Just Human Profile picture
Jul 30, 2025 18 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🧵Late last night, DOJ filed responses in both the Epstein and Maxwell cases, addressing each judge’s questions regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials.

DOJ also submitted the following ex parte and under seal:

-An index of the grand jury materials
-A complete set of unredacted grand jury transcripts
-A complete set of redacted grand jury transcripts
-A description of other grand jury materials (exhibits, etc.)Image
DOJ's effort to unseal the Epstein grand jury material in SDFL was recently denied due to the 11th Circuit's binding opinion in Pitch v. United States, which restricted the judge in that case from unsealing them.

DOJ knew this going in and conceded it in their filing. They made the filing, knowing it would be denied, for purposes of appeal later.

I have a thread breaking that down here: x.com/realjusthuman/…Image
In the 2nd Circuit, where SDNY is, that court has held that “there are certain ‘special circumstances’ in which release of grand jury records is appropriate..."

Even if the exemptions listed in the federal rule governing grand jury matters are not met.
law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/r…Image
The factors for trial-level courts to consider are:

1. Who's asking?
2. Is the defendant or gov't opposed?
3. Why is disclosure being sought?
4. What info is being sought?
5. How long ago was the grand jury?
6. What's the current status of those involved in the grand jury?
7. How much of the info sought has already been made public?
8. Are witnesses to the grand jury who might be impacted by its release still alive?
9. Is there a particular need for maintaining secrecy of the material in the case?Image
1. Who's asking?

DOJ.

And the fact that it is the DOJ asking “serve[s] as a preliminary indication that the need for secrecy is not especially strong,”Image
Image
2. Is the defendant or gov't opposed?

Epstein is dead, so he has nothing to say on this.
Maxwell has yet to file her position on the matter.Image
Image
3. Why is disclosure being sought?

a) "clearly expressed interest from the public in Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s crimes."

b) "abundant public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation into those crimes."Image
c) "Attention given to the Epstein and Maxwell cases has recently intensified in the wake of the July 6, 2025 Memo" Image
4. What info is being sought?

"the Government seeks the public disclosure of the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases"

They've indicated elsewhere in this filing and in others that they are seeking disclosures of exhibits and other materials, so I'm not sure why they do not say that here. Maybe it is implied?Image
5. How long ago was the grand jury?

Epstein was June/July 2019
Maxwell was June/July 2020 and March 2021 Image
6. What's the current status of those targeted by the grand jury?

Epstein is dead.
Maxwell is incarcerated. Image
7. How much of the info sought has already been made public?

The transcripts have not been made public, though "certain aspects and subject matters of the transcripts became public during Maxwell’s trial."

"Many" of the victims/witnesses who testified to the grand jury later testified at trial and "some have also made public those factual accounts in the course of civil litigation."Image
8. Are witnesses to the grand jury who might be impacted by its release still alive?

The same FBI agent testified in both cases, and an NYPD detective testified in Maxwell.

Both are still alive and still working.

A list has been filed under seal of which victims are still alive.Image
9. Is there a particular need for maintaining secrecy of the material in the case?

"the grand jury transcripts contain victim-related and other personal identifying information related to third parties who neither have been charged or alleged to be involved in the crimes with which Epstein and Maxwell were charged"

That info will be redacted.Image
Additionally,

-DOJ reviewed the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury transcripts prior to filing (likely as part of their review before the July 6 Memo)
-Notice has been provided to all but one of the victims referenced in the grand jury materials
-Notice to other individuals identified in the transcripts is ongoing

Ha, remember that story that went around about AG Bondi telling Trump that he is in the Epstein files? Well, one, he already knew that, and two, she had notice him as part of this process!

I have a hunch that there's documentation that he HELPED CATCH Epstein back in the 2000's , maybe even an unserved subpoena for Trump to testify AGAINST Epstein!Image
Filing is signed by @AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche and @SDNYnews 's Jay Clayton. Image
@AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @SDNYnews Also, completely separate from DOJ's efforts to unseal grand jury materials in Epstein and Maxwell is the recent 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Giuffre v. Maxwell. Image
@AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @SDNYnews Picking that one apart will require far more time and posts in this thread than I can provide right now, but suffice to say that some materials from that case, which are currently sealed, MAY be unsealed in the future.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Jan 20
🧵(Disqualified) Interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan's 120-Day Appointment is Up.

The United States District Court for EDVA has posted a vacancy notice, seeking someone to run that office.

1/n Image
Even if you accept the argument that Halligan was lawfully appointed and should not have been disqualified, which is currently under appeal at the Fourth Circuit,... her time is up.

The 120 days have passed by.

So, there's a vacancy.

2/n
The role could have easily and quickly been filled by Robert McBride, an experienced DOJ prosecutor and former Navy lawyer who was taken out of the Kentucky office to serve as Halligan's First Assistant....

But DOJ fired him last week.

3/n Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 16
"The meeting came a day after President Trump spoke to Ms. Rodríguez on the phone and on the same day he met with María Corina Machado, the leader of Venezuela’s opposition and a Nobel laureate." Image
After months of infiltration into the country and the government in Venezuela by CIA operators and just a couple weeks after one of the most extraordinary joint military operations in the history of the world (which could not have happened without the CIA's work pre-raid), the Director of the CIA just strolled into Caracas and told the the communist regime,

"The United States looks forward to an improved working relationship."

That's baller.Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 14
🧵Looks like someone, perhaps more than one person, got caught with their hand in the TS/SCI cookie jar. Image
United States v. Perez-Lugones

1 count of 18 USC 793(e)

Retention of National Defense Information

Might see that more charges added (probably will) Image
Perez-Lugones is former US Navy, working as a govt contractor since 2002, has a TS/SCI clearance.

He is a sys admin for a a company that contracts to a gov't agency and whose workplace is within another government contracting company.

He has access to classified information as part of his job.Image
Read 22 tweets
Jan 13
🧵United States v. Maduro

Some confusion, or silliness, over who represents Maduro played out recently.

Barry Pollack initially filed as counsel for Maduro. Image
The next day, Bruce Fein filed as counsel for Maduro Image
But Pollack quickly informed the court that Fein was NOT counsel to Maduro, and no one authorized him to speak to Maduro or represent him in any way.

Also says he tried to contact Fein and got no response. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 8
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

It appears that defendant Brian J. Cole Jr. will be RELEASED FROM CUSTODY due to DOJ's failure to file a valid federal indictment by Dec 30, 2025.

Charges are not dismissed.
Arraignment on the new indictment is set for tomorrow. Image
It seems Judge Amir H. Ali accepted the defense's argument, summarized here👇 Image
The charges are not dismissed.

Cole will be arraigned tomorrow (and probably put back in custody). Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 6
🧵United States v. Carvajal-Barrios
(Maduro Narco-Terrorism Conspiracy Case)

Thread on case background and related cases. Image
Nicolás Maduro Moros. Image
The case against Maduro, titled U.S. v. Carvajal-Barrios, is not a new one.

It was first brought in March of 2011.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(