I post on Hinduism Culture History based on my studies| Geopolitics enthusiast #contentwriter #Storyteller | Associate at Vibe Gurukul & Swastik production|
13 subscribers
First of all, the Court has refused to strike down or stay the Act, reaffirming the doctrine of “presumption of constitutionality.” Once a law is passed by Parliament, the judiciary assumes it to be valid unless challengers prove that it violates the core pillars of the Constitution.
How Did Nepal Reach Here?
President Donald Trump and his administration may say whatever they like about the Indian economy. They may try to pressure New Delhi with tariffs or rhetoric. But one truth remains undeniable: India’s growth story and its massive consumption market simply cannot be ignored.
For decades, India and the United States have shared a relationship that thrived on technology, talent, and trade. At the heart of this partnership stood India’s IT sector, generating billions of dollars in revenue and employing millions of skilled professionals—many of them working indirectly for American corporations. But Washington’s latest move threatens to tear this bond apart.
If international diplomacy were a stage play, Donald Trump would be its most unpredictable actor — a man who can deliver heartbreak monologues one night and sing love ballads the next. 
It all began when President Donald Trump, under his America First policy, delivered a shocking ultimatum. He openly warned America’s biggest tech giants: “Stop hiring Indians.” And this was no offhand remark but it was a deliberate warning, repeated twice, meant to send a message to the world that America decides, and others follow. Trump wanted to choke India’s IT and startup ecosystem by cutting off opportunities for Indian professionals.
Renowned geo-economist Matteo Maggiori, a Stanford Graduate School of Business scholar with over 6,500 research citations, recently told The Economic Times that India and China are developing alternative payment systems to the U.S. dollar. Globally respected in the field of geoeconomics, his remarks carry serious weight.
China, Islamabad’s self-proclaimed “all-weather” partner, has quietly walked away from financing the Main Line-1 (ML-1) railway project—the crown jewel of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
The dramatic GST rate cuts announced in India for September 2025 mark a turning point for economic policy and household spending, promising direct benefits to Indian consumers and businesses while strategically responding to international trade tensions and internal political dynamics
Narendra Modi has been serving China a series of shocks that no one saw coming. The latest? Singapore — once considered Beijing’s secure backyard — is tilting toward India. This is not a coincidence; it is a calculated geopolitical move, and its timing is flawless.
Prime Minister Modi recently announced India’s vision to become a global chip powerhouse within the next 4–5 years. The first major step has already been taken with the creation of Vikram-32, India’s first fully indigenous microchip designed and manufactured by ISRO’s Semiconductor Laboratory (SCL) for space applications.
🔹U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the India–U.S. partnership the “defining relationship of the 21st century.”
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s whirlwind two-day tour of Japan and China was not just about handshakes and photo ops — it was a masterclass in how to politely remind Washington that the world doesn’t revolve around the White House.
The ongoing Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin, China, is turning out to be one of the most defining moments in recent global diplomacy—almost a once-in-a-lifetime spectacle. What unfolded on stage is not just optics, but a tectonic shift in alignments, signaling a new chapter in Asian geopolitics.
For decades, the U.S. dollar reigned supreme as the world’s reserve currency. It was the bedrock of international trade, financial stability, and global power projection. But history has shown one undeniable truth: no reserve currency lasts forever. Just as empires rise and fall, so too does monetary dominance. Today, we are witnessing the dawn of de-dollarization — a shift that is silent, gradual, but undeniably real.
The year 2025 has already witnessed one of its most defining moments — the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit. What is unfolding here has shaken not only Asia but also the entire global order. The Western media, visibly rattled, has been mourning in chorus, while Washington’s own trade advisor, Peter Navarro, has gone so far off script that his comments have raised eyebrows across the world. In a bizarre outburst, Navarro alleged that “Indian Brahmins are profiteering from refining Russian oil.” The frustration is evident: the United States never expected India to hit back this strongly — and now Washington is left with no real cards to play.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in China has turned into far more than a routine diplomatic gathering. It is becoming the stage where the long-anticipated rise of the Global South is unfolding before the world’s eyes.
Donald Trump seems determined to invite global criticism with his tariff policies. What began as a clash with Russia, India, and China has now spiraled into a full-fledged backlash against Washington itself. Neither the U.S. Congress, nor Wall Street, nor even the American public has endorsed Trump’s strategy. This morning, a U.S. court went so far as to declare his tariffs illegal. American banks and businesses have voiced their disapproval, and surveys show that nearly two-thirds of U.S. citizens reject his tariff agenda.
The U.S., once confident of India bending to its strategic diktats, is now witnessing something it had never anticipated: India flatly rejecting American bullying and charting its own independent path. This defiance has pricked the false ego of Washington, prompting a wave of reactionary and undiplomatic language from U.S. diplomats and officials.
When President Donald Trump initiated his tariff war, he was well aware of its looming economic consequences. What he may not have anticipated, however, were the far-reaching geopolitical ripple effects it would unleash. Today, those consequences are taking shape in ways that few in Washington could have foreseen.
His aggressive tariff policy, especially towards India, is no longer only drawing criticism from economists but is now sparking political backlash within the United States itself.