Just Human Profile picture
Jul 30 18 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🧵Late last night, DOJ filed responses in both the Epstein and Maxwell cases, addressing each judge’s questions regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials.

DOJ also submitted the following ex parte and under seal:

-An index of the grand jury materials
-A complete set of unredacted grand jury transcripts
-A complete set of redacted grand jury transcripts
-A description of other grand jury materials (exhibits, etc.)Image
DOJ's effort to unseal the Epstein grand jury material in SDFL was recently denied due to the 11th Circuit's binding opinion in Pitch v. United States, which restricted the judge in that case from unsealing them.

DOJ knew this going in and conceded it in their filing. They made the filing, knowing it would be denied, for purposes of appeal later.

I have a thread breaking that down here: x.com/realjusthuman/…Image
In the 2nd Circuit, where SDNY is, that court has held that “there are certain ‘special circumstances’ in which release of grand jury records is appropriate..."

Even if the exemptions listed in the federal rule governing grand jury matters are not met.
law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/r…Image
The factors for trial-level courts to consider are:

1. Who's asking?
2. Is the defendant or gov't opposed?
3. Why is disclosure being sought?
4. What info is being sought?
5. How long ago was the grand jury?
6. What's the current status of those involved in the grand jury?
7. How much of the info sought has already been made public?
8. Are witnesses to the grand jury who might be impacted by its release still alive?
9. Is there a particular need for maintaining secrecy of the material in the case?Image
1. Who's asking?

DOJ.

And the fact that it is the DOJ asking “serve[s] as a preliminary indication that the need for secrecy is not especially strong,”Image
Image
2. Is the defendant or gov't opposed?

Epstein is dead, so he has nothing to say on this.
Maxwell has yet to file her position on the matter.Image
Image
3. Why is disclosure being sought?

a) "clearly expressed interest from the public in Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s crimes."

b) "abundant public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation into those crimes."Image
c) "Attention given to the Epstein and Maxwell cases has recently intensified in the wake of the July 6, 2025 Memo" Image
4. What info is being sought?

"the Government seeks the public disclosure of the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases"

They've indicated elsewhere in this filing and in others that they are seeking disclosures of exhibits and other materials, so I'm not sure why they do not say that here. Maybe it is implied?Image
5. How long ago was the grand jury?

Epstein was June/July 2019
Maxwell was June/July 2020 and March 2021 Image
6. What's the current status of those targeted by the grand jury?

Epstein is dead.
Maxwell is incarcerated. Image
7. How much of the info sought has already been made public?

The transcripts have not been made public, though "certain aspects and subject matters of the transcripts became public during Maxwell’s trial."

"Many" of the victims/witnesses who testified to the grand jury later testified at trial and "some have also made public those factual accounts in the course of civil litigation."Image
8. Are witnesses to the grand jury who might be impacted by its release still alive?

The same FBI agent testified in both cases, and an NYPD detective testified in Maxwell.

Both are still alive and still working.

A list has been filed under seal of which victims are still alive.Image
9. Is there a particular need for maintaining secrecy of the material in the case?

"the grand jury transcripts contain victim-related and other personal identifying information related to third parties who neither have been charged or alleged to be involved in the crimes with which Epstein and Maxwell were charged"

That info will be redacted.Image
Additionally,

-DOJ reviewed the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury transcripts prior to filing (likely as part of their review before the July 6 Memo)
-Notice has been provided to all but one of the victims referenced in the grand jury materials
-Notice to other individuals identified in the transcripts is ongoing

Ha, remember that story that went around about AG Bondi telling Trump that he is in the Epstein files? Well, one, he already knew that, and two, she had notice him as part of this process!

I have a hunch that there's documentation that he HELPED CATCH Epstein back in the 2000's , maybe even an unserved subpoena for Trump to testify AGAINST Epstein!Image
Filing is signed by @AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche and @SDNYnews 's Jay Clayton. Image
@AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @SDNYnews Also, completely separate from DOJ's efforts to unseal grand jury materials in Epstein and Maxwell is the recent 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Giuffre v. Maxwell. Image
@AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @SDNYnews Picking that one apart will require far more time and posts in this thread than I can provide right now, but suffice to say that some materials from that case, which are currently sealed, MAY be unsealed in the future.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Aug 21
"19 CF bank accounts obtained by LAFO during a separate Campaign Finance Fraud Investigation."
Read 8 tweets
Aug 20
🧵Update on DOJ's efforts to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material:

Judge Berman has DENIED DOJ's motion to unseal the grand jury materials in the Epstein case. Image
The reasons for the denial are the same as in Maxwell—no exceptions to Rule 6e and not a "special circumstance" case.

A judge CANNOT unseal grand jury materials UNLESS an exception under Rule 6e is met OR the case can be qualified as a "special circumstance" case. Image
In my thread on the denial to unseal grand jury materials in Maxwell I broke down the reasons for that denial and they are largely the same in this case.

Read 37 tweets
Aug 15
According to an HPSCI whistleblower 302, and my own sleuthing, the "system" for leaking classified information to media was "established" by Minority Staff Director Michael Bahar.

**That's if I am correct on what's under the redaction block.** Image
Still not sure who the network admin that set up the stand alone computer in HPSCI offices is.
Tribute to Michael Bahar Image
Read 11 tweets
Aug 14
In February of 2023 I wrote an article about Durham being assigned a media leak investigation.

Thanks to recent declassified docs, we now know that investigation was called "Tropic Vortex." Image
My article traced several subjects: the leaks investigations, the NYT engaging in a court battle against DOJ, Renteria memo, and Special Counsel Durham's efforts to investigate the Russian memoranda. Image
Thanks to recently declassified pages of the Durham Report and the declassified documents the FBI just turned over to the House, we now know a lot more about these efforts.

And the future shock I mentioned in the title of the article—it's here. Image
Read 21 tweets
Aug 14
Remember @CIADirector Ratcliffe's declass from June 26, 2025?

One of the emails described in it is the one we see in @DNIGabbard 's declass from today.

The subject matter is the compressed timeline and the concerns that the IC stakeholders and analysts have. Image
@CIADirector @DNIGabbard From Adm Roger's email Image
@CIADirector @DNIGabbard Two days before this email exchange, as the draft ICA was going through the review process, Brennan was pressuring people in his agency.

We might see that email exchange soon. Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 13
October 6 2018

HPSCI whistleblower meets with an FBI SSA Liaison to the Committee. He describes to the agent a "system" of leaking classified information.

That system was not set up by Schiff, but he was central to its operation. Image
After classified information was acquired it would be "run up to [Rep Adam Schiff], after which a decision would be made as to who would leak [it]"
The whistleblower provided the name of the person who "established" this "system" as well as the names of two other individuals who "refused to leak."

Hopefully they also talked to the FBI at some point and confirmed, perhaps even added to, the whistleblower's story.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(