is missing out here.
So here is what I observed about the revenue (and profits) growth drivers of the two coys:

▪︎ Okomu is benefiting from the trends in the global economy (supply uncertainty in the global market due to rising deglobalisation
▪︎ Presco is benefiting from customers' import substitution, as FX rates are killing. Presco is also benefiting from the global market trends.

Presco is winning on two ends, and one of them is structural (import substitution).
Therefore, in all of these, why then should Okomu trade at this significant premium to Presco?

To start with, the historical premium should even thin out because Presco's fortunes are more structural and sustainable. Also, there is a recent superior performance by Presco. Image
Therefore, I think Okomu's valuation is a stretch, and I hope the pension lads (and other investors) implementing this trade pair really understand the dynamics.
That said, the pension guys are institutional investors and they tend to have more information.. plus they have the resources to hire smart portfolio managers who know stuff. Hence, there is a benefit of doubt about how they are possibly thinking about these two companies.


I am team Presco, by the way.

Selah🤞🤞🤞🤞

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rufybaba

Rufybaba Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Rufyb

Jul 14
I smell an arbitrage opportunity.

UACN PLC has about seven (7) portfolio companies:

☞ Grand Cereals LTD
☞ Livestock Feeds PLC
☞ UAC Foods LTD
☞ CAP PLC
☞ MDS Logistics LTD
☞ UPDC PLC
☞ UAC Restaurants LTD
Grand Cereals LTD and Livestock Feeds PLC are in the Animal Feeds and Edible Oil category.

UACN holds 71.4% stake in Grand Cereals, and a 72.3% stake in Livestock Feeds.

This segment accounts for half of UACN's revenue.Image
Image
UAC Foods LTD is the only lad in the Packaged Foods category.

UACN holds a 99% stake in this business.

This segment accounts for 25% of UACN's revenue.Image
Read 13 tweets
Jul 9
I don't know of 'most undervalued', but I currently know of one very undervalued company - Nigerian Breweries PLC.

If my numbers add up, I expect the coy's stock price to nearly double from ₦63 (₦2trn) to ₦100 (₦3trn) levels..

🧵🧵🧵
Overview
Nigerian Breweries PLC (NB), established in 1946, is Nigeria’s oldest and largest brewing company. With 10 breweries nationwide and iconic brands like Star, Gulder, Maltina, Heineken, and Fayrouz, NB has a deep market reach that spans both urban and rural Nigeria.
NB’s long-standing heritage, trusted brands, and wide reach position it as a resilient player in Nigeria’s beverage industry.
Read 39 tweets
Jul 8
Based on data, yes, Nigeria has a revenue problem. However, the substance is that a spending problem appears to be significantly more prevalent.

Although public finance accounting is a little different, I like to break down government accounting using the business lens...
Balance Sheet (Assets and Liabilities)

▪︎ Assets: Infrastructure, government buildings, natural resources, foreign reserves, and tax receivables

▪︎ Liabilities: Public debt, pension obligations, payables, etc

▪︎ Net assets: The difference between assets and liabilities
Income Statement (Financial Performance)

▪︎ Revenue: Taxes (VAT, income tax, customs duties, etc.), oil revenue, grants, fines, etc

▪︎ Expenses: Public salaries, defense, healthcare, education, debt service

▪︎ Net income: Surplus or deficit
Read 25 tweets
Jul 3
The last time the exchange rate stabilised was in 2017 with the creation of the I&E (Investor & Exporter) window. Following its introduction, inflows surged, liquidity improved, and the FX market became stable after years of instability. Image
However, that stability was bound to be temporary. The FX rate was poised to climb again simply because long-term stability is impossible when the inflation rates for the Naira (NGN) and the US Dollar (USD) are different.
The exchange rate should typically move in line with the differential between the inflation rates of the two currencies.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 27
Let us have a small gist.

How do the poor feel the impact? My sense is that it occurs when their income levels rise and when prices of goods and services are lower/stable.

Before those two things can happen, businesses need to be prosperous...
By prosperity, we mean that coys have to be profitable (via sustainable sources) so that they decide to expand capacity. There must also be signs of corporate profitability so that new businesses are encouraged to enter the market.
If existing corporations expand capacity or new businesses emerge, this means job creation (e.g., when Nestlé expands capacity by building more factories, it means more workers).
Read 10 tweets
Jun 26
Africa needs it.

If lenders have control over borrowers' cash flows, they will be willing to do more. Currently, that control is difficult to achieve, which is why banks only offer salary loans.

It is also why Credit Direct has been relatively successful...
Their business model allows them to maintain asset quality because they have control over the cash flows of their type of client: Civil servants.

Asset quality is great, but the downside is that, in my opinion, there is a cap on how they can scale.
Partnerships with HR platforms like PaidHR or SeamlessHiring may work, but bottlenecks remain.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(