Wars of aggression must end in defeat or peace 🕊️ will never return.
That’s the argument of my latest op-ed for🇨🇭Switzerland’s leading paper: Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German)
Here’s the summary in a short thread 🧵
1/9
What’s happening in 🇺🇦 is not a “conflict.”
It’s not a misunderstanding between two sides.
It’s a war of choice by russia: a criminal act of aggression under international law.
It will only end when russia stops attacking. Not when Ukraine stops defending itself. 2/9
Western Europe says it supports 🇺🇦, but too often from a safe emotional distance.
Solidarity is duly expressed & aid provided, but it comes with a subtle detachment and implicit insistence that the war, however grave, is ultimately Ukraine’s ordeal, not Europe’s. 3/9
Baltic, Polish, and Scandinavian leaders have woken up.
But much of Western Europe still clings to the fantasy of “peace in our time,” as long as the violence stays far enough east.
This is not strategy. It’s self-deception. 4/9
Deep-rooted pacifism is partly to blame: a moral principle & a convenient excuse
The horrors of the early 20th century left an enduring aversion to force & a belief that restraint guaranteed peace
So politicians dodged responsibility until the illusion was shattered in 2022 5/9
Ukraine is not a burden.
🇺🇦 is the guarantor of European security.
Every russian tank stopped, every drone shot down — that’s deterrence in action.
The only reason Europe can still debate peace is because #Ukraine keeps fighting. 6/9
Western leaders still have real options:
♦️ transfer $300B of russian assets
♦️ Close the Baltic to russia’s shadow fleet
♦️ Deliver Taurus missiles and long-range weapons
♦️ Build a shield over Ukrainian skies
♦️ invest massively in Ukrainian defence production 7/9
If anything can curb Moscow’s violence, it’s a free world that stops apologizing for its strength and starts using it.
Supporting Ukraine “as long as it takes” isn’t enough.
There must be consequences for aggression. No more impunity.
8/9
This was my first guest op-ed in NZZ and my second column in German.
If you agree that aggressors must lose for peace to win, please read and share:
📰 9/9 Danke 🇨🇭nzz.ch/meinung/angrif…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Too many people are dying — thousands each week — in a terrible and senseless war.” Trump keeps repeating
moscow’s war of choice is truly terrible, but to call it “senseless” is to miss the point
a few highlights from latest op-ed in a thread 🧵
1/9
russia has been killing Ukrainians for the crime of being Ukrainian since 2014 — predictably, methodically, relentlessly.
russia’s war is also criminal, under the very rules of warfare America helped enshrine in 1945.
2/9
Is it senseless for 🇺🇦 to fight back? A war for survival is immensely costly — but to shield your children from Russian missiles is not a choice; it’s a duty. Kyiv has no real options but to resist: Because failure to defend your home is dishonor, followed by annihilation.
3/9
🧵A thread on #russia & #china in the age of appeasement
Picture a plump, aging man wearing water wings in a Beijing pool, cursing under his breath. Not the fondest memory for Khrushchev — best known for staring down Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis
1/n
As he bobbed awkwardly, Mao Zedong circled around him, relishing the humiliation of a supposed ‘peer’ he knew couldn’t swim 2/n
The scene remains a near-perfect metaphor: the mistrust and tension that colored Russia-China relations then — in 1958, when China’s GDP was less than a quarter of the Soviet Union’s — and now, when russia’s crumbling economy is barely a tenth of China’s 3/n
Let's discuss in detail yet another effort by the phudo-expert Charap to regurgitate kremlin's sewage and present it as candy.
#Thread (link to the article in the last comment)
2/ he wants a “neutral” peacekeeping force for 🇺🇦 knowing full well that russia has sabotaged the UN’s ability to act. The General Assembly overwhelmingly condemned russia’s war of aggression, yet the Security Council is impotent thanks to russia’s veto.
3/ Worse yet, through this 'innocent' comparison, Valdai Sam launders the kremlin’s biggest lie: that there're 'two sides' to this "conflict"
There aren’t. There’s russia—a fascist aggressor waging a criminal war—and 🇺🇦, defending its sovereignty.
🇪🇺 isn't 'neutral' because it stands for restoring peace. Supporting a victim isn’t aggression; it’s justice.
What is russia?
For most countries, the answer is found in a national origin story—a myth collectively embraced by the people
The more coherent, the more grounded in actual events is the myth, the stronger the national identity
russia’s national myth is rooted in a BIG LIE
1/10
Thus, russia’s essence is a perverted insecurity that manifests itself as belligerence layered on top of a siege mentality.
The russian elites know full well and the general populace senses by intuition that their national myth is hollow.
2/10
But they can’t face this painful reckoning, and so the russian people overcompensate for the BIG LIE by soothing themselves with “russia’s greatness.”
3/10