🧵Late last night, DOJ filed responses in both the Epstein and Maxwell cases, addressing each judge’s questions regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials.
DOJ also submitted the following ex parte and under seal:
-An index of the grand jury materials
-A complete set of unredacted grand jury transcripts
-A complete set of redacted grand jury transcripts
-A description of other grand jury materials (exhibits, etc.)
DOJ's effort to unseal the Epstein grand jury material in SDFL was recently denied due to the 11th Circuit's binding opinion in Pitch v. United States, which restricted the judge in that case from unsealing them.
DOJ knew this going in and conceded it in their filing. They made the filing, knowing it would be denied, for purposes of appeal later.
In the 2nd Circuit, where SDNY is, that court has held that “there are certain ‘special circumstances’ in which release of grand jury records is appropriate..."
The factors for trial-level courts to consider are:
1. Who's asking? 2. Is the defendant or gov't opposed? 3. Why is disclosure being sought? 4. What info is being sought? 5. How long ago was the grand jury? 6. What's the current status of those involved in the grand jury? 7. How much of the info sought has already been made public? 8. Are witnesses to the grand jury who might be impacted by its release still alive? 9. Is there a particular need for maintaining secrecy of the material in the case?
1. Who's asking?
DOJ.
And the fact that it is the DOJ asking “serve[s] as a preliminary indication that the need for secrecy is not especially strong,”
2. Is the defendant or gov't opposed?
Epstein is dead, so he has nothing to say on this.
Maxwell has yet to file her position on the matter.
3. Why is disclosure being sought?
a) "clearly expressed interest from the public in Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s crimes."
b) "abundant public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation into those crimes."
c) "Attention given to the Epstein and Maxwell cases has recently intensified in the wake of the July 6, 2025 Memo"
4. What info is being sought?
"the Government seeks the public disclosure of the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases"
They've indicated elsewhere in this filing and in others that they are seeking disclosures of exhibits and other materials, so I'm not sure why they do not say that here. Maybe it is implied?
5. How long ago was the grand jury?
Epstein was June/July 2019
Maxwell was June/July 2020 and March 2021
6. What's the current status of those targeted by the grand jury?
Epstein is dead.
Maxwell is incarcerated.
7. How much of the info sought has already been made public?
The transcripts have not been made public, though "certain aspects and subject matters of the transcripts became public during Maxwell’s trial."
"Many" of the victims/witnesses who testified to the grand jury later testified at trial and "some have also made public those factual accounts in the course of civil litigation."
8. Are witnesses to the grand jury who might be impacted by its release still alive?
The same FBI agent testified in both cases, and an NYPD detective testified in Maxwell.
Both are still alive and still working.
A list has been filed under seal of which victims are still alive.
9. Is there a particular need for maintaining secrecy of the material in the case?
"the grand jury transcripts contain victim-related and other personal identifying information related to third parties who neither have been charged or alleged to be involved in the crimes with which Epstein and Maxwell were charged"
That info will be redacted.
Additionally,
-DOJ reviewed the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury transcripts prior to filing (likely as part of their review before the July 6 Memo)
-Notice has been provided to all but one of the victims referenced in the grand jury materials
-Notice to other individuals identified in the transcripts is ongoing
Ha, remember that story that went around about AG Bondi telling Trump that he is in the Epstein files? Well, one, he already knew that, and two, she had notice him as part of this process!
I have a hunch that there's documentation that he HELPED CATCH Epstein back in the 2000's , maybe even an unserved subpoena for Trump to testify AGAINST Epstein!
Filing is signed by @AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche and @SDNYnews 's Jay Clayton.
@AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @SDNYnews Also, completely separate from DOJ's efforts to unseal grand jury materials in Epstein and Maxwell is the recent 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Giuffre v. Maxwell.
@AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @SDNYnews Picking that one apart will require far more time and posts in this thread than I can provide right now, but suffice to say that some materials from that case, which are currently sealed, MAY be unsealed in the future.
Picture this: Russian hackers are reading emails exchanged between members of think tanks, Hillary Clinton’s campaign staff, and Democratic leadership.
These hackers must translate the emails into Russian, analyze them, and produce reports for the SVR/Moscow.
When drafting their analytical memoranda, they attach only the key emails that support their findings, avoiding the inclusion of dozens of emails or detailed explanations of who sent what to whom or each person’s role.
The Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened based on this single paragraph, which was itself based on a conversation overheard at a bar between Papadopoulos and an Australian diplomat.
The conversations happened on May 6 and May 10, 2016.
Over two months later, ON THE EXACT SAME DAY THAT HILLARY CLINTON APPROVED THE PLAN, July 26, Australia gives the notes on this conversation to U.S. State Dept officials in the U.K. and then hand it off to the FBI official at the London Embassy.
That was enough to spark an FBI investigation, which led to a FISA warrant on @GeorgePapa19 and then FISAs on other people (Page, @GenFlynn ) associated with the Trump campaign, and the full-fledged Crossfire Hurricane investigation had "oil poured into the fire" from the Steele Dossier, Alfa Bank, Yotophone...
Investigative Referral of Possible Clinton Campaign Plan
Late July 2016, U.S. intel “obtains insight” into Russian intel analysis that alleges a Clinton Plan to frame Trump for collusion with Russia
CIA Director Brennan briefs President Obama
(Note: Crossfire Hurricane begins just days later on July 30 2016)
An investigative referral is made by the CIA a month later on September 7, 2016 and forwarded to Comey and Strzok
Special Counsel Durham (referred to as The Office in this report) considered the Clinton Plan Intelligence relevant for two reasons:
1. It “arguably suggested that private actors affiliated with the Clinton campaign were seeking in 2016 to promote a false or exaggerated narrative to the public and to U.S. government agencies…”
“The Clinton Plan Intelligence prompted the Office to consider”
-Was there a plan?
-If there was, did it involved “intentionally [providing] knowingly false and/or misleading information to the FBI or other agencies in furtherance of such a plan”
*cough* CONSPIRACY *cough* RICO *cough*
2. The Clinton Plan was interested Durham because “it was part of the mosaic of information that became known to certain U.S. officials at or before the time they made critical decisions” re: Crossfire Hurricane and in related LE and intel efforts.
🧵UPDATE RE: Unsealing of federal grand jury transcripts in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (SDNY), United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (SDNY), and United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (SDFL).
On July 22, counsel for Maxwell, one of whom also represents Hillary Clinton in Trump's civil RICO case against her, filed a letter motion requesting access to the grand jury transcripts prior to submitting their response to the DOJ's request for their unsealing.
Today, July 23, Judge Engelmayer denied that motion.
"It is black-letter law that defendants generally are not entitled to access grand jury materials."