Washington Post was spreading propaganda against India and Indian media. What happened in next 8 weeks will blow up your mind.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Read the entire post to know the whole story
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Read the entire post to know the whole story
On 7th June, Washington Post published an article by Karishma Mehrotra alleging that Indian news outlets spread misinformation during the India-Pakistan conflict named as operation sindoor.
The article cited false claims, like Pakistani PM had surrendered, and that major Pakistani cities were destroyed, attributing these to Indian channels like TV9 Bharatvarsh, Zee News, ABP News, and others.
It even alleged Indian channels used Sudan conflict footage and passed it off as Pakistan, which was completely false.
But, but what happened next was something that Washington Post was not expecting at all.
It even alleged Indian channels used Sudan conflict footage and passed it off as Pakistan, which was completely false.
But, but what happened next was something that Washington Post was not expecting at all.
TV9 responded strongly with evidence, denying those claims, and served a LEGAL NOTICE. 😂 😂
Under legal pressure, Yesterday, Washington Post issued a correction acknowledging multiple errors 😂:
Misattribution of WhatsApp messages
Misrepresentation of reports by Indian media
Incorrect reporting about Prasar Bharati and TV9
False claims about video footage and city destruction
In short - Washington Post got cooked well by TV9. 😂😂😂
Under legal pressure, Yesterday, Washington Post issued a correction acknowledging multiple errors 😂:
Misattribution of WhatsApp messages
Misrepresentation of reports by Indian media
Incorrect reporting about Prasar Bharati and TV9
False claims about video footage and city destruction
In short - Washington Post got cooked well by TV9. 😂😂😂
Many people ask how to counter the false narratives pushed by Western media. The answer is simple: legal action.
This incident broke the myth that the Washington Post is always factual and neutral. In fact, it exposed the bias and agenda-driven reporting by Western media.
It revealed that WaPo often writes based on unverified sources, assumptions, and anti-India narratives.
Past examples include WaPo falsely claiming India was trying to orchestrate a coup in Maldives, and unverified claims in the Nijjar case.
This incident broke the myth that the Washington Post is always factual and neutral. In fact, it exposed the bias and agenda-driven reporting by Western media.
It revealed that WaPo often writes based on unverified sources, assumptions, and anti-India narratives.
Past examples include WaPo falsely claiming India was trying to orchestrate a coup in Maldives, and unverified claims in the Nijjar case.
The Washington Post has now PUBLICLY ADMITTED to SPREADING FALSE INFORMATION and had to issue a LONG CORRECTION. This case sets a precedent: legal notices can hold Western media accountable for misinformation. The public is now beginning to question their credibility.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
